Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Review ArticlePart BR

Epidemiology of Vitamin D Insufficiency and Cancer Mortality

STEFAN PILZ, ANDREAS TOMASCHITZ, BARBARA OBERMAYER-PIETSCH, HARALD DOBNIG and THOMAS R. PIEBER
Anticancer Research September 2009, 29 (9) 3699-3704;
STEFAN PILZ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: stefan.pilz@chello.at
ANDREAS TOMASCHITZ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
BARBARA OBERMAYER-PIETSCH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HARALD DOBNIG
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
THOMAS R. PIEBER
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

There is growing evidence that vitamin D exerts anticarcinogenic effects. Ultraviolet-B (UV-B) radiation, which is required for vitamin D production in the skin, was found to be inversely associated with cancer incidence and mortality. Recent studies have largely but not consistently shown that low 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels, which are considered to be the best indicator of vitamin D status, are a significant risk factor for cancer mortality. Circulating 25(OH)D levels were also associated with improved survival in colorectal and lung cancer patients and vitamin D insufficiency was observed in various other diseases such as autoimmune, infectious, musculoskeletal, neurological and cardiovascular diseases. In conclusion, we still need further studies to evaluate the association of vitamin D insufficiency and cancer incidence and mortality, but the multiple health benefits of vitamin D and the easy, safe and inexpensive way by which vitamin D can be supplemented should already guide current public health strategies to achieve 25(OH)D levels of at least 75 nmol/l (30 ng/ml) in the general population.

  • 25-Hydroxyvitamin D
  • 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D
  • survival
  • vitamin D supplementation
  • review

Cancer research over the last three decades has produced accumulating evidence in favour of the hypothesis that a poor vitamin D status is associated with an increased cancer risk (1, 2). This is of particular importance for public health when considering the worldwide high prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency (3, 4). This pandemic of vitamin D insufficiency is mainly a consequence of lifestyle (e.g. reduced outdoor activities) and environmental factors (e.g. air pollution) that limit ultraviolet-B (UV-B) exposure of the skin, with subsequently reduced dermal vitamin D production (4). In general, UV-B-induced vitamin D production in the skin is the main source of vitamin D, whereas dietary vitamin D intake plays only a minor role (4).

Classification of the vitamin D status is usually carried out according to serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) which is produced by hydroxylation of vitamin D in the liver (3). 25(OH)D is then converted to 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin (1,25(OH)2D) by 1α hydroxylase activity in the kidney and various other tissues (1, 2, 5, 6). 1,25(OH)2D activates the vitamin D receptor (VDR), which is nearly ubiquitously expressed and mediates its effects through binding to VDR response elements on the DNA that regulate approximately 3% of the human genome (7). Given this important role for the regulation of many different genes, it has been increasingly recognised that vitamin D exerts several molecular effects which are important to prevent the initiation and progression of cancer (1, 2). In this context, it has been shown that vitamin D and its metabolites play a central role in regulation of cell growth and the cell cycle, cellular differentiation, apoptosis, immune modulation, and in the integration of hormonal and cellular signalling pathways (1, 2). Molecular effects of vitamin D that are relevant for carcinogenesis have been excellently reviewed elsewhere (1, 2). In this brief review, we aim to provide an overview of the epidemiology of vitamin D insufficiency and overall cancer mortality, with a main focus on prospective follow-up studies and randomized controlled trials.

UV-B Radiation and Cancer Mortality

In 1941, Frank L. Apperly published data on an inverse association of solar radiation and cancer mortality (8). He concluded that exposure of suitable skin areas to sunlight might reduce cancer deaths, but his work did not significantly stimulate further research in this field at that time (8). About four decades later, in 1980, Garland and Garland were the first in modern literature to hypothesize that low UV-B radiation and subsequently reduced 25(OH)D levels were a risk factor for cancer mortality (9). Their hypothesis was based on the observation that colon cancer mortality in the US was significantly increased in populations with low exposure to solar UV-B radiation. Since then, the knowledge on UV-B radiation and cancer mortality has been extensively increased and was recently reviewed by Grant and Mohr (10). In brief, previous studies have shown that solar UV-B radiation was inversely associated with cancer incidence and mortality of up to 19 cancer sites (11). Importantly, the initial observations of inverse associations of UV-B and cancer mortality, which were largely made in the United States (US), have been further supported in various countries and at different latitudes (10). Furthermore, Grant et al. showed that even after considering the confounding factors of alcohol consumption, Hispanic heritage, urban/rural residence, poverty level and smoking (for lung cancer mortality), there still remained 13 cancer sites whose mortality rates were inversely associated with UV-B radiation: bladder, breast, colon, esophagus, gallbladder, stomach, ovary, pancreas, prostate, rectum, kidney and uterine corpus cancer, as well as Hodgkin's lymphoma (12).

An important aspect concerning the influence of UV-B exposure on vitamin D production and cancer is that due to their higher melanin content in the skin, black persons require more UV-B exposure than whites to produce similar amounts of vitamin D. Hence, blacks have a higher prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency than whites, raising the hypothesis that the higher cancer mortality rate among the US black population compared to US whites might partially be attributable to differences in vitamin D status. Indeed, data from the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study (HPFS), a cohort study among 47,800 men, showed that black men with risk factors for vitamin D insufficiency had a significantly increased risk of cancer mortality compared to white men (relative risk (RR) 2.27; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.57-3.28) (13). On the other hand, there was no significant difference in cancer mortality when blacks with few risk factors for hypovitaminosis D were compared with whites.

Vitamin D Insufficiency and Cancer Mortality

In 2006, Giovannucci et al. were the first to present results of a prospective study on 25(OH)D levels and cancer mortality by analyzing data from the HPFS (14). 25(OH)D levels were measured in 1,095 out of 47,800 study participants and determinants of 25(OH)D levels, including vitamin D intake, skin pigmentation, geographic residence, sunlight exposure and body mass index, were used to estimate/predict 25(OH)D levels in the remaining study cohort. During the follow-up period from 1986 to January 31, 2000, 4,286 incident carcinomas and 2,025 cancer deaths occurred. After adjustments for possible confounders, an increment of 25 nmol/l in these predicted 25(OH)D levels was associated with a 17% reduction in total cancer incidence (RR 0.83; 95% CI 0.74-0.92) and a 29% reduction in total cancer mortality (RR 0.71; 95% CI 0.60-0.83). Significant inverse associations per increment of 25 nmol/l were also observed for colorectal (RR 0.63; 95% CI 0.48-0.83), pancreatic (RR 0.49; 95% CI 0.28-0.86), esophageal (RR 0.37; 95% CI 0.17-0.80) and oral or pharyngeal cancer mortality (RR 0.30; 95% CI 0.11-0.81).

In 2007, Freedman et al. published results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES-III), a study among 16,818 participants from the noninstitutionalized US population (15). The investigators of NHANES-III recorded 526 cancer deaths during follow-up. There was no significant association of 25(OH)D levels and total cancer mortality after adjustments for age, sex, race/ethnicity and smoking history. Colorectal cancer mortality was, however, reduced by 72% (95% CI 32-89%) when comparing persons with 25(OH)D levels above 80 nmol/l with those having 25(OH)D levels below 50 nmol/l. Breast cancer mortality was not significantly associated with vitamin D status when using 25(OH)D levels as a continuous variable but was significantly reduced in participants with 25(OH)D levels ≥62.5 nmol/l when compared to those with lower 25(OH)D concentrations (RR 0.28; 95% CI 0.08-0.93).

We also addressed the issue of vitamin D status and cancer mortality in 3,299 patients form the Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health (LURIC) study, a prospective cohort study from Germany among patients referred for coronary angiography (16). In that study, 95 cancer deaths occurred during a follow-up period of 7.75 years. The risk of total cancer mortality was reduced by 55% (RR 0.45; 95% CI 0.22-0.93) in the fourth versus the first 25(OH)D quartile.

Summarizing the results of these three studies we have inconsistent results, with two studies (HPFS and LURIC) which found a significant association of compromised vitamin D status and total cancer mortality and one study (NHANES-III) which observed significant associations only for colorectal and breast cancer mortality but not for 25(OH)D levels and total cancer mortality. Underlying differences of the study populations and study designs may account for these inconsistent results. In particular, the study cohorts of LURIC and NHANES-III were significantly different, with the LURIC cohort being 2 decades older with much lower 25(OH)D levels and a more homogeneous study population compared to the very heterogeneous study cohort of NHANES-III which included various ethnicities from different geographic regions in the US. Of note is that after the LURIC data were published, Freedman et al. performed a reanalysis of NHANES-III for non-Hispanic whites by using a reference group (lowest 5%) with similar 25(OH)D concentrations as the reference group (lowest quartile) in the LURIC study. The risk of cancer mortality was non significantly reduced by 22% in the lowest 5% in NHANES-III (RR 0.78; 95% CI 0.42-1.43), when compared to the highest quartile (17). Hence, this latter analysis might suggest that the association of vitamin D insufficiency and increased cancer mortality is particularly apparent for persons with very low 25(OH)D levels. However, according to the conclusion by Freedman et al., the small numbers with depressed 25(OH)D levels in NHANES-III limit the power of that study to discern effects at very low 25(OH)D levels (17).

Importantly, both the LURIC and NHANES-III studies considered the seasonal variations in 25(OH)D levels in their statistical analyses, because the seasonal changes in UV-B exposure are responsible for circannual differences of the vitamin D status (16, 17). This is well illustrated by observations that 25(OH)D levels are up to twice as high at the end of the summer when compared to winter levels (16, 18-20). To reduce possible confounding by these seasonal variations in 25(OH)D levels, we and others classified the vitamin D status of an individual according to the percentile distribution of 25(OH)D levels within the respective month in which blood was drawn (17, 18). We therefore suggest that in the future the vitamin D status of an individual be classified not only according to absolute 25(OH)D levels but also according to percentiles of population-based 25(OH)D levels for each month of the year. Another issue which is important to consider when interpreting or analyzing data on vitamin D and cancer is the fact that low physical activity is related to both vitamin D insufficiency and increased cancer risk and may therefore be a possible confounder (20). This problem is, however, complex because reduced physical activity with subsequent reduced outdoor activities and lower UV-B exposure is not only a cause of vitamin D insufficiency but might also be a consequence of vitamin D insufficiency. In this context, it has been demonstrated that vitamin D exerts beneficial effects on musculoskeletal health and reduces fractures and falls thereby preventing immobilisation (2, 4). Given that the assessment of physical activity is not trivial, it was not measured and adjusted for in most of the aforementioned studies but the LURIC study did show that the association of cancer mortality and vitamin D insufficiency remained significant even after adjustment for physical activity level (16).

Vitamin D Insufficiency and Mortality Among Cancer Patients

Observations that cancer patients who were diagnosed in summer had a better survival compared to those diagnosed in winter, and findings that the associations of low UV-B radiation and indices of a poor vitamin D status were stronger for cancer mortality than for cancer incidence, stimulated further studies to evaluate whether 25(OH)D levels are related to mortality in cancer patients (10, 21). Towards this, Ng et al. studied 304 participants from the Nurses' Health Study (NHS) and the HPFS who were diagnosed with colorectal cancer during the respective study periods (21). Participants in the highest quartile of 25(OH)D levels had a 48% lower risk of total mortality (RR 0.52; 95% CI 0.29-0.94) when compared to patients within the lowest quartile. In addition, among 447 participants with early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the risk of mortality was non-significantly reduced by 26% in the highest versus the lowest 25(OH)D quartile (RR 0.74; 95% CI: 0.50-1.10; P for trend 0.07) (20). This latter association was statistically significant for patients with stage IB-IIB (RR 0.45; 95% CI 0.24-0.82) but not for those with stage IA cancer (22).

Apart from this, it is important for us to point out that a poor vitamin D status has also been associated with increased total mortality in two population-based studies (23, 24). Furthermore, Autier and Gandini published a recent meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials which showed that vitamin D supplementation was associated with a statistically significant reduction of total mortality (RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.87-0.99) (25). These data underline that beyond cancer, vitamin D exerts multiple effects that are relevant for overall health resulting in an increased lifespan (2, 4).

Vitamin D Supplementation and Cancer Mortality

The impact of a daily supplementation of 400 IU vitamin D plus 1,000 mg calcium on cancer mortality was evaluated in the Women's Health Initiative (WHI), a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial among 36,282 women (26, 27). During an average follow-up period of 7 years, 726 patients died due to cancer. There was a non-significant reduction of cancer mortality of 11% in the vitamin D and calcium versus the placebo group (RR 0.89; 95% CI 0.77-1.03; p=0.12) (26). When interpreting these statistically non significant results of the WHI, it should be underlined that there is a general consensus that daily vitamin D doses of 400 IU (as used in the WHI) are too low to sufficiently raise the vitamin D status to 25(OH)D levels which significantly improve health outcomes and which should be at least as high as 75 nmol/l (30 ng/ml) (28). This notion is in line with other vitamin D-related health outcomes because a recent meta-analysis showed that vitamin D intake had no significant effect on fracture risk in randomized, placebo controlled trials with a daily supplementation of 400 IU vitamin D (29). The incidence of fractures was, however, significantly reduced by vitamin D supplementation in studies using daily vitamin D doses >400 IU (29). Furthermore, in addition to the WHI study, another randomized, double-blind, controlled trial involving a four-monthly supplementation with 100,000 IU vitamin D was performed among 2,686 people aged 65-85 years living in the general community of Great Britain (30). In that study, risk of total cancer mortality was non significantly reduced by 14% in the vitamin D versus the placebo group (RR 0.86; 95% CI 0.61-1.20) (30).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Associations of vitamin D and cancer risk.

Moreover, Lappe et al. performed a randomized controlled trial among 1,179 healthy community-dwelling postmenopausal women (31). This trial included three groups: placebo, calcium (1,400-1,500 mg) and calcium (1,400-1,500 mg) plus 1,100 IU vitamin D. Fifty women developed cancer during the study duration of 4 years including 13 incident cases diagnosed in the first year of the study. Compared to the placebo group, the risk of incident cancer was reduced by 60% in the vitamin D plus calcium group (RR 0.40; 95% CI 0.20-0.82). This latter analysis was repeated for women free of cancer after 1 year of follow-up in order to reduce possible bias by occult cancer that was already present but not diagnosed at baseline. In this analysis, risk of incident cancer was reduced by 77% in the calcium plus vitamin D versus the placebo group (RR 0.23; 95% CI 0.09-0.60). For both these analyses there was no significant difference for cancer incidence between the placebo and the calcium group. This study by Lappe et al. does not provide data on cancer mortality but the findings of this trial with regard to cancer incidence are of great importance because this was the first study to show to vitamin D supplementation significantly reduced the risk of cancer in a randomized placebo-controlled trial.

Conclusion

Epidemiological data from prospective follow-up studies and randomized controlled trials on the association of vitamin D insufficiency and risk of cancer mortality are largely but not consistently in favour of the hypothesis that a sufficient vitamin D status protects against the initiation and progression of cancer. To provide an overview of the published study results in this field we listed the risk reduction of cancer per increase of 25 nmol/l (10 ng/ml) in 25(OH)D levels by using and/or extrapolating the results from the aforementioned studies (see Table I). It turned out that the vitamin D effects on cancer were relatively well comparable among the studies with available data ranging from a cancer risk reduction of 17% to 60% per increase of 25 nmol/l (10 ng/ml) in 25(OH)D levels (Table I). We are aware that the data from Table I are based on some assumptions (e.g. linearity of the association of 25(OH)D and cancer risk) which should not be made lightly. However, the results which we present are simply an estimate to give an idea of the effects and the differences in the vitamin D cancer associations of the currently available study results (Table I).

There is compelling molecular and epidemiological evidence that vitamin D protects against cancer. The central question is whether the current evidence is sufficient for public health recommendations for vitamin D supplementation and/or increased UV-B exposure? In our opinion, we still need further evidence to strengthen the notion that vitamin D protects against cancer. However, when considering general recommendations for maintaining a sufficient vitamin D status it should also be emphasized that vitamin D insufficiency has been associated with several diseases such as autoimmune, cardiovascular, neurological, metabolic or infectious diseases as well as fractures and falls (2, 4, 29). Hence, in view of the multiple health benefits of vitamin D, the high prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency, and the easy, safe and inexpensive way in which vitamin D can be supplemented, in our opinion, it is time to implement public health strategies for maintaining a sufficient vitamin D status of the general population (28, 32, 33).

  • Received April 15, 2009.
  • Revision received June 4, 2009.
  • Accepted June 8, 2009.
  • Copyright© 2009 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Ingraham BA,
    2. Bragdon B,
    3. Nohe A
    : Molecular basis of the potential of vitamin D to prevent cancer. Curr Med Res Opin 24: 139-149, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Peterlik M,
    2. Cross HS
    : Dysfunction of the vitamin D endocrine system as common cause for multiple malignant and other chronic diseases. Anticancer Res 26: 2581-2588, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Norman AW,
    2. Bouillon R,
    3. Whiting SJ,
    4. Vieth R,
    5. Lips P
    : 13th Workshop consensus for vitamin D nutritional guidelines. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 103: 204-205, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Holick MF
    : Vitamin D deficiency: N Engl J Med 357: 266-281, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Cross HS,
    2. Peterlik M,
    3. Reddy GS,
    4. Schuster I
    : Vitamin D metabolism in human colon adenocarcinoma-derived Caco-2 cells: expression of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3-1α-hydroxylase activity and regulation of side-chain metabolism. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 62: 21-28, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Chen TC
    : 25-hydroxyvitamin D-1 α-hydroxylase (CYP27B1) is a new class of tumor suppressor in the prostate. Anticancer Res 28: 2015-2017, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Bouillon R,
    2. Carmeliet G,
    3. Verlinden L,
    4. van Etten E,
    5. Verstuyf A,
    6. Luderer HF,
    7. Lieben L,
    8. Mathieu C,
    9. Demay M
    : Vitamin D and human health: lessons from vitamin D receptor null mice. Endocr Rev 29: 726-776, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Apperly FL
    : The relation of solar radiation to cancer mortality in North America. Cancer Res 1: 191-195, 1941.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Garland CF,
    2. Garland FC
    : Do sunlight and vitamin D reduce the likelihood of colon cancer? Int J Epidemiol 9: 227-231, 1980.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Grant WB,
    2. Mohr SB
    : Ecological studies of ultraviolet B, vitamin D and cancer since 2000. Ann Epidemiol.
  11. ↵
    1. Boscoe FP,
    2. Schymura MJ
    : Solar ultraviolet-B exposure and cancer incidence and mortality in the United States, 1993-2002. BMC Cancer 6: 264, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Grant WB,
    2. Garland CF
    : The association of solar ultraviolet B (UVB) with reducing risk of cancer: Multifactorial ecologic analysis of geographic variation in age-adjusted cancer mortality rates. Anticancer Res 26: 2687-2700, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Giovannucci E,
    2. Liu Y,
    3. Willett WC
    : Cancer incidence and mortality and vitamin D in black and white male health professionals. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15: 2467-2472, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Giovannucci E,
    2. Liu Y,
    3. Rimm RB,
    4. Hollis BW,
    5. Fuchs CS,
    6. Stampfer MJ,
    7. Willett WC
    : Prospective study of predictors of vitamin D status and cancer incidence and mortality in men. J Natl Cancer Inst 98: 451-459, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Freedman DM,
    2. Looker AC,
    3. Chang SC,
    4. Graubard BI
    : Prospective study of serum vitamin D and cancer mortality in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst 99: 1594-602, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Pilz S,
    2. Dobnig H,
    3. Winklhofer-Roob B,
    4. Riedmüller G,
    5. Fischer JE,
    6. Seelhorst U,
    7. Wellnitz B,
    8. Boehm BO,
    9. März W
    : Low serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D predict fatal cancer in patients referred to coronary angiography. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17: 1228-1233, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Freedman DM,
    2. Fuhrman B,
    3. Graubard BI,
    4. Chang SC
    : Vitamin D and cancer mortality. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 18: 359, 2009.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Bolland MJ,
    2. Grey AB,
    3. Ames RW,
    4. Mason BH,
    5. Horne AM,
    6. Gamble GD,
    7. Reid IR
    : The effects of seasonal variation of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and fat mass on a diagnosis of vitamin D sufficiency. Am J Clin Nutr 86: 959-964, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Zittermann A
    : Vitamin D in preventive medicine: are we ignoring the evidence? Br J Nutr 89: 552-572, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Ulrich CM,
    2. Holmes RS
    : Shedding light on colorectal cancer prognosis: Vitamin D and beyond. J Clin Oncol 26: 2937-2939, 2008.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Ng K,
    2. Meyerhardt JA,
    3. Wu K,
    4. Feskanich D,
    5. Hollis BW,
    6. Giovannucci EL,
    7. Fuchs CS
    : Circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and survival in patients with colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 26: 2984-2991, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Zhou W,
    2. Heist RS,
    3. Liu G,
    4. Asomaning K,
    5. Neuberg DS,
    6. Hollis BW,
    7. Wain JC,
    8. Lynch TJ,
    9. Giovannucci EL,
    10. Su L,
    11. Christiani DC
    : Circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels predict survival in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 25: 479-485, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Melamed ML,
    2. Michos ED,
    3. Post W,
    4. Astor B
    : 25-Hydroxyvitamin D levels and the risk of mortality in the general population. Arch Intern Med 168: 1629-1637, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Pilz S,
    2. Dobnig H,
    3. Nijpels G,
    4. Heine RJ,
    5. Stehouwer CD,
    6. Snijder MB,
    7. van Dam RM,
    8. Dekker JM
    : Vitamin D and mortality in older men and women. Clin Endocrinol.
  24. ↵
    1. Autier P,
    2. Gandini S
    . Vitamin D supplementation and total mortality: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med 167: 1730-1737, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Wactawski-Wende J,
    2. Kotchen JM,
    3. Anderson GL,
    4. Assaf AR,
    5. Brunner RL,
    6. O'Sullivan MJ,
    7. Margolis KL,
    8. Ockene JK,
    9. Philips L,
    10. Pottern L,
    11. Prentice RL,
    12. Robbins J,
    13. Rohan TE,
    14. Sarto GE,
    15. Sharma S,
    16. Stefanick ML,
    17. Van Horn L,
    18. Wallace RB,
    19. Whitlock E,
    20. Bassford T,
    21. Beresford SA,
    22. Black HR,
    23. Bonds DE,
    24. Brzyski RG,
    25. Caan B,
    26. Chlebowski RT,
    27. Cochrane B,
    28. Garland C,
    29. Gass M,
    30. Hays J,
    31. Heiss G,
    32. Hendrix SL,
    33. Howard BV,
    34. Hsia J,
    35. Hubbell FA,
    36. Jackson RD,
    37. Johnson KC,
    38. Judd H,
    39. Kooperberg CL,
    40. Kuller LH,
    41. LaCroix AZ,
    42. Lane DS,
    43. Langer RD,
    44. Lasser NL,
    45. Lewis CE,
    46. Limacher MC,
    47. Manson JE,
    48. for the Women's Health Initiative Investigators
    : Calcium plus vitamin D supplementation and the risk of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 354: 684-696, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. LaCroix AZ,
    2. Kotchen J,
    3. Anderson G,
    4. Brzyski R,
    5. Cauley JA,
    6. Cummings SR,
    7. Gass M,
    8. Johnson KC,
    9. Ko M,
    10. Larson J,
    11. Manson JE,
    12. Stefanick ML,
    13. Wactawski-Wende J
    : Calcium plus vitamin D supplementation and mortality in postmenopausal women: The Women's Health Initiative calcium - vitamin D randomized controlled trial. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 64: 559-567, 2009.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Vieth R,
    2. Bischoff-Ferrari H,
    3. Boucher BJ,
    4. Dawson-Hughes B,
    5. Garland CF,
    6. Heaney RP,
    7. Holick MF,
    8. Hollis BW,
    9. Lamberg-Allardt C,
    10. McGrath JJ,
    11. Norman AW,
    12. Scragg R,
    13. Whiting SJ,
    14. Willett WC,
    15. Zittermann A
    : The urgent need to recommend an intake of vitamin D that is effective. Am J Clin Nutr 85: 649-650, 2007.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Bischoff-Ferrari HA,
    2. Willett WC,
    3. Wong JB,
    4. Stuck AE,
    5. Staehelin HB,
    6. Orav EJ,
    7. Thoma A,
    8. Kiel DP,
    9. Henschkowski J
    : Prevention of nonvertebral fractures with oral vitamin D and dose dependency. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med 169: 551-561, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Trivedi DP,
    2. Doll R,
    3. Khaw KT
    : Effect of four monthly oral vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) supplementation on fractures and mortality in men and women living in the community: randomised double blind controlled trial. BMJ 326: 469, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Lappe JM,
    2. Travers-Gustafson D,
    3. Davies KM,
    4. Recker RR,
    5. Heaney RP
    : Vitamin D and calcium supplementation reduced cancer risk: results of a randomized trial. Am J Clin Nutr 85: 1586-1591, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Hathcock JN,
    2. Shao A,
    3. Vieth R,
    4. Heaney R
    : Risk assessment for vitamin D. Am J Clin Nutr 85: 6-18, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Grant WB,
    2. Cross HS,
    3. Garland CF,
    4. Gorham ED,
    5. Moan J,
    6. Peterlik M,
    7. Porojnicu AC,
    8. Reichrath J,
    9. Zittermann A
    : Estimated benefit of increased vitamin D status in reducing the economic burden of disease in Western Europe. Prog Biophys Mol Biol.
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 29 (9)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 29, Issue 9
September 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Epidemiology of Vitamin D Insufficiency and Cancer Mortality
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
8 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Epidemiology of Vitamin D Insufficiency and Cancer Mortality
STEFAN PILZ, ANDREAS TOMASCHITZ, BARBARA OBERMAYER-PIETSCH, HARALD DOBNIG, THOMAS R. PIEBER
Anticancer Research Sep 2009, 29 (9) 3699-3704;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Epidemiology of Vitamin D Insufficiency and Cancer Mortality
STEFAN PILZ, ANDREAS TOMASCHITZ, BARBARA OBERMAYER-PIETSCH, HARALD DOBNIG, THOMAS R. PIEBER
Anticancer Research Sep 2009, 29 (9) 3699-3704;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • UV-B Radiation and Cancer Mortality
    • Vitamin D Insufficiency and Cancer Mortality
    • Vitamin D Insufficiency and Mortality Among Cancer Patients
    • Vitamin D Supplementation and Cancer Mortality
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Vitamin D and Mortality
  • Vitamin D in Preventive Medicine
  • Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D and Cancer Risk in Older Adults: Results from a Large German Prospective Cohort Study
  • Strong associations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations with all-cause, cardiovascular, cancer, and respiratory disease mortality in a large cohort study
  • Vitamin D: Potential in the Prevention and Treatment of Lung Cancer
  • Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D and Cancer Mortality in the NHANES III Study (1988-2006)
  • Low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels are associated with increased all-cause mortality risk in a general population: the Tromso study
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Modulation of Vitamin D Synthesis and Catabolism in Colorectal Mucosa: A New Target for Cancer Prevention
  • The Dependency of Vitamin D Status on Body Mass Index, Gender, Age and Season
Show more Part B

Similar Articles

Anticancer Research

© 2021 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire