Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Surgical Outcome and Survival Analysis of Young Patients with Primary Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

CHRISTINA FOTOPOULOU, KONSTANTINOS SAVVATIS, GUIDO SCHUMACHER, WERNER LICHTENEGGER and JALID SEHOULI
Anticancer Research July 2009, 29 (7) 2809-2815;
CHRISTINA FOTOPOULOU
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: christina.fotopoulou{at}charite.de
KONSTANTINOS SAVVATIS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
GUIDO SCHUMACHER
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
WERNER LICHTENEGGER
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JALID SEHOULI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objective: The mean age of diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is in the mid-fifties. Limited data exist about the clinical outcome of patients aged below 35 years. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the cancer-related characteristics, intraoperative findings, surgical outcome and survival in this group of young women. Patients and Methods: Within the period between 01/1989 and 06/2008, all consecutive patients younger than 35 years with histologically proven EOC were enrolled into this study. All patients' characteristics, intraoperative and histological findings, as well as survival data were systematically analyzed using a validated prospective documentation tool for the intraoperative and postoperative data collection. Results: Thirty-one patients younger than 35 years at primary diagnosis (mean age: 28.65years; range: 15-35) were identified among 397 patients with primary EOC (7.8%). FIGO-stage III (45.2%) was the most common tumor stage and serous-papillary (54.8%) was the most frequent histological type. A complete tumor resection was achieved in 18 patients (58.1%) with only few postoperative complications. In a mean follow-up period of 44.65 months, 9 patients (29%) died. Mean progression-free survival was 74.72 months (95% CI: 34.22-115.22), whereas mean overall survival was 148.15 months (95% CI: 91.63-204.68) and hence longer than the equivalent survival data of the total patient collective. Conclusion: Primary EOC in young patients (≤35 years old) seems to be associated with a higher overall and progression-free survival, higher platinum-sensitivity rate and a rather better clinical outcome than older patients. Further multicenter studies are warranted to evaluate the underlying reasons for these observations.

  • Ovarian cancer
  • age
  • tumor pattern
  • debulking surgery
  • survival

Ovarian cancer is the second most common gynecological malignancy, but the most common cause of death among women who develop gynecologic cancer (1). The lifetime risk of ovarian cancer in the general population of women is 1.4 % and the age-adjusted incidence rate is 13.5 cases per 100,000 women, whereas incidence rates appear to have slightly decreased over the past 30 years (2). The mean age of diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer is in the mid-fifties (3). The incidence increases with age up to 80 years old and then declines. The overall risk of malignancy of an adnexal mass in premenopausal and postmenopausal women is 6-11% and 29-35%, respectively (4).

The optimal primary treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is considered to be radical cytoreductive surgery followed by a combination chemotherapy regimen with paclitaxel and platinum (5). It has long been reported that an advanced patient age is associated with a reduced surgical radicality including lower rates of bowel resection, which may explain the poorer outcome in elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer (6, 7). Limited data exist about the tumor dissemination pattern, histological type distribution, surgical treatment and overall survival of epithelial ovarian cancer in women aged below 35 years (8). The present study was conducted in order to further evaluate the clinical picture and course of EOC in this special group of patients.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Descriptive statistics of the 31 patients with primary epithelial ovarian cancer.

Patients and Methods

The data of a total of 31 consecutive patients, who were primarily diagnosed and operated on due to histologically proven ovarian cancer during the period 01/1989 and 06/2008, were analyzed. All cytoreductive operations were performed by a gynecological oncologist (J.S., W.L.). The primary aim of each cytoreductive surgical intervention was maximal tumor resection. Standard procedures included midline laparatomy, peritoneal cytology, multiple peritoneal biopsies, hysterectomy, adnectomy, infra-gastric omentectomy and systematic pelvic and paraaortic lymph node dissection. In order to achieve maximal tumor resection, additional multivisceral procedures had to be performed in more advanced cases such as peritonectomy and bowel resections. Written informed consent of the patients was always obtained prior to surgery with special focus also on the fertility issue. When fertility preservation was desired, in cases of unilateral tumor affection, only unilateral adnectomy, cytology, multiple biopsies of the peritoneum, infragastric omentectomy and systematic pelvic and paraaortic lymph node dissection were performed.

During primary surgery, sections from fresh frozen suspected ovarian cancer tissue were always taken. Resection specimens of all patients were examined at the Institute of Pathology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany. Histology and grade of differentiation were re-evaluated by a gynecopathologist (CD). Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained sections were cut from paraffin-embedded blocks and used for histopathological evaluation; grading of tumors was assessed using Silverberg grading system. All relevant patients data including history, surgery data, histological report and tumor staging were abstracted from the patients' records.

Staging was defined in accordance with FIGO criteria for ovarian epithelial carcinoma (10).

The tumor pattern was intraoperatively assessed by an independent person based on the surgical procedures performed and postoperative interview of the surgeon. Postoperatively all histological findings were documented. All data were entered into a validated documentation system (IMO), which was developed for ovarian neoplasms with special focus on the description of the tumor pattern, maximal tumor burden and postoperative residual tumor mass (11). Furthermore, the amount of ascites (none, ≤500 mL and >500 mL) and the largest diameter of the postoperative tumor residual mass (0, <0.5, 0.5-1, 1-2, ≥2 cm) were classified at time of surgery.

Statistical analysis. Analyses were conducted in an exploratory fashion. All results are presented in raw numbers, rates, or medians and ranges, mean±standard deviation according to the underlying distribution. Binomial-exact 95% confidence intervals (CI) are also reported. The analyses of time-to-event data in the case of recurrence and overall survival were calculated according the Kaplan-Meier method. For the calculation of recurrence-free and overall survival, the interval between day of surgery and date of tumor progression, death or last contact was analyzed. All statistical analyses were performed by SPSS 15 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, USA).

Results

Patients and tumor characteristics. Patient characteristics of 31 women with EOC were analyzed. The mean age of patients was 28.65±5.11 years (range: 15-35 years). The number of all patients with primary epithelial ovarian cancer treated surgically in the same time period was 397, so that the patients younger than 35 years old constituted 7.8% of the total patient population. The mean number of pregnancies was 0.35±0.81 (range: 0-3). A bilateral tumor pattern was detected in only 3 women (9.7%). The histology of the tumors was as follows: in 17 patients (54.8%) serous, in 5 patients (16.1%) mucinous, in one patient (3.2%) endometrioid and in 8 patients (25.8%) of mixed histology. The FIGO stage was classified as follows: I: 28.8%; II: 12.9%; III: 45.2% and IV: 12.9%. Most tumors (35.5%) were of low differentiation. Twenty patients (64.5%) had no ascites at initial presentation, whereas 6 patients (19.4%) had ascites less than 500 mL and 5 patients (16.1%) more than 500 mL.

CA-125 tumor marker was elevated (reference level <35 U/mL) in the vast majority of the patients (80.6%) with a mean of 2252±7987.90 U/mL (range: 10-30,000 U/mL). No significant association with second malignancies could be observed; only one patient had a positive personal history of a second malignancy (uterine carcinoma). Data are presented in Tables I and II. Seven patients (22.6%) had a positive family history of ovarian (3) or breast (4) cancer, however without proven evidence of a hereditary pattern. Only one patient had a known BRCA-1 mutation.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Cancer-related characteristics of the 31 young patients with primary epithelial ovarian cancer.

Surgical outcome. All women in the present analysis underwent surgery per midline laparotomy as primary treatment. The mean operative time was 268±113.5 minutes (range: 62-596 min). A complete tumor resection was achieved in 18 patients (58.1%), one patient (3.2%) had tumor residuals less than 5 mm and 6 patients (19.4%) tumor residuals between 5 and 10 mm. In 4 patients (12.9%), tumor residuals larger than 1 cm maximal diameter were left. In patients with macroscopic tumor residuals, localization of the tumor was in the upper abdomen (omental bursa, perihepatic and perilileal) in the vast majority of cases (98%). The postoperative complications were only minor: one patient experienced a wound infection with a subsequent delayed wound healing, another patient suffered from a postoperative lymph fistula due to systematic lymphadenectomy without a clinical consequence and only one patient developed an intestinal insufficiency/perforation and had to be reoperated. Data are presented in Table III.

In six patients (19.35%), a fertility-preserving operation with a unilateral ovarectomy was performed. In the majority of the patients (61.3%), the uterus was preserved. Otherwise, 51.6% of the patients were correctly staged in terms of the FIGO recommendations (10) with cytology, peritoneal biopsies, infragastric omentectomy and systematic pelvic and paraaortal lymphadenectomy when a complete tumor resection was accomplished. Appendectomy was performed mainly in mucinous EOC, when the appendix was affected by the tumor or if so desired by the patient (41.9%).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Surgical outcome - tumor residuals and morbidity - in the 31 young patients with primary epithelial ovarian cancer.

The surgical procedures performed are presented in Table IV. A systematic pelvic (median removed lymph nodes: 24; range: 3-60) and paraaortal lymphadenectomy (median removed lymph nodes: 8; range: 1-71) was performed in a total of 16 patients (51.6%). At this point it has to be noted that only a small number of the dissected lymph nodes was histologically proven to be affected by the tumor: mean number of positive pelvic lymph nodes was 1.00 (range: 0-11) and mean number of positive paraaortal lymph nodes was 0.68 (range: 0-8). An extensive peritonectomy was performed in 21 patients (67.7%), mainly in the paracolic gutters and the small pelvis. A diaphragmatic resection or stripping was performed in 11 patients (35.5%) due to diffuse peritoneal carcinomatosis in the diaphragmatic region. None of the patients underwent a resection of the urinary bladder or the ureter. A total of 11 patients (35.5%) underwent a partial resection of the small intestine, whereas in 15 patients (48.4%) a partial resection of the large bowel had to be performed. In only two patients (6.5%) was a colostomy applied. A considerable number of patients underwent a multivisceral approach in terms of partial hepatectomy or partial gastrectomy (6.5% and 12.9% respectively) so that a maximal tumor debulking could be obtained. In 8 patients (25.8%), a tumor load in the omental bursa was described. A mesenterial carcinosis was noted in only 5 patients (16.1%). Extraperitoneal metastases were presented in 4 patients (12.9%), in terms of malignant pleural effusion. None of the patients presented distant metastases in solid parenchymatous organs. In the majority of the patients (87%), the highest tumor burden was localized in the pelvic region.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table IV.

Surgical procedures performed during primary tumor debulking surgery in the 31 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.

Overall and progression free survival. The mean follow-up period was 44.65±72.63 months (range: 0-267 months). The mean number of recurrences the patients experienced was 0.87 (range: 0-3). The mean progression-free survival time (PFS) was 74.72 months (range: 3-231) with a median of 28.00 months. The mean overall survival (OS) of the patient collective was 148.15 months (range: 1-267 months) with a median of 220.00 months. Fifteen patients (48.4%) experienced at least one relapse episode of the disease during the follow up period. Nine patients (29.0%) died during the same period due to cancer-related causes. Thirteen (86.7%) of the 15 patients with a relapse were initially classified as platinum-sensitive (relapse >6 months).

The 2-year and 5-year overall survival was 81% (95% CI: 65.32-96.68%) and 62% (95% CI: 38.48%-85.52%) respectively. Since only four patients had postoperative tumor residuals ≥2 cm, no statistically significant differences in survival rates could be obtained for patients according to the postoperative residual tumor mass. Kaplan-Meier overall survival curve and data for overall and progression-free survival are presented in Figure 1.

Thirty patients (96.8%) underwent an adjuvant systemic chemotherapy. Eleven patients received carboplatin and cyclophosphamide, 17 patients paclitaxel and carboplatin and 2 patients carboplatin as monotherapy. Thirteen of the 15 patients (86.7% of the relapse patients) who experienced a relapse were classified as platinum sensitive (i.e. relapse >6 months after platinum-based chemotherapy).

The mean number of chemotherapy lines administered was 1.87 (range: 0-5). All 31 patients showed a normalization of the tumor marker CA-125 after completion of the 1st-line chemotherapy (mean CA-125: 18 U/mL) regardless of whether they were initially operated without tumor residuals or not.

Discussion

The incidence of ovarian cancer increases with age, so that most women with EOCs are diagnosed between the ages of 40 and 65. In girls and younger women, non-epithelial histologies (germ cell tumors, sex cord stromal tumors and mixed cell tumors) are rather more common (12).

The strongest known risk factor for ovarian cancer is a family history, which is present in about 10 to 15 % of women who develop the disease. Based on a meta-analysis of pooled case-control studies, it was estimated that a family history of ovarian cancer in one relative increased the lifetime probability of ovarian cancer in a 35-year-old woman from 1.6 to 5% disorder. In contrast, hereditary syndromes are associated with a lifetime risk of ovarian cancer as high as 50% (13-15). In the present analysis it was possible to show that 22.6% of the patients had a positive family history of ovarian or breast cancer and herewith higher than the rate of 10-15% reported in the current literature for the overall ovarian cancer patients collective (14, 15, 21, 22). Although there was awareness of only one patient having an established BRCA-1 mutation, it is assumed that even more patients were carriers of germline mutations in the BRCA gene. Therefore, all young patients were informed about the possible genetical risk and the feasibility of a further genetical investigation and analysis.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Kaplan-Meier overall survival curve and data for overall and progression-free survival for young patients with primary epithelial ovarian cancer after primary tumor debulking surgery.

Over the last 25 years, five-year survival rates for EOC patients have modestly improved from 36% in the mid 1970s to 45% by the year 2002 (16). However, this increasing trend is much less pronounced among elderly patients, leading to an increasing age gradient in prognosis, as shown by Gondos et al. (23). Correlative to these findings, the present study reports considerably higher survival rates for young patients than those described in the current literature for the total EOC patient collective, with a 2-year and 5-year overall survival of 81% and 62% respectively compared to the five-year survival rates of 45% (16). Since elderly patients (>65 years) with EOC seem to present a similar distribution of tumour stage, grading and histological type compared to younger patients (24), alternative reasons such as a lower complication rate, better physical resources, BRCA1-related higher chemotherapy sensitivity and possibly an alternate attitude of the physician, should be discussed as reasons for the better outcome in the younger patient group and should further be evaluated in future studies.

Regarding the platinum-sensitivity and the initial FIGO stage, it is reported that only 3 out of all 31 patients (9.6%) were classified as primary platinum-resistant; a clearly lower rate than described in the literature for the overall EOC patient collective (20). With all the patients presenting a complete normalization of the tumor marker CA-125 (mean value: 18 U/mL) after completion of 6 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy, this can possibly be considered as an additional sign of a better chemotherapeutical response. This is consensual with the recent published results by Tan et al., that BRCA-positive EOC patients have better outcomes than non-hereditary EOC patients with higher response rates to first and subsequent lines of platinum-based treatment (25).

Only 58% of patients presented with an initial FIGO stage III or IV, contrary to over 75% equivalent rates reported in the literature for the overall EOC patient collective (16).

Regarding the histology and grade of differentiation, no relevant differences were noticed between young patients and the common ovarian cancer patients, since serous papillary histology and poor differentiation grade were in both cases most commonly diagnosed.

Similar results of a more favourable tumor stage, more advantageous survival rates and a rather higher differentiation grade are also reported by Chen et al. (17) and Tang et al. (8) in recent analyzes on EOC patients aged below 30 and 35 years, respectively.

Wimberger et al. reporting on the impact of age on surgical outcome in patients with advanced ovarian cancer, describes a reduced operative radicality associated with a poorer outcome in elderly patients (>65 years) (18). One would expect opposing results pertaining to younger patients. Indeed, almost 60% of patients could be operated on without any macroscopic tumor residuals, even if this was associated with a relative high rate of multivisceral upper abdomen-procedures such as hepatectomy (6.5%), gastrectomy (12.9%) and tumor resections in the omental bursa (25.8%). Significant lower rates (34%) of complete tumor resection are described elsewhere on over 2,700 EOC patients with a mean age of 57.5 years (19).

In conclusion, primary epithelial ovarian cancer in patients below 35 years of age is commonly unilateral and of serous-papillary histology. They have a better surgical outcome with improved survival rates, higher response to first-line platinum-based treatment, a lower relapse rate and better operative results regarding radical tumor resection associated with low perioperative complications in comparison to the common EOC patients target group aged in the mid-fifties at initial diagnosis. Further clinical studies incorporating translational research programs are warranted to investigate the underlying reasons for this observation.

Footnotes

  • ↵* Presented at the 8th International Conference of Anticancer Research, 17-22 October 2008, Kos, Greece.

  • This work was presented in part at the VII International Symposium of the North-Eastern German Society of Gynecologic Oncology (NOGGO) at the 8th International Conference of Anticancer Research 2008.

  • Conflict of Interest Statement

    The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest in regard to the present text.

  • Received January 6, 2009.
  • Revision received February 25, 2009.
  • Accepted March 30, 2009.
  • Copyright© 2009 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Jemal A,
    2. Siegel R,
    3. Ward E,
    4. Hao Y,
    5. Xu J,
    6. Murray T,
    7. Thun MJ
    : Cancer statistics, 2008. Cancer J Clin 58(2): 71-96, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. ↵
    www.seer.cancer.gov (accessed June 5, 2007).
  3. ↵
    1. Memarzadeh S,
    2. Berek JS
    : Advances in the management of epithelial ovarian cancer. J Reprod Med 46: 621 pages, 2001.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Kinkel K,
    2. Lu Y,
    3. Mehdizade A,
    4. Pelte MF,
    5. Hricak H
    : Indeterminate Ovarian Mass at US: Incremental value of second imaging test for characterization - meta-analysis and bayesian analysis. Radiology 236: 85, 2005.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Bristow RE,
    2. Berek JS
    : Surgery for ovarian cancer: how to improve survival. Lancet 367(9522): 1558-1560, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Ramesh HS,
    2. Jain S,
    3. Audisio RA
    : Implications of aging in surgical oncology. Cancer J 11(6): 488-494, 2005.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Goff BA,
    2. Matthews BJ,
    3. Larson EH,
    4. Andrilla CH,
    5. Wynn M,
    6. Lishner DM,
    7. Baldwin LM
    : Predictors of comprehensive surgical treatment in patients with ovarian cancer. Cancer 109(10): 2031-2042, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Tang L,
    2. Zheng M,
    3. Xiong Y,
    4. Ding H,
    5. Liu FY
    : Clinical characteristics and prognosis of epithelial ovarian cancer in young women. Ai Zheng 27(9): 951-955, 2008. (Article in Chinese).
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Tanner EJ,
    2. Zahurak ML,
    3. Bristow RE,
    4. Díaz-Montes TP
    : Surgical care of young women diagnosed with ovarian cancer: A population-based perspective. Gynecol Oncol 111(2): 221-225, 2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics
    : Changing in definitions of clinical staging for carcinoma of the cervix and ovary. Am J Obstet Gynecol 156: 263-264, 1987.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Sehouli J,
    2. Könsgen D,
    3. Mustea A,
    4. Oskay-Ozcelik G,
    5. Katsares I,
    6. Weidemann H,
    7. Lichtenegger W
    : “IMO”-intraoperative mapping of ovarian cancer. Zentralbl Gynakol 125(3-4): 129-35, 2003.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. The Surveillance Program, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control
    . Cancer Statistics Review 1973; 87, Publication no. 90-2789, National Cancer Institute, Washington, DC 1988.
  12. ↵
    1. Claus EB,
    2. Schildkraut JM,
    3. Thompson WD,
    4. Risch NJ
    : The genetic attributable risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Cancer 77(11): 2318-2324, 1996.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Kerlikowske K,
    2. Brown JS,
    3. Grady DG
    : Should women with familial ovarian cancer undergo prophylactic oophorectomy? Obstet Gynecol 80(4): 700-707, 1992.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Smith SA,
    2. Richards WE,
    3. Caito K,
    4. Hanjani P,
    5. Markman M,
    6. DeGeest K,
    7. Gallion HH
    : BRCA1 germline mutations and polymorphisms in a clinic-based series of ovarian cancer cases: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 83(3): 586-592, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Barnholtz-Sloan JS,
    2. Schwartz AG,
    3. Qureshi F,
    4. Jacques S,
    5. Malone J,
    6. Munkarah AR
    : Ovarian cancer: changes in patterns at diagnosis and relative survival over the last three decades. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189(4): 1120-1127, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Chen R,
    2. Shen K,
    3. Wu M,
    4. Pan LY,
    5. Huang HF,
    6. Yang JX,
    7. Lang JH
    : Analysis of 21 cases of epithelial ovarian malignancies in women aged below 30 years. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 40(6): 417-420, 2005.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Wimberger P,
    2. Lehmann N,
    3. Kimmig R,
    4. Burges A,
    5. Meier W,
    6. Hoppenau B,
    7. du Bois A,
    8. AGO-OVAR
    : Impact of age on outcome in patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated within a prospectively randomized phase III study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Ovarian Cancer Study Group (AGO-OVAR). Gynecol Oncol 100(2): 300-307, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Fotopoulou C,
    2. duBois A,
    3. Karavas A,
    4. Trappe R,
    5. Aminossadati B,
    6. Schmalfeldt B,
    7. Pfisterer J,
    8. Sehouli J
    : Incidence of venous thromboembolism in patients with ovarian cancer undergoing platinum/paclitaxel-containing first-line chemotherapy: An exploratory analysis by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Ovarian Cancer Study Group. JCO 26(16): 2683-2689, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. du Bois A,
    2. Lück HJ,
    3. Meier W,
    4. Adams HP,
    5. Möbus V,
    6. Costa S,
    7. Bauknecht T,
    8. Richter B,
    9. Warm M,
    10. Schröder W,
    11. Olbricht S,
    12. Nitz U,
    13. Jackisch C,
    14. Emons G,
    15. Wagner U,
    16. Kuhn W,
    17. Pfisterer J,
    18. Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie Ovarian Cancer Study Group
    : A randomized clinical trial of cisplatin/paclitaxel versus carboplatin/paclitaxel as first-line treatment of ovarian cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 95(17): 1320-1329, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Kauff ND,
    2. Domchek SM,
    3. Friebel TM,
    4. Robson ME,
    5. Lee J,
    6. Garber JE,
    7. Isaacs C,
    8. Evans DG,
    9. Lynch H,
    10. Eeles RA,
    11. Neuhausen SL,
    12. Daly MB,
    13. Matloff E,
    14. Blum JL,
    15. Sabbatini P,
    16. Barakat RR,
    17. Hudis C,
    18. Norton L,
    19. Offit K,
    20. Rebbeck TR
    : Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy for the prevention of BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated breast and gynecologic cancer: a multicenter, prospective study. J Clin Oncol 26(8): 1331-1337, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Rubin SC
    : BRCA-related ovarian carcinoma. Cancer 97(9): 2127-2129, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Gondos A,
    2. Holleczek B,
    3. Arndt V,
    4. Stegmaier C,
    5. Ziegler H,
    6. Brenner H
    : Trends in population-based cancer survival in Germany: to what extent does progress reach older patients? Ann Oncol 18(7): 1253-1259, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Koensgen D,
    2. Sehouli J,
    3. Mustea A,
    4. Hauschild M,
    5. Lichtenegger W
    : Tumour biology in advanced ovarian cancer: Do older patients (>65 years) have other tumour characteristics than younger patients? 2004 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (Post-Meeting Edition). J Clin Oncol 22(14S): 5137, 2004.
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. Tan DS,
    2. Rothermundt C,
    3. Thomas K,
    4. Bancroft E,
    5. Eeles R,
    6. Shanley S,
    7. Ardern-Jones A,
    8. Norman A,
    9. Kaye SB,
    10. Gore ME
    : “BRCAness” syndrome in ovarian cancer: a case-control study describing the clinical features and outcome of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. J Clin Oncol 26(34): 5530-5536, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 29, Issue 7
July 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Surgical Outcome and Survival Analysis of Young Patients with Primary Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
10 + 10 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Surgical Outcome and Survival Analysis of Young Patients with Primary Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
CHRISTINA FOTOPOULOU, KONSTANTINOS SAVVATIS, GUIDO SCHUMACHER, WERNER LICHTENEGGER, JALID SEHOULI
Anticancer Research Jul 2009, 29 (7) 2809-2815;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Surgical Outcome and Survival Analysis of Young Patients with Primary Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
CHRISTINA FOTOPOULOU, KONSTANTINOS SAVVATIS, GUIDO SCHUMACHER, WERNER LICHTENEGGER, JALID SEHOULI
Anticancer Research Jul 2009, 29 (7) 2809-2815;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Awareness, Utilization, and Barriers to Fluorescence Ureteral Navigation in Japan: A Nationwide Survey Study
  • Clinical Parameters and Radiomics of Vestibular Schwannomas in NF2-related Schwannomatosis
  • Prognostic Impact of Claudin18.2 and TROP2 Expression in Advanced Gastric Cancer Treated With Nivolumab
Show more Clinical Studies
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire