Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

Differing Expression of Metalloprotease and of Adhesion Molecules in Signet-ring Cell and Intestinal Colorectal Carcinoma

DANIELA CABIBI, ANNA CALASCIBETTA, FEDERICO ARAGONA, ANNA MARTORANA, MARIA CAMPIONE and ROSARIO SANGUEDOLCE
Anticancer Research November 2009, 29 (11) 4417-4422;
DANIELA CABIBI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ANNA CALASCIBETTA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
FEDERICO ARAGONA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ANNA MARTORANA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARIA CAMPIONE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ROSARIO SANGUEDOLCE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sanguedolce@unipa.it
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Pure signet-ring cell colorectal carcinoma (SRCC) is an infrequent and highly malignant histological variant of colorectal cancer (CRC), while it is present as a histological component in colorectal carcinomas more frequently. Materials and Methods: The aim of this work was to widen the knowledge of the biological factors involved in the pathogenesis and aggressiveness of SRCC by the identification and evaluation of possible molecular abnormalities. By means of immunohistochemistry the expression of the proteolytic degradation enzyme matrix metalloprotease (MMP)-1, that is a collagenase specifically degrading collagens I, II, III and of the adhesion proteins E-cadherin, β-catenin and fibronectin which are usually involved in the carcinogenesis of conventional colorectal tumours was investigated. Results: SRCCs showed a significantly greater MMP-1 expression compared to the ordinary intestinal colorectal cancer (ICRC) and a significantly reduced E-cadherin, β-catenin and fibronectin expression. Conclusion: The biological aggressiveness and strong metastatic behaviour of SRCC could be due to high MMP-1 and low expression of the adhesion molecules.

  • Colorectal cancer
  • cadherin
  • catenin
  • fibronectin
  • metalloprotease-1
  • signet-ring cell

Pure signet-ring cell colorectal carcinoma (SRCC) is a rare form of colorectal cancer (CRC), reported to be approximately 1-2% of all CRCs (1), but the signet ring cell histotype is more frequently present in many intestinal carcinomas <50% of tumour component (2). This component grows in a diffuse fashion and in contrast to the pattern of mucinous carcinomas, these tumours synthesise all their mucin in the intracellular space. This intracellular production of mucin results in the displacement of the nucleus, so that the cancer cells acquire the typical signet ring configuration. A substantial number of studies have reported that SRCC presents different biological behaviour and a different clinical course compared to ordinary colorectal adenocarcinomas (3).

SRCC has a worse prognosis and relatively greater drug resistance than ordinary intestinal colorectal cancer (ICRC), and also shows aggressive infiltration to surrounding tissues, the frequent peritoneal seeding (2). These observations might suggest a different molecular behaviour implying characteristic carcinogenesis and progression of SRCC.

In a previous study, we found that SRCC expressed very low levels of Ki-67 (a proliferation marker) suggesting that these cells were in a post-mitotic phase of the cell cycle, and very low levels of thymidylate synthase (4), the main target of the most common drug used in CRC therapy 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (5), which could be one reason for the frequent drug resistance of SRCC (6).

Metalloproteases play key roles in the responses of cells to their microenvironment. By effecting proteolytic degradation or activation of cell surface and extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins such as collagen and laminin, they can modulate both cell—cell and cell—ECM interactions, which influence cell differentiation, migration, proliferation and survival (7). Both secreted and membrane-bound forms of metalloproteases have been implicated in pericellular proteolysis. Cells use various strategies to regulate extracellular proteases: transcriptional regulation, trafficking of membrane-bound forms (secretion and endocytosis), activation of latent proenzyme forms, extracellular binding proteins and the action of endogenous inhibitors. Matrix metalloprotease (MMP)-1, is a collagenase specifically degrading collagens I, II and III, and is involved in tumour invasion and metastasis (8). It is the predominant collagenase of resident cells, and of endothelial cells (9), tissue macrophages (10), synovial cells (11-12), and fibroblasts (13-14). Its expression has been found in various cancer tissues (15-17), but there are no reports on its expression in SRCC. Some adhesion proteins such as E-cadherin, β-catenin and fibronectin, are usually involved in the carcinogenesis and metastatic behaviour of conventional CRC. E-cadherin, is involved in cell—cell adhesion through calcium-regulated homophilic interaction, whereas in its intracellular domain, it connects to the actin cytoskeleton via catenins. E-cadherin has a significant function in intracellular adhesion of epithelial cells, the establishment of epithelial polarization, glandular differentiation and stratification. Down-regulation of E-cadherin expression has been observed in a number of carcinomas and is usually associated with advanced stage and progression (18).

β-Catenin is an 88 kDa multifunctional protein playing an essential role in cell-cell adhesion by binding to the transmembrane protein, cadherin. β-Catenin is also involved in the regulation of gene expression as a mediator of the Wnt signaling pathway. The expression and intracellular localization of β-catenin is altered in many types of carcinomas, such as breast cancer (19).

Fibronectin is a dimeric glycoprotein which is present in cells, ECM and blood. It possesses at least four binding sites for collagen, glycosaminoglycans, transglutaminase and cell surface receptor. Fibronectin is involved in cell adhesion, tissue organization, and wound healing, and fibronectin low carcinomas expression has been shown to be associated with many tumours, such as gastrointestinal carcinomas (20)

Few studies have investigated the mechanism of the distinctive phenotype and aggressive clinical behavior of SRCC, thus the aim of this study was to assess the expression of the proteolytic degradation and adhesion protein molecules MMP-1, E-cadherin, β-catenin and fibronectin in SRCCs compared to ICRCs in order to identify the distinct biological profile of these tumours.

Materials and Methods

The study used formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded primary tumour samples of 102 patients who had undergone surgery for previously untreated CRC, retrieved from archival material.

Immunohistochemistry assay. For each case, 10 serial 5-micron sections from the formalin-fixed tissue blocks, dewaxed and rehydrated, were used. Antigen retrieval was carried out using Dako antigen retrieval fluid and microwaving at 850 W for a total of 15 minutes, divided into 3 periods, each lasting 5 minutes, adding distilled water during the break between each microwaving. The sections were then treated with 3% hydrogen peroxidase for 5 minutes, followed by the monoclonal antibodies: E-cadherin clone NCH-38, at a dilution of 1:50 for 30 minutes; β-catenin clone Beta- catenin 1, at a dilution of 1:30 for 30 minutes, fibronectin clone FBN11, at a dilution of 1:50 for 30 minutes and MMP-1, at a dilution of 1:100 for 30 minutes. Visualization was obtained by incubation with anti-mouse rabbit and goat antibody (Dako) for 15 minutes, followed by a streptavidin-biotin peroxidase complex (Dako) for 15 minutes and finally, Dako chromogen for 5 minutes. Mayer's haematoxylin was used to counterstain the sections. As a positive control the normal mucous glands, present adjacent to the tumour, were used. Negative controls, lacking primary antibody, were included in each run of immunohistochemistry

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Clinicopathological features of patients.

Staining was evaluated as being positive when the intensity of staining of the samples (cytoplasmatic and/or nuclear) was greater than the control intensity of staining. The staining positivity for every patient was evaluated in 10 microscopic high power fields (HPFs) in which the neoplastic epithelial area was more than 70% of the whole field.

The staining positivity was evaluated semi-quantitatively as strong positivity (+++) if more than 50% of the neoplastic areas were positive; mild positivity (++) if 10-50% of neoplastic areas were positive, or negativity (—) if less than 10% of the neoplastic areas were positive.

Statistical analysis. Differences in the distribution of the study variables, and associations between variables were assessed by means of the Chi-square test.

Results

The clinicopathological features of the patients are summarised in Table I. The histopathological features of the tumours were evaluated by two different pathologists and classified as follows: ICRC, 70 cases, of which 22 were well-differentiated, 35 were moderately differentiated and 13 were undifferentiated, and SRCC, 32 cases. Their classification according to Dukes' system is shown in Table II.

Immunohistochemical staining of E-cadherin, β-catenin, fibronectin and MMP-1. Normal colonic epithelium showed basolateral membrane staining for E-cadherin, β-catenin and fibronectin along the entire length of the crypt; this served as an internal positive control.

The ICRCs showed variable degrees of membrane expression of these markers. It was noted that no expression of E-cadherin was found in 16% of the cases, while 84% of the samples were strongly positive; β-catenin was moderately expressed in 28% of the samples and highly expressed in 72% of the samples; fibronectin expression was moderate in 60% and high in 40% of the ICRC tumours. The SRCC samples were 100% negative for E-cadherin and fibronectin staining (Figures 1 and 2), while staining for β-catenin was negative in 75% (Figure 3) and moderately expressed in 25% of the tumour samples (p<0.001) These results are summarized in Tables III, IV and V.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Dukes' stage of patients included in the study.

MMP-1 expression was found predominantly in the cancer cells, but also some stromal cells and endothelial cells stained weakly. In the MMP-1-positive cells, diffuse staining was observed in the cytoplasm of the cells. Some tumours stained diffusely and others focally, at different intensities, but SRCCs showed a higher expression of MMP-1 overall in the invasion front of the tumour and in the neoplastic embolus compared to ICRCs (p<0.001) (Table VI). Haematogenous metastases of SRCCs highly expressing MMP-1 staining were found (Figure 4).

Discussion

In this study, SRCCs showed a significantly greater MMP-1 expression compared to the ICRCs, and this could be a reason for the major aggressiveness and metastatic behaviour of SRCC which is demonstrated in spite of their proliferation index (4). As MMPs seem to play important roles in tumour invasion and metastasis, recently they have gained attention as targets for new anticancer therapy strategies. Inhibitors of MMPs have been shown to prevent tumor spread both in vitro and in vivo (21-23) and to inhibit tumour angiogenesis (24), and some are being developed for clinical use. Marimastat, a synthetic low-molecular weight inhibitor of MMPs, is currently in phase I/II and III clinical trials with satisfactory preliminary results, but some side-effects have been reported (25-27). An anti-MMP therapy could be advisable for those patients bearing SRCCs because of their poor prognosis and hyperexpression of MMP-1.

The loss of function in any of the E-cadherin—catenin complex components has been suggested as the cause of the loss of epithelial differentiation and architecture, or the acquisition of a motile and invasive phenotype. Alteration in the expression or function of E-cadherin in carcinomas may allow certain carcinoma cells to be readily detached from the surrounding structure and thereby develop a more infiltrative growth pattern (18). A variety of human malignancies, including thyroid, oesophageal, gastric, and colonic adenocarcinomas, showing a reduced E-cadherin expression, have been found to develop greater tumour de-differentiation, greater infiltrative growth, and lymph node involvement (28-31). In the present study, significantly reduced E-cadherin, β-catenin and fibronectin was found expression in the SRCCs, suggesting that the aggressive biological behaviour of SRCCs is partly attributable to this altered molecular profile. Further studies will be necessary to understand other possible mechanisms responsible for the aggressiveness and above all for the frequent drug resistance, for example possible alterations in the apoptotic pathway, of SRCC.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Expression of E-cadherin in SRCC and IRCC.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table IV.

Expression of β-catenin in SRCC and IRCC.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table V.

Expression of fibronectin in SRCC and IRCC.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table VI.

Expression of MMP-1 in SRCC and IRCC.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

E-cadherin expression in (A) normal colonic mucosa and (B) SRCC.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Fibronectin expression in SRCC.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

β-Catenin expression in (A) normal colonic mucosa and (B) SRCC.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

MMP-1 expression in SRCC forming a neoplastic embolus.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by University of Palermo and MIU grants.

  • Received June 29, 2009.
  • Revision received October 8, 2009.
  • Accepted October 13, 2009.
  • Copyright© 2009 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Psathakis D,
    2. Schiedeck TH,
    3. Krug F,
    4. Oevermann E,
    5. Kujath P,
    6. Bruch HP
    : Ordinary colorectal adenocarcinoma vs. primary colorectal signet-ring cell carcinoma: study matched for age, gender, grade, and stage. Dis Colon Rectum 42(12): 1618-1625, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Casavilca Zambrano S,
    2. Sanchez Lihon J,
    3. Zavaleta A
    : Colon and rectum signet-ring cell carcinoma in the National Institute of Neoplastic Diseases. Rev Gastroenterol Peru 24(3): 234-237, 2004.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Kang H,
    2. O'Connell JB,
    3. Maggard MA,
    4. Sack J,
    5. Ko CY
    : A 10-year outcomes evaluation of mucinous and signet-ring cell carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 48(6): 1161-1168, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Cabibi D,
    2. Calascibetta A,
    3. Campione M,
    4. Barresi E,
    5. Rausa L,
    6. Dardanoni G,
    7. Aragona F,
    8. Sanguedolce R
    : Clinical relevance of thymidylate synthase expression in the signet-ring cell histotype component of colorectal carcinoma. Eur J Cancer 40(18): 2845-2850, 2004.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Showalter SL,
    2. Showalter TN,
    3. Witkiewicz A,
    4. Havens R,
    5. Kennedy EP,
    6. Hucl T,
    7. Kern SE,
    8. Yeo CJ,
    9. Brody JR
    : Evaluating the drug-target relationship between thymidylate synthase expression and tumor response to 5-fluorouracil. Is it time to move forward? Cancer Biol Ther 7(7): 986-994, 2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Negri FV,
    2. Wotherspoon A,
    3. Cunningham D,
    4. Norman AR,
    5. Chong G,
    6. Ross PJ
    : Mucinous histology predicts for reduced fluorouracil responsiveness and survival in advanced colorectal cancer. Ann Onc 16: 1305-1310, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Bernard Davies,
    2. Jonathan Waxman,
    3. Harpret Wasan,
    4. Paul Abel,
    5. Gordon Williams,
    6. Thomas Krausz,
    7. David Neal,
    8. David Thomas,
    9. Andrew Hanby,
    10. Frances Balkwill
    : Levels of matrix metalloproteases in bladder cancer correlate with tumour grade and invasion. Cancer Res 53: 5365-5369, 1993.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Sunami E,
    2. Tsuno N,
    3. Osada T,
    4. Saito S,
    5. Kitayama J,
    6. Tomozawa S,
    7. Tsuruo T,
    8. Shibata Y,
    9. Muto B,
    10. Agawaa H
    : MMP-1 is a prognostic marker for hematogenous metastasis of colorectal cancer. Oncologist 5: 108-114, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Nelimarkka LO,
    2. Nikkari ST,
    3. Ravanti LS,
    4. et al.
    : Collagenase-1, stromelysin-1 and 92 kDa gelatinase are associated with tumour necrosis factor-alpha induced morphological change of human endothelial cells in vitro. Matrix Biol 17: 293-304, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Wahl LM,
    2. Corcoran ML
    : Regulation of monocyte/ macrophage metalloproteinase production by cytokines. J Periodontol 64(suppl 5): 467-473, 1993.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Kapila S,
    2. Xie Y
    : Targeted induction of collagenase and stromelysin by relaxin in unprimed and beta-estradiol-primed diarthrodial joint fibrocartilaginous cells but not in synoviocytes. Lab Invest 78: 925-938, 1998.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Vaatainen U,
    2. Lohmander LS,
    3. Thonar E,
    4. et al.
    : Markers of cartilage and synovial metabolism in joint fluid and serum of patients with chondromalacia of the patella. Osteoarthr Cartil 6: 115-124, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Brenneisen P,
    2. Wenk J,
    3. Klotz LO,
    4. et al.
    : Central role of Ferrous/Ferric iron in the ultraviolet B irradiation-mediated signalling pathway leading to increased interstitial collagenase (matrix-degrading metalloprotease (MMP)-1) and stromelysin-1 (MMP-3) mRNA levels in cultured human dermal fibroblasts. J Biol Chem 273: 5279-5287, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Ito A,
    2. Nakajima S,
    3. Sasaguri Y,
    4. et al.
    : Co-culture of human breast adenocarcinoma MCF-7 cells and human dermal fibroblasts enhances the production of matrix metalloproteinases 1, 2 and 3 in fibroblasts. Br J Cancer 71: 1039-1045, 1995.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Murray GI,
    2. Duncan ME,
    3. O'Neil P,
    4. et al.
    : Matrix metallo-proteinase-1 is associated with poor prognosis in colorectal cancer. Nat Med 2: 461-462, 1996.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Polette M,
    2. Clavel C,
    3. Muller D,
    4. et al.
    : Detection of mRNAs encoding collagenase 1 and stromelysin 2 in carcinomas of the head and neck by in situ hybridization. Invasion Metastasis 11: 76-83, 1991.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Murray GI,
    2. O'Neil P,
    3. McKay JA,
    4. et al.
    : Matrix metalloproteinase-1 is associated with poor prognosis in esophageal cancer. J Pathol 185: 256-261, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Shiozaki H,
    2. Doki Y,
    3. Oka H,
    4. Iihara K,
    5. Miyata M,
    6. Kadowaki T,
    7. Matsui S,
    8. Tamura S,
    9. Inoue M,
    10. Mori T
    : E-Cadherin expression and cancer invasion and metastasis. Hum Cell 6(2): 94-99, 1993.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Dolled-Filhart M,
    2. McCabe A,
    3. Giltnane J,
    4. Cregger M,
    5. Camp RL,
    6. Rimm DL
    : Quantitative in situ analysis of β-Catenin expression in breast cancer shows decreased expression is associated with poor outcome. Cancer Res 66, 5487-5494, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. D'Ardenne AJ,
    2. Burns J,
    3. Sykes BC,
    4. Bennett MK
    : Fibronectin and type III collagen in epithelial neoplasms of gastrointestinal tract and salivary gland. J Clin Pathol 36: 756-763, 1983.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Sledge GJ,
    2. Qulali M,
    3. Goulet R,
    4. et al.
    : Effect of matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor batimastat on breast cancer regrowth and metastasis in athymic mice. J Natl Cancer Inst 87: 1546-1550, 1995.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Nikkari ST,
    2. O'Brien KD,
    3. Ferguson M,
    4. et al.
    : Interstitial collagenase (MMP-1) expression in human carotid atherosclerosis. Circulation 92: 1393-1398, 1995.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Watson SA,
    2. Morris TM,
    3. Robinson G,
    4. et al.
    : Inhibition of organ invasion by the matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor batimastat (BB-94) in two human colon carcinoma metastasis models. Cancer Res 55: 3629-3633, 1995.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Johnson MD,
    2. Kim HR,
    3. Chesler L,
    4. et al.
    : Inhibition of angiogenesis by tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase. J Cell Physiol 160: 194-202, 1994.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Nelson NJ
    : Inhibitors of angiogenesis enter phase III testing (news). J Natl Cancer Inst 90: 960-963, 1990.
    OpenUrl
    1. Nemunaitis J,
    2. Poole C,
    3. Primrose J,
    4. et al.
    : Combined analysis of studies of the effects of the matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor marimastat on serum tumor markers in advanced cancer: selection of a biologically active and tolerable dose for longer-term studies. Clin Cancer Res 4: 1101-1109, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  24. ↵
    1. Parsons SL,
    2. Watson SA,
    3. Steele RJ
    : Phase I/II trial of batimastat, a matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor, in patients with malignant ascites. Eur J Surg Oncol 23: 526-531, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Wiseman SM,
    2. Masoudi H,
    3. Niblock P,
    4. Turbin D,
    5. Rajput A,
    6. Hay J,
    7. Filipenko D,
    8. Huntsman D,
    9. Gilks B
    : Derangement of the E-cadherin/catenin complex is involved in transformation of differentiated to anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. Am J Surg 191(5): 581-587, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Bu W,
    2. Tang ZY,
    3. Sun FX,
    4. et al.
    : Effects of matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor BB-94 on liver cancer growth and metastasis in a patient-like orthotopic model LCI-D20. Hepatogastroenterology 45: 1056-1061, 1998.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Kawanishi K,
    2. Doki Y,
    3. Shiozaki H,
    4. Yano M,
    5. Inoue M,
    6. Fukuchi N,
    7. Utsunomiya T,
    8. Watanabe H,
    9. Monden M
    : Correlation between loss of E-Cadherin expression and overexpression of autocrine motility factor receptor in association with progression of human gastric cancers. Am J Clin Pathol 113: 266-274, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Tsanou E,
    2. Peschos D,
    3. Batistatou A,
    4. Charalabopoulos A,
    5. Charalabopoulos K
    : The E-Cadherin adhesion molecule and colorectal cancer. A global literature approach. Anticancer Res 28: 3815-3826, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 29 (11)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 29, Issue 11
November 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Differing Expression of Metalloprotease and of Adhesion Molecules in Signet-ring Cell and Intestinal Colorectal Carcinoma
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
9 + 7 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Differing Expression of Metalloprotease and of Adhesion Molecules in Signet-ring Cell and Intestinal Colorectal Carcinoma
DANIELA CABIBI, ANNA CALASCIBETTA, FEDERICO ARAGONA, ANNA MARTORANA, MARIA CAMPIONE, ROSARIO SANGUEDOLCE
Anticancer Research Nov 2009, 29 (11) 4417-4422;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Differing Expression of Metalloprotease and of Adhesion Molecules in Signet-ring Cell and Intestinal Colorectal Carcinoma
DANIELA CABIBI, ANNA CALASCIBETTA, FEDERICO ARAGONA, ANNA MARTORANA, MARIA CAMPIONE, ROSARIO SANGUEDOLCE
Anticancer Research Nov 2009, 29 (11) 4417-4422;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Clinicopathological and Corresponding Genetic Features of Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Effect of Chloroquine on Doxorubicin-induced Apoptosis in A549 Cells
  • Effect of Aspirin on G0/G1 Cell Cycle Arrest and microRNA Signatures in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Cells
  • Suppression of Inflammatory Cytokine Genes Expression in Vascular Endothelial Cells by Super-low Dose Lipopolysaccharide-activated Macrophages
Show more Experimental Studies

Similar Articles

Anticancer Research

© 2022 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire