Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

FEN1 is Overexpressed in Testis, Lung and Brain Tumors

TEODORA NIKOLOVA, MARKUS CHRISTMANN and BERND KAINA
Anticancer Research July 2009, 29 (7) 2453-2459;
TEODORA NIKOLOVA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARKUS CHRISTMANN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
BERND KAINA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: kaina{at}uni-mainz.de
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Flap endonuclease 1 (FEN1) is a DNA replication/repair protein involved in Okazaki fragment processing, long-patch base excision repair, DNA double-strand break repair and stalled replication fork restart. FEN1 is also important for preservation of telomere stability and thus a key node in maintaining genomic stability. The aim of the present study was to elucidate the level of expression of FEN1 protein in cancer of testis, lung and brain. FEN1 protein expression was studied by Western blot analysis in specimens of tumor tissues compared with the normal tissue from the same patient or normal brain extract. In addition, FEN1 was transiently down-regulated in the glioblastoma cell line LN308 by transfection with siRNA. The transfected cells were treated with cisplatin, temozolomide, nimustine and methyl methanesulfonate (MMS). Induced apoptosis (subG1 fraction) was analysed by flow cytometry. Our data show a clear overexpression of FEN1 in 19/25 samples from testicular tumors (mostly seminomas) and 4/4 samples from lung tumors (non-small cell lung cancer). For brain tumors, 9/11 glioblastoma multiforme and 5/8 astrocytomas expressed FEN1 protein at a higher level than did normal brain tissue. Overall, the data demonstrate that FEN1 overexpression is common in testis, lung and brain tumors. Low-level expression of FEN1 by siRNA down-regulation increased sensitivity to methylating agents (temozolomide, MMS) and cisplatin in LN308 glioma cells, which indicates that altered FEN1 expression might impact the therapeutic response.

  • FEN1
  • testis tumors
  • lung cancer
  • glioblastoma multiforme
  • astrocytoma
  • anticancer drugs

Flap endonuclease-1 (FEN1) is a DNA replication/repair protein with pleiotropic functions. It plays a pivotal role in primer removal during lagging-strand DNA synthesis and Okazaki fragment processing (1) and long-patch base excision repair (BER) by removing the 5'-flaps generated by Polδ/ε during repair synthesis (2). There are reports that FEN1 is also involved in DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair by non-homologous end-joining (3) or homologous recombination (4). FEN1 attenuates DSB generation during DNA replication and suppresses DNA recombination, thus maintaining genomic stability. In addition, in a complex with Werner's syndrome protein it plays an important role in stalled replication fork restart (5). FEN1 depletion leads to telomere dysfunction, phosphorylation of H2AX and sister telomere loss, which shows that FEN1 is important for telomere stability (6, 7).

There is growing evidence that FEN1 expression is related to the development of cancer and the progression of the disease (8). FEN1 homozygous inactivation in mice leads to early embryonic lethality. Mice with mutations in FEN1 and the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) genes show increased frequency of adenocarcinomas in the gastrointestinal tract and decreased survival (9, 10). FEN1 is proliferation-dependently regulated (11, 12) and, in mouse fibroblasts, up-regulated in response to genotoxic stress (13). Increased gene expression of FEN1 was reported in lung cancer cell lines obtained from both small cell lung cancer and non-small cell lung cancer (14). FEN1 transcripts were also overexpressed in gastric cancer cell lines compared to a normal gastric cell line (15). Since the expression of FEN1 is induced by feeding serum starved adherent cells or following stimulation of lymphocytes with mitogens (11), studies with in vitro cultivated cells should be considered with caution. However, FEN1 up-regulation was also shown in tumors in situ. Thus, FEN1 mRNA level was up-regulated in metastatic prostate cancer (16), pancreatic cancer (17) and neuroblastomas (18). Using immunohistochemistry, FEN1 was shown to be overexpressed in prostate cancer compared to the normal prostate tissue (19). In a recent study, using a cancer profiling array and immunohistochemistry, FEN1 expression was determined in breast cancer and other tumor entities such as colon, stomach, lung and shown to be overexpressed at the RNA and protein level. It was also found to be expressed at a higher level in samples of metastases. FEN1 overexpression was related to hypomethylation of the promoter (20).

Some reports give evidence that FEN1 might be involved in the acquisition of resistance to anticancer drugs. Myoshi et al. isolated a cell line resistant to the farnesyltransferase inhibitor tipifarnib, which is used in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (21). By DNA microarray analyses, the authors identified 5 genes with higher expression levels, among them FEN1.

In this work, we studied the expression of FEN1 protein by Western blot analysis in testis, lung and brain tumors in order to gain insight into its potential as a diagnostic and therapeutic target. We also studied the effect of transient FEN1 down-regulation on the sensitivity of LN229 glioblastoma cells to the genotoxin methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) and the anticancer drugs temozolomide (TMZ), nimustine (ACNU) and cisplatin.

Materials and Methods

Preparation of tumor tissue extracts. The collection of testicular and brain tumors was described elsewhere (22, 23). Specimens of surgically removed testicular tumors (n=25) and lung tumors (n=4) as well as the corresponding normal tissue from the same patient were stored in liquid nitrogen. The brain tumor samples [glioblastoma multiforme (n=13) and astrocytoma (n=7)] were compared with commercially available extracts from normal human cerebellum (BioChain, Hayward, CA, USA). For preparation of total tumor tissue extracts, the frozen tissue was crushed in a mortar and transferred to pre-chilled vials, sonicated in 180 μl buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.5; 1 mM EDTA, pH 8; 1 mM β-mercaptoethanol; 5% glycerin; protease-inhibitors: aprotinin 10 μg/ml; bestatin 10 μmol/l; leupeptin 10 μmol/l, pepstatinA 1 μmol/l, PMSF 0.1 mmol/l) and centrifuged at 14 000 rpm at 4°C for 10 min. The protein concentration was measured by Bradford with Roti-quant® (Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) at a wavelength of 595 mm.

Western blot analysis. All loading samples were prepared by dilution with bi-distilled water and 4× load buffer (1:3, v/v) to a protein concentration of 1 μg/μl, boiled at 95°C for 5 min to denature the proteins, then briefly centrifuged and cooled on ice for 5 min. A volume of 30 μl per specimen was loaded onto 4% SDS stacking gel/10% separation gel and run at 40 mA. Thereafter, proteins were blotted onto a nitrocellulose transfer membrane (Protran; Schleicher&Schuell, Dassel, Germany) overnight at 100 mA. Membranes were blocked for 1 h at room temperature in 5% (w/v) fat-free milk powder in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.2% Tween, then incubated overnight at 4°C with primary mouse anti-FEN1 antibody (1:500; Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY, USA), washed 3 times (10 min each) diluted in blocking buffer. After 3 washes in PBS containing 0.2% Tween, the membranes were incubated for 1h with a horse radish peroxidise-coupled secondary antibody (1:3000; Amersham Biosciences AB, Uppsala, Sweden) and blots were developed by a chemiluminescence detection system. All blots were exposed to the same film for 5 min in order to facilitate the comparison between the samples, then stripped, blocked again and incubated with rabbit anti-extracellular signal-regulated kinase2 (ERK2; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) used as a loading control, followed by a secondary anti-rabbit antibody. The films were illuminated in an InGenius system and stored by SynGene Snap v.6.05.01 and analysed by the SynGene Tool software v.3.01. (Syngene, Cambridge, UK). The data were plotted as percentage changes in relation to the expression of ERK2. The highest protein level of ERK2 was used to normalize the amount of protein in all samples.

Cell culture of human glioblastoma cells and transient transfection with FEN1 siRNA. The 21mer single-stranded RNA oligonucleotide sequences used were GCAGCACAAUGAUGAGUGCAA (sense) and UUCGUCGUGUUACUACUCACG (antisense) according to (24). They were synthesized at 20 nmol scale by Ambion (Austin, TX, USA) and the RNA strands were resuspended in the supplied nuclease-free water to obtain a final concentration of 100 μM. Annealing of the complementary strands was performed by mixing equal amounts of RNA in the annealing buffer supplied by Ambion followed by heating of the mixture to 90°C for 1 min and incubation at 37°C for 1 h. In control experiments, ‘scrambled’ siRNA (AllStars Negative control siRNA; Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) was used. Glioblastoma cells LN308 were maintained in DMEM/High Glucose (PAA, Pasching, Austria) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Biowest, Nuaille, France). The cells were passaged at subconfluence 4 times and 5×104 cells were plated 24 h before transfection in 2.5 ml medium in 6-well plates. Transfections were performed using 40 nM siRNA per well and 2.9 μl Lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany) in a total volume of 200 μl, with a complexation time of 30 min. Thereafter, the complexes were diluted to 1 ml and added to cells; after 24 h the transfection mixture was replaced with medium.

Preparation of cell extracts from LN308 cells. Cells were collected by trypsin/EDTA treatment, washed in serum-containing DMEM medium, and once in PBS and the cell pellet was resuspended in a homogenization buffer supplied with COMPLETE Mini Protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany), used according to the manufacturer's protocol. The lysate was sonicated six times (40 cycles) on ice using a Branson B15 SONIFIER cell disruptor. The lysate was then spun for 10 min at 14,000×g and the supernatant transferred to a new microcentrifuge tube. Total protein content was determined using Nanodrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer with ND-1000 v.3.0. software (PEQLAB, Erlangen, Germany). Western blot quantification and data analysis was performed as described above.

Treatment with genotoxins. Cells were treated 48 h following siRNA transfection. A 100 mM MMS (Sigma, Munich, Germany) stock solution was prepared by diluting MMS with sterile H2O. Cells were treated with 0.5 mM MMS for 1 h and the medium was changed. ACNU and cisplatin (both from Sigma) stocks were prepared by dissolving the drugs in sterile H2O and filtering. The concentration of the ACNU stock solution was 10 mM and of the cisplatin stock solution 1 mg/ml. TMZ (Schering-Plough, Kenilworth, NJ, USA) was dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) and diluted 2-fold in distilled water (stock 35 mM). Stocks were stored at -80°C. Cells were treated with 50 μM ACNU, 0.2 mM TMZ or 9 μg/ml cisplatin for 6 h, washed once and fresh medium was added.

Determination of apoptosis by flow cytometry. Both adherent and detached cells were collected at certain time-points following treatment and centrifuged at 1,000 rpm for 5 min. Pelleted cells were washed in cold PBS, suspended in 100 μl cold PBS and 2 ml ice-cold 70% ethanol and stored at -20°C up to 3-4 days. Before analysis, cells were treated with RNase (0.03 mg/ml) and subsequently stained with propidium iodide (16.5 mg/ml) in PBS. Samples were transferred to FACS microtubes and propidium iodide fluorescence was measured by flow cytometry (FACScalibur, Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany). For each variant, 10,000 cells were counted and the results were expressed as percentage of sub-diploid cells using WinMDI v.2.8 (J. Trotter). All apoptosis experiments were repeated 3 times. Statistical significance was tested by Mann-Whitney non-parametric test in SPSS v.11.0 for Windows™ (LEAD Technologies, Charlotte, NC, USA).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Protein expression of FEN1 in testis and lung tumors. Specimens of surgically removed seminomas (A) and lung tumors (B) were compared for FEN1 expression to the corresponding normal tissue from the same patient. ERK2 was used as loading control. The upper panel shows a representative Western blot. The lower panel shows the quantification, whereby the highest expressing sample was set to 100%. The quantification was expressed in relation to the loading control (ERK2).

Results

The expression level of FEN1 in testis and lung tumors and the corresponding normal tissue from the same patient is shown in Figure 1. For quantification ERK2 was used as loading control. The data shown in Figure 1A are representative for a set of 8 paired seminoma samples. Among the studied testicular germ cell tumors (n=25), 14/17 samples from seminomas, 2/4 from embryonic carcinomas and 3/4 from mixed tumors displayed overexpression of FEN1 (compared to the corresponding normal tissue of the same patient). For lung cancer, we determined the expression level in 4 paired NSCLC samples and found 4/4 with FEN1 overexpression (Figure 1B). The expression of FEN1 in glioblastoma multiforme (WHO grade IV) and astrocytomas is shown in Figure 2. Since normal brain was not available from the same patient, we compared the expression level in tumors with protein extracts from cerebellum. It can be seen that 9/11 GBM (Figure 2A) and 5/8 astrocytomas (Figure 2B) expressed FEN1 at a higher level than did normal brain. Overall, the data show that FEN1 overexpression is common in testis, lung and brain tumors.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

FEN1 expression in brain tumors. For comparison of glioblastoma (GB) (A) and astrocytoma (B) with normal tissue, human commercially available cerebellum extract (N) was used for control. The upper panel shows a representative Western blot, the lower panel the quantification. The sample with the highest expression level was set to 100%. N, normal human brain; GB, glioblastoma multiforme; A, primary astrocytoma; AA, anaplastic astrocytoma; OA, oligoastrocytoma.

In view of the key function of FEN1 in DNA repair it is pertinent to speculate that the high level of expression in tumors contributes to intrinsic or aquired drug resistance. To gain some insight as to the effect of FEN1 on cell death by anticancer drugs, we down-regulated FEN1 by siRNA transfection in LN308 glioblastoma cells. FEN1 down-regulation was confirmed by immunoblotting (Figure 3A). As shown in Figure 3B, FEN1-depleted cells were significantly more sensitive to the methylating agents MMS and TMZ as well as to cisplatin (CDDP). The data indicate that alterations in the FEN1 level may have impact on the tumor cell response to anticancer drugs.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study showing FEN1 overexpression in glioblastoma and astrocytoma. Overall, the data reported here extend previous observations, indicating that FEN1 at the protein level is up-regulated, not in all, but in most of the tumors assayed compared to normal tissue. Therefore, it might pose a marker of tumor progression for many types of tumors.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Transient down-regulation of FEN1 by siRNA in the LN229 glioblastoma cell line provokes sensitivity to methylating agents and cisplatin. A, FEN1 was transiently down-regulated in LN308 cells by transfection with siRNA for FEN1 using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX. For control, a ‘scrambled’ siRNA (SCRsiRNA) was used for transfection. Total cells extracts were prepared and assayed for FEN1 protein expression by quantitative Western blotting. B, The cells were treated 48 h after transient transfection with either MMS for 1 h, or TMZ, ACNU or CDDP for 6 h at the indicated concentration. After 96 h, cells were harvested, stained and the percentage of sub-G1 fraction was determined by flow cytometry. Data from 3 independent experiments were compared by Mann-Whitney non-parametric test. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, significant increase in apoptosis.

In several studies, FEN1 protein expression was determined by immunohistochemistry, e.g. in breast (20) and prostate cancer (19). Immunohistochemistry is not quantitative and possible alterations in the protein cannot be determined. Therefore, we decided to measure the expression level by Western blot analysis. Interestingly, in several samples from testis and brain, a shift in the size of FEN1 protein was observed towards higher molecular weight as compared with the normal tissue (e.g. Figure 1A, sample 3, 4 and 6). This might indicate that the protein is posttranslationally modified. There are data that acetylation of FEN1 through the transcriptional coactivator p300 or phosphorylation by cyclin-dependent kinase1-cyclin A leads to reduction of its nuclease and DNA-binding activity in vitro and in vivo (25, 26).

It has been proposed that increased expression of FEN1 in different types of cancer may reflect the greater proliferation rate of cancer cells compared to normal cells (19) since FEN1 is proliferation-dependent regulated (11) and silenced in terminally differentiated cells (12). Increased FEN1 expression might also be a response to greater DNA damage in cancer cells. We should note that FEN1 is induced at the gene level by genotoxic stress in mouse fibroblasts and that transgenic expression of FEN1 attenuates UV light induced DNA replication inhibition (13). Although the data support the view that FEN1 overexpression protects against genotoxins, it remains to be shown that up-regulation of FEN1 by genotoxic stress can also occur in human cells, notably in tumor tissue. Irrespective of the mechanism of FEN1 up-regulation in tumors, it is pertinent to conclude on the basis of available data that FEN1 provides a marker of tumor progression. Whether FEN1 can become up-regulated in tumors due to radiation and chemotherapy is an intriguing question that remains to be solved.

Since FEN1 is a limiting factor in DNA repair one might speculate that a high expression level in tumors contributes to intrinsic or aquired drug resistance. Therefore, we down-regulated FEN1 in LN308 glioblastoma cells. FEN1-depleted cells were more sensitive to the methylating agents MMS and TMZ. They were also more sensitive to cisplatin, indicating that the FEN1 level may have impact on the tumor cell response to anticancer drugs. This is in line with reports showing that breast cancer cells with low basal expression of FEN1 are much more sensitive to induction of apoptosis through polyamine depletion compared to breast cancer cells with a higher expression level (27). We should note that FEN1-down-regulated cells became sensitive to methylating agents that induce DNA damage repaired by BER, in which FEN1 is decisively involved in the long-patch BER pathway [for review see (28)]. TMZ is first-line therapy for glioma (WHO III, IV) and, therefore, modulation of FEN1 might have significant impact on chemotherapy by TMZ. FEN1 was also shown to play a role in the final step of nucleotide excision repair (NER) in a complex with ligase I (29). In addition, FEN1 and the NER protein XPG show homology in the DNA-binding domain, which is suggested to confer resistance to the antitumor drug trabectedin (30). Therefore, altered expression of FEN1 might have impact on a broad range of anticancer drugs, including methylating agents and cisplatin. Clearly, further and more detailed studies are required for clarifying the role of FEN1 as a marker of anticancer drug resistance and tumor progression.

Acknowledgements

We thank Georg Nagel for technical assistance and Drs. W. Brenner, D. Wiewrodt and H.A. Lehr for normal tissue and tumor samples. This work was supported by Deutsche Krebshilfe No. 106748.

  • Received March 23, 2009.
  • Revision received May 8, 2009.
  • Accepted May 19, 2009.
  • Copyright© 2009 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Henneke G,
    2. Friedrich-Heineken E,
    3. Huebscher U
    : Flap endonuclease 1: a novel tumour suppresser protein. TRENDS Biochem Sci 28: 384-390, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Klungland A,
    2. Lindahl T
    : Second pathway for completion of human DNA base excision-repair: reconstitution with purified proteins and requirement for DNase IV (FEN1). EMBO J 16: 3341-3348, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  3. ↵
    1. Wu X,
    2. Wilson TE,
    3. Lieber MR
    : A role for FEN-1 in nonhomologous DNA end joining: The order of strand annealing and nucleolytic processing events. PNAS 96: 1303-1308, 1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Kikuchi K,
    2. Taniguchi Y,
    3. Hatanaka A,
    4. Sonoda E,
    5. Hochegger H,
    6. Adachi N,
    7. Matsuzaki Y,
    8. Koyama H,
    9. van Gent DC,
    10. Jasin M,
    11. Takeda S
    : FEN-1 facilitates homologous recombination by removing divergent sequences at DNA break ends. Mol Cell Biol 25: 6948-6955, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Shen B,
    2. Singh P,
    3. Liu R,
    4. Qiu J,
    5. Zheng L,
    6. Finger LD,
    7. Alas S
    : Multiple but dissectible functions of FEN-1 nucleases in nucleic acid processing, genome stability and diseases. Bioessays 27: 717-729, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Saharia A,
    2. Guittat L,
    3. Crocker S,
    4. Lim A,
    5. Steffen M,
    6. Kulkarni S,
    7. Stewart SA
    : Flap endonuclease 1 contributes to telomere stability. Curr Biol 18: 496-500, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Sampathi S,
    2. Bhusari A,
    3. Shen B,
    4. Chai W
    : Human flap endonuclease I is in complex with telomerase and is required for telomerase-mediated telomere maintenance. J Biol Chem 284: 3682-3690, 2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Zheng L,
    2. Dai H,
    3. Zhou M,
    4. Li M,
    5. Singh P,
    6. Qiu J,
    7. Tsark W,
    8. Huang Q,
    9. Kernstine K,
    10. Zhang X,
    11. Lin D,
    12. Shen B
    : FEN1 mutations result in autoimmunity, chronic inflammation and cancers. Nat Med 13: 812-819, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Kucherlapati M,
    2. Nguyen A,
    3. Kuraguchi M,
    4. Yang K,
    5. Fan K,
    6. Bronson R,
    7. Wei K,
    8. Lipkin M,
    9. Edelmann W,
    10. Kucherlapati R
    : Tumour progression in Apc1638N mice with Exo1 and Fen1 deficiencies. Oncogene 26: 6297-6306, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Kucherlapati M,
    2. Yang K,
    3. Kuraguchi M,
    4. Zhao J,
    5. Lia M,
    6. Heyer J,
    7. Kane MF,
    8. Fan K,
    9. Russell R,
    10. Brown AM,
    11. Kneitz B,
    12. Edelmann W,
    13. Kolodner RD,
    14. Lipkin M,
    15. Kucherlapati R
    : Haploinsufficiency of Flap endonuclease (FEN1) leads to rapid tumour progression. PNAS 99: 9924-9929, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Warbrick E,
    2. Coates PJ,
    3. Hall PA
    : FEN1 expression: a novel marker for cell proliferation. J Pathol 186: 319-324, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Kim IS,
    2. Lee MY,
    3. Lee IH,
    4. Shin SL,
    5. Lee SY
    : Gene expression of flap endonuclease-1 during cell proliferation and differentiation. Biochim Biophys Acta 1496: 333-340, 2000.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Christmann M,
    2. Tomicic MT,
    3. Origer J,
    4. Kaina B
    : FEN1 is induced p53 dependently and involved in the recovery from UV-light-induced replication inhibition. Oncogene 24: 8304-8313, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Sato M,
    2. Girard L,
    3. Sekine I,
    4. Sunaga N,
    5. Ramirez RD,
    6. Kamibayashi C,
    7. Minna JD
    : Increased expression and no mutation of the Flap endonuclease (FEN1) gene in human lung cancer. Oncogene 22: 7243-7246, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Kim JM,
    2. Sohn HY,
    3. Yoon SY,
    4. Oh JH,
    5. Yang JO,
    6. Kim JH,
    7. Song KS,
    8. Rho SM,
    9. Yoo HS,
    10. Kim YS,
    11. Kim JG,
    12. Kim NS
    : Identification of gastric cancer-related genes using a cDNA microarray containing novel expressed sequence tags expressed in gastric cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res 11: 473-482, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. LaTulippe E,
    2. Satagopan J,
    3. Smith A,
    4. Scher H,
    5. Scardino P,
    6. Reuter V,
    7. Gerald WL
    : Comprehensive gene expression analysis of prostate cancer reveals distinct transcriptional programs associated with metastatic disease. Cancer Res 62: 4499-4506, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Iacobuzio-Donahue CA,
    2. Maitra A,
    3. Olsen M,
    4. Lowe AW,
    5. van Heek NT,
    6. Rosty C,
    7. Walter K,
    8. Sato N,
    9. Parker A,
    10. Ashfaq R,
    11. Jaffee E,
    12. Ryu B,
    13. Jones J,
    14. Eshleman JR,
    15. Yeo CJ,
    16. Cameron JL,
    17. Kern SE,
    18. Hruban RH,
    19. Brown PO,
    20. Goggins M
    : Exploration of global gene expression patterns in pancreatic adenocarcinoma using cDNA microarrays. Am J Pathol 162: 1151-1162, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Krause A,
    2. Combaret V,
    3. Iacono I,
    4. Lacroix B,
    5. Compagnon C,
    6. Bergeron C,
    7. Valsesia-Wittmann S,
    8. Leissner P,
    9. Mougin B,
    10. Puisieux A
    : Genome-wide analysis of gene expression in neuroblastomas detected by mass screening. Cancer Lett 225: 111-120, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Lam JS,
    2. Seligson DB,
    3. Yu H,
    4. Eeva M,
    5. Pantuck AJ,
    6. Zeng G,
    7. Horvath S,
    8. Belldegrun AS
    : Flap endonuclease 1 is overexpressed in prostate cancer and is associated with a high Gleason score. BJU Int 98: 445-451, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Singh P,
    2. Yang M,
    3. Dai H,
    4. Yu D,
    5. Huang Q,
    6. Tan W,
    7. Kernstine KH,
    8. Lin D,
    9. Shen B
    : Overexpression and hypomethylation of flap endonuclease 1 gene in breast and other cancers. Mol Cancer Res 6: 1710-1717, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Miyoshi T,
    2. Nagai T,
    3. Kikuchi S,
    4. Ohmine K,
    5. Nakamura M,
    6. Hanafusa T,
    7. Komatsu N,
    8. Ozawa K
    : Cloning and characterization of a human BCR/ABL-positive cell line, K562/RR, resistant to the farnesyltransferase inhibition by tipifarnib. Exp Hematol 35: 1358-1365, 2007.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Nagel G,
    2. Brenner W,
    3. Johnsson K,
    4. Kaina B
    : DNA repair protein O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase in testis and testicular tumors as determined by a novel nonradioactive assay. Anal Biochem 321: 38-43, 2003.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Wiewrodt D,
    2. Nagel G,
    3. Dreimüller N,
    4. Hundsberger T,
    5. Perneczky A,
    6. Kaina B
    : MGMT in primary and recurrent human glioblastomas after radiation and chemotherapy and comparison with p53 status and clinical outcome. Int J Cancer 122: 1391-1399, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Holen T,
    2. Moe SE,
    3. Sørbø JG,
    4. Meza TJ,
    5. Ottersen OP,
    6. Klungland A
    : Tolerated wobble mutations in siRNAs decrease specificity, but can enhance activity in vivo. Nucleic Acids Res 33: 4704-4710, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Hasan S,
    2. Stucki M,
    3. Hassa PO,
    4. Imhof R,
    5. Gehrig P,
    6. Hunziker P,
    7. Huebscher U,
    8. Hottiger MO
    : Regulation of human flap endonuclease-1 activity by acetylation through the transcriptional coactivator p300. Mol Cell 7: 1221-1231, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Henneke G,
    2. Koundrioukoff S,
    3. Huebscher U
    : Phosphorylation of human FEN1 by cyclin-dependent kinase modulates its role in replication fork regulation. Oncogene 22: 4301-4313, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Johansson VM,
    2. Miniotis MF,
    3. Hegardt C,
    4. Jönsson G,
    5. Staaf J,
    6. Berntsson PS,
    7. Oredsson SM,
    8. Alm K
    : Effect of polyamine deficiency on proteins involved in Okazaki fragment maturation. Cell Biol Int 32: 1467-1477, 2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Christmann M,
    2. Tomicic MT,
    3. Roos WP,
    4. Kaina B
    : Mechanisms of human DNA repair: an update. Toxicology 193: 3-34, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Mocquet V,
    2. Lainé JP,
    3. Riedl T,
    4. Yajin Z,
    5. Lee MY,
    6. Egly JM
    : Sequential recruitment of the repair factors during NER: the role of XPG in initiating the resynthesis step. EMBO J 27: 155-167, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Herrero AB,
    2. Martin-Castellanos C,
    3. Marco E,
    4. Gago F,
    5. Moreno S
    : Cross-Talk between nucleotide excision and homologous recombination DNA repair pathways in the mechanism of action of antitumour trabectedin. Cancer Res 66: 8155-8162, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 29, Issue 7
July 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
FEN1 is Overexpressed in Testis, Lung and Brain Tumors
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 9 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
FEN1 is Overexpressed in Testis, Lung and Brain Tumors
TEODORA NIKOLOVA, MARKUS CHRISTMANN, BERND KAINA
Anticancer Research Jul 2009, 29 (7) 2453-2459;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
FEN1 is Overexpressed in Testis, Lung and Brain Tumors
TEODORA NIKOLOVA, MARKUS CHRISTMANN, BERND KAINA
Anticancer Research Jul 2009, 29 (7) 2453-2459;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Integrated genetic screening reveals FEN1 as a driver of stemness and temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma
  • CDK1 and HSP90AA1 appears as novel regulatory gene in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Bioinformatics Approach
  • Cross-Species Complementation of Nonessential Yeast Genes Establishes Platforms for Testing Inhibitors of Human Proteins
  • Inhibition of AKT Sensitizes Cancer Cells to Antineoplastic Drugs by Downregulating Flap Endonuclease 1
  • FEN1 Ensures Telomere Stability by Facilitating Replication Fork Re-initiation
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Coumarin-based Oximes Exert Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitory Activity
  • Selective Inhibition of Protein Kinase D2 Activity Reduces Human Neutrophil Survival
  • POM121 Drives Gastric Cancer Progression via the mTOR/p70S6K Signaling Axis
Show more Experimental Studies
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire