Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Management of Cardiac Adverse Events Occurring with Sunitinib Treatment

MANUELA SCHMIDINGER, ANDJA BOJIC, URSULA M VOGL, WOLFGANG LAMM and CHRISTOPH C. ZIELINSKI
Anticancer Research May 2009, 29 (5) 1627-1629;
MANUELA SCHMIDINGER
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: manuela.schmidinger{at}meduniwien.ac.at
ANDJA BOJIC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
URSULA M VOGL
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
WOLFGANG LAMM
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CHRISTOPH C. ZIELINSKI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Sunitinib malate is the reference standard of care for the first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Cardiovascular adverse events (AEs) have been observed with sunitinib treatment. Here, we present the case report of a 49-year-old male patient with mRCC in whom cardiac AEs experienced during sunitinib treatment were successfully managed. The patient was at poor prognostic risk, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 3. Results: The patient was treated with sunitinib 50 mg/day (4 weeks on treatment followed by 2 weeks off treatment; Schedule 4/2) following lung and bone metastases. Cardiac AEs occurred following sunitinib initiation. These events were resolved with cardiovascular co-medication. Sunitinib improved the patient's quality of life and performance status, with a prolonged duration of treatment of 24 months. Conclusion: This case indicates that cardiac AEs should not be a barrier to the effective use of sunitinib in mRCC.

  • Sunitinib
  • renal cell carcinoma
  • cardiovascular
  • tyrosine kinase inhibitor

Case Report

Sunitinib malate is an oral, multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, approved multinationally for the first-line and second-line treatment of advanced and/or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Sunitinib has shown substantial efficacy in the first-line treatment of mRCC (1) and is now considered the reference standard of care in this setting (2). In a randomised, phase III trial in patients with previously untreated mRCC, sunitinib was associated with median progression-free survival more than double that observed with interferon-alfa (IFN-α) (11.0 months vs. 5.1 months, respectively; p<0.000001) (3). Sunitinib was also superior to IFN-α with respect to objective response rate (47% vs. 12%, respectively; p<0.000001) (3). In addition, sunitinib was associated with median overall survival (OS) of more than 2 years in this study (26.4 months vs. 21.8 months for IFN-α; p=0.051) (3). Patients were permitted to cross over from IFN-α to sunitinib in the study. To account for this, an analysis was performed on patients who received only their on-study treatments, where median OS was found to be 28.1 months for sunitinib compared with 14.1 months for IFN-α (p=0.0033) (3).

Cardiovascular adverse events (AEs) have been observed with sunitinib treatment. In the phase III trial in patients with mRCC, 24% of patients treated with sunitinib reported hypertension of any grade (1). The incidence of grade 3 decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was similar in both the sunitinib and IFN-α groups (2% vs. 1%) in this trial (1). The presenting study group recently reported electrocardiogram (ECG) changes in 40.5% of patients treated with either sunitinib or the multikinase inhibitor, sorafenib (4). Here a case in which cardiac AEs experienced during sunitinib treatment were successfully managed is presented.

Patient background. A 49-year-old male patient underwent nephrectomy in June 2005 following diagnosis of clear-cell RCC with venous invasion but no distant metastases (pT3b, pNx, M0). In March 2006, the patient was diagnosed with mRCC with lung and bone metastases. The patient presented with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) of 3, increased corrected calcium (1.55 mmol/L [normal range: 1.16-1.32 mmol/L]), elevated lactate dehydrogenase (539 u/L [normal: <248 u/L]) and anaemia. He was thus considered to be at poor prognostic risk according to the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) classification (5). In addition, the patient was wheelchair-bound due to weakness and pain.

Treatment. Sunitinib was initiated at the end of March 2006 using the standard dose of 50 mg/day on Schedule 4/2 (4 weeks on treatment followed by 2 weeks off treatment) following diagnosis of lung and bone metastases. Minor toxicities (≤ grade 2) emerging upon sunitinib treatment included slight increases in blood pressure, anaemia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Following two 6-week cycles of sunitinib, the patient was admitted to hospital for severe dyspnoea. His blood pressure had reduced to 90/60 mmHg and tests revealed oedema, in addition to pleural and pericardial effusions (Table I). Reduced ejection fraction (EF) of 26%, low-voltage ECG and regional contraction disturbances were observed. Cardiac troponin was detected at a level of 0.04 ng/mL. Coronary angiography revealed no significant obstructive coronary artery disease.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Adverse events according to World Health Organization (WHO) Grades. Grades seen in this patient are shown in italics.

The patient was prescribed an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (lisinopril 5 mg/day initiated and increased up to 30 mg/day), diuretics (spironolactone 100 mg/day and furosemide 40 mg/day) and a β-blocker (carvedilol 6.25 mg initiated twice daily and increased up to 25 mg twice daily). Sunitinib treatment was also interrupted. After 10-days of receiving cardiovascular co-medication, complete cardiac compensation occurred, including disappearance of pericardial/pleural effusions and oedema; blood pressure was normalised. Sunitinib was resumed at a reduced dose of 25 mg/day and the patient was discharged after 3 weeks in the hospital. Sunitinib dosage was subsequently increased to 37.5 mg/day. The patient remains on ACE inhibitors and β-blockers; diuretics were stopped after 3 months of treatment.

The patient survived without mRCC disease progression for 25.0 months, ending in April 2008. The patient's OS is >31 months since the start of sunitinib treatment. These findings are significant considering the patient was initially classified at poor risk according to MSKCC criteria, with an expected PFS of only 2.5 months and OS of just 5 months according to historical data (5). Throughout sunitinib treatment, there have been continuous improvements in the patient's quality of life, determined using clinical assessments. In addition, the patient has experienced no pain and was able to walk and participate in moderate exercise programmes. As of November 2007, disappearance of lung metastases and minor remission of spinal metastases were observed and confirmed by a computed tomography scan. The patient's performance status also improved to an ECOG PS of 1.

Discussion

In the case reported here, cardiac AEs occurred following initiation of sunitinib treatment. However, rapid improvement in cardiovascular symptoms was observed following interruption of sunitinib and initiation of cardiovascular co-medication. This enabled sunitinib treatment to be successfully resumed with the patient surviving without disease progression for 25.0 months. In addition, sunitinib treatment has resulted in an improvement in quality of life and overall performance status.

This case report illustrates that cardiac AEs observed with sunitinib were reversible after the initiation of cardiac co-medication, enabling sunitinib to be re-introduced. As a result the patient achieved prolonged survival without progression and improvements in quality of life. To enable patients with cardiac AEs to be effectively managed, and maintain oncological treatment, it is important to involve a cardiologist to provide guidance at the earliest possible opportunity. The cardiologist should be informed regarding the profile of AEs that can be expected with sunitinib, in the context of the survival benefits that this agent can provide to patients with mRCC. As well as sunitinib, cardiac AEs have been observed during treatment with several other targeted agents available for mRCC, including sorafenib and bevacizumab (6-9). As such, addressing these AEs should be the first step to allow patients to continue oncological treatment, rather than switching to a different targeted agent that may not provide the same level of antitumour efficacy. In conclusion, this case clearly indicates that cardiac AEs should not be seen as a barrier to the effective use of sunitinib in mRCC.

Acknowledgements

Editorial assistance was provided by ACUMED (Tytherington, UK) with funding from Pfizer, Inc.

  • Received December 3, 2008.
  • Revision received January 23, 2009.
  • Accepted February 2, 2009.
  • Copyright© 2009 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Motzer RJ,
    2. Hutson TE,
    3. Tomczak P
    : Sunitinib versus interferon alfa in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 356: 115-124, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Ljungberg B,
    2. Hanbury D,
    3. Kuczyk M
    : Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma. Update March 2007. http://wwwuroweborg/fileadmin/user_upload/Guidelines/08_Renal_Cell_Carcinoma_2007pdf2007.
  3. ↵
    1. Figlin RA,
    2. Hutson TE,
    3. Tomczak P
    : Overall survival with sunitinib versus (IFN)-alfa as first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). J Clin Oncol 26 (May 20 suppl; abstr 5024; oral presentation), 2008.
  4. ↵
    1. Schmidinger M,
    2. Zielinski CC,
    3. Vogl UM
    : Cardiac toxicity of sunitinib and sorafenib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 26: 5204-5212, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Motzer RJ,
    2. Bacik J,
    3. Murphy BA,
    4. Russo P,
    5. Mazumdar M
    : Interferon-alfa as a comparative treatment for clinical trials of new therapies against advanced renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 20: 289-296, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Bevacizumab (Avastin®) Summary of Product Characteristics. Roche Products Limited, August 2008.
    1. Zhu X,
    2. Wu S,
    3. Dahut WL,
    4. Parikh CR
    : Risks of proteinuria and hypertension with bevacizumab, an antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis 49: 186-193, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. Sorafenib (Nexavar®) Summary of Product Characteristics. Bayer plc, April 2008.
  8. ↵
    1. Wu S,
    2. Chen JJ,
    3. Kudelka A,
    4. Lu J,
    5. Zhu X
    : Incidence and risk of hypertension with sorafenib in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 9: 117-123, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 29, Issue 5
May 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Management of Cardiac Adverse Events Occurring with Sunitinib Treatment
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
10 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Management of Cardiac Adverse Events Occurring with Sunitinib Treatment
MANUELA SCHMIDINGER, ANDJA BOJIC, URSULA M VOGL, WOLFGANG LAMM, CHRISTOPH C. ZIELINSKI
Anticancer Research May 2009, 29 (5) 1627-1629;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Management of Cardiac Adverse Events Occurring with Sunitinib Treatment
MANUELA SCHMIDINGER, ANDJA BOJIC, URSULA M VOGL, WOLFGANG LAMM, CHRISTOPH C. ZIELINSKI
Anticancer Research May 2009, 29 (5) 1627-1629;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Case Report
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Real-world Comparative Study of Androgen Receptor Signaling Inhibitors in Japanese Patients With Non-metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
  • Adverse Events and Safety Outcomes Associated With Chemotherapy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease–associated Gastrointestinal Cancers
  • Prognostic Impact of Early GNRI Sustainability in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Receiving Pembrolizumab
Show more Clinical Studies
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire