Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Venous Coupler for Free-flap Anastomosis

O. CAMARA, J. HERRMANN, A. EGBE, I. KOCH, M. GAJDA and I.B. RUNNEBAUM
Anticancer Research July 2009, 29 (7) 2827-2830;
O. CAMARA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: oumar.camara{at}med.uni-jena.de
J. HERRMANN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. EGBE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
I. KOCH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. GAJDA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
I.B. RUNNEBAUM
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Free-flap surgery has become a routine procedure in breast reconstruction. The microvascular surgical anastomosis remains one of the technically sensitive aspects of free-tissue transfers. Between December 2006 and September 2007, 12 anastomoses were performed with a venous coupling device from Synovis. There were no free-flap failures. Venous congestion occurred in only one case and was managed successfully with leeches. No major complications were observed. The Synovis venous coupling device system allowed a time-efficient and safe venous anastomosis in breast reconstruction.

  • Venous coupler
  • free flap
  • breast reconstruction

Since the first description of the technique (1, 2) free-flap surgery has become a routine procedure in breast reconstruction. Free-flap surgery frequently leads to patient satisfaction and can be executed fairly straight forwardly. Disadvantages are the requirement of microvascular anastomoses, with the need for adequate training, experience and equipment. Most free-flap failures result from technical problems in performing vascular anastomoses, such as endothelial intima lacerations, distortion of the vessels, and unequal intersuture distances. These incorrect practices can lead to thrombosis formation and, ultimately, flap failure (3). Microvascular surgical anastomosis remains one of the most technically sensitive aspects of free-tissue transfers. To facilitate these often time-consuming, difficult anastomoses, various anastomotic coupling systems have been introduced (4-7). The purpose of our report is to describe the usefulness of a coupler system, which is time-efficient and safe in performing venous anastomosis.

Patients and Methods

Between 12/2006 and 09/2007, 11 patients were treated, 8 with deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP), 2 with free transverse abdominal rectus muscle (TRAM) and 1 with free latissimus dorsi flap. Patients characteristics are listed in Table I. Two patients had had extensive ductal carcinoma in situ. One suffered from medullar carcinoma and five from ductal invasive carcinoma. Three patients had conversion due to implant Problems and one needed reconstruction after mastectomy only. For venous anastomosis, the Synovis venous coupling device (www.synovismicro.com) was used. The Microvascular Anastomotic COUPLER System is a mechanical method for small vessels ranging in size from 0.8 mm to 4.3 mm in outer diameter (Figure 1). It provides an intima-to-intima anastomosis, with no foreign material exposed to the flow surface. A successful anastomosis is performed in five steps: i) placement of the vascular clamp; ii) pinning of vessels to coupler; iii) rotation of the instrument knob to mate vessel ends; iv) forceps are used to ensure the fit is tight and v) intima-to-intima anastomosis is confirmed (Figure 1).

Results

Twelve anastomoses in eleven patients were performed with the coupler: 11 of them were venous and 1 was arterial. The recipient vessels were the mammaria interna vessels, except in one case in which the thoracica lateral vessels were used, particularly the artery. All cases were performed with a 2.0 mm to 2.5 mm coupler ring. Figure 1 shows the coupling procedure. There were no free-flap failures. Venous congestion occurred in only one case and was successfully managed with leeches. No major complications were observed. Figures 2, 3 and 4 shows different cases of successful free-flaps. At a median follow-up time of 19.6 months (range 13-27 months) there had been two deaths, due to progressive disease.

Discussion

Free-flap surgery has become a routine procedure in breast reconstruction. Coupler-assisted anastomoses are performed on both, arteries and veins. The overall success rate varies between 94% and 100% for venous (1, 4, 8-10) and between 87% and 100% for arterial anastomosis (11-13). Preferred recipient vessels are the thoracodorsal or internal mammary vessels. In their first eleven cases, Allen and Treece used the thoracodorsal vessels as recipient vessels (1). There was 100% flap survival in all patients, with only a small amount of flap necrosis in one patient. Arterial anastomosis complication rate varies between 3.2% (12) and 13% (11). The coupling system by Spector et al. was only used, if the thoracodorsal artery was the recipient, never in the internal mammary artery (11). Our single arterial anastomosis was done on the thoracodorsal artery as recipient. Elliot et al. used a coupling device for the venous anastomosis in their 3-hour muscle free flap, reported in 111 cases. The coupling device allowed a reduction in the time of the venous anastomosis from approximately 12 minutes to 3 minutes. There was no total flap necrosis in this series (10). As performed in our own series, Granzow et al. used an anastomostic coupling device to connect to the recipient and flap veins. Typically, the arterial anastomosis is performed with a nylon 9/0 suture (8). In this retrospective analysis on 758 DIEP flaps, 6% of patients returned to the operating room for flap-related problems. Partial flap loss occurred in 2.5% while total flap loss occurred in fewer than 1% of all cases. In a series of 117 patients, Knight et al. preferred the internal mammary artery as recipient, which was used in 65.3%. The rate of anastomotic revision (arterial and venous) was 4.9%. The majority of cases used a 2.5-mm venous coupler (65.3%) (14). In our series, the venous coupler used was between 2.0 mm and 2,5 mm. Yap et al. reviewed the microsurgical procedures performed at the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center over a 40-month period. In this retrospective analysis, they compared anastomostic coupling devices (ACD) and sutured anastomosis. Overall, the venous thrombosis rates were not significantly different between the ACD (1.4%, 2/139 cases) and sutured (3.3%, 19/584 cases) groups. Salvage rates following venous thrombosis were not significantly different for venous anastomoses performed with an ACD (50%, 1 of 2 cases salvaged) compared with venous anastomoses performed with sutures (68.4%, 13 of 19 cases salvaged) (15).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Patient characteristics.

In our series, there was one venous congestion, treated with leeches. Only one arterial anatomosis was performed on the thoracodorsal artery. There were no major complications.

The coupler system was time effective and safe in performing venous anastomosis in free-flap breast reconstruction.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

a) Vessel measuring gauge; b,c) anastomotic instrument; d) successful intima-to-intima anastomosis both artery and vein.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Free latissimus dorsi flap, preoperative (a) and postoperative (b) view.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Free DIEP pre- (a) and postoperative (b) view.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Free DIEP pre- (a) and postoperative (b) view, after skin-sparing mastectomy and left and right mammaplasty.

Footnotes

  • ↵* Presented at the 8th International Conference of Anticancer Research, 17-22 October 2008, Kos, Greece.

  • Received January 8, 2009.
  • Revision received March 13, 2009.
  • Accepted May 4, 2009.
  • Copyright© 2009 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Allen RJ,
    2. Treece P
    : Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 32: 32-38, 1994.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Allen RJ,
    2. Tucker CJ
    : Superior gluteal artery perforator free flap for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 95: 1207, 1995.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Chang KP,
    2. Lin SD,
    3. Lai CS
    : Clinical experience of a microvascular venous coupler device in free-tissue transfers. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 23(11): 566-572, 2007.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Ahn CY,
    2. Shaw WW,
    3. Berns S,
    4. Markowitz BL
    : Clinical experience with the 3M microvascular coupling anastomotic device in 100 free-tissue transfers. Plast Reconstr Surg 93(7): 1481-1484, 1994.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Hallock GG,
    2. Rice DC
    : On “management of significant venous discrepancy with microvascular venous coupler”. (J Reconstr Microsurgery 19: 377-380, 2003). J Reconstr Microsurg 20(1): 59, 2004.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Sasson HN,
    2. Stofman GM,
    3. Berman P
    : Clinical use of the 3M 2.5 mm mechanical microcoupling device in free tissue transfer. Microsurgery 15(6): 421-423, 1994.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Sullivan SK,
    2. Dellacroce F,
    3. Allen R
    : Management of significant venous discrepancy with microvascular venous coupler. J Reconstr Microsurg 19(6): 377-380, 2003.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Granzow JW,
    2. Levine JL,
    3. Chiu ES,
    4. Allen RJ
    : Breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap: History and update on current technique. J Plastic, Reconstr Aesth Surg 59: 571-579, 2006.
    OpenUrl
    1. Denk MJ,
    2. Longaker MT,
    3. Basner AL,
    4. Glat PM,
    5. Karp NS,
    6. Kasabian AK
    : Microsurgical reconstruction of the lower extremity using the 3M microvascular coupling device in venous anastomoses. Ann Plast Surg 35(6): 601-606, 1995.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Elliot LF,
    2. Seify H,
    3. Bergey P
    : The 3-hour muscle-sparing free TRAM flap: safe and effective treatment review of 111 consecutive free TRAM flaps in a private practice setting. Plast Reconstr Surg 120: 27-34, 2007.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Spector JA,
    2. Draper LB,
    3. Levine JP,
    4. Ahn CY
    : Routine use of microvascular coupling device for arterial anastomosis in breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 56(4): 365-368, 2006.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Chernichenko N,
    2. Ross DA,
    3. Shin J,
    4. Chow JY,
    5. Sasaki CT,
    6. Ariyan S
    : Arterial coupling for microvascular free-tissue transfer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 138(5): 614-618, 2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Tran NV,
    2. Buchel EW,
    3. Conversy PA
    : Microvascular complications of DIEP Flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 119: 1397-1405, 2007.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Knight MA,
    2. Nguyen DTt,
    3. Kobayashi MR,
    4. Evans GR
    : Institutional review of free TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 56(6): 593-598, 2006.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Yap LH,
    2. Constantinides J,
    3. Butler CE
    : Venous thrombosis in coupled versus sutured microvascular anastomoses. Ann Plast Surg 57: 666-669, 2006.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 29, Issue 7
July 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Venous Coupler for Free-flap Anastomosis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
10 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Venous Coupler for Free-flap Anastomosis
O. CAMARA, J. HERRMANN, A. EGBE, I. KOCH, M. GAJDA, I.B. RUNNEBAUM
Anticancer Research Jul 2009, 29 (7) 2827-2830;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Venous Coupler for Free-flap Anastomosis
O. CAMARA, J. HERRMANN, A. EGBE, I. KOCH, M. GAJDA, I.B. RUNNEBAUM
Anticancer Research Jul 2009, 29 (7) 2827-2830;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Venous Coupler for Free-Flap Anastomosis: Outcomes of 1,000 Cases
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Awareness, Utilization, and Barriers to Fluorescence Ureteral Navigation in Japan: A Nationwide Survey Study
  • Clinical Parameters and Radiomics of Vestibular Schwannomas in NF2-related Schwannomatosis
  • Prognostic Impact of Claudin18.2 and TROP2 Expression in Advanced Gastric Cancer Treated With Nivolumab
Show more Clinical Studies
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire