Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

Two Multidrug-resistance (ABCB1) Gene Polymorphisms as Prognostic Parameters in Women with Ovarian Cancer

CHRISTOPH GRIMM, STEPHAN POLTERAUER, ROBERT ZEILLINGER, DAN TONG, GEORG HEINZE, ANDREA WOLF, CAMILLA NATTER, ALEXANDER REINTHALLER and LUKAS A. HEFLER
Anticancer Research September 2010, 30 (9) 3487-3491;
CHRISTOPH GRIMM
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: christoph.grimm@meduniwien.ac.at
STEPHAN POLTERAUER
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ROBERT ZEILLINGER
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DAN TONG
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
GEORG HEINZE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ANDREA WOLF
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CAMILLA NATTER
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ALEXANDER REINTHALLER
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
LUKAS A. HEFLER
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: The transport protein P-glycoprotein, which is encoded by the multidrug-resistance ABCB1 gene, is crucially involved in the export of taxanes and other cytotoxic substances out of the cell. Treatment response to paclitaxel has been shown to correlate with ABCB1 gene polymorphisms. Data regarding the prognostic value of ABCB1 gene polymorphisms in ovarian cancer patients is conflicting. Materials and Methods: The present study evaluates the association of two common ABCB1 gene polymorphisms, namely G2677T/A in exon 21 (rs2032582) and C3435T in exon 26 (rs1045642), and survival in 106 Caucasian women with ovarian cancer. Results: The two ABCB1 gene polymorphisms (G2677T/A and C3435T) were associated neither with disease-free (p=0.8 and p=0.9, respectively) nor with overall survival (p=0.9 and p=0.9, respectively). Tumor stage (p=0.01; p=0.01) and residual tumor mass (p=0.005; p=0.01), but not tumor grade and age at diagnosis were associated with disease-free and overall survival, respectively, in a multivariate analysis. Haplotype analysis did not reveal any association between the combined effect of the two gene polymorphisms and survival. Conclusion: In the present study, ABCB1 G2677T/A and ABCB1 C3435T gene polymorphisms were not found to be associated with prognosis in Caucasian women with ovarian cancer.

  • Ovarian cancer
  • gene
  • polymorphism
  • ABCB1
  • prognosis

P-Glycoprotein (Pgp), which is encoded by the ATP-binding cassette subfamily B member 1 gene (ABCB1, often known as MDR1), is a 170 kDa transmembranous protein. It functions as an ATP-dependent efflux pump, transporting exogenous and endogenous substrates from the inside of the cell to the outside (1). Pgp is expressed in both nonmalignant tissue, such as the intestine and the blood–brain barrier, and malignant tissue, such as breast cancer and ovarian cancer tissue (2-4).

Numerous in vitro studies demonstrated that high expression of Pgp caused an elevated cellular efflux of xenobiotics (5, 6). Due to the elevated cellular clearance, high Pgp expression has been reported to be associated with a poor response to chemotherapeutic agents (7, 8), whereas tissue with low functional Pgp is more sensitive to various chemotherapeutic agents (9). Moreover, high Pgp expression is thought to lead to a multidrug-resistant phenotype (3, 4).

High Pgp expression is caused by elevated mRNA expression of the ABCB1 gene. ABCB1 expression seems to be higher in non-responders to paclitaxel/carboplatin compared to responders (10, 11), and has been reported to be a useful predictor of treatment response to taxane-containing chemotherapy (11). The ABCB1 gene is located on chromosome 7q21.1 in humans (5). Various single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been described in Caucasian women; the most interesting SNPs are ABCB1 G2677T/A in exon 21 (rs2032582) and ABCB1 C3435T in exon 26 (rs1045642), as they have been shown to correlate with Pgp expression (12, 13). The homozygous mutant genotype of the two investigated polymorphisms has been reported to lead to lower Pgp levels, causing a lower cellular clearance of chemotherapeutic substances such as paclitaxel (12, 14).

These two gene polymorphisms have been studied in various malignancies and are associated with the risk for endometrial (15), breast (16), gastric (17) and colon cancer (18), as well as leukemia (19). Moreover, the homozygous wild-type genotypes of ABCB1 G2677T/A and ABCB1 C3435T have been reported to be associated with a better response to preoperative chemotherapy and better prognosis in breast (20) and esophageal cancer (21), acute myeloid leukemia (13, 22) and multiple myeloma (23).

Data regarding the association of ABCB1 gene polymorphisms and prognosis in women with ovarian cancer are conflicting. One study comprising 914 women did not observe any association between ABCB1 G2677T/A anddisease-free survival (24, 25). In contrast, a recent study by an Australian study group comprising 309 women with epithelial ovarian cancer observed a prolonged disease-free survival in women carrying the T/A allele of the ABCB1 G2677T/A gene polymorphism (26). Another smaller study (n=53) also reported the T/A allele of the ABCB1 G2677T/A gene polymorphism to be associated with a prolonged disease-free interval (12).

Based on the prominent role of ABCB1 in predicting treatment response to chemotherapy, we evaluated the association between the two gene polymorphisms ABCB1 G2677T/A in exon 21 and ABCB1 C3435T in exon 26 and prognosis in Caucasian women with ovarian cancer.

Patients and Methods

Patients. In the present study, we included 106 Caucasian women with ovarian cancer. Patients were included and treated at the Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. Approval for this study was obtained by the Institutional Review Board. Patients were treated according to standards of the respective institution with upfront surgery and adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy. Surgical staging according to FIGO (International Federation of Gynecologists and Obstetricians) guidelines was performed, including hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy, appendectomy, omentectomy and cytoreductive procedure in order to resect all gross tumor. All patients with tumor stages FIGO Ic to III and all patients with clear cell carcinoma received a platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients wishing to preserve fertility and those with tumor stage FIGO Ia were treated with conservative surgery (unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy) and full surgical staging including washings, omentectomy, appendectomy, node biopsies and a thorough abdominal exploration with biopsies of all suspicious areas. Post-therapeutically, all patients were followed up four times annually, including pelvic examination, abdominal ultrasound examination, and serum tumor marker evaluation. Progression-free survival was defined as the time between date of histological diagnosis and the first sign of disease recurrence based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in solid Tumors (RECIST).

DNA extraction. DNA was obtained from peripheral venous blood using a commercially available DNA extraction kit (DNA Extraction System I; ViennaLab, Vienna, Austria) before therapy (surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy) was started. The extracted DNA was stored at 4°C until analyzed.

Pyrosequencing. Primer pairs 5′-GCAGGAGTTGTTGAAATG-3′ and 5′-TTAGTTTGACTCACCTTCC-3′, and 5′-CCTATGGA GACAACAGCC-3′ and 5′-GAGAGACTTACATTAGGCAG-3′ were used to amplify 89 bp and 106 bp fragments of the ABCB1 gene (mRNA: NM_000927, DNA: http://genome.ucsc.edu/), respectively. Polymerase chain reaction was carried out in a total volume of 25 μl, including 25 ng template, 5 pmol of each sense and antisense primers, and puReTaq Ready-To-Go PCR Beads (Amersham Biosciences, UK), which contain 2.5 units of puReTaq DNA polymerase, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 9.0 at room temperature), 50 mM KCl, 1.5m M MgCl2, 200 μM dATP, dCTP, dGTP and dTTP, and stabilizers including bovine serum albumin. The reaction was performed on a Perkin-Elmer GeneAmp PCR system 9600 (PerkinElmer, USA) with a primary denaturation step at 94°C for 1 minute, 40 cycles at 94°C for 30 seconds, at 50°C for 30 seconds, and at 72°C for 30 seconds. This was followed by a final incubation at 72°C for 7 minutes.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Patients' characteristics.

The polymorphism was detected using Pyrosequencer PSQ 96 and PSQ 96 SNP Reagent Kit using 25 μl PCR product according to the manufacturer's instructions; 5 pmol of the sequencing primers 5′-AGAAAGAACTAGAAGG-3′ and 5′-GTCACAGGAAGAGAT-3′ were applied to detect the polymorphisms in exon 21 and 26, respectively.

Statistics. After testing for normality using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, continuous parameters are given as means [standard deviation (SD)]. Parameters were compared using Student's t-tests or Chi-square tests where appropriate. Results are given as p-values with odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Survival probabilities were calculated by the product limit method of Kaplan and Meier. Differences between groups were tested using the log-rank test. The results were analyzed for the endpoint of disease-free and overall survival. Patients disease-free or still alive at the time of last follow-up were censored at the last follow-up date. Survival time was measured from the date of diagnosis. A multivariate Cox regression model was performed for disease-free survival and overall survival comprising tumor stage, tumor grade, residual tumor mass, patient's age at diagnosis, and the two ABCB1 gene polymorphisms. Haplotype frequencies were calculated using SAS/Genetics software. Association between haplotypes and ovarian cancer survival were calculated using a Cox regression model treating each haplotype as an independent continuous variable.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Univariate Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate Cox regression model of prognostic covariates in women with ovarian cancer.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Association between ABCB1 haplotypes and overall survival in women with ovarian cancer.

SAS System software (Version 9.1 SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) and SPSS (SPSS 11.0, SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, USA) were used for statistical analysis. P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Patients' characteristics are shown in Table I. Genotype frequencies in patients with ovarian cancer were as follows: ABCB1 G2677T/A 42.9% (G/G), 44.8% (G/T), and 12.4% (T/T), and ABCB1 C3435T 22.6% (C/C), 60.4% (C/T), and 17.0% (T/T). The distributions of the genotype frequencies for ABCB1 G2677T/A and C3435T in women with ovarian cancer were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (p=0.9 and p=0.2, respectively). No associations were found between ABCB1 G2677T/A and C3435T and clinicopathological parameters, i.e. tumor stage (p=0.7 and p=0.6), tumor grade (p=0.4 and p=0.8), residual tumor mass (p=0.1 and p=0.5), and age at diagnosis (p=0.9 and p=0.8), respectively.

In a univariate Kaplan-Meier analysis, tumor stage, tumor grade, residual tumor mass, and patient's age at diagnosis, but neither ABCB1 G2677T/A nor ABCB1 C3435T gene polymorphisms were associated with disease-free and overall survival (Table II). In a multivariate Cox regression model, tumor stage and tumor residual mass, but not tumor grade, patient's age at diagnosis, ABCB1 G2677T/A, nor ABCB1 C3435T gene polymorphisms, were associated with disease-free and overall survival (Table II). The combined prognostic effect of the two gene polymorphisms was investigated by haplotype analysis (Table III). No significant associations between haplotypes and disease-free or overall survival were observed.

Discussion

The ABCB1 gene polymorphisms seem to have a certain predictive value for the treatment response in women with ovarian cancer (11, 12, 20). We investigated whether two important ABCB1 gene polymorphisms are associated with prognosis of women with epithelial ovarian cancer.

Although the ABCB1 pathway is thought to play a crucial role in treatment response and drug resistance in women with ovarian cancer (1, 9, 11, 12), our findings do not support the hypothesis that the investigated ABCB1 gene polymorphisms, whether combined or as independent factors, have a prognostic value in women with ovarian cancer, nor do they appear to be associated with the biological phenotype. Our negative finding is in line with the largest study investigating the role of ABCB1 G2677T/A gene polymorphism and prognosis of women with ovarian cancer (24). It is in contrast to a study performed by an Australian study group comprising 309 patients (26). Of note, the latter study observed an association between ABCB1 G2677T/A gene polymorphism and disease-free survival, but not overall survival, only in a subset of optimally debulked patients (26). The different findings compared to the Australian study might be caused by slightly diverging genotype distribution. They observed a higher number of heterozygous and homozygous mutant ABCB1 G2677T/A genotypes, which were seen as a risk factor for shortened progression-free survival, than we did (69.7% vs. 57.5%) (26).

Clinical drug resistance is almost certainly multifactorial (27). Recently, various pathways have been identified and shown to be associated with drug resistance and a subsequent poorer prognosis in women with ovarian cancer (28-30). Different molecular mechanisms might lead to different types of drug resistance (27). Furthermore, our sample size might be too small to demonstrate the independent effect of ABCB1 G2677T/A and ABCB1 C3435T gene polymorphisms on survival in women with ovarian cancer or perform a subanalysis to evaluate only optimally debulked patients. Of note, the aim of our study was to investigate the prognostic but not the predictive value, regarding response to chemotherapy, of ABCB1 gene polymorphisms.

In conclusion, we were not able to observe any association between ABCB1 G2677T/A and ABCB1 C3435T gene polymorphisms and prognosis in Caucasian women with epithelial ovarian cancer.

Footnotes

  • Financial Support

    Ludwig Boltzmann-Institute of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Vienna, Austria.

  • Received October 8, 2009.
  • Revision received April 12, 2010.
  • Accepted April 22, 2010.
  • Copyright© 2010 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Pauli-Magnus C,
    2. Kroetz DL
    : Functional implications of genetic polymorphisms in the multidrug resistance gene MDR1 (ABCB1). Pharm Res 21: 904-913, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Thiebaut F,
    2. Tsuruo T,
    3. Hamada H,
    4. Gottesman MM,
    5. Pastan I,
    6. Willingham MC
    : Cellular localization of the multidrug-resistance gene product P-glycoprotein in normal human tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84: 7735-7738, 1987.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Jekerle V,
    2. Klinkhammer W,
    3. Scollard DA,
    4. Breitbach K,
    5. Reilly RM,
    6. Piquette-Miller M,
    7. Wiese M
    : In vitro and in vivo evaluation of WK-X-34, a novel inhibitor of P-glycoprotein and BCRP, using radio imaging techniques. Int J Cancer 119: 414-422, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Glazer RI,
    2. Rohlff C
    : Transcriptional regulation of multidrug resistance in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 31: 263-271, 1994.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Marzolini C,
    2. Paus E,
    3. Buclin T,
    4. Kim RB
    : Polymorphisms in human MDR1 (P-glycoprotein): recent advances and clinical relevance. Clin Pharmacol Ther 75: 13-33, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Zhou SF
    : Structure, function and regulation of P-glycoprotein and its clinical relevance in drug disposition. Xenobiotica 38: 802-832, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Baekelandt MM,
    2. Holm R,
    3. Nesland JM,
    4. Tropé CG,
    5. Kristensen GB
    : P-glycoprotein expression is a marker for chemotherapy resistance and prognosis in advanced ovarian cancer. Anticancer Res 20: 1061-1067, 2000.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Ng IO,
    2. Liu CL,
    3. Fan ST,
    4. Ng M
    : Expression of P-glycoprotein in hepatocellular carcinoma. A determinant of chemotherapy response. Am J Clin Pathol 113: 355-363, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Allen JD,
    2. Brinkhuis RF,
    3. van Deemter L,
    4. Wijnholds J,
    5. Schinkel AH
    : Extensive contribution of the multidrug transporters P-glycoprotein and Mrp1 to basal drug resistance. Cancer Res 60: 5761-5766, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Naniwa J,
    2. Kigawa J,
    3. Kanamori Y,
    4. Itamochi H,
    5. Oishi T,
    6. Shimada M,
    7. Shimogai R,
    8. Kawaguchi W,
    9. Sato S,
    10. Terakawa N
    : Genetic diagnosis for chemosensitivity with drug-resistance genes in epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 17: 76-82, 2007.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Kamazawa S,
    2. Kigawa J,
    3. Kanamori Y,
    4. Itamochi H,
    5. Sato S,
    6. Iba T,
    7. Terakawa N
    : Multidrug resistance gene-1 is a useful predictor of paclitaxel-based chemotherapy for patients with ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 86: 171-176, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Gréen H,
    2. Söderkvist P,
    3. Rosenberg P,
    4. Horvath G,
    5. Peterson C
    : MDR-1 single nucleotide polymorphisms in ovarian cancer tissue: G2677T/A correlates with response to paclitaxel chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 12: 854-859, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Illmer T,
    2. Schuler US,
    3. Thiede C,
    4. Schwarz UI,
    5. Kim RB,
    6. Gotthard S,
    7. Freund D,
    8. Schäkel U,
    9. Ehninger G,
    10. Schaich M
    : MDR1 gene polymorphisms affect therapy outcome in acute myeloid leukaemia patients. Cancer Res 62: 4955-4962, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Kim RB,
    2. Leake BF,
    3. Choo EF,
    4. Dresser GK,
    5. Kubba SV,
    6. Schwarz UI,
    7. Taylor A,
    8. Xie HG,
    9. McKinsey J,
    10. Zhou S,
    11. Lan LB,
    12. Schuetz JD,
    13. Schuetz EG,
    14. Wilkinson GR
    : Identification of functionally variant MDR1 alleles among European Americans and African Americans. Clin Pharmacol Ther 70: 189-199, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Mrozikiewicz PM,
    2. Seremak-Mrozikiewicz A,
    3. Semczuk A,
    4. Landt O,
    5. Breborowicz GH,
    6. Drews K
    : The significance of C3435T point mutation of the MDR1 gene in endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 17: 728-731, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Turgut S,
    2. Yaren A,
    3. Kursunluoglu R,
    4. Turgut G
    : MDR1 C3435T polymorphism in patients with breast cancer. Arch Med Res 38: 539-544, 2007.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Tahara T,
    2. Arisawa T,
    3. Shibata T,
    4. Hirata I,
    5. Nakano H
    : Multi-drug resistance 1 polymorphism is associated with reduced risk of gastric cancer in the Japanese population. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 22: 1678-1682, 2007.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Kurzawski M,
    2. Droździk M,
    3. Suchy J,
    4. Kurzawski G,
    5. Białecka M,
    6. Górnik W,
    7. Lubiński J
    : Polymorphism in the P-glycoprotein drug transporter MDR1 gene in colon cancer patients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 61: 389-394, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Urayama KY,
    2. Wiencke JK,
    3. Buffler PA,
    4. Chokkalingam AP,
    5. Metayer C,
    6. Wiemels JL
    : MDR1 gene variants, indoor insecticide exposure, and the risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 16: 1172-1177, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Kafka A,
    2. Sauer G,
    3. Jaeger C,
    4. Grundmann R,
    5. Kreienberg R,
    6. Zeillinger R,
    7. Deissler H
    : Polymorphism C3435T of the MDR-1 gene predicts response to preoperative chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer. Int J Oncol 22: 1117-1121, 2003.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Wu X,
    2. Gu J,
    3. Wu TT,
    4. Swisher SG,
    5. Liao Z,
    6. Correa AM,
    7. Liu J,
    8. Etzel CJ,
    9. Amos CI,
    10. Huang M,
    11. Chiang SS,
    12. Milas L,
    13. Hittelman WN,
    14. Ajani JA
    : Genetic variations in radiation and chemotherapy drug action pathways predict clinical outcomes in esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol 24: 3789-3798, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Monzo M,
    2. Brunet S,
    3. Urbano-Ispizua A,
    4. Navarro A,
    5. Perea G,
    6. Esteve J,
    7. Artells R,
    8. Granell M,
    9. Berlanga J,
    10. Ribera JM,
    11. Bueno J,
    12. Llorente A,
    13. Guardia R,
    14. Tormo M,
    15. Torres P,
    16. Nomdedéu JF,
    17. Montserrat E,
    18. Sierra J,
    19. CETLAM
    : Genomic polymorphisms provide prognostic information in intermediate-risk acute myeloblastic leukemia. Blood 107: 4871-4879, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Buda G,
    2. Maggini V,
    3. Galimberti S,
    4. Martino A,
    5. Giuliani N,
    6. Morabito F,
    7. Genestreti G,
    8. Iacopino P,
    9. Rizzoli V,
    10. Barale R,
    11. Rossi AM,
    12. Petrini M
    : MDR1 polymorphism influences the outcome of multiple myeloma patients. Br J Haematol 137: 454-456, 2007.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Marsh S,
    2. King CR,
    3. McLeod HL,
    4. Paul J,
    5. Gifford G,
    6. Brown R
    : ABCB1 2677G>T/A genotype and paclitaxel pharmacogenetics in ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res 12: 4127, 2006.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Marsh S,
    2. Paul J,
    3. King CR,
    4. Gifford G,
    5. McLeod HL,
    6. Brown R
    : Pharmacogenetic assessment of toxicity and outcome after platinum plus taxane chemotherapy in ovarian cancer: the Scottish Randomised Trial in Ovarian Cancer. J Clin Oncol 25: 4528-4535, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Johnatty SE,
    2. Beesley J,
    3. Paul J,
    4. Fereday S,
    5. Spurdle AB,
    6. Webb PM,
    7. Byth K,
    8. Marsh S,
    9. McLeod H,
    10. AOCS Study Group,
    11. Harnett PR,
    12. Brown R,
    13. DeFazio A,
    14. Chenevix-Trench G
    : ABCB1 (MDR 1) polymorphisms and progression-free survival among women with ovarian cancer following paclitaxel/carboplatin chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 14: 5594-5601, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Kaye SB
    : Reversal of drug resistance in ovarian cancer: where do we go from here? J Clin Oncol 26: 2616-2618, 2008.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Helleman J,
    2. Jansen MP,
    3. Span PN,
    4. van Staveren IL,
    5. Massuger LF,
    6. Meijer-van Gelder ME,
    7. Sweep FC,
    8. Ewing PC,
    9. van der Burg ME,
    10. Stoter G,
    11. Nooter K,
    12. Berns EM
    : Molecular profiling of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Int J Cancer 118: 1963-1971, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Jazaeri AA,
    2. Awtrey CS,
    3. Chandramouli GV,
    4. Chuang YE,
    5. Khan J,
    6. Sotiriou C,
    7. Aprelikova O,
    8. Yee CJ,
    9. Zorn KK,
    10. Birrer MJ,
    11. Barrett JC,
    12. Boyd J
    : Gene expression profiles associated with response to chemotherapy in epithelial ovarian cancers. Clin Cancer Res 11: 6300-6310, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Spentzos D,
    2. Levine DA,
    3. Kolia S,
    4. Otu H,
    5. Boyd J,
    6. Libermann TA,
    7. Cannistra SA
    : Unique gene expression profile based on pathologic response in epithelial ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 23: 7911-7918, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 30 (9)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 30, Issue 9
September 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Two Multidrug-resistance (ABCB1) Gene Polymorphisms as Prognostic Parameters in Women with Ovarian Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
7 + 11 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Two Multidrug-resistance (ABCB1) Gene Polymorphisms as Prognostic Parameters in Women with Ovarian Cancer
CHRISTOPH GRIMM, STEPHAN POLTERAUER, ROBERT ZEILLINGER, DAN TONG, GEORG HEINZE, ANDREA WOLF, CAMILLA NATTER, ALEXANDER REINTHALLER, LUKAS A. HEFLER
Anticancer Research Sep 2010, 30 (9) 3487-3491;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Two Multidrug-resistance (ABCB1) Gene Polymorphisms as Prognostic Parameters in Women with Ovarian Cancer
CHRISTOPH GRIMM, STEPHAN POLTERAUER, ROBERT ZEILLINGER, DAN TONG, GEORG HEINZE, ANDREA WOLF, CAMILLA NATTER, ALEXANDER REINTHALLER, LUKAS A. HEFLER
Anticancer Research Sep 2010, 30 (9) 3487-3491;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Polymorphisms of ABCB1, CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 Genes in Ovarian Cancer and Treatment Response in Poles
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Tumor Immunology Visualized in Realtime in In-vivo-like 3-D Gelfoam® Histoculture by Color-coded Imaging
  • The Role of EMP2 in Triple-negative Breast Cancer
  • Role of the Circadian Clock Gene DEC1 in Chemosensitivity and Apoptosis in Colorectal Cancer
Show more Experimental Studies

Similar Articles

Anticancer Research

© 2025 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire