Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Circulating hTERT DNA in Early Breast Cancer

ROSA DIVELLA, STEFANIA TOMMASI, ROSANNA LACALAMITA, ANTONELLA DANIELE, INES ABBATE, VITO MICHELE GARRISI, EUFEMIA SAVINO, MARIA COVIELLO, VINCENZA RUBINI, GIOVANNI SIMONE, ANGELO PARADISO and MICHELE QUARANTA
Anticancer Research July 2009, 29 (7) 2845-2849;
ROSA DIVELLA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: rosadive@inwind.it michelequaranta@virgilio.it
STEFANIA TOMMASI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ROSANNA LACALAMITA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ANTONELLA DANIELE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
INES ABBATE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
VITO MICHELE GARRISI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
EUFEMIA SAVINO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARIA COVIELLO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
VINCENZA RUBINI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
GIOVANNI SIMONE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ANGELO PARADISO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MICHELE QUARANTA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: rosadive@inwind.it michelequaranta@virgilio.it
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: The objective of the study was to quantify the human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) gene in the circulating DNA of patients with primary breast cancer (BC) and to test its correlation with clinical parameters of the disease. Patients and Methods: One hundred and twenty-one BC patients, 30 patients with fibroadenoma (NBC) and 50 healthy women were enrolled. Results: The level of hTERT in the plasma was significantly different in BC, NBC and controls (p<0.01), showing a sensitivity of 50% and specificity of 90% in the ability to detect malignancy. The circulating hTERT DNA was significantly different in the estrogen receptor (ER)+/progesterone receptor (PgR)+ compared to the ER-/PgR- patients (p=0.03). Higher hTERT levels were associated with higher human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2/Neu expression: score 0-1 vs. score 2+ (p=0.01) and vs. score 3+ (p=0.02). Finally, hTERT was significantly inversely correlated with the carbohydrate antigen (CA) 15.3 serum level (p=0.001). Conclusion: Circulating hTERT DNA has a better diagnostic value than CA 15.3 in early breast cancer disease and could be a possible candidate as a tumor marker in patients with infiltrating ductal carcinoma positive to steroid hormonal receptor and with amplification of HER-2/Neu.

  • hTERT
  • circulating DNA
  • breast cancer
  • real-time PCR
  • tumor marker

Breast cancer (BC) is a leading cause of malignancy in women and 35-40% of patients with operable breast cancer develop metastases after primary therapy. At the time of surgery, the clinical prediction of relapse is still based on the determination of prognostic parameters in the primary tumor or locoregional lymphonodes (1, 2). Various serum tumor markers have been evaluated regarding their utility for the detection and monitoring of BC patients (3). However, current screening methods fail to completely predict recurrency. Thus, a non-invasive test for early detection of the disease and for monitoring disease progression has been a goal for many researchers (4).

The finding that tumors can release DNA into the circulation has opened new areas in translational cancer research. Increased concentrations of cell-free DNA in plasma or serum have been found in patients with different types of cancer, but not in healthy individuals (5, 6). Accordingly, it is possible to detect tumor-specific DNA alterations such as oncogenes and tumor suppressor gene mutations, microsatellite and epigenetic alterations, and chromosomal translocations, identical to those found in the primary DNA in the plasma of patients carrying various types of cancer (7, 8). In particular, the level of the human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) gene in plasma has been suggested as a marker of tumor presence/aggressiveness at least for liver cancer (9).

hTERT is a single-copy gene, detectable with good correlation in serum and plasma (10). Telomerase is not expressed in most somatic tissues, but is widely expressed in cancer cells (11, 12). Telomerase expression is thought to be necessary for cells to divide continuously beyond replicative senescence and may, therefore, be a critical step in cellular immortality and carcinogenesis (13). The role of telomerase activation in human cancer development has been extensively studied in recent years. Telomerase reactivation appears to constitute a relatively early event in invasive breast carcinogenesis, in fact it increases in preinvasive lesions such as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIs) (14, 15). Recent studies have correlated the expression of hTERT with the aggressiveness of the tumour and with an accelerated progression in diverse types of neoplasias (16, 17). The objective of this study was to quantify the hTERT gene in the plasma of patients with primary breast cancer and to test its correlation with the clinical parameters of disease: age, histology, stage, nodal status, hormonal receptors, proliferative activity (mitotic index: MIB-1), human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2/Neu and carbohydrate antigen (CA) 15-3.

Patients and Methods

Patients. One hundred and twenty-one BC patients (median age 59 years: range 37-92) and 30 patients with benign breast disease, fibroadenoma (NBC: non-breast cancer) median age 45 years (range: 23-65) were enrolled in this study at the Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II of Bari. Fifty women volunteers (median age 45: range 25-70 years) who came to the laboratory and were considered healthy by clinical and laboratory examination were included as healthy controls. The clinical diagnosis of the 121 patients was confirmed by histological examination. Among them, 97 had ductal infiltrating BC (IDC), 15 infiltrating intraductal and 10 infiltrating lobular BC. Peripheral blood samples (5 ml) were collected from each participant using a vacutainer system with lithium-heparin. Samples were collected before any invasive procedures or therapy. The plasma was immediately separated from the cellular fraction by centrifugation at 2,500 rpm for 10 min at 4°C, and frozen at -80°C.

Extraction of DNA from plasma and quantification of hTERT. The DNA was extracted from 200 μl of plasma using commercial kits based on affinity columns (QIAamp Blood Mini Kit; Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer's recommendations. The quantification of hTERT was performed using a RT-PCR (real-time polymerase chain reaction), based method. The primers and the probe were designed by Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA, USA) to specifically amplify the gene of interest, hTERT (The Quantifiler® Human DNA Quantification Kit). The Quantifiler kit contained all the necessary reagents for the amplification, detection and quantification of a human-specific DNA target (hTERT, location 5p15.33, amplicon length 62 bases pairs): Quantifiler® Human Primer Mix, Quantifiler Human DNA Standard, Quantifiler PCR Reaction Mix (AmpliTaq Gold® DNA Polymerase, deoxyribonucleotide triphosphate (dNTPs) with deoxyuridine triphosphate (dUTP), and optimized buffer components).

The RT-PCR reaction was carried out in 96-well plates with a total volume of 25 μl/well containing the following reagents: 12.5 μl of PCR Master Mix, 10.5 μl of Primer Mix and 2 μl of purified DNA from each sample. The reaction was carried out using the GeneAmp 7000 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems) under the following conditions: the mixture of samples and reactants for the PCR reaction was pre-heated to 50°C for 2 min and then 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 1 min. This was followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 1 min. A standard curve with Quantifiler Human DNA Standard ranging from 50 ng/μl to 0.023 ng/μl (50.0 ng/μl,16.7 ng/μl, 5.56 ng/μl, 1.85 ng/μl, 0.62 ng/μl, 0.21 ng/μl, 0.068 ng/μl, 0.023 ng/μl) was used for every plate. Every patient sample and DNA standard was carried out in duplicate and only the curves with a coefficient of correlation between 0.999 and 0.995 and a slope between 3.25 and 3.35 were accepted.

Detection of CA 15.3. CA 15.3 serum levels were determined using IMMULITE 2000 BR-MA (Medical System S.p.A., Genova, Italy), a two-step sequential chemiluminescent immunometric assay that using an anti-CA 15.3 murine monoclonal antibody, with 0.2 U/ml as the lower limit of sensitivity; 99% of the sera donated by the healthy women contained less than 40 U/ml of CA 15.3 in agreement with reported normal values (18).

Statistical analyses. The data were analysed by unpaired t-test, Mann Whitney U-test, Pearson correlation by SPSS software for window 9.0.1. The numerical data were expressed as mean±standard deviation (SD). A p-value ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The level of hTERT in the plasma was significantly different between the BC (0.98±0.94 ng/μl), NBC (0.55±0.25 ng/μl) and controls (0.03±0.09 ng/μl) (p<0.001, Mann-Whitney U-test) showing a sensitivity of 50% and specificity of 90% in the ability to detect malignancy (Figure 1). Table I lists the correlation between the plasma level of circulating hTERT DNA and the clinical characteristics of the patients: no statistically significant associations were found with age, menopausal status, stage, grading, nodal status or MIB-1.

Higher levels of circulating hTERT DNA were found in the patients with ductal infiltrating carcinoma with respect to the patients with other types of BC (1.04±0.97 ng/μl vs. 0.66±0.37 ng/μl; p=0.05). Higher levels of circulating hTERT DNA were also found in the 38 patients who had menarche at age >14 years (1.13±1.00 ng/μl) than in the 68 patients who had menarche at age <14 years (0.75±0.70 ng/μl) p=0.02.

A significant correlation was found between circulating hTERT DNA and steroid hormone receptor status (in the 115 analysed patients). Circulating hTERT DNA was significantly higher in the estrogen receptor (ER)+/progesterone receptor (PgR)+ patients (1.00±0.84 ng/μl) compared to the ER-/PgR- patients (0.48±0.42 ng/μl) (p=0.03).

HER-2/Neu amplification was analysed in 52 patients, in 14 of whom the protein was not expressed (score 0-1), 11 were border line (score 2+) and 27 were positive (3+). Interestingly, higher hTERT levels were associated with higher HER-2/Neu expression: 0-1 (0.70±0.43 ng/μl) vs. 2+ (1.18±0.67 ng/μl), p=0.02, and vs. 3+ (1.24±0.42 ng/μl), p=0.01.

Finally, the circulating hTERT DNA was significantly inversely correlated with CA 15.3 serum level (p=0.001) (Table I). When the circulating hTERT DNA levels and serum CA 15.3 concentrations were compared as continuous variables, a significant inverse correlation between the two markers was found (Pearson correlation=-0.2, p=0.006) (Figure 2). For further analysis, the patients were divided into four groups on the basis of the cut-off values of the two markers. For hTERT, the cut-off value was the median value of 1 ng/μl and for CA 15.3, 40 U/ml was the cut-off. The first group (N=31) consisted of patients who had an increase of hTERT only; the second group (N=68) did not have an increase of either tumor marker; the third group (N=22) had increased serum CA 15.3 only; and the fourth group (N=0) had both increased circulating DNA and serum CA 15.3. These groups were modelled on nodal status, grading, receptor status and HER-2/Neu amplification. Interestingly, no patients belonged in the fourth group: high level of hTERT DNA and high level of CA 15.3.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Mean value of circulating hTERT DNA in BC patients (breast cancer), NBC patients (non-breast cancer) and in healthy women.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Scatter plot showing correlation between circulating hTERT DNA and serum CA 15.3.

Discussion

The present study was the first that examine circulating hTERT DNA with respect to the clinicopathological characteristics in breast cancer. Furthermore only a limited number of investigations have evaluated the relationship between human telomerase expression or activity and clinico-pathological parameters (19). In the current study, the mean level of circulating hTERT seemed to be a predictor of positive malignancy predictor with a specificity of 90%. In fact, it was significantly more elevated in the BC patients than in those with benign breast disease and it was even less in the healthy donors, confirming the observations of other authors that circulating DNA varies among individual cancer patients and that it can also be measured in healthy individuals (20, 21). Furthermore, telomerase activation was shown in premalignant lesions, such as cervical and prostate intraepithelial neoplasia, and even in some benign lesions, suggesting its early role in carcinogenesis (22, 23). However, Boddy et al., while reporting significantly lower levels of circulating DNA in healthy individuals compared to prostate cancer patients, also stated that men with benign hyperplasia presented higher circulating DNA than prostate cancer patients (24). It is possible that genomic instability caused by telomere dysfunction occurs in the early stages of carcinogenesis, when telomerase has not yet been activated. During subsequent progression, the telomeres may undergo further progressive shortening, generating rampant chromosomal instability, which threatens the survival of these cells. Therefore, telomerase activation necessarily occurs at this stage to stabilize the genome and confer unlimited proliferative capacity upon the emerging and evolving cancer cell (25, 26).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Association between patient characteristics and circulating hTERT DNA.

In this study, a direct correlation between circulating hTERT DNA and steroid hormone receptor status and older age at menarche was shown. Evidence has indicated that telomerase activity is critically regulated by steroid hormones in their target tissues (27). In particular, the human endometrium expresses telomerase activity despite its somatic origin, and this activity is tightly regulated in a menstrual phase-dependent manner, suggesting a control mechanism of telomerase by sex steroids (28). Hombach-Klonish et al. demonstrated that estrogen activates telomerase via the direct interaction of ligand-activated ER with the hTERT promoter (29). The present data demonstrated that hTERT could be a direct target of estrogen pathways confirming the existence of hormone-dependent mechanisms of telomerase activity control. The identification of hTERT as a target of estrogens is a novel finding which advances the understanding of telomerase regulation in hormone-dependent cells, potentially implicating hormones in senescence and malignant conversion.

To the best of our knowledge, this was also the first study to investigate the relationship between the plasma expression of circulating hTERT DNA and the serum level of CA 15.3 in BC patients before surgery, and to analyze their association with the clinicopathological characteristics. Currently, CA 15.3 is the most widely used serum marker for BC, it is recommended in the evaluation of response to therapy and for monitoring the course of BC, but there is no evidence of the efficacy of screening with this marker in BC (30). In fact, CA 15.3, is elevated in only 3% of patients with localised cancer while it is elevated in up to 70% of patients with metastatic disease (31). In the present study, high CA 15.3 levels were found in only 19% of the patients with no significant difference between the patients with and without nodal metastasis (11% vs. 23%, respectively). The CA 15.3 assay measures the protein product of the mucin 1 gene (MUC-1). This protein (episialin, epithelial membrane antigen, CA 15.3 antigen) is a highly O-glycosilated mucin-like transmembrane glycoprotein encoded by the MUC-1 gene on chromosome 1q21 (32). In most normal glandular epithelium, MUC-1 is expressed at the apical surface. Entire membrane MUC-1 expression is more often seen in mucinous carcinoma than in ductal carcinomas of no special type (33). Several studies have described cell adhesion inhibition as well as an increased metastatic and invasive potential of tumor cells associated with the overexpression of MUC-1 (34). For that reason, apical expression in breast carcinoma, indicates normal routing of MUC-1 molecules and, as a consequence, relatively intact glandular differentiation (35). Thus, the present study indicated that circulating hTERT DNA has a better diagnostic value than CA 15.3 in early BC disease and hTERT could be a possible candidate as a tumor marker in patients with a histology of infiltrating ductal carcinoma positive to steroid hormonal receptor and with amplification of HER-2/Neu.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by A.I.R.C. Regional Grant 2005, code 1177. We thank Mr. Baldassarre Stea for his assistance with the statistical analysis.

  • Received March 4, 2009.
  • Revision received April 27, 2009.
  • Accepted May 6, 2009.
  • Copyright© 2009 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Jemal A,
    2. Thomas A,
    3. Murray T,
    4. Thurn M
    : Cancer statistics. Cancer J Clin 52: 23-47, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. ↵
    1. Fischer B,
    2. Bauer M,
    3. Wickerhb DL
    : Relation of number of positive axillary nodes to the prognosis of patients with primary breast cancer. An NJABP update. Cancer 52: 1551-1557, 1983.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Harris L,
    2. Fritsche H,
    3. Mennel R,
    4. Norton L,
    5. Ravdin P,
    6. Taube S,
    7. Somerfield MR,
    8. Hayes DF,
    9. Bast RC,
    10. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007
    : Update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast cancer. J Clin Oncolo 25(33): 5287-5312, 2007.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Pantel K,
    2. Muller V,
    3. Aver M,
    4. Nusser N,
    5. Harbeck N,
    6. Braun S
    : Detection and clinical implications of early systemic tumour cell dissemination in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 9(7): 6326-6334, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Umetani N,
    2. Giuliano AF,
    3. Hiramtsu SH
    : Prediction of breast cancer tumor progression by integrity of free circulating DNA in serum. J Clin Oncol 24: 4270-4276, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Goebel G,
    2. Zitt M,
    3. Muller HM
    : Circulating nucleic acids in plasma or serum (CNAPs) as prognostic and predictive markers in patients with solid neoplasias. Dis Markers 21: 105-120, 2005.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Coulet F,
    2. Blons H,
    3. Cabelguenne A,
    4. Lecomte T,
    5. Lacourreye O,
    6. Brasnu D,
    7. Beaune P,
    8. Zucman J,
    9. Laurent-Puig P
    : Detection of plasma tumor DNA in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma by microsatellite typing and p53 mutation analysis. Cancer Res 60: 707-711, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Thijssen MA,
    2. Swinkels DW,
    3. Ruers TJ,
    4. De Kok JB
    : Difference between free circulating plasma and serum DNA in patients with colorectal liver metastases. Anticancer Res 22: 421-425, 2002.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Divella R,
    2. Lacalamita R,
    3. Tommasi S,
    4. Coviello M,
    5. Daniele A,
    6. Garrisi VM,
    7. Abbate I,
    8. Simone G,
    9. Gadaleta C,
    10. Paradiso A,
    11. Quaranta M
    : PAI-1, t-PA and circulating hTERT DNA as related to virus infection in liver carcinogenesis. Anticancer Res 28(1): 223-228, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Shaw JW,
    2. Bacchetti S
    : A survey of telomerase activity in human cancer. Eur J Cancer 33: 787-791, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Holt SE,
    2. Shay JW
    : Role of telomerase in cellular proliferation and cancer. J Cell Physiol 180: 10-18, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Kirkpatrick K,
    2. Mombel K
    : The significance of human telomerase reverse transcriptase in human cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 27: 754-760, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Rhyu MS
    : Telomeres, telomerase and immortality. J Natl Cancer Inst 87: 884-894, 1995.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Bisoffi M,
    2. Headhy CM,
    3. Grffith JW
    : Telomeres: prognostic markers for solid tumors. Int J Cancer 119: 2255-2260, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Shpitz B,
    2. Zimlichman S,
    3. Zemer R,
    4. Bomstein Y,
    5. Zehavi T,
    6. Liverant S,
    7. Bernehim J,
    8. Kaufman Z,
    9. Klein E,
    10. Shapira Y,
    11. Klein A
    : Telomerase activity in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat 58: 65-69, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Mokbel K
    : The role of telomerase in breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 26(5): 509-514, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Hines WC,
    2. Fasardo AM,
    3. Joste NE,
    4. Bisoffi M,
    5. Griffith JK
    : Quantitative and spatial measurements of telomerase reverse transcriptase expression within normal and malignant human breast tissues. Mol Cancer Res 9: 503-509, 2005.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Quaranta M,
    2. Daniele A,
    3. Coviello M,
    4. Venneri MT,
    5. Abbate I,
    6. Caringella ME,
    7. Ditardo S,
    8. Divella R,
    9. Trerotoli P,
    10. DiGennaro M,
    11. Schittulli F,
    12. Fransvea E,
    13. Giannelli G
    : MMP-2, MMP-9, VEGF and CA 15.3 in breast cancer. Anticancer Res 27: 3593-3600, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Hosseini-Asl S,
    2. Atri M,
    3. Modarressi MH,
    4. Salhab M,
    5. Mokbel K,
    6. Mehidipour P
    : The expression of hTR and hTERT in human breast cancer: correlation with clinico-pathological parameters. Int Semin in Surg Oncol 3(2): 1-5, 2006.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. Wu TL,
    2. Zhang D,
    3. Chia SH,
    4. Tsao KH,
    5. Sun CF,
    6. Wu JT
    : Cell-free DNA: measurement in various carcinomas and establishment of normal reference range. Clin Chim Acta 321: 77-87, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Zanetti-Dallenbach RA,
    2. Schmid S,
    3. Wight E,
    4. Holzgreve W,
    5. Ladewig A,
    6. Hahn S,
    7. Zhong XY
    : Levels of circulating cell-free serum DNA in benign and malignant breast lesions. Int J of Biol Markers 22(2): 95-99, 2007.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Narisawa-Saito M,
    2. Yoshimatsu Y,
    3. Ohno S,
    4. Yugawa T,
    5. Egawa N,
    6. Fujita M,
    7. Hirohashi S,
    8. Kiyono T
    : An in vitro multistep carcinogenesis model for human cervical cancer. Cancer Res 68(14): 5699-5705, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Altimari A,
    2. Grigioni AD,
    3. Benedettini E,
    4. Gabusi E,
    5. Schiavina R,
    6. Martinelli A,
    7. Morselli-Labate AM,
    8. Martonara G,
    9. Grigioni WF,
    10. Fiorentino M
    : Diagnostic role of circulating free plasma DNA detection in patients with localized prostate cancer. Am J Clin Pathol 129(5): 756-762, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Boddy IL,
    2. Gal S,
    3. Malone PR,
    4. Harris AL,
    5. Wainscoal JS
    : Prospective study of plasma DNA levels in the diagnosis of malignant versus benign prostate disease. Clin Cancer Res 11: 1394-1399, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Hiyama E,
    2. Hiyama K
    : Telomerase detection in the diagnosis and prognosis of cancer. Cytotechnology 45(1-2): 61-74, 2004.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Kassen M,
    2. Abdhallah BM,
    3. Yu Z,
    4. Ditzel N,
    5. Burns JJ
    : The use of hTERT-immortalized cells in tissue engineering. Cytotechnology 45(1-2): 39-46, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Kyo S,
    2. Takakura M,
    3. Kohama T,
    4. Inoue M
    : Telomerase activity in human endometrium. Cancer Res 57: 610-614, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Takakura M,
    2. Kyo S,
    3. Kanaya T,
    4. Tanaka M,
    5. Inoue M
    : Expression of human telomerase subunits and correlation with telomerase activity in cervical cancer. Cancer Res 58: 1558-1561, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Hombach-Klonish S,
    2. Kehlen A,
    3. Fowler PA,
    4. Huppertz B,
    5. Jurget JF,
    6. Bischoff G,
    7. Schluter E,
    8. Buchmann J,
    9. Klonish T
    : Regulation of functional steroid receptors and ligand-induced responses in telomerase-immortalized human endometrial epithelial cells. J Mol Endocrinol 34(2): 517-534, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Duffy MJ
    : Serum tumor markers in breast cancer: are they of clinical value? Clin Chem 52(3): 345-351, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Duffy MJ,
    2. Duggan C,
    3. Keane R,
    4. Hill A,
    5. McDermott E,
    6. Crown J,
    7. O'Higgins N
    : High preoperative CA 15.3 concentrations predict adverse outcome in node-negative and node-positive breast cancer: study of 600 patients with histologically confirmed breast cancer. Clin Chem 50(3): 559-563, 2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Baldus SE,
    2. Engelmann K,
    3. Hanisch FG
    : MUC1 and the MUCs: a family of human mucins with impact in cancer biology. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 41: 189-231, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Reginbald LH,
    2. Pilarski LM,
    3. Longenecker BM,
    4. Reddish MA,
    5. Zimmermann G,
    6. Hugh JC
    : The breast mucin MUC1 as a novel adhesion ligand for endothelial intercellular adhesion molecule 1 in breast cancer. Cancer Res 56: 4244-4249, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Hattrup CL,
    2. Gendler SJ
    : MUC-1 alters oncogenic events and transcription in human breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res 8(4): 37, 2006.
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    1. Schroeder JA,
    2. Masri AA,
    3. Adriance MC,
    4. Tessier JC,
    5. Kotlarczyk KL,
    6. Thompson MC,
    7. Gendler SJ
    : MUC-1 overexpression results in mammary gland tumorigenesis and prolonged alveolar differentiation. Oncogene 23: 5739-5747, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 29 (7)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 29, Issue 7
July 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Circulating hTERT DNA in Early Breast Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Circulating hTERT DNA in Early Breast Cancer
ROSA DIVELLA, STEFANIA TOMMASI, ROSANNA LACALAMITA, ANTONELLA DANIELE, INES ABBATE, VITO MICHELE GARRISI, EUFEMIA SAVINO, MARIA COVIELLO, VINCENZA RUBINI, GIOVANNI SIMONE, ANGELO PARADISO, MICHELE QUARANTA
Anticancer Research Jul 2009, 29 (7) 2845-2849;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Circulating hTERT DNA in Early Breast Cancer
ROSA DIVELLA, STEFANIA TOMMASI, ROSANNA LACALAMITA, ANTONELLA DANIELE, INES ABBATE, VITO MICHELE GARRISI, EUFEMIA SAVINO, MARIA COVIELLO, VINCENZA RUBINI, GIOVANNI SIMONE, ANGELO PARADISO, MICHELE QUARANTA
Anticancer Research Jul 2009, 29 (7) 2845-2849;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Efficacy of Pembrolizumab as Second or Third-line Therapy for Local Advanced and Metastatic Urothelial Cancer
  • End-of-life Androgen Deprivation Syndrome With Enzalutamide in Metastatic Prostate Cancer: A Case Report
  • Effect of a Biweekly Dosing Schedule on Severe Neutropenia Induced by Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Colorectal Cancer
Show more Clinical Studies

Similar Articles

Anticancer Research

© 2025 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire