Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Carboplatin and Vinorelbine Combined with Subcutaneous Interleukin-2 in Metastatic Melanoma with Poor Prognosis

MERI-SISKO VUORISTO, PIA VIHINEN, TANJA SKYTTÄ, KRISTIINA TYYNELÄ and PIRKKO KELLOKUMPU-LEHTINEN
Anticancer Research May 2009, 29 (5) 1755-1759;
MERI-SISKO VUORISTO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: meri-sisko.vuoristo{at}fimnet.fi
PIA VIHINEN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TANJA SKYTTÄ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KRISTIINA TYYNELÄ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PIRKKO KELLOKUMPU-LEHTINEN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: The treatment results of metastatic melanoma are miserable if the tumor has spread beyond the soft tissue and lung, in particular, if dacarbazine (DTIC)-based therapy has failed. Platinum analogs and vinca alkaloids have shown some activity in melanoma. Interleukin-2 (IL-2) may augment the efficacy of chemotherapy. Patients and Methods: A prospective phase II pilot study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a regimen which contained carboplatin (450 mg/m2 on day 1), vinorelbine (30 mg/m2 on day 1) and IL-2 (9 MU subcutaneously once daily on days 2-5 and 9-12) in metastatic melanoma. Twenty-two patients (11 men, 11 women; median age 56 years) were eligible, of whom 13 had cutaneous, 6 ocular and 3 unknown primary melanoma. Seventeen patients (77%) had liver metastases and an equal number had received prior chemotherapy and/or interferon-alfa for recurrent disease. Results: One partial response was recorded, yielding a response rate of 4.5% . Nine patients had stable disease for a median of 6.0 months (range 3.0-8.6 months). The median time to progression for all patients was 1.8 months (range 0.7-8.6 months) and the median survival was 7.2 months (range 1.4-42.0 months). Toxicity was moderate but manageable. Myelosuppression was the most significant adverse event. Conclusion: This regimen may offer clinical benefit for melanoma patients with poor prognosis as second-line therapy after DTIC has failed.

  • Carboplatin
  • interleukin-2
  • melanoma
  • metastatic
  • second-line treatment
  • vinorelbine

Metastatic melanoma remains a challenge for oncologists despite recent developments in medical oncology. Dacarbazine (DTIC), which is still the standard agent in melanoma, produces an average response rate of 17% and a median survival of around 7 months (1). Polychemotherapy regimens have often yielded higher response rates than single agents but they have not improved survival in randomised studies (2). The cytokines interferon (IFN)-alfa and interleukin-2 (IL-2) have shown some activity in melanoma (2, 3). High-dose intravenous IL-2 has produced durable responses in metastatic melanoma: at a long-term follow-up update, 5-year survival was 10% (3). The toxicity of high-dose IL-2, however, limits its wider use. Less toxic, lower doses of IL-2 administered subcutaneously have been incorporated into various chemotherapy plus IFN-alfa regimens with some benefit in terms of response rate (2).

Besides DTIC, vinca alkaloids and platinum compounds have shown some anti-melanoma activity (4). There are only few reports on a newer vinca alkaloid, vinorelbine, in metastatic melanoma. Single agent studies have produced negative results (5, 6) but combined with paclitaxel (7), tamoxifen (8), IL-2 (9), or docetaxel plus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (10), response rates ranging from 9 to 50% have been reported in small phase II first- or second-line studies. Responses in unfavourable metastatic locations, such as abdominal viscera, have also been occasionally observed with vinorelbine (7, 8). Carboplatin has been studied less than cisplatin in melanoma. Over the last decade, response rates ranging from zero to 29% have been reported with carboplatin-containing combinations in metastatic melanoma (11-16). With regimens containing vinorelbine or carboplatin some second-line activity has also been reported (9, 10, 13, 15, 16).

We carried out a prospective phase II pilot study to assess the efficacy and tolerability of a regimen which contained carboplatin, vinorelbine and subcutaneous IL-2 in melanoma patients who had progressed on previous systemic treatment or in chemo-naive patients with unfavourable metastatic load.

Patients and Methods

Patient eligibility. The main inclusion criteria for the study were i) cytologically or histologically verified metastatic melanoma with cutaneous, subcutaneous tissue, lymph node and/or lung or pleural disease that had progressed on previous systemic treatment(s); ii) other metastases irrespective of previous treatment(s), if any. Other inclusion criteria were measurable or evaluable disease, age ≤65 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2, a life expectancy of at least 3 months and adequate bone marrow, liver and renal functions. The main exclusion criteria were metastases confined to the soft tissue and/or lung in chemo-naive patients, central nervous system involvement, severe other illness or any illness which required chronic immunosuppressive treatment and any other metastasizing malignancy treated within the previous five years.

A physical examination, performance status, complete blood counts, blood chemistry and electrocardiogram were recorded at baseline and before each treatment cycle. Staging was based on clinical and radiological examinations, which included chest radiography, body computed tomography scan, bone scan and additional imaging, when indicated. Blood counts and liver and renal function tests were repeated in the second week of the treatment cycle.

The protocol was approved by the Ethical Committee and all patients provided written informed consent to participate in the study.

Treatment schedule. The treatment regimen consisted of carboplatin 450 mg/m2 and vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 (maximum dose 60 mg), both on day 1 intravenously (i.v.). Recombinant human IL-2 (Proleukin® Chiron Corporation, Emeryville, California, USA) was administered at a dose of 9 million international units (MU) subcutaneously (s.c.) once daily on days 2 to 5 and 9 to 12. The cycle was 3 weeks.

In cases of no disease progression after 2 cycles, the treatment was to be continued up to 4 cycles, unless a patient refused or toxicity warranted treatment interruption. If the patient had a response or stable disease (SD) after 4 treatment cycles, maintenance treatment with IL-2 was to be pursued to a maximum of 4 cycles. The maintenance treatment consisted of IL-2 at 9 MU once daily s.c. on days 1 to 4 and 8 to 11 of a 28-day cycle.

Assessment of efficacy. The primary end-points were response rate (RR) and tolerability; the secondary end-points included time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS). Response was analysed every 6-8 weeks according to the RECIST criteria (17) in all eligible patients. Toxicity assessments were performed at every cycle according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v3.0) (http://ctep.info.nih.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/ctc.htm).

In the statistical analysis, descriptive statistics and the Kaplan-Meier method were used. TTP was calculated from the initiation of treatment to the date of progression and OS from the treatment start to the date of death or last follow-up.

Results

Twenty-three patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage IV melanoma and poor prognostic features were enrolled for the present multicenter study during April 2004 and October 2006. One patient was subsequently deemed ineligible due to concomitant metastatic carcinoid tumor. The patient characteristics of the 22 eligible patients are shown in Table I. The male/female ratio was 11/11 and the median age 56 years (range 27-63 years). Six patients had an ocular primary tumor. Out of 22 patients, only 3 had metastases confined to the soft tissue or lung, while 17 had liver metastases and 2 had other abdominal involvement. The majority had received prior DTIC-containing chemotherapy for recurrent metastatic disease.

At the time of analysis, all patients had progressed and 20 patients had died. One patient (4.5%, 95% CI 0.8-21.8%) with nodal, liver, bone and adrenal involvement from unknown primary melanoma achieved a partial response (PR) with TTP of 4.5 months. Nine patients (40.9%, 95% CI 23.3-61.3%) had stable disease (SD) which lasted for a median of 6.0 months (range 3.0-8.6 months, 95% CI 1.4-10.5 months). Six of them had a cutaneous primary tumor, two had uveal melanoma and one had melanoma of an unknown origin. Twelve patients (54.5%, 95% CI 34.7-73.1%) had PD. The median TTP for the entire patient population was 1.8 months (range 0.7-8.6 months, 95% CI 0-3.7 months). TTP exceeded 6 months in 4 patients. The median OS for all patients was 7.2 months (range 1.4-42.0 months, 95% CI 3.5-10.9 months) and for patients with SD, 18.2 months (range 4.2-42.0 months, 95% CI 14.5-21.9 months). Nine patients survived for over one year.

The median number of administered cycles (treatment and maintenance) per patient was 2 (range 1-8). The patient with PR received 6 cycles and the patients with SD received a median of 6 cycles (range 2-8 cycles). Dose reductions and/or treatment delays with chemotherapeutic agents occurred in 17 patients and with IL-2 in 9 patients.

The toxicity was moderate but manageable (Table II). Constitutional symptoms, myelosuppression, nausea and subcutaneous injection site reactions were the most frequent adverse events. In addition, elevations of liver transaminases or alkaline phosphatase were frequent, but mostly mild and transient. No capillary leak syndrome attributable to IL-2 was documented. The dose-limiting toxicity was hematological, neutropenia in particular. IL-2 frequently caused lymphopenia followed by rebound lymphocytosis, and eosinophilia was also common. Any (worst) grade 3 toxicity occurred in 9 patients and grade 4 in 8 patients. Grade 4 toxicities included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, gastrointestinal bleeding associated with thrombocytopenia and anemia, and hyponatremia. One patient had the study treatment discontinued due to severe obstipation and fatigue. There were no toxic deaths.

Discussion

In the present prospective phase II study, we analyzed the efficacy and feasibility of a combination of carboplatin, vinorelbine and subcutaneous IL-2 in patients with advanced melanoma. The vast majority of our patients (77%) had liver involvement (all ocular melanoma patients and 69% of the others). Two thirds of the patients had been previously treated with DTIC-containing chemotherapy for stage IV disease. Therefore, albeit the RR for the present regimen was no greater than 4.5%, the SD rate of 41% with a median duration of 6 months and median survival of 18.2 months deserves some attention. Presently, there is no standard second-line therapy for patients with disseminated cutaneous melanoma, and even less so for those with the ocular counterpart. In previous reports, RR of 0-26% and SD in around 20% of patients have been obtained in pretreated melanoma patients with combinations that contain vinorelbine or carboplatin (5, 9, 13, 15, 16). Those studies, however, included fewer patients with liver metastases than did our study (5, 9, 13, 16). Furthermore, our series included 5 patients with uveal melanoma, a disease which is even more resistant to systemic therapies than is cutaneous melanoma (18). Interestingly, in our series, two patients with uveal melanoma who achieved SD, one with liver metastases and the other with liver plus lung involvement, were still alive at 31.2 and 42 months, respectively. The latter patient was continuing on low-dose IFN-alfa after three lines of chemotherapy, including the study treatment.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Patient characteristics.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Toxicity of treatment.

In the present study on patients with poor prognosis, the median TTP in the entire study population of 1.8 months is slightly inferior to other reports on pretreated melanoma patients with TTP of 2-3 months, while the median OS of approximately 7 months falls within the category of 6-9 months reported in second-line studies (5, 9, 15, 16). In previously published literature, an interesting combination which aims at increasing the platinum dose but avoiding severe side-effects is a combination of carboplatin and cisplatin. The regimen has produced 14-26% response rates, 20-50% SD rates and a median survival of 8-12.5 months in pretreated melanoma patients (19, 20).

In the present study, the main toxicity was hematological, particularly neutropenia. This was not unexpected since carboplatin and vinorelbine both are myelotoxic. The most frequent non-hematological toxicities were, as expected, subcutaneous injection site reactions, flu-like symptoms, fatigue and gastrointestinal effects. In our study, mild metabolic hepatotoxicity, attributable to vinorelbine, was also common. Vinca alkaloids are eliminated mainly by the biliary system while platinum agents are primarily excreted by the kidneys (21).

On more novel agents, preliminary data on a multi-kinase inhibitor, sorafenib, combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel were not impressive in the second-line setting, but sorafenib combined with DTIC in chemo-naive patients appears more promising (4, 22). A novel immunotherapeutic approach, namely monoclonal antibodies against cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA4), is an interesting avenue (23). Meanwhile, considering that only few agents have any effect in advanced melanoma, cytokines continue to have some role in melanoma therapy. Local treatment modalities combined with systemic treatment should not be neglected either (24). Selected patients with metastatic disease may benefit from aggressive surgery (25).

In conclusion, the present regimen offered clinically meaningful disease stabilization in melanoma patients with an unfavourable tumor load albeit at the cost of moderate toxicity. This regimen may be a second-line treatment option for DTIC-resistant patients.

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by the Pirkanmaa Hospital District Research Fund.

  • Received September 17, 2008.
  • Revision received December 17, 2008.
  • Accepted January 14, 2009.
  • Copyright© 2009 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Huncharek M,
    2. Caubet JF,
    3. McGarry R
    : Single agent DTIC versus combination chemotherapy with or without immunotherapy in metastatic melanoma: a meta-analysis of 3,273 patients from 20 randomized trials. Melanoma Res 11: 75-81, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Nashan D,
    2. Müller ML,
    3. Grabbe S,
    4. Wustlich S,
    5. Enk A
    : Systemic therapy of disseminated malignant melanoma: an evidence-based overview of the state-of-the-art in daily routine. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 21: 1305-1318, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Atkins MB
    : Cytokine-based therapy and biochemotherapy for advanced melanoma. Clin Cancer Res 12: 2353s-2358s, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Tawbi HA,
    2. Kirkwood JM
    : Management of metastatic melanoma. Semin Oncol 34: 532-545, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Whitehead RP,
    2. Moon J,
    3. McCachren SS,
    4. Hersh EM,
    5. Samlowski WE,
    6. Beck JT,
    7. Tchekmedyian NS,
    8. Sondak VK
    : A Phase II trial of vinorelbine tartrate in patients with disseminated malignant melanoma and one prior systemic therapy: a Southwest Oncology Group study. Cancer 100: 1699-1704, 2004.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Jimeno A,
    2. Hitt R,
    3. Quintela-Fandino M,
    4. Cortés-Funes H
    : Phase II trial of vinorelbine tartrate in patients with treatment-naive metastatic melanoma. Anticancer Drugs 16: 53-57, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Retsas S,
    2. Mohith A,
    3. Mackenzie H
    : Taxol and vinorelbine: a new active combination for disseminated malignant melanoma. Anticancer Drugs 7: 161-165, 1996.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Feun LG,
    2. Savaraj N,
    3. Hurley J,
    4. Marini A,
    5. Lai S
    : A clinical trial of intravenous vinorelbine tartrate plus tamoxifen in the treatment of patients with advanced malignant melanoma. Cancer 88: 584-558, 2000.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Gogas H,
    2. Bafaloukos D,
    3. Aravantinos G,
    4. Fountzilas G,
    5. Tsoutsos D,
    6. Panagiotou P,
    7. Frangia K,
    8. Kalofonos HP,
    9. Briasoulis E,
    10. Castana O,
    11. Polyzos A,
    12. Pectasides D,
    13. Ioannovich J,
    14. Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Goup
    : Vinorelbine in combination with interleukin-2 as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic melanoma. A phase II study of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group. Cancer Invest 22: 832-839, 2004.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Fruehauf JP,
    2. Kong KM,
    3. Jakowatz JG
    : Docetaxel and vinorelbine plus GM-CSF in malignant melanoma. Oncology (Williston Park) 19(4 Suppl 2): 19-22, 2005.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Bafaloukos D,
    2. Fountzilas G,
    3. Skarlos D,
    4. Pavlidis N,
    5. Bakoyiannis C,
    6. Karvounis N,
    7. Kosmidis P
    : Subcutaneous low doses of interleukin-2 and recombinant interferon alpha with carboplatin and vinblastine in patients with advanced melanoma. Oncology 55: 48-52, 1998.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Agarwala SS,
    2. Ferri W,
    3. Gooding W,
    4. Kirkwood JM
    : A phase III randomized trial of dacarbazine and carboplatin with and without tamoxifen in the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma. Cancer 85: 1979-1984, 1999.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Jelić S,
    2. Babović N,
    3. Stamatović L,
    4. Kreacić M,
    5. Matković S,
    6. Popov I
    : Vinblastin-carboplatin for metastatic cutaneous melanoma as first-line chemotherapy and in dacarbazine failures: a single-center study. Med Oncol 18: 189-195, 2001.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Hodi FS,
    2. Soiffer RJ,
    3. Clark J,
    4. Finkelstein DM,
    5. Haluska FG
    : Phase II study of paclitaxel and carboplatin for malignant melanoma. Am J Clin Oncol 25: 283-286, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Zimpfer-Rechner C,
    2. Hofmann U,
    3. Figl R,
    4. Becker JC,
    5. Trefzer U,
    6. Keller I,
    7. Hauschild A,
    8. Schadendorf D
    : Randomized phase II study of weekly paclitaxel versus paclitaxel and carboplatin as second-line therapy in disseminated melanoma: a multicentre trial of the Dermatologic Co-operative Oncology Group (DeCOG). Melanoma Res 13: 531-536, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Rao RD,
    2. Holtan SG,
    3. Ingle JN,
    4. Croghan GA,
    5. Kottschade LA,
    6. Creagan ET,
    7. Kaur JS,
    8. Pitot HC,
    9. Markovic SN
    : Combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin as second-line therapy for patients with metastatic melanoma. Cancer 106: 375-382, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Therasse P,
    2. Arbuck SG,
    3. Eisenhauer EA,
    4. Wanders J,
    5. Kaplan RS,
    6. Rubinstein L,
    7. Verweij J,
    8. Van Glabbeke M,
    9. van Oosterom AT,
    10. Christian MC,
    11. Gwyther SG
    : New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 92: 205-216, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study Group
    : Development of metastatic disease after enrollment in the COMS trials for treatment of choroidal melanoma. Arch Ophthalmol 123: 1639-1643, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Güven K,
    2. Kittler H,
    3. Wolff K,
    4. Pehamberger H
    : Cisplatin and carboplatin combination as second-line chemotherapy in dacarbazine-resistant melanoma patients. Melanoma Res 11: 411-415, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Hofmann MA,
    2. Gabriel V,
    3. Milling A,
    4. Kiecker F,
    5. Sterry W,
    6. Trefzer U
    : High-dose platinum combination therapy in pretreated patients with disseminated melanoma. Chemotherapy 53: 422-428, 2007.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Eklund JW,
    2. Trifilio S,
    3. Mulcahy MF
    : Chemotherapy dosing in the setting of liver dysfunction. Oncology (Williston Park) 19: 1057-1063, 2005.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. McDermott DF,
    2. Sosman JA,
    3. Gonzalez R,
    4. Hodi FS,
    5. Linette GP,
    6. Richards J,
    7. Jakub JW,
    8. Beeram M,
    9. Tarantolo S,
    10. Agarwala S,
    11. Frenette G,
    12. Puzanov I,
    13. Cranmer L,
    14. Lewis K,
    15. Kirkwood J,
    16. White JM,
    17. Xia C,
    18. Patel K,
    19. Hersh E
    : Double-blind randomized phase II study of the combination of sorafenib and dacarbazine in patients with advanced melanoma: a report from the 11715 Study Group. J Clin Oncol 26: 2178-2185, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Cranmer LD,
    2. Hersh E
    : The role of the CTLA4 blockade in the treatment of malignant melanoma. Cancer Invest 25: 613-631, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Richtig E,
    2. Ludwig R,
    3. Kerl H,
    4. Smolle J
    : Organ- and treatment-specific local response rates to systemic and local treatment modalities in stage IV melanoma. Br J Dermatol 153: 925-931, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. McLoughlin JM,
    2. Zager JS,
    3. Sondak VK,
    4. Berk LB
    : Treatment options for limited or symptomatic metastatic melanoma. Cancer Control 15: 239-247, 2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 29, Issue 5
May 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Carboplatin and Vinorelbine Combined with Subcutaneous Interleukin-2 in Metastatic Melanoma with Poor Prognosis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 7 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Carboplatin and Vinorelbine Combined with Subcutaneous Interleukin-2 in Metastatic Melanoma with Poor Prognosis
MERI-SISKO VUORISTO, PIA VIHINEN, TANJA SKYTTÄ, KRISTIINA TYYNELÄ, PIRKKO KELLOKUMPU-LEHTINEN
Anticancer Research May 2009, 29 (5) 1755-1759;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Carboplatin and Vinorelbine Combined with Subcutaneous Interleukin-2 in Metastatic Melanoma with Poor Prognosis
MERI-SISKO VUORISTO, PIA VIHINEN, TANJA SKYTTÄ, KRISTIINA TYYNELÄ, PIRKKO KELLOKUMPU-LEHTINEN
Anticancer Research May 2009, 29 (5) 1755-1759;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Risk of Non-colorectal Malignancies in Sporadic Versus Lynch Syndrome–associated dMMR Colorectal Cancer
  • Evaluation of Radiotherapy Dose in Secondary Breast Angiosarcoma: Implications for Pathogenesis
  • Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Outcomes for Colorectal and Mesothelioma Peritoneal Metastases: A 12-year Study
Show more Clinical Studies
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire