Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Gemcitabine-Capecitabine plus Intra-arterial Epirubicin-Cisplatin in Pretreated Pancreatic Cancer Patients: A Phase I Study

ANDREA MAMBRINI, PAOLA PACETTI, ALFONSO DEL FREO, ROBERTA DELLA SETA, DEBORA PEZZUOLO, TITO TORRI, MASSIMO ORLANDI, ROBERTA TARTARINI and MAURIZIO CANTORE
Anticancer Research May 2009, 29 (5) 1547-1549;
ANDREA MAMBRINI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PAOLA PACETTI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ALFONSO DEL FREO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ROBERTA DELLA SETA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DEBORA PEZZUOLO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TITO TORRI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MASSIMO ORLANDI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ROBERTA TARTARINI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MAURIZIO CANTORE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: maurizio.cantore{at}usl1.toscana.it
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Gemcitabine plus capecitabine are active in patients (pts) with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC). Intra-arterial chemotherapy showed activity and low toxicity. Combination of systemic and intra-arterial chemotherapy was investigated. Patients and Methods: Patients with APC, progressed after a first-line chemotherapy, were included. Fixed doses of epirubicin 35 mg/m2 and cisplatin 42 mg/m2 intra-arterially every 28 days, and capecitabine 650 mg/m2 twice a day on days 2-15; gemcitabine systemically in increasing doses on day 2. The purpose was to find maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Results: Fifteen patients were enrolled. DLT occurred at 1300 mg/m2 of gemcitabine and consisted of myelotoxicity (grade 4 febrile neutropenia and grade 4 thrombocytopenia). Conclusion: Limiting toxicity was hematological. For further studies intra-arterial epirubicin 35 mg/m2 and cisplatin 42 mg/m2; systemic gemcitabine at 1,000 mg/m2 on day 2, and capecitabine at 650 mg/m2 twice a day PO on days 2-15 are suggested.

  • Gemcitabine
  • capecitabine
  • intra-arterial chemotherapy
  • phase I study

Pancreatic cancer is an important cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality in Europe and United States, with an overall 5-year survival rate of less than 4% (1). Surgical resection remains the only potentially curative treatment modality (2). Chemotherapy for patients with advanced disease improves clinical symptoms and overall survival, but life expectancy for the majority of these patients is short, with a median survival between 4 and 10 months. Single-agent gemcitabine is considered the standard treatment in patients with advanced disease (3). In order to improve therapeutic efficacy, gemcitabine was combined with antimetabolites, platinum analogs or topoisomerase inhibitors. The most promising results were obtained when gemcitabine was combined with the oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine, or with platinum compound (4-8). A recent meta-analysis of randomized trials indicated that patients with a good performance status appear to benefit from gemcitabine-based cytotoxic combination, whereas patients with a poor performance status seem to have no survival benefit from combination chemotherapy (9).

Some studies of intra-arterial chemotherapy have demonstrated that pancreatic adenocarcinoma is dose dependently sensitive to drugs administered by intra-arterial route (10, 11). A four-drug regimen (FLEC: 5-FU, leucovorin, epirubicin and carboplatin) has demonstrated a very good tolerance and interesting results in term of response rate and survival (12). In the adjuvant setting the same regimen with or without systemic gemcitabine has shown a favorable impact on disease free interval and overall survival (13).

The aim of this study was to find the appropriate dose of gemcitabine to adiminister with capecitabine and intra-arterial epirubicin and cisplatin.

Patients and Methods

Patients were eligible if their disease was in progression after at least one line of chemotherapy or chemo/radiotherapy. They had to have histologically or cytologically proven, surgically unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Other inclusion criteria were age 18 to 80 years, ECOG performance status ≤1 and adequate organ function (leukocyte count >3,500/μL, haemoglobin >10.0 g/dL, serum creatinine <1.25 times upper limit of normal (ULN), transaminases and alkaline phosphatase <2.5 times ULN, bilirubin <1.5 times ULN). Written informed consent was obtained from each patient. The protocol and the informed consent were approved by the local institutional review boards.

Treatment plan. On day 1, epirubicin 35 mg/m2 and cisplatin 42 mg/m2 were administered into celiac axis by bolus injection through a catether inserted in the femoral artery with the Seldinger method. Capecitabine was given orally at the fixed dose of 650 mg/m2 twice a day, on days 2-15. Gemcitabine was administered on day 2 of each cycle at a starting dose of 1,000 mg/m2 (intravenously, over 30 minutes) and a 30% dose increase for each consecutive cohort (no intrapatient dose escalation) was planned.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Patient's characteristics.

Adverse events were recorded according to the National Cancer Institute of Canada common toxicity criteria (NCIC-CTC). The maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) was defined as one dose level below the dose level at which two or more of six patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), which was defined as neutropenia and/or thrombocytopenia grade 4 or any non-hematologic grade 3 or 4 toxic effect occurring during the first two treatment courses. The MTD represents the dose recommended for further studies.

The epirubicine and/or cisplatin and/or capecitabine dosage was adjusted, delayed or omitted for toxic effects ≥ grade 2, based on protocol guidelines.

Statistics. The study design was a classic phase I design: three patients were planned for each cohort. If one of these three patients experienced DLT, six more patients were treated at the same dose level. If three patients in the same cohort experienced DLT, the previous dose level was found to be MTD. Three more patients were included at the MTD to ensure that the combination was feasible and tolerable. No formal hypotesis testing on efficacy was planned because assessment of safety was the primary goal of this study.

Results

Fifteen patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer entered this study between August 2006 and February 2008 (Table I). Three patients were planned to receive the dose level 1 (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, on day 2). These patients tolerated the treatment very well. Next, three patients were treated with the dose level 2 (gemcitabine 1300 mg/m2); a grade 3 thrombocytopenia was observed. So, another 6 patients were treated with the same dosage (level 2). In this group, 2 patients registered with grade 4 thrombocytopenia and 1 patient with grade 4 neutropenia. The toxicity of patients treated with the dose level 2 was considered unaccettable. The last three patients, treated with the dose level 1, did not show any grade 3-4 toxicity. Regarding non-hematologic toxicity, in both levels 4 patients presented with grade 2 mucositis and 4 patients with grade 3 alopecia (Table II). The DLT was defined at the level 2 and the MTD at the level 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Toxicity (n=15 patients).

Discussion

Unresectable pancreatic cancer patients with good performance status benefit from gemcitabine-based chemotherapeutic combination, whereas gemcitabine alone remains the standard treatment for patients with a poor performance status. Two four-drugs regimens have been compared with gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: systemic PEF-G (cisplatin, epirubicin, 5-FU and gemcitabine) and intra-arterial FLEC (12, 14). Both regimens have resulted to be superior to gemcitabine in terms of survival. The objective of this study was to find the appropriate dose of gemcitabine to adiminister with capecitabine and intra-arterial epirubicin and cisplatin. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was myelotoxicity (grade 4 febrile neutropenia and grade 4 thrombocytopenia) and occurred at the dose of 1300 mg/m2 of gemcitabine, without any other significant toxicity. In this group of pretreated patients, it was an expected toxicity, mainly related to gemcitabine. For further studies the following doses are suggested: on day 1 every 28 days intra-arterial epirubicin 35 mg/m2 and cisplatin 42 mg/m2, on day 2 systemic gemcitabine at 1,000 mg/m2 and on days 2-15 capecitabine at 650 mg/m2 twice a day.

  • Received November 26, 2008.
  • Revision received January 19, 2009.
  • Accepted February 2, 2009.
  • Copyright© 2009 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Jemal A,
    2. Murray T,
    3. Ward E,
    4. Samuels A,
    5. Tiwari RC,
    6. Ghafoor A,
    7. Feuer EJ,
    8. Thun MJ
    : Cancer statistics,2005. CA Cancer J Clin 55: 10-30, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Wagner M,
    2. Redaelli C,
    3. Lietz M,
    4. Seiler CA,
    5. Friess H
    : Curative resection is the single most important factor determining outcome in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 91: 586-594, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Burris HA 3rd.,
    2. Moore MJ,
    3. Andersen J,
    4. Green MR,
    5. Rothenberg ML,
    6. Modiano MR,
    7. Cripps MC,
    8. Portenoy RK,
    9. Storniolo AM,
    10. Tarassoff P,
    11. Nelson R,
    12. Dorr FA,
    13. Stephens CD,
    14. Von Hoff DD
    : Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 15: 2403-2413, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Heinemann V,
    2. Quietzsch D,
    3. Gieseler F,
    4. Gonnermann M,
    5. Schönekäs H,
    6. Rost A,
    7. Neuhaus H,
    8. Haag C,
    9. Clemens M,
    10. Heinrich B,
    11. Vehling-Kaiser U,
    12. Fuchs M,
    13. Fleckenstein D,
    14. Gesierich W,
    15. Uthgenannt D,
    16. Einsele H,
    17. Holstege A,
    18. Hinke A,
    19. Schalhorn A,
    20. Wilkowski R
    : Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine plus cisplatin compared with gemcitabine alone in advanced pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 24: 3946-3952, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Louvet C,
    2. Labianca R,
    3. Hammel P,
    4. Lledo G,
    5. Zampino MG,
    6. André T,
    7. Zaniboni A,
    8. Ducreux M,
    9. Aitini E,
    10. Taïeb J,
    11. Faroux R,
    12. Lepere C,
    13. de Gramont A
    : Gemcitabine in combination with oxaliplatin compared with gemcitabine alone in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: final results of a GERCOR and GISCAD phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 23: 3509-3516, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Boeck S,
    2. Hoehler T,
    3. Seipelt G,
    4. Mahlberg R,
    5. Wein A,
    6. Hochhaus A,
    7. Boeck HP,
    8. Schmid B,
    9. Kettner E,
    10. Stauch M,
    11. Lordick F,
    12. Ko Y,
    13. Geissler M,
    14. Schoppmeyer K,
    15. Kojouharoff G,
    16. Golf A,
    17. Neugebauer S,
    18. Heinemann V
    : Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CapOx) versus capecitabine plus gemcitabine (CapGem) versus gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin (GemOx): final results of a multicenter randomized phase II trial in advanced pancreatic cancer. Ann Oncol 19: 340-347, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Park BB,
    2. Park JO,
    3. Lee HR,
    4. Lee J,
    5. Choi DW,
    6. Choi SH,
    7. Heo JS,
    8. Lee JK,
    9. Lee KT,
    10. Lim do H,
    11. Park YS,
    12. Lim HY,
    13. Kang WK,
    14. Park K
    : A phase II trial of gemcitabine plus capecitabine for patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 60: 489-494, 2007.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Herrmann R,
    2. Bodoky G,
    3. Ruhstaller T,
    4. Glimelius B,
    5. Bajetta E,
    6. Schüller J,
    7. Saletti P,
    8. Bauer J,
    9. Figer A,
    10. Pestalozzi B,
    11. Köhne CH,
    12. Mingrone W,
    13. Stemmer SM,
    14. Tàmas K,
    15. Kornek GV,
    16. Koeberle D,
    17. Cina S,
    18. Bernhard J,
    19. Dietrich D,
    20. Scheithauer W,
    21. Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research,
    22. Central European Cooperative Oncology Group
    : Gemcitabine (G) plus capecitabine versus G alone in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: a randomized, multicenter, phase III trial of the Swiss Group for Clinical Research (SAKK) and the Central European Cooperative Oncology Group (CECOG). J Clin Oncol 25: 2212-2217, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Heinemann V,
    2. Boeck S,
    3. Hinke A,
    4. Labianca R,
    5. Louvet C
    : Meta-analysis of randomized trials: evaluation of benefit from gemcitabine-based combination chemotherapy applied in advanced pancreatic cancer. BMC Cancer 28: 82, 2008.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Muchmore JH
    : Treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer with regional chemotherapy plus hemofilatration. Semin Surg Oncol 11: 1-14, 1995.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Link KH,
    2. Gansauge F,
    3. Pillasch J,
    4. Beger HG
    : Multimodal therapies in ductal pancreatic cancer. The future. Int J Pancreatol 21: 71-83, 1997.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Mambrini A,
    2. Sanguinetti F,
    3. Pacetti P,
    4. Caudana R,
    5. Iacono C,
    6. Guglielmi A,
    7. Guadagni S,
    8. Del Freo A,
    9. Fiorentini G,
    10. Cantore M
    : Intra-arterial infusion of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, epirubicin and carboplatin (FLEC regimen) in unresectable pancreatic cancer: results of a ten-year experience. In Vivo 20: 751-755, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Cantore M,
    2. Serio G,
    3. Pederzoli P,
    4. Mambrini A,
    5. Iacono C,
    6. Pulica C,
    7. Capelli P,
    8. Lombardi M,
    9. Torri T,
    10. Pacetti P,
    11. Pagani M,
    12. Fiorentini G
    : Adjuvant intra-arterial 5-fluoruracil, leucovorin epirubicin and carboplatin with or without systemic gemcitabine after curative resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 58: 504-508, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Reni M,
    2. Cordio S,
    3. Milandri C,
    4. Passoni P,
    5. Bonetto E,
    6. Oliani C,
    7. Luppi G,
    8. Nicoletti R,
    9. Galli L,
    10. Bordonaro R,
    11. Passardi A,
    12. Zerbi A,
    13. Balzano G,
    14. Aldrighetti L,
    15. Staudacher C,
    16. Villa E,
    17. Di Carlo V
    : Gemcitabine versus cisplatin, epirubicin, 5-fluorouracil, gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 6: 369-376, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 29, Issue 5
May 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Gemcitabine-Capecitabine plus Intra-arterial Epirubicin-Cisplatin in Pretreated Pancreatic Cancer Patients: A Phase I Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Gemcitabine-Capecitabine plus Intra-arterial Epirubicin-Cisplatin in Pretreated Pancreatic Cancer Patients: A Phase I Study
ANDREA MAMBRINI, PAOLA PACETTI, ALFONSO DEL FREO, ROBERTA DELLA SETA, DEBORA PEZZUOLO, TITO TORRI, MASSIMO ORLANDI, ROBERTA TARTARINI, MAURIZIO CANTORE
Anticancer Research May 2009, 29 (5) 1547-1549;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Gemcitabine-Capecitabine plus Intra-arterial Epirubicin-Cisplatin in Pretreated Pancreatic Cancer Patients: A Phase I Study
ANDREA MAMBRINI, PAOLA PACETTI, ALFONSO DEL FREO, ROBERTA DELLA SETA, DEBORA PEZZUOLO, TITO TORRI, MASSIMO ORLANDI, ROBERTA TARTARINI, MAURIZIO CANTORE
Anticancer Research May 2009, 29 (5) 1547-1549;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Relationship Between Histopathological Growth Patterns and Indocyanine Green Fluorescence in Colorectal Liver Metastases
  • The Role of MRI in the Preoperative Staging of Rectal Cancer: Ten-year Experience from a Single Tertiary Center
  • Impact of Postoperative Prognostic Nutritional Index on Post-gastrectomy Outcomes in Older Adults With Gastric Cancer
Show more Clinical Studies
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire