Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Review ArticleClinical StudiesR

Immunological Similarities between Cancer and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: The Common Link to Fatigue?

MIRA MEEUS, WILHELM MISTIAEN, LUC LAMBRECHT and JO NIJS
Anticancer Research November 2009, 29 (11) 4717-4726;
MIRA MEEUS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
WILHELM MISTIAEN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
LUC LAMBRECHT
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JO NIJS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jo.nijs@vub.ac.be jo.nijs@artesis.be
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Cancer and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) are both characterised by fatigue and severe disability. Besides fatigue, certain aspects of immune dysfunctions appear to be present in both illnesses. In this regard, a literature review of overlapping immune dysfunctions in CFS and cancer is provided. Special emphasis is given to the relationship between immune dysfunctions and fatigue. Abnormalities in ribonuclease (RNase) L and hyperactivation of nuclear factor kappa beta (NF-κB) are present in CFS and in prostate cancer. Malfunctioning of natural killer (NK) cells has long been recognised as an important factor in the development and reoccurrence of cancer, and has been documented repeatedly in CFS patients. The dysregulation of the RNase L pathway, hyperactive NF-κB leading to disturbed apoptotic mechanisms and oxidative stress or excessive nitric oxide, and low NK activity may play a role in the two diseases and in the physiopathology of the common symptom fatigue. However, in cancer the relation between the immune dysfunctions and fatigue has been poorly studied. Immunological abnormalities to such as a dysregulated RNase L pathway, hyperactive NF-κB, increased oxidative stress and reduced NK cytotoxicity, among others, are present in both diseases. These anomalies may be part of the physiopathology of some of the common complaints, such as fatigue. Further studies to confirm the hypotheses given here are warranted.

  • Fatigue
  • RNase L
  • nitric oxide
  • protein kinase R
  • nuclear factor kappa beta
  • NF-κB
  • intracellular immune dysfunction
  • natural killer cell
  • oxidative stress
  • exercise
  • review

Cancer and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) are both characterised by fatigue and severe disability. Fatigue is the hallmark of CFS, and is also a common symptom experienced during and after treatment for cancer. Fatigue may not be the only link between the two pathologies. A body of literature describing immune abnormalities in both cancer and CFS is currently available. Comparing the two pathologies might result in more insight into the nature of common complaints such as fatigue. Therefore, the two diseases are here set side by side regarding fatigue and immune dysfunctions. An in-depth review of the scientific literature fuels the comparison of immune dysfunctions in cancer and CFS. In the discussion, the hypothesized relation between fatigue and immune dysfunctions is presented and discussed in relation to the available evidence.

Fatigue

Chronic fatigue syndrome. The most commonly used diagnostic criteria and definition of CFS for research and clinical purposes were published by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDCP). The CDCP definition of CFS requires two criteria be fulfilled (1): i. A new onset (not lifelong) of unexplained, persistent fatigue unrelated to exertion and not substantially relieved by rest, which causes a significant reduction in previous activity levels. ii. Four or more of the following symptoms that last six months or longer: impaired memory or concentration; post-exertional malaise, where physical or mental exertions bring on “extreme, prolonged exhaustion and sickness”; unrefreshing sleep; muscle pain; pain in multiple joints; headaches of a new kind or greater severity; sore throat; tender lymph nodes (cervical or axillary).

When symptoms are attributable to other conditions, the diagnosis of CFS is excluded. The CDCP specifically refers to several illnesses with symptoms resembling those of CFS (1), for example primary sleep disorders, severe obesity, major depressive disorders or cancer. The fatigue in CFS is very disabling, causing substantial reductions in premorbid activity levels, unexplained and not improved by rest (1). The cause may yet not be clear, but fatigue is the hallmark of CFS. Several hypotheses as to the cause of the fatigue have been proposed in the literature. Most rely on a biopsychosocial model with possible contributing factors such as neuroendocrine abnormalities, neuropsychological dysfunctions, autonomic dysregulations, environmental factors, psychological processes and personality traits, abnormal exercise response, overactive or passive lifestyle, infections and immune dysfunctions. Many reviews are available on these possible contributing or predisposing factors. But then again, CFS, with the hallmark fatigue, can only be diagnosed in the absence of a clear medical cause for the fatigue.

Cancer patients. Although fatigue arouses less interest in cancer, it is one of the most common side-effects of cancer and its treatment. The fact that less emphasis is put on fatigue in cancer than in CFS may be explained by the presence of other underlying symptoms and the high mortality rates of cancer. Doctors are still struggling with high mortality rates for cancer and therefore survival would be the main treatment objective, regardless of possible side-effects.

Most of the research on fatigue in people with cancer has been conducted on samples of people undergoing cancer treatment. Cancer-related fatigue is reported by 60% to 99% of cancer patients and has been described as one of the most significant quality-of-life issues in cancer care (see for example 2, 3-8). The fatigue experienced as a side-effect of cancer treatment differs from the fatigue experienced by healthy people in their daily lives. Cancer patients describe their fatigue as chronic, more severe, intense, energy draining, unrelenting, and rapid in onset (9).

Over the past decade, the medical community has recognised fatigue as a debilitating symptom also in people who have been treated successfully for cancer. Between 19% and 39% of cancer survivors experience severe fatigue up to 9 years after cancer treatment has terminated and long after they were categorised as ‘cured’ of cancer (10-12). There is evidence that fatigue significantly affects the quality of life of cancer survivors. The experience of fatigue in cancer survivors is quite similar to the experience of patients with CFS in the general medical setting. The fatigue is often accompanied by other symptoms such as concentration difficulties, emotional problems, functional restrictions and reduced physical activity (13). Clinical experience seems to suggest that fatigue complaints continue to decrease during the first 3-4 years after curative treatment. For about a quarter of cancer survivors, fatigue remains a continuous problem, with detrimental consequences on the functional status and quality of life (10, 14).

While the exact cause of the fatigue in CFS remains unclear, several contributing factors have been identified in (post-)cancer fatigue. Some of these are typical for cancer patients or survivors, other are also applicable to other chronic syndromes, such as CFS. The contributing factors are extensively reviewed and can be categorized as treatment-related, disease-related, physical symptoms, psychological symptoms and coping strategies (4, 5, 15).

Treatment-related factors. The association of fatigue with the major cancer treatment modalities of surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy and biological response-modifying therapy fuelled the speculation that fatigue resulted from tissue damage or accumulation of products of cell death (16). Nevertheless, different studies have refuted this hypothesis because they were unable to find associations between fatigue severity and length, dosage or type of treatment (e.g. 11-13).

Moreover some side-effects of therapy, such as nausea and vomiting, can trigger fatigue (17, 18). In addition, concurrent medications such as analgesics, hypnotics, antidepressants and steroids may sedate the central nervous system, contributing to the problem of fatigue.

Disease-related factors and physical symptoms. Evidence suggests that anaemia (related to the disease itself or the therapy) may be a major factor in cancer-related fatigue (CRF) and quality of life in cancer patients (6), while anaemia cannot be retained as an etiological factor in the fatigue of CFS.

Besides anaemia, several metabolic and endocrine alterations may cause fatigue. Malnutrition is particularly identified as an important factor contributing to fatigue by causing an imbalance between energy supply and energy requirements. Malnutrition may be the consequence of alteration in the body's ability to process nutrients efficiently (impaired metabolism), an increase in the body's energy requirements (tumour consumption, infections, fever, etc.) and a decrease in intake of energy sources (anorexia, vomiting, etc.). In advanced cancer, cachexia often occurs. This is a pathological state characterized by anorexia and metabolic abnormalities such as glucose intolerance, fat depletion and muscle protein catabolism, generating a high degree of energetic inefficiency that results in early satiety, impaired immune response, weight loss, fatigue and a considerable loss of muscle and, therefore, asthenia among others (19). Insomnia and inactivity are also mentioned as possible contributing factors (5). The literature is not consistent regarding the influence of tumour stage, size or type (e.g. reviewed in 4, 15).

Psychological symptoms and coping strategies. The diagnosis of cancer, the often demolishing treatment and the life-threatening situation unavoidably bring along fears, doubts, depression, negative self-efficacy (self-efficacy is the belief that one is capable of performing in a certain manner to attain certain goals), distress, problems with accepting etc. Emotional vulnerability and the endurance of heavy stress over prolonged periods of time may trigger fatigue. In several studies, the intensity of fatigue showed a strong correlation with indicators of psychological distress such as depression, somatization, catastrophizing and anxiety (e.g. 10, 20-23). Coping strategies are also related to fatigue levels (12, 20).

The latter category of contributing factors could also hold true for CFS patients. CFS patients and cancer patients or survivors seem to differ on, for example, self-efficacy (13), CFS patients tend to focus more on their fatigue and experience fatigue more negatively. A possible explanation may be the fact that for CFS patients there is no distinct cause, while cancer patients tend to attribute their fatigue to their specific disease.

While treatment-related factors are fairly specific for cancer patients, some of the disease-related factors are also applicable to CFS patients. For example, physical inactivity (24, 25) and pain (26, 27) are frequently reported in CFS patients and could also be related to their fatigue. However, of all the body systems affected by cancer and CFS, the immune system has shown the most important and partly overlapping changes in both illnesses.

Intracellular Immunity: Ribonuclease L (RNase L)

CFS patients. One of the major intracellular immune dysfunctions in CFS is the dysregulation of the RNase L antiviral pathway. RNase L is the effector of the major 2-5-oligoadenylate synthetase/ribonuclease L (2-5A/RNase L) antiviral system. It is one of the intracellular proteins activated by type I interferons (IFN) and is cardinal to the cellular defence mechanisms. By regulating viral and cellular RNA expression, RNase L plays an important role in the antiviral and antiproliferative activities of IFN and contributes to innate immunity and cell metabolism. Activation of the endoribonuclease RNase L produces small RNA cleavage products not only from viral RNA but from self-RNA as well. In consequence, the 2-5A/RNase L pathway is implicated in mediating apoptosis in response to viral infections and to several types of external stimuli. The effects of the 2-5A synthetase/RNase L pathway extend beyond initially infected cells to support a broader antiviral state in the organism (28, 29).

After its discovery by Suhadolnik and colleagues (30, 31), hyperactivation of the 2-5 A synthetase/RNase L antiviral pathway and the abnormal low molecular weight (LMW) RNase L (37 kDa) in a subset of CFS patients has been reported at length in the scientific literature (e.g. 32, 33-35).

The LMW RNase L hydrolyses RNA three times faster than the native RNase L (36). Moreover, the 37 kDa RNase L binds its activator, 2-5A, with an affinity six-fold tighter than does the 83 kDa RNase L. The higher affinity of LMW RNase L for 2-5A suggests that LMW RNase L is activated preferentially over the HMW RNase L and thus contributes more than the 83 kDa RNase L to the up regulated RNase L activity (32). In consequence, the LMW RNase L fragments in CFS patients are responsible for the uncontrolled degradation of ribosomal and mitochondrial RNA, leading to apoptosis. Apoptosis triggers the production of elastase and calpain (37), which are, in turn, considered to be responsible for the proteolytic cleavage of a number of structurally and functionally vital proteins, including the authentic RNase L (35), leading to an apoptopic vicious circle (37). In addition, the LMW RNase L may disturb proper ion flux through cell membranes by binding to the ion channels. The subsequent channelopathy causes inefficient ion transport, possibly leading to several of the CFS symptoms (38).

The LMW RNase L variant is specific for CFS and even considered as a potential biological marker, since the presence of the 37 kDa RNase L in extracts of peripheral blood mononuclear cells may distinguish patients with CFS from healthy individuals and those suffering from other diseases (39). But in cancer patients, abnormalities in the RNase L pathway are also documented.

Cancer patients. Besides antiviral activity, RNase L has been suggested to function as a tumour suppressor based on its roles in mediating apoptosis and antiproliferative activity of IFN (40). RNase L is able to inhibit tumour formation/growth in vivo (41, 42).

In addition, the evidence of a tumour suppressor function of RNase L has emerged from studies on the genetics of hereditary prostate cancer (HPC). HPC genetics is complex with many genes proposed as susceptibility factors in this syndrome, among them the RNASEL gene. Several variants in these genes have been observed among HPC cases (reviewed in 40).

The R462Q variant of RNASEL, having about 3-fold reduced catalytic activity in vitro, is the most prevalent genetic marker for prostate cancer. RNase L may directly or at least indirectly suppress one or more steps in prostate tumourigenesis and/or metastasis (40). The RNase L(R462Q) is deficient in causing apoptosis in response to 2-5A, consistent with its possible role in prostate cancer development. RNASEL mutations and some variants allow tumour cells to escape a potent apoptotic pathway (43). Individuals heterozygous for these mutations exhibit a 150% increased risk of prostate cancer, and homozygotes have a greater than double risk, underscoring the importance of inactivating RNASEL in the aetiology of prostate cancer (44, 45). The association of mutations in RNASEL with prostate cancer cases further suggests a relationship between innate immunity and tumour suppression. It is proposed here that RNase L functions in counteracting prostate cancer by virtue of its ability to degrade RNA, thus initiating a cellular stress response that leads to apoptosis (40).

It remains to be seen if mutated RNASEL predisposes to any other forms of cancer. Bartsch and colleagues (46) showed that the RNASEL R462Q variant might be associated with an increased risk for sporadic pancreas cancer and with more aggressive tumours in familial pancreatic cancer. Furthermore, the occurrence of elevated levels of RNase L seems to be an early event in colorectal tumourigenesis, suggesting that control of RNA turnover is an important step in tumour progression (47).

Intracellular Immunity: Nuclear Factor Kappa Beta (NF-κB)

Besides activating the RNase L system, IFN also activates another intracellular double-stranded RNA-detecting system, namely protein kinase R (PKR). PKR will, once activated, stimulate nuclear factor kappa beta (NF-κB), a group of transcriptional regulators which modulate cellular responses to environmental stimuli and cytokines. NF-κB is the major upstream, intracellular mechanism which regulates inflammatory and oxidative stress mediators. NF-κB would, for instance, trigger inducible nitric oxide synthetase expression. Inducible nitric oxide synthetase generates increased production of nitric oxide (NO) by monocytes/macrophages (48, 49).

CFS patients. NF-κB, as well as inducible nitric oxide synthetase and NO have been shown to be increased in CFS (50-52). The production of NF-κB is significantly correlated to the severity of illness and symptoms, such as fatigue and pain. These correlations suggest that the symptoms of CFS, such as fatigue, pain, muscular tension and depressive symptoms reflect a genuine inflammatory response in those patients (50).

The produced NO, in turn, has an immunological function: it is cytotoxic by inhibiting the mitochondrial electron transport and the DNA synthesis and by influencing iron metabolism (important for the proliferation of viruses) (49, 53). Excessive or persistent NO production as reported in CFS (52), is, however, detrimental for physiological functions, as explained in earlier studies on intracellular immune dysfunctions in CFS (34, 54, 55).

Cancer patients. Aberrant activation of NF-κB has been observed in many cancer types (56-58). NF-κB activation occurs in cells (premalignant cells) that are destined to undergo malignant conversion and in cells (microenvironment cells) that are recruited to the tumour microenvironment and produce cytokines, growth and angiogenic factors, and proteases that degrade the extracellular matrix to support cancer development and progression (59).

Many reviews have already focused on the relation between NF-κB activation and the carcinogenesis process, as well as tumour progression and metastatogenesis (e.g. 57, 60, 61). Based on the evidence describing the role of NF-κB, it is evident that NF-κB plays a pivotal role in suppression of apoptosis, promotion of cell proliferation and inflammation, and is closely associated with cancer development (61).

Cellular Immunity: Natural Killer Cell Functioning

Natural killer (NK) cells are an important part of the non-specific immune system. Malfunctioning of NK cells (i.e. decreased NK cell cytotoxicity) has long been recognised as an important factor in the development and reoccurrence of cancer (62), and has been documented repeatedly in people with CFS (63).

CFS patients. Concerning the number of NK cells in CFS patients, the literature is inconsistent. Some authors report decreased numbers (64), some approximately normal (65). About the activity or cytotoxicity of the NK cells there is less controversy: the cytotoxicity is reduced in a subgroup of patients (62, 65). In the study of Whiteside and Friburg (62), 25% of the CFS patients presented lower NK activity, although the quantity of cells was not different from healthy individuals. Curiously, the low NK syndrome itself is characterized by an uncomfortable chronic fatigue, malaise and reduced interest in physical or mental activities. In addition, long-lasting low-grade fever is often reported and most of the sufferers are disabled or even bedridden. These symptoms are almost identical to those associated with CFS (66). Observations suggest that individuals with chronically low NK activity may be genetically predisposed to the development of CFS (65).

Cancer patients. Natural cytotoxic receptors (e.g. NKp46, NKp44, NKp30) are displayed on the surface of NK cells and trigger NK cytotoxicity against tumour cells (67). Tumour cells appear continuously, but in healthy people they are cleared by NK cells. This is accomplished by perforins, stored in the cytoplasm of NK cells and capable of destroying the cell membrane of tumour cells (67). Alternatively, activated NK cells produce tumour necrosis factor α, which in turn initiates tumour cell apoptosis (68). In families with cancer, particularly with familial melanoma or breast cancer, low NK activity has been observed in family members with no evidence of cancer (69-71), suggesting that the low NK activity may be evidence of susceptibility to a future malignancy. The decreased cytotoxicity of the NK cells is directly related to the development and the reoccurrence of cancer (62), since NK cells act antitumourally.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Fatigue and immune dysfunctions observed in chronic fatigue syndrome and cancer patients.

The exact cause of the decreased NK activity is however unclear. It has been hypothesised that basically there could be a genetic predisposition. Observations suggest that individuals with chronically low NK activity may be genetically predisposed to the development of CFS (65) and might also be prone to the development of malignancy. These studies suggest that genetically determined defects in NK activity may contribute to the initiation of human cancer (72) and perhaps even of CFS. In general, the level of NK activity is a stable individual trait, which fluctuates within a low, middle, or high normal range characteristic for each individual. Therefore it is not surprising that both CFS and cancer often occur in the same family (65).

Besides genetic predisposition, and RNase L dysregulation (38), low NK activity could be the result of impaired NO-mediated activation of NK cells in CFS patients (50). It is known that more NO is released in the peripheral circulation of CFS patients and NO itself is known to be toxic to NK cells (73). NO is also suggested as having both a dual pro- and antitumour action within the multistage model of carcinogenesis (74, 75). Serum NO levels were found to be much higher in lung cancer patients (76) and since serum NO levels tend to increase further after chemotherapy (77), NO might play an important role in the impaired NK activity in cancer patients too. NO is also related to the prognosis of cancer patients (76).

Physical activity (i.e. aerobic exercise) is known to have positive effects on the number and cytotoxicity of natural killer cells in healthy humans (78-80), but this interaction is currently unexplored in people with cancer or CFS. Exercise triggers the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g. interleukin-1β and tumour necrosis factor-α), which in turn activate NK cells (80). In addition, catecholamines such as epinephrine are released during exercise and are capable of stimulating NK cells: NK cells display a high density of β2-adrenergic receptors capable of binding epinephrine (79). Still, the exact mechanisms as to how exercise alters immune function remain to be revealed (79), but this line of thinking may also be interesting since both patient groups are less active than healthy controls, as mentioned above.

Finally, increased oxidative stress, apparent in CFS patients (as reviewed in 81) and also in cancer survivors due to the aftercare (82), can reduce NK cytotoxicity (reviewed in 83) and cause fatigue (82).

Before discussing the link between the fatigue and the immune dysfunctions in both diseases, an overview of the immune dysfunctions observed in (subsets of) cancer patients and CFS patients is given in Table I.

Fatigue and Immunity

The question remains as to whether the immune dysfunctions observed could be related to the fatigue experienced in both diseases.

CFS patients. In CFS patients, RNase L dysfunctions already seem related to self-reported measures of physical functioning and to exercise capacity (55, 84-86). Physical functioning and exercise capacity can be seen as a physical component of fatigue. In addition, RNase L cleavage is weakly correlated to the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory score (87). Furthermore, it is hypothesized that the channelopathy caused by LMW RNase L could be responsible for fatigue due to abnormal ion flux throughout cell membranes. Depending on the type of channel that is dysregulated, the transport of potassium, calcium, sodium, magnesium, etc. could become dysregulated, leading to central fatigue, sympathetic hyperactivity, muscle weakness, reduced aerobic power, sleep disturbances, etc. (38).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Relation between immune dysfunctions and fatigue.

The low NK syndrome, as observed in a subset of CFS patients, is characterized by a triad of symptoms, namely fatigue, malaise and reduced interest in physical or mental activities (66). In the study of Siegel et al. (63), 65.7% of the included CFS patients were actually correctly be classified as CFS patients with normal NK activity or CFS patients with reduced NK activity based on vigour and fatigue severity scores. These authors hypothesize that the fatigue may be the consequence of a chronic inflammatory response due to reduced NK activity.

Concerning the role of NF-κB in the fatigue of CFS patients, we already mentioned the study of Maes et al. (50) in which significant positive correlations were observed between the production of NF-κB and the severity of illness as measured with the FibroFatigue scale and with symptoms such as aches and pain, muscular tension, fatigue, irritability, sadness, and the subjective feeling of infection. Furthermore, the subsequent excessive NO production would also be related to fatigue (51). Excessive NO could lead to fatigue by disturbing iron metabolism (88), mitochondrial respiration (89), etc.

Cancer patients. Given the established role of immune dysfunctions in the fatigue experienced by CFS patients and the overlap in immune dysfunctions between CFS and cancer, we hypothesize that the 2-5A synthetase/RNase L pathway is impaired in fatigued cancer patients compared to non-fatigued patients and healthy controls. Likewise, it is hypothesised that NK cell functioning is decreased in fatigued cancer patients compared to the non-fatigued. Literature concerning this relation in cancer is currently lacking. Only on NF-κB is there some evidence for its relation to fatigue.

It is proposed that cancer-related symptom clusters, which include fatigue, share common cytokine-based neuroimmunological mechanisms. The review of Lee et al. (90) provides evidence for a correlation between the altered cytokine profile and cancer-related symptoms. The expression of coexisting symptoms such as fatigue could thus be linked to the dysregulated activity of NF-κB.

As presented in Figure 1, there is already evidence for the relation between immune dysfunctions and fatigue in CFS, but in cancer this relation is far less understood.

Discussion

It may be clear that fatigue is a major complaint in both diseases. Exact causes are not yet identified, but several contributing factors could apply for both CFS and cancer-related fatigue. The immunological problems in particular are clearly apparent and quite similar in both diseases.

RNase L is likely to play a role in the protection against cancer reoccurrence in cancer survivors and various intracellular pathogens. In those with CFS, a literature review concluded that proteolytic cleavage of the native RNase L enzyme is characteristic of this nosological entity (54). In addition, and in contrast to the reduced catalytic activity of RNase L in prostate cancer (40), there is increasing evidence for up regulation of various aspects of the 2-5A synthetase/RNase L pathway in CFS (54). Another intracellular immune dysfunction apparent in both entities is the hyperactivation of NF-κB, leading to inflammation and increased (cytotoxic) NO concentrations (50, 51, 59, 60). Finally, NK cytotoxicity seemed reduced in both patient groups, with frequent familiar aggregation of low NK syndrome in both CFS and cancer (65). In CFS, it has already been shown that these immunological abnormalities are related to the experienced fatigue. In cancer, however, more research is warranted to explore the relation between the cancer-related fatigue and the specific immune dysfunctions.

Since, for example, RNase L and NK cells may play a role in both the disabling fatigue and the protection of cancer patients against cancer reoccurrence, it would be important to target treatment approaches at improving functioning of these immune aspects. Several pharmacological therapies could offer a solution, but rehabilitation might also be beneficial. Given the fact that appropriate amounts of physical activity have positive effects on the number and cytotoxicity of NK cells in both healthy humans (72) and cancer patients (91), sufficient physical activity could be an important item in rehabilitation, especially since both CFS and cancer patients seems to be rather passive (92-96). A lack of physical activity might not only predispose cancer patients to experience severe fatigue, it might even decrease NK cell functioning and hence make them prone to cancer reoccurrence (97, 98). In addition, in CFS patients, light physical activity is associated with better well-being (unpublished data).

In consequence, exercise is currently recommended as a conservative intervention for both fatigued cancer patients and CFS patients. However, with regard to these immunological abnormalities, prudence is called concerning exercise during the rehabilitation of these patients. Based on literature findings and our own results, we know that intracellular immune dysfunctions restrict exercise capacity, but also that too vigorous exercise may further worsen the immune system (99, 100) and the complaints in CFS patients (1). The exercise response to intensive activity in cancer patients is less understood. Several conditions during cancer treatment and recovery can preclude any physical activity, including chest pain, irregular pulse, acute vomiting, blurred vision, sudden onset dyspnoea, bleeding, and extreme immunocompromised states. Moreover, many patients suffer anaemia and some patients are at risk of lymphoedema development (101). From animal studies, there is also evidence that high-intensity (>80% of maximum heart rate), high-volume physical activity in cancer patients may increase the spread of the disease (102). On the other hand, it is well known that moderate exercise has beneficial effects on the immune system and may even have preventive effects on cancer in all disease stages. Therefore physical rehabilitation should be carefully balanced. But it is clear that far more research is warranted to guide the conservative treatment and the rehabilitation of these patients.

In conclusion, despite the major difference in mortality rates, there are many points of clinical overlap between cancer patients and CFS patients. Fatigue and immunological abnormalities especially have surprisingly similar characteristics. The relation between cancer-related fatigue and immune dysfunctions deserves further research in cancer patients. The application of physical activity schemes, which could be beneficial in both pathologies, also needs more research regarding the risks and benefits.

  • Received July 31, 2009.
  • Revision received October 8, 2009.
  • Accepted October 15, 2009.
  • Copyright© 2009 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Fukuda K,
    2. Straus SE,
    3. Hickie I,
    4. Sharpe MC,
    5. Dobbins JG,
    6. Komaroff A
    : The chronic fatigue syndrome: a comprehensive approach to its definition and study. International Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Study Group. Ann Intern Med 121: 953-959, 1994.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Irvine DM,
    2. Vincent L,
    3. Bubela N,
    4. Thompson L,
    5. Graydon J
    : A critical appraisal of the research literature investigating fatigue in the individual with cancer. Cancer Nurs 14: 188-199, 1991.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Smets EM,
    2. Garssen B,
    3. Schuster-Uitterhoeve AL,
    4. de Haes JC
    : Fatigue in cancer patients. Br J Cancer 68: 220-224, 1993.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Prue G,
    2. Rankin J,
    3. Allen J,
    4. Gracey J,
    5. Cramp F
    : Cancer-related fatigue: A critical appraisal. Eur J Cancer 42: 846-863, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Stone PC,
    2. Minton O
    : Cancer-related fatigue. Eur J Cancer 44: 1097-1104, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Vogelzang NJ,
    2. Breitbart W,
    3. Cella D,
    4. Curt GA,
    5. Groopman JE,
    6. Horning SJ,
    7. Itri LM,
    8. Johnson DH,
    9. Scherr SL,
    10. Portenoy RK
    : Patient, caregiver, and oncologist perceptions of cancer-related fatigue: results of a tripart assessment survey. The Fatigue Coalition. Semin Hematol 34: 4-12, 1997.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Cella D,
    2. Peterman A,
    3. Passik S,
    4. Jacobsen P,
    5. Breitbart W
    : Progress toward guidelines for the management of fatigue. Oncology (Williston Park) 12: 369-377, 1998.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Borneman T,
    2. Piper BF,
    3. Sun VC,
    4. Koczywas M,
    5. Uman G,
    6. Ferrell B
    : Implementing the Fatigue Guidelines at one NCCN member institution: process and outcomes. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 5: 1092-1101, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Holley S
    : Cancer-related fatigue. Suffering a different fatigue. Cancer Pract 8: 87-95, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Hann DM,
    2. Jacobsen PB,
    3. Martin SC,
    4. Kronish LE,
    5. Azzarello LM,
    6. Fields KK
    : Fatigue in women treated with bone marrow transplantation for breast cancer: a comparison with women with no history of cancer. Support Care Cancer 5: 44-52, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Nieboer P,
    2. Buijs C,
    3. Rodenhuis S,
    4. Seynaeve C,
    5. Beex LV,
    6. van der Wall E,
    7. Richel DJ,
    8. Nooij MA,
    9. Voest EE,
    10. Hupperets P,
    11. Mulder NH,
    12. van der Graaf WT,
    13. TenVergert EM,
    14. van Tinteren H,
    15. de Vries EG
    : Fatigue and relating factors in high-risk breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant standard or high-dose chemotherapy: a longitudinal study. J Clin Oncol 23: 8296-8304, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Servaes P,
    2. Verhagen S,
    3. Bleijenberg G
    : Determinants of chronic fatigue in disease-free breast cancer patients: a cross-sectional study. Ann Oncol 13: 589-598, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Servaes P,
    2. van der Werf S,
    3. Prins J,
    4. Verhagen S,
    5. Bleijenberg G
    : Fatigue in disease-free cancer patients compared with fatigue in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Support Care Cancer 9: 11-17, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Servaes P,
    2. Gielissen MF,
    3. Verhagen S,
    4. Bleijenberg G
    : The course of severe fatigue in disease-free breast cancer patients: a longitudinal study. Psychooncology 16: 787-795, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Servaes P,
    2. Verhagen C,
    3. Bleijenberg G
    : Fatigue in cancer patients during and after treatment: prevalence, correlates and interventions. Eur J Cancer 38: 27-43, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Collado-Hidalgo A,
    2. Bower JE,
    3. Ganz PA,
    4. Cole SW,
    5. Irwin MR
    : Inflammatory biomarkers for persistent fatigue in breast cancer survivors. Clin Cancer Res 12: 2759-2766, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Stone P,
    2. Richards M,
    3. A'Hern R,
    4. Hardy J
    : Fatigue in patients with cancers of the breast or prostate undergoing radical radiotherapy. J Pain Symptom Manage 22: 1007-1015, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Ahlberg K,
    2. Ekman T,
    3. Gaston-Johansson F
    : The experience of fatigue, other symptoms and global quality of life during radiotherapy for uterine cancer. Int J Nurs Stud 42: 377-386, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. von Meyenfeldt M
    : Cancer-associated malnutrition: an introduction. Eur J Oncol Nurs 9(Suppl 2): S35-38, 2005.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Ahlberg K,
    2. Ekman T,
    3. Wallgren A,
    4. Gaston-Johansson F
    : Fatigue, psychological distress, coping and quality of life in patients with uterine cancer. J Adv Nurs 45: 205-213, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Servaes P,
    2. Verhagen S,
    3. Schreuder HW,
    4. Veth RP,
    5. Bleijenberg G
    : Fatigue after treatment for malignant and benign bone and soft tissue tumors. J Pain Symptom Manage 26: 1113-1122, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Romito F,
    2. Montanaro R,
    3. Corvasce C,
    4. Di Bisceglie M,
    5. Mattioli V
    : Is cancer-related fatigue more strongly correlated to haematological or to psychological factors in cancer patients? Support Care Cancer 16: 943-946, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Donovan KA,
    2. Small BJ,
    3. Andrykowski MA,
    4. Munster P,
    5. Jacobsen PB
    : Utility of a cognitive-behavioral model to predict fatigue following breast cancer treatment. Health Psychol 26: 464-472, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. van der Werf SP,
    2. Prins JB,
    3. Vercoulen JH,
    4. van der Meer JW,
    5. Bleijenberg G
    : Identifying physical activity patterns in chronic fatigue syndrome using actigraphic assessment. J Psychosom Res 49: 373-379, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Vercoulen JH,
    2. Bazelmans E,
    3. Swanink CM,
    4. Fennis JF,
    5. Galama JM,
    6. Jongen PJ,
    7. Hommes O,
    8. Van der Meer JW,
    9. Bleijenberg G
    : Physical activity in chronic fatigue syndrome: assessment and its role in fatigue. J Psychiatr Res 31: 661-673, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Jason LA,
    2. Torres-Harding SR,
    3. Carrico AW,
    4. Taylor RR
    : Symptom occurrence in persons with chronic fatigue syndrome. Biol Psychol 59: 15-27, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Nishikai M,
    2. Tomomatsu S,
    3. Hankins RW,
    4. Takagi S,
    5. Miyachi K,
    6. Kosaka S,
    7. Akiya K
    : Autoantibodies to a 68/48 kDa protein in chronic fatigue syndrome and primary FM: a possible marker for hypersomnia and cognitive disorders. Rheumatology 40: 806-810, 2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Bisbal C,
    2. Silverman RH
    : Diverse functions of RNase L and implications in pathology. Biochimie 89: 789-798, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Malathi K,
    2. Dong B,
    3. Gale M Jr.,
    4. Silverman RH
    : Small self-RNA generated by RNase L amplifies antiviral innate immunity. Nature 448: 816-819, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Suhadolnik RJ,
    2. Peterson DL,
    3. O'Brien K,
    4. Cheney PR,
    5. Herst CV,
    6. Reichenbach NL,
    7. Kon N,
    8. Horvath SE,
    9. Iacono KT,
    10. Adelson ME,
    11. De Meirleir K,
    12. De Becker P,
    13. Charubala R,
    14. Pfleiderer W
    : Biochemical evidence for a novel low molecular weight 2-5A-dependent RNase L in chronic fatigue syndrome. J Interferon Cytokine Res 17: 377-385, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Suhadolnik RJ,
    2. Reichenbach NL,
    3. Hitzges P,
    4. Sobol RW,
    5. Peterson DL,
    6. Henry B,
    7. Ablashi DV,
    8. Muller WE,
    9. Schroder HC,
    10. Carter WA,
    11. et al.
    : Upregulation of the 2-5A synthetase/RNase L antiviral pathway associated with chronic fatigue syndrome. Clin Infect Dis 18(Suppl 1): S96-104, 1994.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Suhadolnik RJ,
    2. Peterson DL,
    3. Cheney PR,
    4. Horvath SE,
    5. Reichenbach NL,
    6. O'Brien K,
    7. Lombardi V,
    8. Welsch S,
    9. Furr EG,
    10. Charubala R,
    11. Pfleiderer W
    : Biochemical dysregulation of the 2-5A synthetase/RNase L antiviral defense pathway in chronic fatigue syndrome. J Chronic Fatigue Syndr 5: 223-242, 1999.
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    1. Shetzline SE,
    2. Martinand-Mari C,
    3. Reichenbach NL,
    4. Buletic Z,
    5. Lebleu B,
    6. Pfleiderer W,
    7. Charubala R,
    8. De Meirleir K,
    9. De Becker P,
    10. Peterson DL,
    11. Herst CV,
    12. Englebienne P,
    13. Suhadolnik RJ
    : Structural and functional features of the 37-kDa 2-5A-dependent RNase L in chronic fatigue syndrome. J Interferon Cytokine Res 22: 443-456, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Nijs J,
    2. De Meirleir K
    : Impairments of the 2-5A synthetase/RNase L pathway in chronic fatigue syndrome. In Vivo 19: 1013-1021, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Demettre E,
    2. Bastide L,
    3. D'Haese A,
    4. De Smet K,
    5. De Meirleir K,
    6. Tiev KP,
    7. Englebienne P,
    8. Lebleu B
    : Ribonuclease L proteolysis in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of chronic fatigue syndrome patients. J Biol Chem 277: 35746-35751, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Shetzline SE,
    2. Suhadolnik RJ
    : Characterization of a 2′,5′-oligoadenylate (2-5A)-dependent 37-kDa RNase L: azido photoaffinity labeling and 2-5A-dependent activation. J Biol Chem 276: 23707-23711, 2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Englebienne P
    : RNase L in health and disease — What did we learn recently? J Chron Fatig Syndr 11: 97-107, 2003.
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    1. Englebienne P,
    2. Herst CV,
    3. De Smet K,
    4. D'Haese A,
    5. De Meirleir K
    : Interactions between RNase L ankyrin-like domain and ABC transporters as a possible origin for pain, ion transport, CNS and immune disorders of chronic fatigue immune dysfunction syndrome. J Chron Fatig Syndr 8: 83-102, 2001.
    OpenUrl
  36. ↵
    1. De Meirleir K,
    2. Bisbal C,
    3. Campine I,
    4. De Becker P,
    5. Salehzada T,
    6. Demettre E,
    7. Lebleu B
    : A 37 kDa 2-5A binding protein as a potential biochemical marker for chronic fatigue syndrome. Am J Med 108: 99-105, 2000.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Silverman RH
    : Implications for RNase L in prostate cancer biology. Biochemistry 42: 1805-1812, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Liu W,
    2. Liang SL,
    3. Liu H,
    4. Silverman R,
    5. Zhou A
    : Tumour suppressor function of RNase L in a mouse model. Eur J Cancer 43: 202-209, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Zhou A,
    2. Paranjape JM,
    3. Hassel BA,
    4. Nie H,
    5. Shah S,
    6. Galinski B,
    7. Silverman RH
    : Impact of RNase L overexpression on viral and cellular growth and death. J Interferon Cytokine Res 18: 953-961, 1998.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Xiang Y,
    2. Wang Z,
    3. Murakami J,
    4. Plummer S,
    5. Klein EA,
    6. Carpten JD,
    7. Trent JM,
    8. Isaacs WB,
    9. Casey G,
    10. Silverman RH
    : Effects of RNASEL mutations associated with prostate cancer on apoptosis induced by 2′,5′-oligoadenylates. Cancer Res 63: 6795-6801, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    1. Wang L,
    2. McDonnell SK,
    3. Elkins DA,
    4. Slager SL,
    5. Christensen E,
    6. Marks AF,
    7. Cunningham JM,
    8. Peterson BJ,
    9. Jacobsen SJ,
    10. Cerhan JR,
    11. Blute ML,
    12. Schaid DJ,
    13. Thibodeau SN
    : Analysis of the RNASEL gene in familial and sporadic prostate cancer. Am J Hum Genet 71: 116-123, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Casey G,
    2. Neville PJ,
    3. Plummer SJ,
    4. Xiang Y,
    5. Krumroy LM,
    6. Klein EA,
    7. Catalona WJ,
    8. Nupponen N,
    9. Carpten JD,
    10. Trent JM,
    11. Silverman RH,
    12. Witte JS
    : RNASEL Arg462Gln variant is implicated in up to 13% of prostate cancer cases. Nat Genet 32: 581-583, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Bartsch DK,
    2. Fendrich V,
    3. Slater EP,
    4. Sina-Frey M,
    5. Rieder H,
    6. Greenhalf W,
    7. Chaloupka B,
    8. Hahn SA,
    9. Neoptolemos JP,
    10. Kress R
    : RNASEL germline variants are associated with pancreatic cancer. Int J Cancer 117: 718-722, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Wang L,
    2. Zhou A,
    3. Vasavada S,
    4. Dong B,
    5. Nie H,
    6. Church JM,
    7. Williams BR,
    8. Banerjee S,
    9. Silverman RH
    : Elevated levels of 2′,5′-linked oligoadenylate-dependent ribonuclease L occur as an early event in colorectal tumorigenesis. Clin Cancer Res 1: 1421-1428, 1995.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  45. ↵
    1. Uetani K,
    2. Der SD,
    3. Zamanian-Daryoush M,
    4. de La Motte C,
    5. Lieberman BY,
    6. Williams BR,
    7. Erzurum SC
    : Central role of double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase in microbial induction of nitric oxide synthase. J Immunol 165: 988-996, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. ↵
    1. Paludan SR,
    2. Ellermann-Eriksen S,
    3. Mogensen SC
    : NF-kappaB activation is responsible for the synergistic effect of herpes simplex virus type 2 infection on interferon-gamma-induced nitric oxide production in macrophages. J Gen Virol 79(Pt 11): 2785-2793, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    1. Maes M,
    2. Mihaylova I,
    3. Bosmans E
    : Not in the mind of neurasthenic lazybones but in the cell nucleus: patients with chronic fatigue syndrome have increased production of nuclear factor kappa beta. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 28: 456-462, 2007.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Maes M,
    2. Mihaylova I,
    3. Kubera M,
    4. Bosmans E
    : Not in the mind but in the cell: increased production of cyclo-oxygenase-2 and inducible NO synthase in chronic fatigue syndrome. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 28: 463-469, 2007.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Kurup RK,
    2. Kurup PA
    : Hypothalamic digoxin, cerebral chemical dominance and myalgic encephalomyelitis. Int J Neurosci 113: 683-701, 2003.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Cifone MG,
    2. Ulisse S,
    3. Santoni A
    : Natural killer cells and nitric oxide. Int Immunopharmacol 1: 1513-1524, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Nijs J,
    2. Fremont M
    : Intracellular immune dysfunction in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: state of the art and therapeutic implications. Expert Opin Ther Targets 12: 281-289, 2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Meeus M,
    2. Nijs J,
    3. McGregor N,
    4. Meeusen R,
    5. De Schutter G,
    6. Truijen S,
    7. Fremont M,
    8. Van Hoof E,
    9. De Meirleir K
    : Unravelling intracellular immune dysfunctions in chronic fatigue syndrome: interactions between protein kinase R activity, RNase L cleavage and elastase activity, and their clinical relevance. In Vivo 22: 115-121, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. ↵
    1. Conti A,
    2. Ageunnouz M,
    3. La Torre D,
    4. Cardali S,
    5. Angileri FF,
    6. Buemi C,
    7. Tomasello C,
    8. Iacopino DG,
    9. D'Avella D,
    10. Vita G,
    11. Tomasello F
    : Expression of the tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factors 1 and 2 and regulation of the nuclear factor-kappaB antiapoptotic activity in human gliomas. J Neurosurg 103: 873-881, 2005.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Naugler WE,
    2. Karin M
    : NF-kappaB and cancer-identifying targets and mechanisms. Curr Opin Genet Dev 18: 19-26, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Angileri FF,
    2. Aguennouz M,
    3. Conti A,
    4. La Torre D,
    5. Cardali S,
    6. Crupi R,
    7. Tomasello C,
    8. Germano A,
    9. Vita G,
    10. Tomasello F
    : Nuclear factor-kappaB activation and differential expression of survivin and Bcl-2 in human grade 2-4 astrocytomas. Cancer 112: 2258-2266, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Pikarsky E,
    2. Porat RM,
    3. Stein I,
    4. Abramovitch R,
    5. Amit S,
    6. Kasem S,
    7. Gutkovich-Pyest E,
    8. Urieli-Shoval S,
    9. Galun E,
    10. Ben-Neriah Y
    : NF-kappaB functions as a tumour promoter in inflammation-associated cancer. Nature 431: 461-466, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. ↵
    1. Inoue J,
    2. Gohda J,
    3. Akiyama T,
    4. Semba K
    : NF-kappaB activation in development and progression of cancer. Cancer Sci 98: 268-274, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Shen HM,
    2. Tergaonkar V
    : NFkappaB signaling in carcinogenesis and as a potential molecular target for cancer therapy. Apoptosis 14: 348-363, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. ↵
    1. Whiteside TL,
    2. Friberg D
    : Natural killer cells and natural killer cell activity in chronic fatigue syndrome. Am J Med 105: 27S-34S, 1998.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  60. ↵
    1. Siegel SD,
    2. Antoni MH,
    3. Fletcher MA,
    4. Maher K,
    5. Segota MC,
    6. Klimas N
    : Impaired natural immunity, cognitive dysfunction, and physical symptoms in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome: preliminary evidence for a subgroup? J Psychosom Res 60: 559-566, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. ↵
    1. Tirelli U,
    2. Marotta G,
    3. Improta S,
    4. Pinto A
    : Immunological abnormalities in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Scand J Immunol 40: 601-608, 1994.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    1. Levine PH,
    2. Whiteside TL,
    3. Friberg D,
    4. Bryant J,
    5. Colclough G,
    6. Herberman RB
    : Dysfunction of natural killer activity in a family with chronic fatigue syndrome. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 88: 96-104, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. ↵
    1. Aoki T,
    2. Miyakoshi H,
    3. Usuda Y,
    4. Herberman RB
    : Low NK syndrome and its relationship to chronic fatigue syndrome. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 69: 253-265, 1993.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. ↵
    1. Arnon TI,
    2. Markel G,
    3. Mandelboim O
    : Tumor and viral recognition by natural killer cells receptors. Semin Cancer Biol 16: 348-358, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. ↵
    1. Terunuma H,
    2. Deng X,
    3. Dewan Z,
    4. Fujimoto S,
    5. Yamamoto N
    : Potential role of NK cells in the induction of immune responses: implications for NK cell-based immunotherapy for cancers and viral infections. Int Rev Immunol 27: 93-110, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. ↵
    1. Strayer DR,
    2. Carter WA,
    3. Mayberry SD,
    4. Pequignot E,
    5. Brodsky I
    : Low natural cytotoxicity of peripheral blood mononuclear cells in individuals with high familial incidences of cancer. Cancer Res 44: 370-374, 1984.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Strayer DR,
    2. Carter WA,
    3. Brodsky I
    : Familial occurrence of breast cancer is associated with reduced natural killer cytotoxicity. Breast Cancer Res Treat 7: 187-192, 1986.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  67. ↵
    1. Hersey P,
    2. Edwards A,
    3. Honeyman M,
    4. McCarthy WH
    : Low natural killer cell activity in familial melanoma patients and their relatives. Br J Cancer 40: 113-122, 1979.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  68. ↵
    1. Whiteside TL,
    2. Herberman RB
    : The role of natural killer cells in immune surveillance of cancer. Curr Opin Immunol 7: 704-710, 1995.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. ↵
    1. Pollack S
    : Chronic fatigue syndrome and immune dysfunction: cause or effect? Isr Med Assoc J 4: 883-885, 2002.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  70. ↵
    1. Jenkins DC,
    2. Charles IG,
    3. Thomsen LL,
    4. Moss DW,
    5. Holmes LS,
    6. Baylis SA,
    7. Rhodes P,
    8. Westmore K,
    9. Emson PC,
    10. Moncada S
    : Roles of nitric oxide in tumor growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92: 4392-4396, 1995.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  71. ↵
    1. Wink DA,
    2. Vodovotz Y,
    3. Laval J,
    4. Laval F,
    5. Dewhirst MW,
    6. Mitchell JB
    : The multifaceted roles of nitric oxide in cancer. Carcinogenesis 19: 711-721, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  72. ↵
    1. Colakogullari M,
    2. Ulukaya E,
    3. Yilmaztepe A,
    4. Ocakoglu G,
    5. Yilmaz M,
    6. Karadag M,
    7. Tokullugil A
    : Higher serum nitrate levels are associated with poor survival in lung cancer patients. Clin Biochem 39: 898-903, 2006.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  73. ↵
    1. Kaya E,
    2. Keskin L,
    3. Aydogdu I,
    4. Kuku I,
    5. Bayraktar N,
    6. Erkut MA
    : Oxidant/antioxidant parameters and their relationship with chemotherapy in Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Int Med Res 33: 687-692, 2005.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  74. ↵
    1. Shephard RJ,
    2. Shek PN
    : Effects of exercise and training on natural killer cell counts and cytolytic activity: a meta-analysis. Sports Med 28: 177-195, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  75. ↵
    1. Woods JA,
    2. Davis JM,
    3. Smith JA,
    4. Nieman DC
    : Exercise and cellular innate immune function. Med Sci Sports Exerc 31: 57-66, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  76. ↵
    1. Mackinnon LT
    : Advances in Exercise Immunology. Leeds Mackinnon LT, Human Kinestics, pp. 94-96, 1999.
  77. ↵
    1. Fulle S,
    2. Pietrangelo T,
    3. Mancinelli R,
    4. Saggini R,
    5. Fano G
    : Specific correlations between muscle oxidative stress and chronic fatigue syndrome: a working hypothesis. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 28: 355-362, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  78. ↵
    1. Nicolson GL,
    2. Conklin KA
    : Reversing mitochondrial dysfunction, fatigue and the adverse effects of chemotherapy of metastatic disease by molecular replacement therapy. Clin Exp Metastasis 25: 161-169, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. ↵
    1. Malmberg KJ
    : Effective immunotherapy against cancer: a question of overcoming immune suppression and immune escape? Cancer Immunol Immunother 53: 879-892, 2004.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  80. ↵
    1. Nijs J,
    2. Meeus M,
    3. McGregor NR,
    4. Meeusen R,
    5. de Schutter G,
    6. van Hoof E,
    7. de Meirleir K
    : Chronic fatigue syndrome: exercise performance related to immune dysfunction. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37: 1647-1654, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Snell CR,
    2. Vanness JM,
    3. Strayer DR,
    4. Stevens SR
    : Exercise capacity and immune function in male and female patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). In Vivo 19: 387-390, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  81. ↵
    1. Snell CR,
    2. Vanness JM,
    3. Strayer DR,
    4. Stevens SR
    : Physical performance and prediction of 2-5A synthetase/RNase L antiviral pathway activity in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. In Vivo 16: 107-109, 2002.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  82. ↵
    1. Tiev KP,
    2. Briant M,
    3. Ziani M,
    4. Cabane J,
    5. Demettre E,
    6. Lebleu B
    : Variability of the RNase L isoform ratio (37 kiloDaltons/83 kiloDaltons) in diagnosis of chronic fatigue syndrome. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 12: p366, 2005.
    OpenUrl
  83. ↵
    1. Qian ZM,
    2. Xiao DS,
    3. Ke Y,
    4. Liao QK
    : Increased nitric oxide is one of the causes of changes of iron metabolism in strenuously exercised rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 280: R739-743, 2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  84. ↵
    1. Tatsumi T,
    2. Matoba S,
    3. Kawahara A,
    4. Keira N,
    5. Shiraishi J,
    6. Akashi K,
    7. Kobara M,
    8. Tanaka T,
    9. Katamura M,
    10. Nakagawa C,
    11. Ohta B,
    12. Shirayama T,
    13. Takeda K,
    14. Asayama J,
    15. Fliss H,
    16. Nakagawa M
    : Cytokine-induced nitric oxide production inhibits mitochondrial energy production and impairs contractile function in rat cardiac myocytes. J Am Coll Cardiol 35: 1338-1346, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  85. ↵
    1. Lee BN,
    2. Dantzer R,
    3. Langley KE,
    4. Bennett GJ,
    5. Dougherty PM,
    6. Dunn AJ,
    7. Meyers CA,
    8. Miller AH,
    9. Payne R,
    10. Reuben JM,
    11. Wang XS,
    12. Cleeland CS
    : A cytokine-based neuroimmunologic mechanism of cancer-related symptoms. Neuroimmunomodulation 11: 279-292, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  86. ↵
    1. Na YM,
    2. Kim MY,
    3. Kim YK,
    4. Ha YR,
    5. Yoon DS
    : Exercise therapy effect on natural killer cell cytotoxic activity in stomach cancer patients after curative surgery. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 81: 777-779, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  87. ↵
    1. Fulcher KY,
    2. White PD
    : Strength and physiological response to exercise in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 69: 302-307, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Irwin ML,
    2. Crumley D,
    3. McTiernan A,
    4. Bernstein L,
    5. Baumgartner R,
    6. Gilliland FD,
    7. Kriska A,
    8. Ballard-Barbash R
    : Physical activity levels before and after a diagnosis of breast carcinoma: the Health, Eating, Activity, and Lifestyle (HEAL) study. Cancer 97: 1746-1757, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Courneya KS,
    2. Friedenreich CM
    : Relationship between exercise pattern across the cancer experience and current quality of life in colorectal cancer survivors. J Altern Complement Med 3: 215-226, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Courneya KS,
    2. Friedenreich CM
    : Determinants of exercise during colorectal cancer treatment: an application of the theory of planned behavior. Oncol Nurs Forum 24: 1715-1723, 1997.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  88. ↵
    1. Thorsen L,
    2. Courneya KS,
    3. Stevinson C,
    4. Fossa SD
    : A systematic review of physical activity in prostate cancer survivors: outcomes, prevalence, and determinants. Support Care Cancer 16: 987-997, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  89. ↵
    1. Irwin ML
    : Physical activity interventions for cancer survivors. Br J Sports Med 43: 32-38, 2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  90. ↵
    1. Irwin ML,
    2. Mayne ST
    : Impact of nutrition and exercise on cancer survival. Cancer J 14: 435-441, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  91. ↵
    1. Sorensen B,
    2. Streib JE,
    3. Strand M,
    4. Make B,
    5. Giclas PC,
    6. Fleshner M,
    7. Jones JF
    : Complement activation in a model of chronic fatigue syndrome. J Allergy Clin Immunol 112: 397-403, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  92. ↵
    1. Jammes Y,
    2. Steinberg JG,
    3. Mambrini O,
    4. Bregeon F,
    5. Delliaux S
    : Chronic fatigue syndrome: assessment of increased oxidative stress and altered muscle excitability in response to incremental exercise. J Intern Med 257: 299-310, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  93. ↵
    1. Schmitz KH,
    2. Holtzman J,
    3. Courneya KS,
    4. Masse LC,
    5. Duval S,
    6. Kane R
    : Controlled physical activity trials in cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14: 1588-1595, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  94. ↵
    1. Cohen LA,
    2. Choi KW,
    3. Wang CX
    : Influence of dietary fat, caloric restriction, and voluntary exercise on N-nitrosomethylurea-induced mammary tumorigenesis in rats. Cancer Res 48: 4276-4283, 1988.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 29 (11)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 29, Issue 11
November 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Immunological Similarities between Cancer and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: The Common Link to Fatigue?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
9 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Immunological Similarities between Cancer and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: The Common Link to Fatigue?
MIRA MEEUS, WILHELM MISTIAEN, LUC LAMBRECHT, JO NIJS
Anticancer Research Nov 2009, 29 (11) 4717-4726;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Immunological Similarities between Cancer and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: The Common Link to Fatigue?
MIRA MEEUS, WILHELM MISTIAEN, LUC LAMBRECHT, JO NIJS
Anticancer Research Nov 2009, 29 (11) 4717-4726;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Fatigue
    • Intracellular Immunity: Ribonuclease L (RNase L)
    • Intracellular Immunity: Nuclear Factor Kappa Beta (NF-κB)
    • Cellular Immunity: Natural Killer Cell Functioning
    • Fatigue and Immunity
    • Discussion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Infection, Viral Dissemination, and Antibody Responses of Rhesus Macaques Exposed to the Human Gammaretrovirus XMRV
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Retrospective Study of Radiotherapy Impact on the Outcome of Material-assisted Implant-based Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction
  • Carbon-ion Radiotherapy for Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer in the Liver or Lung
  • Treatment Volume, Dose Prescription and Delivery Techniques for Dose-intensification in Rectal Cancer: A National Survey
Show more Clinical Studies

Similar Articles

Anticancer Research

© 2021 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire