Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

Gender Differences in Gemcitabine (Gemzar) Efficacy in Cancer Cells: Effect of Indole-3-Carbinol

BEVERLY D. LYN-COOK, SULMA I. MOHAMMED, CORNELIUS DAVIS, BEVERLY WORD, AARON HAEFELE, HONGGANG WANG and GEORGE HAMMONS
Anticancer Research December 2010, 30 (12) 4907-4913;
BEVERLY D. LYN-COOK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Beverly.lyn-cook{at}fda.hhs.gov
SULMA I. MOHAMMED
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CORNELIUS DAVIS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
BEVERLY WORD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
AARON HAEFELE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HONGGANG WANG
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
GEORGE HAMMONS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer has a poor prognosis, mainly due to lack of effective therapies. This study demonstrated the ability of dietary agent, indole-3-carbinol (I3C), to lower the LD50 of gemcitabine (Gemzar) in decreasing growth of both male (MiaPaca2) and female (SU86.86) pancreatic cancer cells. Female pancreatic cancer cells were more resistant to gemcitabine alone. Additionally, RT-PCR analysis of MiaPaca2 cells treated with 1, 10 or 100 μM of I3C showed that I3C reactivated the tumor suppressor gene p16INK4a in pancreatic cancer cells. Methylated-specific PCR analysis indicated that I3C demethylated the promoter region of p16 INK4a, which was methylated in the untreated cancer cells. p16INK4a inactivation through promoter hypermethylation is considered an early event in pancreatic carcinogenesis. A positive control using 5-azacytidine also reactivated p16INK4a. This study demonstrated the potential of I3C, a possible non-toxic hypomethylating agent, combined with the anticancer agent, gemcitabine, to be a powerful strategy for treating pancreatic cancer.

  • Sex differences
  • pancreatic cancer
  • gemcitabine
  • indole-3-carbinol

Diagnosis of pancreatic cancer often results in a bleak prognosis, mainly due to the inability to detect early biomarkers and the lack of therapies available at later stages of the disease. Gemcitabine (2′,2′-difluorodeoxycytidine) (Gemzar) is the gold standard for chemotherapeutic treatment of pancreatic cancer (1). This drug, being an analogue of deoxycytidine, when incorporated into DNA inhibits DNA synthesis and repair, resulting in apoptosis. However, treatment is hampered by drug resistance in approximately 75% of patients and only a modest increase in median survival over traditional treatment with 5-fluorouracil (5.65 months versus 4.41 months) (2, 3).

New drugs developed specifically for potential targets have shown little or no benefit as single agents over gemcitabine in clinical trails. These include farnesyl transferase inhibitors, matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors and vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (4-6). Attempting to focus on a single target in a disease where multiple pathways are simultaneously involved in pathogenesis may be an approach with limited effectiveness. In light of the shortcomings of current therapeutics for treatment of pancreatic cancer, new strategies must be found. One strategy gaining support is combinatorial treatment in order to improve overall effectiveness. This has been demonstrated with various gemcitabine-based combinations (7). However, these combination therapies often lead to severe toxicity and eventually patient death. Several dietary agents (for example, curcumin or resveratrol) have been reported to sensitize pancreatic cancer cells to standard chemotherapeutic drugs (for example, gemcitabine or erlotinib), which suggests that these agents could potentially be used as potentiators of standard chemotherapy (8-10).

Indole-3-carbinol (I3C), a compound found in Brassica vegetables such as cabbages and broccoli, has been shown to exert anticancer properties in various tumor cells (11-13). Moreover, I3C has inhibited spontaneous and chemical-induced tumorigenesis in mammary gland, liver, lung, cervix, and gastrointestinal tract in different animal model studies (14, 15). I3C is thought to exert its anticancer effects through numerous mechanisms (16-19). It was recently demonstrated that DNA methyltransferases may be a target for I3C (20). I3C decreased the expression of DNA methyltransferases 1 and 3b in pancreatic cancer cells. DNA methyltransferases are highly expressed in numerous cancers and are thought to be associated with silencing of tumor suppression genes through hypermethylation (21-24). Promoter hyper-methylation in critical genes such as p16INK4a is known to play a role in the progression of cancer (25). The p16INK4a pathway is inactivated in >95 of pancreatic carcinomas and recent studies have shown its inactivation in pancreatic secretion in inflammatory disease (26). The identification of genes targeted by hypermethylation is important for developing therapy for reactivation of important silenced genes.

The present study examined the ability of the non-toxic dietary agent I3C to enhance the anticancer effect of gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer cells. I3C effectively reduced the concentration of gemcitabine needed to significantly decrease the growth of male- and female-derived pancreatic cancer cells. The study also demonstrated that I3C can reactivate p16INK4a in pancreatic cancer cells through hypomethylation. These studies provide further rationale for combinational treatment of this cancer and specifically for the combined use of DNA methyltransferase inhibitors to target suppressor genes or other critical genes inactivated through this process.

Materials and Methods

Cell culture and treatment. MiaPaca2 (male) and SU86.86 (female) cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) (Manassas, VA, USA). They were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, L-glutamine, and penicillin streptomycin. Gemcitabine was obtained from Eli Lilly and Co. (Indianapolis, IN, USA); I3C was obtained from Sigma. For toxicity studies cells were treated with various concentrations of gemcitabine for 24 h. In combination studies, either 100 μM or 200 μM I3C was included. For methylation analysis, cells were treated with I3C for 24 or 48 h at the following concentrations: 1, 10, or 100 μM. Cell pellets were frozen at −80°C for molecular analysis.

MTT assay for cytotoxicity. Cell proliferation and cell toxicity assays were conducted using the MTT colorimetric assay. The activity of metabolically active cells was measured in an ELISA reader at optical density 570. All procedures were carried out according to the manufacturer's protocol, and the results were expressed as percent of cell growth of untreated cells.

DNA isolation and bisulfite modification. The QIAamp DNA kit (Qiagen; Valencia, CA, USA) was used to isolate genomic DNA from pancreatic cancer cells. For promoter hypermethylation, DNA was modified using a CpGenome™ DNA modification kit (Intergen Company; Purchase, NY, USA). The bisulfite treatment was carried out for 16 h at 50°C on 1 μg of DNA according to the manufacturer's instructions. PCR annealing conditions were optimized to 95°C (initial 15 min), followed by 40 cycles (1 min each) at 95, 54°C (unmethylated) or 59°C (methylated) and 72°C, completing the reaction at 72°C for 10 min. Resultant PCR products were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis. The following sense and antisense primers were used to detect unmethylated and methylated sequences: Unmethylated: forward, (F): 5′-TTATTAGAGGGTGGGGTGGATTGT-3′, reverse (R): 5′-CAACCCCAAACCACA-ACCCATAA-3′; methylated, forward: 5′-TTATTAGAGGGTGGGGCGGATCGC-3′, reverse: 5′-GACCCCGAA CCGCGACCGTAA-3′.

RNA isolation and RT-PCR analysis. A RNeasy isolation kit (Qiagen) was used to isolate total RNA. A Clontech cDNA synthesis kit (Palo Alto, CA, USA) was used for cDNA synthesis. Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was carried out to determine the expression levels of p16INK4a and GAPDH. The primers used to detect the mRNA expression of these genes were synthesized by Sigma-Genosys (Woodlands, TX, USA). A 50μl sample consisted of 2.0 μl cDNA, 32.75 μl sterile distilled water, 5.0 μl 10X PCR buffer, 2.0 μl of each of the four DNTPs, 1.0 μl forward and reverse primer, and 0.25 μl taq polymerase was used to amplify the products by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The PCR primers used in these studies were: p16INK4a F: 5′-CAACGCACCGAATAGTTACG-3′ and R: 3′-ACCAGCGTGTCCAGGAA-5′ (21). GAPDH primers were F: CCACCCATGGCA-AATTCCATGGCA and R: TCTAGACGGCAGGTCAGGTCCACC. PCR for these genes was carried out by beginning with a hot start at 94°C for two minutes. After completion, the cycle started at 94°C for 30 s, 66°C for one minute, and ended at 72°C for one minute before the cycle repeated itself. Once the cycling was completed the reaction mixture underwent a seven minute extension for 30 cycles. The PCR products were separated using a 2.0% agarose gel. The PCR products were analyzed and quantified by an Alphaimager 2000 Documentation Analysis System (Alpha Innotech; San Leandro, CA) using GAPDH as a reference gene.

Statistical analysis. Prism IV software (GraphPAD Software; San Diego, CA, USA) was used for graphical analyses. Results for MTT toxicity studies are shown as % of control.

Results

I3C, in combination with the chemotherapeutic drug used to treat patients with pancreatic cancer, gemcitabine, has proven to be effective in inhibiting the growth of pancreatic cancer cells. Figure 1 shows that gemcitabine alone suppressed cell growth in the male cell line (MiaPaca2) at higher concentrations, indicating that alone it is a more effective anticancer agent at higher doses. I3C combination enhanced its anti-proliferative effect at lower doses, decreasing gemcitabine IC50 from 30 nM alone to 3 nM in combination, a ten-fold decrease in the amount of gemcitabine needed to kill a significant number of cancer cells. Pancreatic cancer cells from the female cell line (SU86.86) were highly resistant to gemcitabine alone and growth was not affected even at doses as high as 500μM compared to another powerful anti-cancer drug, doxorubicin (IC50=2.47 μM) (Figure 2). However, I3C in combination with gemcitabine exerted powerful anti-cancer effects. The IC50 with 200 μM I3C was 0.388 μM and 1.13 μM with 100 μM I3C (Figure 3), which were lower than that of doxorubicin.

I3C is known to affect a number of biomarkers associated with highly aggressive cancers, including the expression of DNA methyltransferases. Inactivation of a number of genes through epigenetic mechanisms is known in several cancer types, including pancreatic cancer. Experiments were conducted to explore possible mechanisms underlying the effect of I3C in the pancreatic cancer cells shown in this study. I3C was shown to reactivate p16INK4a as demonstrated by increased expression in MiaPaca2 cells (Figure 4). Furthermore, this effect was through demethylation of the p16INK4a promoter, after 24 h (Figure 5). Treating pancreatic cancer cells with a known hypomethylating agent, 5-azacytidine, was found to also reactivate p16INK4a after 48 h (Figure 6).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Cytotoxicity of gemcitabine singly and in combination with I3C in pancreatic cancer cells by MTT assay. MiaPaCa2 cells (male) were treated with 0.1, 1, 10, 100 or 1000 nM of gemcitabine in the absence (A) or the presence of 100 μM indole-3-carbinol (B). Each data point is the average of at least three determinations.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Cytotoxicity of doxorubicin (A) and gemcitabine (B) in pancreatic cancer cells by MTT assay. SU86.86 cells (female) were treated with 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1 or 5 μM of doxorubicin or with 0.1,1, 10, 100 or 500 μM gemcitabine. Each data point is the average of at least three determinations.

Discussion

Combinational therapy is a promising strategy for the treatment of pancreatic cancer. This study showed that combining the non-toxic dietary agent I3C with gemcitabine greatly enhances its anticancer effect in male- and female-derived pancreatic cancer cells. Positive effects have been found with dietary agents in several other studies. Curcumin has been reported to sensitize pancreatic cancer cells to gemcitabine (8, 9), celecoxib (27), and paclitaxel (28). In an orthotopic animal model in which human pancreatic cancer cells (MiaPaCa2) were implanted in the pancreas of athymic nude mice, curcumin (1 g/kg, once daily by mouth) enhanced the antitumor activity of gemcitabine (25 mg/kg, twice weekly, intraperitoneal injection) by inhibiting cell proliferation, angiogenesis and NFκB-regulated gene products (cyclin D1, BCL2, BCL-xL, c-myc, COX2, and surviving) (8). Genistein, an isoflavonoid found in soy products, has been shown to induce apoptosis and inhibit NFκB activation in BxPC3 pancreatic cancer cells via inhibition of Notch-1 and NFκB signaling pathways, and to sensitize pancreatic cancer cells to docetaxel and cisplatin (29). Furthermore, in another study, genistein potentiated the effect of erlotinib in BxPC3, ASPC1, and CAPAN2 pancreatic cancer cells through inhibition of AKT and NFκB (30). Resveratrol, a polyphenol found in grape skins, has been shown to inhibit the growth of pancreatic cancer cells and enhance the antitumor activity of gemcitabine in an orthotopic mouse model (10).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Cytotoxicity of gemcitabine singly and in combination with I3C in pancreatic cancer cells by MTT assay. SU86.86 cells (female) were treated with 0.01, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 10 or 100 μM of gemcitabine in the presence of 200 μM indole-3-carbinol (A) or in the presence of 100 μM indole-3-carbinol (B). Each point is the average of at least three determinations.

The precise molecular mechanism(s) underlying the anti-cancer properties of I3C on neoplastic cells are not yet completely clear; however, substantial evidence indicates that the antitumor effect of I3C is attributable to its ability to target a plethora of signaling pathways governing apoptosis, cell-cycle progression, hormonal homeostasis, DNA repair, and angiogenesis (31). Multiple aspects of cancer cell-cycle regulation and survival are targeted, including Akt-NFκB signaling, caspase activation, cyclin-dependent kinase activities, estrogen metabolism, estrogen receptor signaling, endoplasmic reticulum stress, and BRCA gene expression. This broad spectrum of antitumor activities in conjunction with low toxicity emphasizes the translational value of I3C in cancer therapy. Previous studies have shown that I3C modulated the constitutively activated STAT3 transcription factor, which activates a number of cancer genes and its ability to induced apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells was further demonstrated (32).

Considering the pleiotropic effects on multiple signaling targets relevant to cell survival, I3C has also shown an ability to sensitize cancer cells to apoptosis induced by various anti-cancer agents and radiation. I3C and various therapeutic agents work through different signal transduction pathways in a synergistic manner to suppress cell viability of various types of cancer cells. For example, I3C has been shown to be an effective sensitizer of TRAIL treatment against TRAIL-resistant LNCaP prostate cancer cells by up-regulating the expression of two TRAIL death receptors, DR4and DR5 (33). In addition, treatment of MCF-7 cells with I3C and tamoxifen synergistically ablated expression of the phosphorylated retinoblastoma protein (Rb), an endogenous substrate for the G1 cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), through specific down-regulation of the expression of CDK6 (34).

Results from the current study demonstrate that I3C can also effect epigenetic changes. I3C reactivated the p16INK4a tumor suppressor gene through hypomethylation of the promoter. As a tumor suppressor gene, p16INK4a is the universal and key regulator of the G1-S phase transition of the cell cycle (35). p16INK4a was selected for the present study because it is a key tumor suppressive gene and a strong candidate for mediating cellular senescence (36). As an essential cell cycle regulation factor, p16INK4a inhibits the cyclin D-dependent protein kinases CDK4 and CDK6, the main function of which appears to be the phosphorylation of RB. p16INK4a is functionally inactivated by promoter hypermethylation in a wide variety of cancers, including breast, colon, prostate, esophageal, pancreatic carcinomas, head and neck cancers, and other cell lines (25). Results from a recent study suggest that accumulation of DNA methylation of multiple tumor-related genes, including p16INK4a, is involved in multistage carcinogenesis of the pancreas, from early precancerous stages to malignant progression, and that DNA methyltransferase 1 protein overexpression may by responsible for this aberrant DNA methylation (37). Restoration of p16INK4a expression through novel demethylating agents in combination with cytotoxic drugs may represent an important therapeutic intervention for human cancer.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Gene expression analysis of MiaPaCa2 cells using RT-PCR. MiaPaCa2 cells (male-derived) were treated with 0.1, 1, 10, or 100 μM of indole-3-carbinol. Lanes 1-5 are 24 h treatment and lanes 6-10 are 48 h treatment. Lanes 1 and 6, controls (untreated).

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Methylation-specific PCR (MSP) analysis of MiaPaCa2 cells (male) treated with 1, 10 or 100 μM indole-3-carbinol. W=wild type, U=unmethylation and M=methylated.

Other mechanisms involving epigenetic alterations may be involved. Gemcitabine is a prodrug requiring intracellular phosphorylation to 2′,2′-difluoro-2′-deoxycytidine mono-phosphate (dFdCMP) by deoxycytidine kinase (dCK) then converted to 2′,2′-difluoro-2′-deoxycytidine di- and triphosphate (dFdCDP and dFdCTP, respectively) (38). Cytidine deaminase (CDA) catalyzes gemcitabine degradation. dCK is important in gemcitabine sensitivity, since induction of this enzyme resulted in re-sensitization of cells to gemcitabine (39). Factors influencing dCK transcriptional regulation and function have been explored. Treatment with 5-azacytidine in human lymphoid cell lines resulted in an increase in dCK activity up to 37%, which suggests that epigenetic control may be responsible for dCK gene silencing during development of gemcitabine resistance (40). Thus, opportunities for therapeutic intervention may include modulating dCK activity at the transcriptional level with epigenetic agents in combination with cytotoxic nucleosides. Because CDA catalyzes deamination of cytidine, deoxycytidine, and their analogs (41), it might be expected that its up-regulation may induce gemcitabine resistance. There is an indication that 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine, a potent inhibitor of DNA methylation, induces CDA activity in human HL-60 myeloid leukemic cells, which correlates with induction of their differentiation. Whether this increased CDA activity by 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine is due to CDA promoter demethylation or gene expression remains to be demonstrated. Hence, it is important to investigate whether gemcitabine-resistant cells have differential expression of this gene that is modulated by epigenetic mechanisms (42).

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

Gene expression analysis of MiaPaCa2 cells using RT-PCR. MiaPaCa2 cells (male) were treated with 0.1, 1, 10, 100, 1000 μM 5-azacytidine. Lanes 1-5 are 24 h treatment and lanes 6-10 are 48 h treatment. Lane 1 and 7, controls (untreated).

In conclusion, this study showed the ability of I3C to enhance the cytotoxicity of gemcitabine, the cancer drug used as a standard regimen for pancreatic cancer. This effect was shown in both male- and female-derived pancreatic cancer cells, although cells from the female cell line were more highly resistance to gemcitabine alone. Given the need to develop improved treatments for this disease, these results suggest a potential for combinational therapy. The use of non-toxic dietary agents is particularly attractive. I3C was also shown to reactivate the p16INK4a tumor suppressor gene through hypomethylation of the promoter. The renewed expression of epigenetically silenced genes following treatment with the demethylating agent may provide an important approach to increase the sensitivity of anti-cancer drugs. Additional studies are needed to clearly delineate the usefulness of dietary agents in chemotherapy.

  • Received October 13, 2010.
  • Revision received November 8, 2010.
  • Accepted November 10, 2010.
  • Copyright© 2010 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Wong HH,
    2. Lemoine NR
    : Pancreatic cancer: molecular pathogenesis and new therapeutic targets. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 6: 412-422, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Burris HA III.,
    2. Moore MJ,
    3. Andersen J,
    4. Green MR,
    5. Rothenberg ML,
    6. Modiano MR,
    7. Cripps MC,
    8. Portenoy RK,
    9. Storniolo AM,
    10. Tarassoff P,
    11. Nelson R,
    12. Dorr FA,
    13. Stephens CD,
    14. Von Hoff DD
    : Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 15: 2403-2413, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Akada M,
    2. Crnogarac-Jurcevic T,
    3. Lattimore S,
    4. Mahon P,
    5. Lopes R,
    6. Sunamura M,
    7. Matsuno S,
    8. Lemoine NR
    : Intrinsic chemoresistance to gemcitabine is associated with decreased expression of BNIP3 in pancreatic cancer. Clin Cancer Res 11: 3094-3101, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Macdonald JS,
    2. McCoy S,
    3. Whitehead RP,
    4. Iqbal S,
    5. Wade JL 3rd.,
    6. Giguere JK,
    7. Abbruzzese JL
    : A phase II study of farnesyl transferase inhibitor R115777 in pancreatic cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group (SW)G 9924) study. Invest New Drugs 23: 485-487, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Bramhall SF,
    2. Rosemurgy A,
    3. Brown PD,
    4. Bowry C,
    5. Buckels JAC
    : Marimastat as first line therapy for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer: a randomized trail. J Clin Oncol 19: 3447-3454, 2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Cohen SJ,
    2. Meropol NJ
    : Drug development in pancreatic cancer: finally, biology begets therapy. Int J Gastrointest Cancer 32; 91-106, 2002.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Rivera F,
    2. Lopez-Tarruella S,
    3. Vega-Villega ME,
    4. Salcedo M
    : Treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer: from gemcitabine single agent to combinations and targeted therapy. Cancer Retreatment Rev 35: 335-339, 2009.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Kunnumakkara AB,
    2. Guha S,
    3. Krishnan S,
    4. Diagaradjane P,
    5. Gelovani J,
    6. Aggarwal BB
    : Curcumin potentiates antitumor activity of gemcitabine in an orthotopic model of pancreatic cancer through suppression of proliferation, angiogenesis, and inhibition of nuclear factor-kappa-B-regulated gene products. Cancer Res 67: 3853-3861, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Lev-Ari S,
    2. Vexler A,
    3. Starr A,
    4. Ashkenazy-Voghera M,
    5. Greif J,
    6. Aderka D,
    7. Ben-Yosef R
    : Curcumin augments gemcitabine cytotoxic effect on pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell lines. Cancer Invest 25: 411-418, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Harikumar KB,
    2. Kunnumakkara AB,
    3. Sethi G,
    4. Diagaradjane P,
    5. Anand P,
    6. Pandey MK,
    7. Gelovani J,
    8. Krishnan S,
    9. Guha S,
    10. Aggarwal BB
    : Resveratrol, a multitarget agent, can enhance antitumor activity of gemcitabine in vitro and in orthotopic mouse model of human pancreatic cancer. Int J Cancer 15: 257-268, 2010.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Rahman KM,
    2. Aranha FH,
    3. Sarkar FH
    : Indole-3-carbinol (I3C) induces apoptosis in tumorigenic but not in nontumorigenic breast epithelial cells. Nutr Cancer 45: 101-112, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Frydoonfar HR,
    2. McGrath DR,
    3. Spigelman AD
    : Inhibition of proliferation of a colon cancer cell line by indole-3-carbinol. Colorectal Dis 4: 205-207, 2002.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Nachshon-Kedmi M,
    2. Yannai S,
    3. Haj A,
    4. Fares FA
    : Indole-3-carbinol and 3,3′-diindolylmethane induce apoptosis in human prostate cancer cells. Food Chem Toxicol 41: 745-752, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Bradlow HL,
    2. Michniviez J,
    3. Telang NT,
    4. Osborne MP
    : Effects of dietary indole-3-carbinol on estradiol metabolism and spontaneous mammary tumors in mice. Carcinogenesis 12: 1571-1574, 1991.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. He YH,
    2. Friesen MD,
    3. Ruch RJ,
    4. Schut HA
    : Indole-3-carbinol as a chemopreventive agent in 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo [4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP) carcinogenesis: inhibition of PhIP-DNA adduct formation, acceleration of PhIP metabolism, and induction of cytochromome P450 in females F344 rats. Food Chem Toxicol 38: 15-23, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Wattenberg LW,
    2. Loub WD
    : Inhibition of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-induced neoplasia by naturally occurring indoles. Cancer Res 38: 1410-1413, 1978.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Bradfield CA,
    2. Bjeldanes LF
    : Effect of dietary indole-3-carbinol on intestinal and hepatic monooxygenase, glutathione S-transferase and epoxide hydrolase activities in the rat. Food Chem Toxicol 22: 977-982, 1984.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Chen I,
    2. Safe S,
    3. Bjeldanes LF
    : Indole-3-carbinol and diindolylmethane as aryl hydrocarbon (Ah) receptor agonists and antagonists in T47D human breast cancer cells. Biochem Pharmacol 51: 1069-1076, 1996.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Firestone GL,
    2. Bjeldanes LF
    : Indole-3-carbinol and 3-3′-diindolylmethane antiproliferative signaling pathways control cell-cycle gene transcription in human breast cancer cells by regulating promoter Sp 1 transcription factor interactions. J Nutr 133: 2448S-2455S, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Haefele A,
    2. Word B,
    3. Yongmei X,
    4. Hammons GJ,
    5. Lyn-Cook BD
    : Indole-3-carbinol (I3C) modulates expression of DNA methyltransferases 1, 3a, and 3b in pancreatic cancer cells: Effects of gender and a novel (C→T) polymorphism in the promoter region of DNMT 3b. Int J Cancer Prevention 2: 245-255, 2007.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Girault I,
    2. Tozlu S,
    3. Lidereau R,
    4. Bieche I
    : Expression analysis of DNA methyltransferases 1, 3A, and 3B in sporadic breast carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res 9: 4415-4422, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Kanai Y,
    2. Ushijima S,
    3. Kondo Y,
    4. Nakanishi Y,
    5. Hirohashi S
    : DNA methyltransferase expression and DNA methylation of CpG islands and pericentromeric satellite regions in human colorectal and stomach cancers. Int J Cancer 91: 205-212, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Robertson KD,
    2. Uzvolgyi E,
    3. Liang G,
    4. Talmadge C,
    5. Sumegi J,
    6. Gonzales FA,
    7. Jones PA
    : The human DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) 1, 3a, and 3b: coordinate mRNA expression in normal tissues and overexpression in tumors. Nucleic Acids Res 27: 2292-2298, 1999.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Wu J,
    2. Issa JP,
    3. Herman J,
    4. Bassett DE Jr.,
    5. Nelkin BD,
    6. Baylin SB
    : Expression of an exogenous eukaryotic DNA methyltransferase gene induces transformation of NIH 3T3 cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. 90: 8891-8895, 1993.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Auerkari EI
    : Methylation of tumor suppressor genes p16(INK4a), p27(Kip1), and E-cadherin in carcinogenesis. Oral Oncol 42: 5-13, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Klump B,
    2. Hsieh CJ,
    3. Nehls O,
    4. Dette S,
    5. Holzmann,
    6. Kieblich R,
    7. Jung,
    8. Sinn U,
    9. Ortner M,
    10. Porschen R,
    11. Gregor M
    : Methylation status of p14ARF and p16INK4a as detected in pancreatic secretions. Br J Cancer 88: 217-222, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Lev-Ari,
    2. Zinger H,
    3. Kazanov D,
    4. Yona D,
    5. Ben-Yosef R,
    6. Starr A,
    7. Figer A,
    8. Arber N
    : Curcumin synergistically potentiates the growth inhibitory and pro- apoptotic effects of celecoxib in pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells. Biomed Pharmacother 59 (Suppl.2): S276-S280, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Wang W,
    2. Abbruzzese JL,
    3. Evans DB,
    4. Larry L,
    5. Cleary KR,
    6. Chiao PJ
    : The nuclear factor-κB RelA transcription factor is constitutively activated in human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells. Clin Cancer Res 5: 119-127, 1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Wang Z,
    2. Zhang Y,
    3. Banerjee S,
    4. Li Y,
    5. Sarker FH
    : Inhibition of nuclear factor-κB activity by genistein is mediated via Notch-1 signaling pathway in pancreatic cancer cells. Int J Cancer 118: 1930-1936, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. El-Rayes BF,
    2. Ali S,
    3. Ali IF,
    4. Philip PA,
    5. Abbruzzese J,
    6. Sarkar FH
    : Potentiation of the effect of erlotnib by genistein in pancreatic cancer: the role of Akt and nuclear factor-κB. Cancer Res 66: 10553-10559, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Rogan EG
    : The natural chemopreventive compound indole-3-carbinol: state of the science. In vivo 20: 221-228, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Lian JP,
    2. Word B,
    3. Taylor S,
    4. Hammons GJ,
    5. Lyn-Cook BD
    : Modulation of the constitutive activated STAT3 transcription factor in pancreatic cancer prevention: effects of indole-3-carbinol (I3C) and genistein. Anticancer Res 23: 3-7, 2004.
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    1. Jeon KI,
    2. Rih JK,
    3. Kim HJ,
    4. Lee YJ,
    5. Cho CH,
    6. Goldberg ID,
    7. Rosen EM,
    8. Bae I
    : Pretreatment of indole-3-carbinol augments TRAIL-induced apoptosis in a prostate cancer cell line, LNCaP. FEBS Lett 544: 246-251, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Cover CM,
    2. Hsieh SJ,
    3. Cram EJ,
    4. Hong C,
    5. Riby JE,
    6. Bjeldanes LF,
    7. Firestone GL
    : Indole-3-carbinol and tamoxifen cooperates to arrest the cell cycle of MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. Cancer Res 59: 1244-1251, 1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Shapiro GI,
    2. Edwards CD,
    3. Ewen ME,
    4. Rollins BJ
    : p16INK4A participates in a G1 arrest checkpoint in response to DNA damage. Mol Cell Biology 18: 378-387, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Hara E,
    2. Smith R,
    3. Parry D,
    4. Tahara H,
    5. Stone S,
    6. Peters G
    : Regulation of p16CDKN2 expression and its implications for cell immortalization and senescence. Mol Cell Biology 16: 859-867, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Peng D-F,
    2. Kanai Y,
    3. Sawada M,
    4. Ushijima S,
    5. Hiraoka N,
    6. Kitazawa S,
    7. Hirohashi S
    : DNA methylation of multiple tumor-related genes in association with the overexpression of DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) during multistage carcinogenesis of the pancreas. Carcinogenesis 27: 1160-1168, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Mini E,
    2. Nobilli S,
    3. Caciagli B,
    4. Landini I,
    5. Mazzei T
    : Cellular pharmacology of gemcitabine. Ann Oncol 17 (Suppl 5): v7-12, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Sebastiani V,
    2. Ricci F,
    3. Rubio-Viqueira B,
    4. Kulesza P,
    5. Yeo CJ,
    6. Hidalgo M,
    7. Klein A,
    8. Laheru D,
    9. Iacobuzio-Donahue CA
    : Immunohistochemical and genetic evaluation of deoxycytidine kinase in pancreatic cancer: relationship to molecular mechanisms of gemcitabine resistance and survival. Clin Cancer Res 12: 2492-2497, 2006
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Antonsson BE,
    2. Avramis VI,
    3. Nyce J,
    4. Holcenberg JS
    : Effect of 5-azacytidine and congeners on DNA methylation and expression of deoxycytidine kinase in the human lymphoid cell lines CCRF/CEM/) and CCRF/CEM/ddCK-1. Cancer Res 47: 3672-3678, 1987.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Chabner BA,
    2. Johns DG,
    3. Coleman CN,
    4. Drake JC,
    5. Evans WH
    : Purification and properties of cytidine deaminase from normal and leukemic granulocytes. J Clin Invest 53: 287-290, 1974.
    OpenUrl
  36. ↵
    1. Smid K,
    2. Bergman AM,
    3. Eijk PP,
    4. Veerman G,
    5. van Haperen VW,
    6. van den Ijssel P,
    7. Ylstra B,
    8. Peters GJ
    : Microarray analysis of resistance for gemcitabine results in increased expression of ribonucleotide reductase subunits. Nucleosides Nucleic Acids 25: 1001-1007, 2006.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 30, Issue 12
December 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Gender Differences in Gemcitabine (Gemzar) Efficacy in Cancer Cells: Effect of Indole-3-Carbinol
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 12 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Gender Differences in Gemcitabine (Gemzar) Efficacy in Cancer Cells: Effect of Indole-3-Carbinol
BEVERLY D. LYN-COOK, SULMA I. MOHAMMED, CORNELIUS DAVIS, BEVERLY WORD, AARON HAEFELE, HONGGANG WANG, GEORGE HAMMONS
Anticancer Research Dec 2010, 30 (12) 4907-4913;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Gender Differences in Gemcitabine (Gemzar) Efficacy in Cancer Cells: Effect of Indole-3-Carbinol
BEVERLY D. LYN-COOK, SULMA I. MOHAMMED, CORNELIUS DAVIS, BEVERLY WORD, AARON HAEFELE, HONGGANG WANG, GEORGE HAMMONS
Anticancer Research Dec 2010, 30 (12) 4907-4913;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Chemosensitivity Induced by Down-regulation of MicroRNA-21 in Gemcitabine-resistant Pancreatic Cancer Cells by Indole-3-Carbinol
  • Enhanced Efficacy of Gemcitabine by Indole-3-carbinol in Pancreatic Cell Lines: The Role of Human Equilibrative Nucleoside Transporter 1
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Ginsenoside Rh4 Induces Apoptosis Through ROS-Mediated Fas Signaling in Human Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma NPC/HK1 Cells
  • Genome-wide Analysis Highlights rs4671908 and rs2238431 as Predictors of Survival in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
  • Implications of the Cuproptosis Protein SLC31A1 for the Immune Microenvironment and Temozolomide Sensitivity in Glioblastoma
Show more Experimental Studies
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire