Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

Ovarian Renin—Angiotensin System-regulating Aminopeptidases Are Involved in Progesterone Overproduction in Rats with Mammary Tumours Induced by N-Methyl Nitrosourea

MARÍA DEL PILAR CARRERA, MARÍA JESÚS RAMÍREZ-EXPÓSITO, MARÍA JESÚS GARCÍA, MARÍA DOLORES MAYAS and JOSÉ MANUEL MARTÍNEZ-MARTOS
Anticancer Research November 2009, 29 (11) 4633-4637;
MARÍA DEL PILAR CARRERA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: pcarrera{at}ujaen.es
MARÍA JESÚS RAMÍREZ-EXPÓSITO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARÍA JESÚS GARCÍA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARÍA DOLORES MAYAS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JOSÉ MANUEL MARTÍNEZ-MARTOS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

A local renin-angiotensin system (RAS) has been found in ovary. This ovarian RAS may regulate ovarian steroidogenesis. Ample studies show that the ovarian hormones estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P) are strongly implicated in the development of breast cancer. Materials and Methods: The aim of the present work was to elucidate if alterations in ovarian RAS, analyzed through their proteolytic regulatory enzymes aminopeptidase A (APA), B (APB) and N (APN), could be responsible for an altered steroidogenesis in rats with mammary tumours induced by N-methyl nitrosourea (NMU). Results: We describe here a highly significant increase of serum P levels in NMU-treated rats, concomitantly with an increase in ovarian aspartyl and glutamyl aminopeptidase activities (named together as APA activity). Moreover, we did not find changes in APB or APN activities, suggesting an increased metabolism from Ang II to Ang III and a decreased catabolism of Ang III. Conclusion: The relationship between ovarian RAS and P overproduction in a rat model of mammary carcinogenesis indicates ovarian RAS as a new potential target in breast cancer therapy.

  • Breast cancer
  • renin-angiotensin system
  • ovary
  • steroidogenesis
  • estradiol

Breast cancer, the most frequent spontaneous malignancy diagnosed in women in the Western world, is continuously increasing in incidence in industrialized nations. Although breast cancer develops in women as the result of a combination of external and endogenous factors such as exposure to ionizing radiation, diet, socioeconomic status, and endocrine, familial, or genetic factors, no specific etiological agent(s) or the mechanism responsible for the initiation of the disease has been identified as yet. On the basis of experimental, epidemiological, and clinical studies, the ovarian hormones estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P) are strongly implicated in the development of this disease. Both hormones drive cellular proliferation in the breast; this increased proliferation provides greater opportunity for the accumulation of random errors, leading to breast tumorigenesis (1, 2).

Tumors induced in rats by administration of N-methyl-nitrosourea (NMU) constitute a useful tool for dissecting the initiation, promotion and progression processes of carcinogenesis (3). NMU-induced mammary tumors are estrogen-dependent, aggressive and locally invasive, to a similar degree to that observed in the human disease (4-8).

It is well known that the renin angiotensin system (RAS) plays important roles in mammals in general homeostasis, including the regulation of systemic blood pressure and of fluid and electrolyte balance (9). Besides its classical roles, a local RAS has been found in the female reproductive system in several mammals. Thus, binding sites for angiotensin II (Ang II) have been identified in rat ovarian follicles (10, 11) and corpora lutea (CL) (12, 13). Renin- and prorenin-like activities have been shown in bovine follicles (14) and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) is also present in rat ovarian follicles and CL (15). The presence of angiotensin receptor subtypes (AT1 and AT2) have been documented and all studies have conclusively shown that by far the predominant receptor in the rat ovary is the AT2 (16). Furthermore, evidence has been accumulating that Ang II locally regulates ovulation, oocyte maturation (17, 18), and steroidogenesis (19). These findings suggest that ovarian RAS may function independently, or in concert with the systemic RAS, and regulate ovarian function through the paracrine/autocrine actions of Ang II. However, although classically AngII has been considered as the main bioactive peptide of the RAS, it has been postulated that is actually angiotensin III (AngIII) which plays this role (20, 21). In fact, Ang III has most of Ang II properties and shares the same receptors (22, 23). Ang III is obtained by deletion of the N-terminal aspartic residue by glutamyl-aminopeptidase (GluAP: EC 3.4.11.7) and aspartyl-aminopeptidase (AspAP: EC 3.4.11.21). Both enzymes are named together as aminopeptidase A (APA). Furthermore, AngIII is metabolized to angiotensin IV (Ang IV) by arginyl-aminopeptidase (aminopeptidase B, APB: EC 3.4.11.6) and alanyl-aminopeptidase (aminopeptidase N, APN: EC 3.4.11.14) (23-25).

In recent work, we determined that Ang III is the main peptide involved in ovarian P (but not E2) production in the rat (26). Therefore, the aim of the present work was to elucidate if alterations in ovarian RAS, analyzed through their proteolytic regulatory enzymes, could be responsible for an altered steroidogenesis in rats with mammary tumours induced by NMU.

Materials and Methods

Animal and treatments. Forty female virgin Wistar rats (164.7±4.7 g body weight) were used in this work. The animals were provided from the animal house of the University of Jaén, and maintained in a controlled environment under constant temperature (25°C) with a 12 h light/12 h dark cycle. All animals were allowed access to water and food ad libitum. The experimental procedures for animals use and care were in accordance with the European Community Council directive (86/609/EEC). The rats were randomly divided into two groups. One group were intraperitoneally injected with three doses of NMU 50 mg/kg body weight dissolved in distilled water (10 mg/ml) at 50, 80 and 110 days after birth, as described by Rivera et al. (27). All rats were at estrous at the first NMU injection, verified by daily vaginal smears. The control group received the vehicle only. For tumour detection, rats were examined by palpation 2 days each week after the second NMU injection. The following tumour growth parameters were determined: latency period (LP), as the number of days between the first NMU injection and the appearance of the first tumour, with a value of 113.0±4.2 days (mean±SEM); tumour incidence (TI), as the percentage of the rats that developed at least one tumour, with a value of 60%; and mean tumour number per rat (n/t), as the number of tumours per rat in animals developing at least one tumour, with a value of 1.93±0.4 tumours (mean±SEM).

Sample preparation. After 122 days from the first NMU injection, animals were sacrificed under equithensin anaesthesia (2 ml/kg body weight). Blood samples were obtained through the left cardiac ventricle and centrifuged for ten minutes at 3000×g to obtain the serum. These samples were frozen and stored at −80°C, until use. The right ovary was quickly removed and also frozen until use. To obtain soluble fraction, tissue samples were homogenized in 10 volumes of 10 mM HCl-Tris buffer (pH 7.4) and ultracentrifuged at 100,000×g for 30 min (4°C). The supernatants were used to measure soluble enzymatic activity and protein content in triplicate. To solubilize membrane proteins, the pellets were homogenized again in HCl-Tris buffer (pH 7.4) plus 1% Triton X-100. After centrifugation (100,000×g, for 30 min at 4°C), the supernatant was used to determinate solubilized membrane-bound activity and proteins in triplicate.

RAS-regulating aminopeptidase assays. AspAP was determined fluorimetrically using aspartyl-β-naphthylamide (AspNNap) as the substrate, according to the method previously described by Carrera et al. (28). Briefly, ten microliters of each sample was incubated in triplicate for 30 min at 37°C with 100 μl of the substrate solution: 100 μM AspNNap, 1.3 μM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and 2 mM MnCl2 in 50 mM of phosphate buffer, pH 7.4.

GluAP activity was measured in the same way using glutamyl-β-naphthylamide (GluNNap) as the substrate, as previously described (29). Ten microliters of each sample was incubated in triplicate for 30 min at 37°C with 100 μl of the substrate solution: 100 μM GluNNap, 0.65 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) and 50 mM CaCl2 in 50 mM of phosphate buffer, pH 7.4.

APN and APB were also measured fluorometrically using alanyl-β-naphthylamide (AlaNNap) or arginyl-β-naphthylamide (ArgNNap) as the substrate, as previously described by Garcia et al. (30). Ten microliters of each supernatant were incubated for 30 min at 37°C with 100 μM of the substrate solution: 100 μM AlaNNap or 100 μM ArgNNap and 0.65 mM DTT in 50 mM of phosphate buffer, pH 7.4.

All the reactions were stopped by adding 100 μl of 0.1 M acetate buffer, pH 4.2.

The amount of β-naphthylamine released as the result of the enzymatic activities was measured fluorimetrically at 412 nm emission wavelength with an excitation wavelength of 345 nm. Proteins were quantified also in triplicate by the method of Bradford, using bovine serum albumin (BSA) as standard. Specific soluble and membrane-bound APN, APB, AspAP and GluAp activities were expressed as nanomoles of Ala-, Arg-, Asp- and Glu-β-naphthylamide hydrolysed per min per mg of protein, by using a standard curve prepared with the latter compound under corresponding assay conditions.

Assessment of sex hormones. Serum samples were assayed by dissociation enhanced lanthanide fluorescence immunoassay (DELFIA) for E2 and P (PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences, Wallac Oy, Turku, Finlad), according to the manufacturer's instructions. For E2, the lower limit of the assay detection was 0.05 nmol/l (13.6 pg/ml) and the interassay coefficient of variation was between 1.8-2.1%. For P, the lower limit of assay detection was 0.8 nmol/l (0.25 ng/ml) and the interassay coefficient of variation was between 1.9-4.5%.

Statistical analysis. To analyse the differences between the control group and the animals with mammary tumours due to NMU injections, an unpaired Student's t-test was used. All comparisons with p-values below 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Figure 1 shows ovarian soluble and membrane-bound RAS-regulating aminopeptidase activities. Neither soluble nor membrane-bound APN (Figure 1A) or APB (Figure 1B) activities were modified in NMU-treated animals. Instead, a significant increase was found in soluble AspAP (Figure 1C) (p<0.05) (0.24±0.04 nmol/min/mg protein versus 0.88±0.21 nmol/min/mg protein) and GluAP (Figure 1D) (p<0.001) (0.42±0.047 nmol/min/mg protein versus 1.16±0.14 nmol/min/mg protein) activities in ovary from NMU-treated rats. However, no significant changes were observed in membrane-bound activities (Figure 1C and 1D).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Specific soluble and membrane-bound renin-angiotensin system (RAS) regulating aminopeptidase N (A), aminopeptidase B (B), aspartyl aminopeptidase (C) and glutamyl aminopeptidase (D) activities in ovary of control and N-methyl nitrosourea (NMU)-treated rats. Results are expressed in nanomoles of the corresponding aminoacyl-β-naphthylamide (see Material and Methods section) hydrolysed per min and per mg of protein (mean±SEM; n=10; *p<0.05, ***p<0.001).

Figure 2 shows serum circulating levels of E2 and P in control and NMU-treated animals. No significant differences were found in E2 levels, but a significant increase (p<0.01) was observed in serum P levels in NMU-treated rats. The serum P level was increased by more than 50% (31.07±3.45 ng/ml in the control group versus 46.97±4.05 ng/ml in the NMU-treated group).

Discussion

Although the action of ovarian hormones on the breast does not appear to be genotoxic, they affect the rate of cell division (31, 32). Thus, E2 stimulates ductal growth and increases cell proliferation rates, which can increase the likelihood of a random genetic error. P stimulates alveolar growth and also has proliferative effects (33). In the same way, sex steroid hormone receptors (ER and PgR, respectively) have been characterized in mammary tumours of NMU-treated rats in the cytosolic fraction (34). The total incidence of ER and PgR positivity was 100%, PgR presence being an expression of ER functionality (35). In the present study, we observed a highly significant increase of serum P levels in NMU-treated rats. Under physiological conditions, the major developmental role of P in the normal breast is the formation of lobular-alveolar structures during pregnancy (36), but in the case of breast cancer cells, a decrease in PgR associated with exposure to progestins (37-39) has been documented. Furthermore, many of the effects of P are thought to be due to its ability to oppose the action of E2, particularly in the uterus. P abrogates E2 induction of many of the known hormone-responsive genes. This effect is mediated by down-regulation of cytoplasmic and nuclear ER protein concentrations (40, 41). Thus, the rise in P levels in this breast cancer model could lead to a reduction in PgR levels in breast tumour, and therefore, reduces ER activity in mammary gland. In this manner, P will counteract the pro-proliferative effect of estrogens.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Serum circulating levels of estradiol (A) and progesterone (B) in control and N-methyl nitrosourea (NMU)-treated animals (mean±SEM; n= 10; **p<0.01).

In this way, it is well known that ovarian RAS is involved in steroidogenesis (10, 11, 42) Ang III being responsible, at least in the rat, for P production (26). In the present work, we also found an increase in ovarian AspAP and GluAP activities (named together as aminopeptidase A or APA activity) in NMU-treated animals, suggesting an increased metabolism from Ang II to Ang III. In the same way, we did not find changes in APN or APB activities, responsible for Ang III catabolism. Therefore, a rise in ovarian Ang III levels would be expected, leading to an increase in P production. To our knowledge, the literature regarding the effects of endogenous progesterone on breast cancer risk is confusing and inconsistent, as the effects of this hormone can only be studied in ovulatory menstrual cycles of premenopausal women. Most studies that have evaluated progesterone levels do nor report whether measurement was restricted to ovulatory cycles. During anovulatory menstrual cycles, the P level remains low throughout the cycle. Furthermore, it is impractical in most epidemiological studies to make certain that the progesterone measurement occurs on the day of the progesterone peak; this requires daily measurements throughout the luteal phase of the cycle. Finally, with recent studies showing a marked increase in breast cancer risk associated with addition of a progestin to estrogen replacement therapy regimens (43, 44), the seroepidemiology of progesterone is of great interest, and the present report shows for the first time the relationship between ovarian RAS and progesterone overproduction in a rat model of mammary carcinogenesis, pointing to ovarian RAS as a new potential target in breast cancer therapy.

  • Received June 15, 2009.
  • Revision received October 8, 2009.
  • Accepted October 13, 2009.
  • Copyright© 2009 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Bernstein L
    : Epidemiology of endocrine-related risk factors for breast cancer. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 7: 3-15, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Russo J,
    2. Russo IH
    : The role of estrogen in the initiation of breast cancer. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 102: 89-96, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Russo IH,
    2. Russo J
    : Hormonal approach to breast cancer prevention. J Cell Biochem Suppl 34: 1-6, 2000.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Gullino PM,
    2. Pettigrew HM,
    3. Grantham FH
    : N-Nitrosomethylurea as mammary gland carcinogen in rats. J Natl Cancer Inst 54: 401-414, 1975.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. McCormick DL,
    2. Adamowski CB,
    3. Fiks A,
    4. Moon RC
    : Lifetime dose-response relationships for mammary tumor induction by a single administration of N-methyl-N-nitrosourea. Cancer Res 41: 1690-1694, 1981.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Russo J,
    2. Gusterson BA,
    3. Rogers AE,
    4. Russo IH,
    5. Wellings SR,
    6. van Zwieten MJ
    : Comparative study of human and rat mammary tumorigenesis. Lab Invest 62: 244-278, 1990.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Thompson HJ,
    2. Adlakha H
    : Dose-responsive induction of mammary gland carcinomas by the intraperitoneal injection of 1-methyl-1-nitrosourea. Cancer Res 51: 3411-3415, 1991.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Welsch CW
    : Host factors affecting the growth of carcinogen-induced rat mammary carcinomas: a review and tribute to Charles Brenton Huggins. Cancer Res 45: 3415-3443, 1985.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Nielsen AH,
    2. Hagemann A,
    3. Poulsen K
    : The tissue renin-angiotensin system in the female reproductive tissues. A review. Adv Exp Med Biol 377: 253-268, 1995.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Husain A,
    2. Bumpus FM,
    3. De Silva P,
    4. Speth RC
    : Localization of angiotensin II receptors in ovarian follicles and the identification of angiotensin II in rat ovaries. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84: 2489-2493, 1987.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Speth RC,
    2. Bumpus FM,
    3. Husain A
    : Identification of angiotensin II receptors in the rat ovary. Eur J Pharmacol 130: 351-352, 1986.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Haulica I,
    2. Bild W,
    3. Serban DN
    : Angiotensin peptides and their pleiotropic actions. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst 6: 121-131, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Pepperell JR,
    2. Nemeth G,
    3. Yamada Y,
    4. Naftolin F,
    5. Merino M
    : Localized accumulation of angiotensin II and production of angiotensin-(1-7) in rat luteal cells and effects on steroidogenesis. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 291: E221-233, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Schultze D,
    2. Brunswig B,
    3. Mukhopadhyay AK
    : Renin and prorenin-like activities in bovine ovarian follicles. Endocrinology 124: 1389-1398, 1989.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Speth RC,
    2. Husain A
    : Distribution of angiotensin-converting enzyme and angiotensin II-receptor binding sites in the rat ovary. Biol Reprod 38: 695-702, 1988.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  13. ↵
    1. Obermuller N,
    2. Schlamp D,
    3. Hoffmann S,
    4. Gentili M,
    5. Inagami T,
    6. Gretz N,
    7. Weigel M
    : Localization of the mRNA for the angiotensin II receptor subtype 2 (AT2) in follicular granulosa cells of the rat ovary by nonradioactive in situ hybridization. J Histochem Cytochem 46: 865-870, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Kuo TC,
    2. Endo K,
    3. Dharmarajan AM,
    4. Miyazaki T,
    5. Atlas SJ,
    6. Wallach EE
    : Direct effect of angiotensin II on in vitro perfused rabbit ovary. J Reprod Fertil 2: 469-474, 1991.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Yoshimura Y,
    2. Karube M,
    3. Koyama N,
    4. Shiokawa S,
    5. Nanno T,
    6. Nakamura Y
    : Angiotensin II directly induces follicle rupture and oocyte maturation in the rabbit. FEBS Lett 307: 305-308, 1992.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Yoshimura Y,
    2. Karube M,
    3. Aoki H,
    4. Oda T,
    5. Koyama N,
    6. Nagai A,
    7. Akimoto Y,
    8. Hirano H,
    9. Nakamura Y
    : Angiotensin II induces ovulation and oocyte maturation in rabbit ovaries via the AT2 receptor subtype. Endocrinology 137: 1204-1211, 1996.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Pepperell JR,
    2. Nemeth G,
    3. Yamada Y,
    4. Naftolin F
    : The type 1 angiotensin-II receptor mediates intracellular calcium mobilization in rat luteal cells. Endocrinology 133: 1678-1684, 1993.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Reaux A,
    2. Fournie-Zaluski MC,
    3. Llorens-Cortes C
    : Angiotensin III: a central regulator of vasopressin release and blood pressure. Trends Endocrinol Metab 12: 157-162, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Barrett AJ,
    2. Woessner JF,
    3. Rawlings ND
    : Handbook of Proteolytic Enzymes. Amsterdam, Elsevier/Academic Press, 2004.
  20. ↵
    1. Szczepanska-Sadowska E
    : Interaction of vasopressin and angiotensin II in central control of blood pressure and thirst. Regul Pept 66: 65-71, 1996.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Beynon RJ,
    2. Bond JS
    : Proteolytic Enzymes: A Practical Approach. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001.
  21. ↵
    1. Ward PE,
    2. Benter IF,
    3. Dick L,
    4. Wilk S
    : Metabolism of vasoactive peptides by plasma and purified renal aminopeptidase M. Biochem Pharmacol 40: 1725-1732, 1990.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. de la Chica-Rodriguez S,
    2. Cortes-Denia P,
    3. Ramirez-Exposito MJ,
    4. de Saavedra JM,
    5. Sanchez-Agesta R,
    6. Perez MC,
    7. Martinez-Martos JM
    : Doxazosin blockade of alpha 1-adrenergic receptors increases rat serum progesterone levels: a putative role of ovarian angiotensin III in steroidogenesis. Fertil Steril 88: 1071-1075, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Rivera ES,
    2. Andrade N,
    3. Martin G,
    4. Melito G,
    5. Cricco G,
    6. Mohamad N,
    7. Davio C,
    8. Caro R,
    9. Bergoc RM
    : Induction of mammary tumors in rat by intraperitoneal injection of NMU: histopathology and estral cycle influence. Cancer Lett 86: 223-228, 1994.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Carrera MP,
    2. Ramirez-Exposito MJ,
    3. Valenzuela MT,
    4. Garcia MJ,
    5. Mayas MD,
    6. Martinez-Martos JM
    : Glutamyl- but not aspartyl-aminopeptidase activity is modified in serum of N-methyl nitrosourea-induced rat mammary tumours. Anticancer Res 24: 801-805, 2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Carrera MP,
    2. Ramirez-Exposito MJ,
    3. Valenzuela MT,
    4. Duenas B,
    5. Garcia MJ,
    6. Mayas MD,
    7. Martinez-Martos JM
    : Renin-angiotensin system-regulating aminopeptidase activities are modified in the pineal gland of rats with breast cancer induced by N-methyl-nitrosourea. Cancer Invest 24: 149-153, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Garcia MJ,
    2. Martinez-Martos JM,
    3. Mayas MD,
    4. Carrera MP,
    5. Ramirez-Exposito MJ
    : Hormonal status modifies renin-angiotensin system-regulating aminopeptidases and vasopressin-degrading activity in the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis of male mice. Life Sci 73: 525-538, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Henderson BE,
    2. Feigelson HS
    : Hormonal carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis 21: 427-433, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Preston-Martin S,
    2. Pike MC,
    3. Ross RK,
    4. Jones PA,
    5. Henderson BE
    : Increased cell division as a cause of human cancer. Cancer Res 50: 7415-7421, 1990.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Mustafa IA,
    2. Bland KI
    : Physiologic effects of steroid hormones and postmenopausal hormone replacement on the female breast and breast cancer risk. Ann Surg 228: 638-651, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Martin G,
    2. Melito G,
    3. Rivera E,
    4. Levin E,
    5. Davio C,
    6. Cricco G,
    7. Andrade N,
    8. Caro R,
    9. Bergoc R
    : Effect of tamoxifen on intraperitoneal N-nitroso-N-methylurea-induced tumors. Cancer Lett 100: 227-234, 1996.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. McGuire WL,
    2. Osborne CK,
    3. Clark GM,
    4. Knight WA 3rd..
    : Steroid hormone receptors and carcinoma of the breast. Am J Physiol 243: E99-102, 1982.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Topper YJ,
    2. Freeman CS
    : Multiple hormone interactions in the developmental biology of the mammary gland. Physiol Rev 60: 1049-1106, 1980.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Alexander IE,
    2. Clarke CL,
    3. Shine J,
    4. Sutherland RL
    : Progestin inhibition of progesterone receptor gene expression in human breast cancer cells. Mol Endocrinol 3: 1377-1386, 1989.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Nardulli AM,
    2. Katzenellenbogen BS
    : Progesterone receptor regulation in T47D human breast cancer cells: analysis by density labeling of progesterone receptor synthesis and degradation and their modulation by progestin. Endocrinology 122: 1532-1540, 1988.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Read LD,
    2. Snider CE,
    3. Miller JS,
    4. Greene GL,
    5. Katzenellenbogen BS
    : Ligand-modulated regulation of progesterone receptor messenger ribonucleic acid and protein in human breast cancer cell lines. Mol Endocrinol 2: 263-271, 1988.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Clarke CL,
    2. Roman SD,
    3. Graham J,
    4. Koga M,
    5. Sutherland RL
    : Progesterone receptor regulation by retinoic acid in the human breast cancer cell line T-47D. J Biol Chem 265: 12694-12700, 1990.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Graham JD,
    2. Clarke CL
    : Physiological action of progesterone in target tissues. Endocr Rev 18: 502-519, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Johnson MC,
    2. Vega M,
    3. Vantman D,
    4. Troncoso JL,
    5. Devoto L
    : Regulatory role of angiotensin II on progesterone production by cultured human granulosa cells. Expression of angiotensin II type-2 receptor. Mol Hum Reprod 3: 663-668, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Ross RK,
    2. Paganini-Hill A,
    3. Wan PC,
    4. Pike MC
    : Effect of hormone replacement therapy on breast cancer risk: estrogen versus estrogen plus progestin. J Natl Cancer Inst 92: 328-332, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    1. Schairer C,
    2. Byrne C,
    3. Keyl PM,
    4. Brinton LA,
    5. Sturgeon SR,
    6. Hoover RN
    : Menopausal estrogen and estrogen-progestin replacement therapy and risk of breast cancer (United States). Cancer Causes Control 5: 491-500, 1994.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 29, Issue 11
November 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Ovarian Renin—Angiotensin System-regulating Aminopeptidases Are Involved in Progesterone Overproduction in Rats with Mammary Tumours Induced by N-Methyl Nitrosourea
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 9 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Ovarian Renin—Angiotensin System-regulating Aminopeptidases Are Involved in Progesterone Overproduction in Rats with Mammary Tumours Induced by N-Methyl Nitrosourea
MARÍA DEL PILAR CARRERA, MARÍA JESÚS RAMÍREZ-EXPÓSITO, MARÍA JESÚS GARCÍA, MARÍA DOLORES MAYAS, JOSÉ MANUEL MARTÍNEZ-MARTOS
Anticancer Research Nov 2009, 29 (11) 4633-4637;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Ovarian Renin—Angiotensin System-regulating Aminopeptidases Are Involved in Progesterone Overproduction in Rats with Mammary Tumours Induced by N-Methyl Nitrosourea
MARÍA DEL PILAR CARRERA, MARÍA JESÚS RAMÍREZ-EXPÓSITO, MARÍA JESÚS GARCÍA, MARÍA DOLORES MAYAS, JOSÉ MANUEL MARTÍNEZ-MARTOS
Anticancer Research Nov 2009, 29 (11) 4633-4637;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Mutual Interaction of 17{beta}-Estradiol and Progesterone: Electron Emission. Free Radical Effect Studied by Experiments In Vitro
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Integrative Analysis Combining Machine Learning and Functional Experiments Uncovers ISG15 As a Key Determinant of Cisplatin Resistance in Gastric Cancer
  • Allow Aloe to Do the Work: Aloe vera Constrains Growth of Bladder Cancer Cells and Modulates Expression of Key Costimulatory Molecules
  • PKF118-310 as a Potential Small Molecule Inhibitor Targeting the Wnt/β-Catenin Pathway for Gastric Cancer Therapy
Show more Experimental Studies
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire