Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

CDK10 Is Not a Target for Aberrant DNA Methylation in Breast Cancer

GERWIN HELLER, BARBARA ZIEGLER, ANITA BRANDSTETTER, SABINE NOVAK, MARGARETHA RUDAS, GUIDO HENNIG, MATHIAS GEHRMANN, TORSTEN ACHT, SABINE ZÖCHBAUER-MÜLLER and MARTIN FILIPITS
Anticancer Research October 2009, 29 (10) 3939-3944;
GERWIN HELLER
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
BARBARA ZIEGLER
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ANITA BRANDSTETTER
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SABINE NOVAK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARGARETHA RUDAS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
GUIDO HENNIG
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MATHIAS GEHRMANN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TORSTEN ACHT
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SABINE ZÖCHBAUER-MÜLLER
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARTIN FILIPITS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: martin.filipits@meduniwien.ac.at
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Loss of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 10 expression may be an important mechanism of tamoxifen resistance and the 5′ CpG island associated with the CDK10 gene has been suggested to be a target for aberrant methylation in breast cancer. Patients and Methods: The methylation status of CDK10, RASSF1A (Ras association domain family 1A) and DAL-1 (differentially expressed in adenocarcinoma of the lung) was determined by means of methylation-specific PCR (MSP) in the formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) surgical specimens of 96 breast carcinoma patients. Reverse transcription kinetic PCR (RT-kPCR) was used for assessment of the expression of CDK10. Results: The unmethylated form of CDK10, RASSF1A and DAL-1 was detected in all the samples analyzed. Methylation of the CDK10 5′ region was not found in any of the 96 breast cancer samples. RASSF1A methylation was detected in 75 out of 96 (78%) and DAL-1 in 9 out of 15 (60%) breast cancer samples, respectively. Consistent with the methylation results, the expression of CDK10 was detected in all 96 samples. Conclusion: CDK10 is not a target for aberrant DNA methylation in breast cancer.

  • Breast cancer
  • CDK10
  • tamoxifen
  • DNA methylation
  • cyclin-dependent kinase

Endocrine therapy with the anti-estrogen tamoxifen is an effective treatment for women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, but de novo and acquired resistance remains a major problem (1). A considerable fraction of patients do not respond to tamoxifen despite having estrogen receptor-positive tumors. These patients may need other therapeutic interventions. Therefore, the ability to predict the outcome of tamoxifen treatment should significantly improve the management of early-stage breast cancer.

Cyclins, their associated cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) and CDK inhibitory proteins play a central role in cell cycle progression and may also affect the response to tamoxifen (2, 3). Besides the central role in cell cycle regulation, cyclin D1 directly affects the estrogen receptor and may be involved in the response to estrogens and anti-estrogens (4, 5). In vitro studies have linked tamoxifen resistance to the expression of cyclin D1 in cell lines and several clinical studies have demonstrated early relapse and shorter survival in women with cyclin D1-positive breast cancer who received tamoxifen treatment (6-13). Recently, it has been shown that in patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, low levels of CDK10 may be an important determinant of tamoxifen resistance (14). Furthermore, low levels of CDK10 have been shown to be associated with methylation of the CDK10 promoter (14). Aberrant methylation (referred to as methylation) of normally unmethylated CpG-rich areas, also known as CpG islands, which are located in or near the promoter region of many genes, has been associated with transcriptional inactivation of genes in human cancer (15). These findings led us to investigate the expression and the methylation pattern of CDK10 in primary breast carcinomas.

Patients and Methods

Patients and tumor specimens. Ninety six breast cancer patients surgically treated at the Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, from May 2006 to June 2008, were included in the study. A representative formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor block from each patient was collected after obtaining appropriate Institutional Review Board permission and written informed consent from the patients. All the tumor specimens had been obtained at the time of surgery before adjuvant therapy and the paraffin blocks had been stored at room temperature at the Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna. From each tumor block sections were cut at 4 to 10 μm. One 4 μm section was stained by hematoxylin and eosin to confirm the presence of invasive carcinoma histologically and further sections were used as described.

Nucleic acid isolation and bisulfite treatment of genomic DNA. The genomic DNA was isolated from the FFPE breast cancer samples using a QIAamp DNA FFPE Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Four 5 μm sections from each tumor block were used for the DNA preparation. In addition, genomic DNA from MCF-7 breast cancer cells and from human B lymphocytes was isolated by digestion with proteinase K followed by standard phenol-chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation as reported previously (16). Afterwards, 2 μg of genomic DNA were modified by treatment with sodium bisulfite using an EpiTect 96 Bisulfite Kit (Qiagen).

The total RNA was extracted with a Siemens, silica bead-based and fully automated isolation method for RNA from one 10 μm whole FFPE tissue section on a Hamilton MICROLAB STARlet liquid handling robot (17). The robot, buffers and chemicals (unless indicated differently) were part of a Siemens VERSANT® kPCR Molecular System (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Tarrytown, NY; not commercially available in the USA). Briefly, 150 μl FFPE buffer (Buffer FFPE, research reagent, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, not commercially available) were added to each section and incubated for 30 minutes at 80°C with shaking to melt the paraffin. After cooling down, proteinase K was added and incubated for 30 minutes at 65°C. After lysis, residual tissue debris was removed from the lysis fluid by a 15 minutes incubation step at 65°C with 40 μl silica-coated iron oxide beads. The beads with surface-bound tissue debris were separated with a magnet and the lysates were transferred to a standard 2 ml deep well-plate (96 wells). There, the total RNA and DNA was bound to 40 μl unused beads and incubated at room temperature. Chaotropic conditions were produced by the addition of 600 μl lysis buffer. Then, the beads were magnetically separated and the supernatants were discarded. Afterwards, the surface-bound nucleic acids were washed three times followed by magnetization, aspiration and disposal of supernatants. Afterwards, the nucleic acids were eluted by incubation of the beads with 100 μl elution buffer for 10 minutes at 70°C with shaking. Finally, the beads were separated and the supernatant incubated with 12 μl DNase I Mix (2 μL DNase I (RNase free); 10 μl 10x DNase I buffer; Ambion/Applied Biosystems, Darmstadt, Germany) to remove contaminating DNA. After incubation for 30 minutes at 37°C, the DNA-free total RNA solution was aliquoted and stored at −80°C.

mRNA expression analysis by reverse transcription kinetic PCR (RT-kPCR). All the samples were analyzed with one-step RT-kPCR for the gene expression of one reference gene, RPL37A (ribosomal protein L37a) and three target genes CDK10, CCND1 (cyclin D1) and ESR1 (estrogen receptor 1) in an ABI PRISM® 7900HT (Applied Biosystems, Darmstadt, Germany). The SuperScript® III Platinum® One-Step Quantitative RT-PCR System with ROX (6-carboxy-X-rhodamine) (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany) was used according to the manufacturer's instructions. The PCR conditions were as follows: 30 minutes at 50°C, 2 minutes at 95°C followed by 40 cycles of 15 seconds at 95°C and 30 seconds at 60°C. All the PCR assays were performed in triplicate. As surrogate marker for RNA yield, the housekeeper gene, RPL37A cycle threshold (Ct) value was used as described elsewhere (17). The relative gene expression levels of the target genes were calculated by the ΔCt method using the formula: 20 - (Cttarget - CtRPL37A). The sequences of the primers and probes were as follows: RPL37A: forward: 5′-TGTGGTTCCTGCATGAAGACA-3′, reverse: 5′-GTGACAGCG GAAGTGGTATTGTAC-3′, probe: 5′-TGGCTGGCGGTGCCT GGA-3′; CDK10: forward: 5′-GCACGCC CAGTGA GAACAT-3′, reverse: 5′-CAGGTTGTTGTAGGGCTG CTT-3′, probe: 5′-CCGGGCTTTTCCAAGCTGCCA-3′; CCND1: forward: 5′-CACGCGCAGACCTTCGTT-3′, reverse: 5′-CCGCTGCC ACCATGGA-3′, probe: 5′-TGTGCCACAGATGTGAAGTTCATT TCC-3′ and ESR1: forward: 5′-GCCAAATTGTGTTTGATGG ATTAA-3′, reverse: 5′-GACAAAACCGAGTCACATCAGTAATAG-3′, probe: 5′-ATGCCCTTTTGCCGATGCA-3′. All the RT-kPCR assays were performed using 1 μl of eluate in a 10 μl reaction volume and run in triplicate. The mean of the triplicates is reported.

Methylation-specific PCR (MSP). The methylation status of CDK10, RASSF1A (Ras association domain family 1A) and DAL-1 (differentially expressed in adenocarcinoma of the lung) was determined by MSP (18). Bisulfite-treated DNA was subjected to PCR amplification using primers designed to anneal specifically to the methylated or unmethylated bisulfite-modified DNA sequence within the gene. CDK10 MSP was performed with two different primer sets. Primer set A amplified a 328 bp fragment and was used as reported previously (14). In addition, a search for CpG islands in the 5' region of CDK10 (ENSG00000185324, www.ensembl.org, release 52) was performed using the CpGplot tool (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/emboss/cpgplot/index.html) which found a CpG island located at -225 bp to +632 bp relative to the transcription start site of CDK10. The sequences of CDK10 MSP primer set B yielding a 126 bp fragment were designed using MethPrimer (19). The primers were designed to amplify a region within a predicted promoter region at -138 bp to -12 bp relative to the transcription start site of CDK10 (Figure 1). The forward and reverse primer sequences of CDK10 MSP primer set B were: 5′-AGGTTCGAATTG TAGTAGTCGGAG-3′ and 5′-GACGCAAACGCGAAAACTCC TTCC-3′. The PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation for 12 minutes at 95°C followed by 40 cycles of denaturation for 30 seconds at 95°C, annealing for 40 seconds at 60°C and extension for 30 seconds at 72°C with a final extension for 7 minutes at 72°C. The MSP primer sequences and PCR conditions for RASSF1A and DAL-1 were used as reported previously (20-22). The MSP products were separated in 2% agarose gels stained with GelRed™ (Biotium, Hayward, CA, USA) and visualized under UV spectrophotometry. The DNA extracted from the normal B-lymphocytes and the breast cancer cell line MCF-7 was treated with Sss1 methylase (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA, USA) and used as a positive control for the methylated alleles. Furthermore, DNA from FFPE breast tissue was treated with Sss1 methylase (New England Biolabs) and used as a positive control for the methylated alleles to ensure the efficiency of MSP on fragmented DNA. Water blanks were used as the negative controls.

Statistical analyses. Comparison of CDK10, CCND1 and ESR1 mRNA expression with the clinico-pathological parameters was performed using the Mann-Whitney U-test or the Kruskal-Wallis test. Correlations among CDK10, CCND1 and ESR1 mRNA levels were assessed using the Spearman's Correlation Coefficient Method. All the p-values are the result of two-sided tests. A p-value equal to or less than 5% was considered statistically significant. The SPSS 15.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for the calculations.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

CpG island search and location of MSP primer sets A and B in the CDK10 5′ region. A 1000 bp fragment which included the transcription start site of CDK10 was analyzed for the presence of a CpG island using the EMBOSS CpGplot program. CpG sites are shown as vertical bars. MSP primer binding sites of primer set A and B are shown as arrows.

Results

Expression of CDK10, CCND1 and ESR1 in breast carcinoma specimens. The isolation of mRNA was successful in all 96 tumor blocks. The Ct values for RPL37A ranged from 17.7 to 30.5 (median 19.8) and, therefore, sufficient RNA for the expression analyses was available. Figure 2 shows the distribution of CDK10, CCND1 and ESR1 mRNA levels in the studied population. The median value of mRNA expression normalized to the expression value of RPL37A (20 - ΔCt) for CDK10 was 7.43 (range, 4.44-14.78), for CCND1 15.69 (range, 12.40-19.54) and for ESR1 15.49 (range, 8.84-18.73), respectively (Figure 2).

The relationship between CDK10, CCND1 and ESR1 mRNA status and the standard clinical and pathological factors is listed in Table I. No significant association between the CDK10 mRNA expression and age, tumor size, lymph node status, tumor grade, histology, estrogen receptor or progesterone receptor status, HER2, p53 or Ki-67 expression was observed. The CCND1 mRNA expression was significantly correlated with lymph node status (p=0.03) and estrogen receptor status (p=0.002). The ESR1 mRNA expression was inversely correlated with tumor grade (p=0.001), HER2 (p=0.01) and p53 expression (p=0.002), whereas a positive association between the ESR1 mRNA expression and age (p=0.007), estrogen receptor (p<0.001) as well as progesterone receptor (p<0.001) protein expression determined by means of immunohistochemistry was observed.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Distribution of CDK10, CCND1 and ESR1 mRNA levels in the studied population.

The CDK10 mRNA status was significantly correlated with both the CCND1 (Spearman rank correlation r=0.35, p=0.001) and ESR1 mRNA status (Spearman rank correlation r=0.23, p=0.02). Moreover, the CCND1 and ESR1 mRNA values were positively correlated to each other (Spearman rank correlation r=0.57, p<0.001).

DNA methylation analysis. To further define the role of CDK10 and its epigenetic silencing in breast cancer, we analyzed the methylation status of CDK10 in 96 primary breast cancer samples by MSP. We first used primers (MSP primer set A) specific for methylated or unmethylated DNA sequences of the CDK10 gene as described previously by Iorns et al. (14). As shown in Figure 3A, the MSP primer set A worked well on the non-fragmented, SssI CpG methylase treated DNA isolated from both normal human B-lymphocytes and MCF-7 cells. However, no amplification product could be detected using methylated primer set A on fragmented DNA from the FFPE breast tumor samples. In addition, PCR amplification using the primer sequences for unmethylated CDK10 was found in only one of the breast tumor samples. As seen in Figure 3A, CDK10 methylation was detected in all the positive controls including the SssI methylase treated fragmented DNA with the MSP primer set B. Interestingly, using primer set B, methylation of the CDK10 5′ region was not found in any of the 96 primary breast cancer samples. In contrast, using primer set B the unmethylated form of CDK10 was detected in all the samples analyzed indicating that both the extraction of genomic DNA from the FFPE breast tissue samples and the treatment of this DNA with sodium bisulfite worked well in this sample cohort.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Characteristics of patients.

To ensure that the MSP assay was suitable for methylation analysis of DNA extracted from paraffin embedded tissues the methylation status of the RASSF1A and DAL-1 genes in the breast carcinoma samples was also determined using previously reported primer sequences (20-22). The unmethylated form of RASSF1A and DAL-1 was detected in all the FFPE breast tissue samples analyzed. RASSF1A methylation was detected in 75 out of the 96 (78%) breast cancer samples and DAL-1 in 9 out of 15 (60%) samples analyzed, respectively. Examples of MSP results are shown in Figure 3B.

Discussion

Tamoxifen has been the standard of care for women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Although aromatase inhibitors are a slightly more effective endocrine strategy against hormone-dependent breast cancer, tamoxifen still plays an important role in adjuvant endocrine treatment. Whereas some patients are unsuitable for aromatase inhibitor therapy due to side-effects others may be unsuitable due to pre-existing bone problems which many consider an aromatase inhibitor contraindication. For those women who relapse or develop metastases after aromatase inhibitor therapy, tamoxifen may still be a reasonable treatment choice. Moreover, in many parts of the world, tamoxifen remains the only economically affordable treatment option for women with endocrine-responsive breast cancer. Therefore, tamoxifen remains in the adjuvant treatment armamentarium and the ability to predict the outcome of tamoxifen treatment is still of importance in the management of hormone-dependent breast cancer.

Several biomarkers have been identified which may predict tamoxifen response (1, 23). Recently, Iorns et al. using an RNA interference (RNAi) screen identified CDK10 as an important factor of resistance to tamoxifen and fulvestrant in estrogen receptor-positive MCF-7 breast cancer cells (14). Using quantitative PCR in estrogen receptor-positive breast tumors from patients treated with adjuvant tamoxifen they found that low CDK10 expression was not associated with well-established prognostic factors such as age, tumor size, lymph node status, tumor grade, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER2, p53 and Ki-67, which was in line with the present results. Furthermore, low CDK10 expression was associated with a shorter time to distant relapse and shorter overall survival in two independent data sets. Moreover, Iorns et al. using MSP found that 7 out of 38 (18%) FFPE breast tumors had methylation of the CpG island in the CDK10 promoter, which correlated with low CDK10 expression and was also significantly associated with a shorter time to disease progression (p<0.001) and shorter overall survival (p<0.001) (14). The authors concluded that methylation may be a mechanism by which tumors develop low CDK10 expression levels resulting in tamoxifen resistance.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

(A) MSP analysis of CDK10 in DNA of FFPE breast tumor samples. M, 100 bp ladder; 1-13 primary breast tumor samples; SssI MCF7, SssI CpG methylase treated DNA from MCF7 cells used as positive control; SssI Paraff, SssI CpG methylase treated DNA from a FFPE breast tumor sample; SssI BL, SssI CpG methylase treated DNA from mononuclear cells. -ctrl. (B) MSP analysis of RASSF1A and DAL-1 in DNA of FFPE breast tumor samples. M, 100 bp ladder; 1-15 primary breast tumor samples; SssI MCF7, SssI CpG methylase treated DNA from MCF7 cells used as positive control; -ctrl, water blanks; m, results with primers specific for methylated sequences; u, results with primers specific for unmethylated sequences.

The present observations that using primer set A no amplification was detected in SssI CpG methylase treated DNA isolated from FFPE breast tissue and that the unmethylated form of CDK10 was only seen in one sample suggested that the product amplified by MSP primer set A may have been too long for the detection of CDK10 methylation in the present sample cohort. In general, using fragmented DNA obtained from FFPE tissue for MSP assays, MSP products should not exceed 150 bp in length (24). Thus, to improve MSP efficiency, additional MSP primer sequences for the 5′ region of CDK10 yielding a 126 bp fragment were designed in this study (Figure 1). Importantly, these primers were designed to anneal in the same region as the primer sequences used by Iorns et al. (14).

Surprisingly, even using the two different primer sets, no methylation of the CDK10 promoter region was observed in the present 96 breast cancer samples. The data suggested that the lack of methylation of the CDK10 promoter region in these tumor samples was not due to technical problems for the following reasons. Firstly, several enzymatically methylated positive controls were used to test primer sets A and B for their efficiency in identifying CDK10 methylation in different sample types including FFPE breast tumors. All these controls were positive in the case of primer set B (Figure 2) suggesting that the MSP assay works well also on DNA extracted from FFPE breast cancer samples. Secondly, the unmethylated form of CDK10 was detected in all the breast cancer samples analyzed using the unmethylated primer set B which indicated that after bisulfite treatment the DNA of the present samples was in good condition for subsequent MSP analysis. Thirdly, the methylation frequencies of RASSF1A and DAL-1 were determined and found to be in accordance with other reports suggesting that the MSP assays were suitable for detecting methylation of DNA. Finally, it is noteworthy that CDK10 mRNA expression was detected in all the samples analyzed.

In conclusion, the results strongly suggest that CDK10 is not a target for aberrant DNA methylation in breast cancer which may be important information for future investigations of the clinical relevance of CDK10 in tamoxifen resistance.

Acknowledgements

Martin Filipits was supported by a research grant of the Institute of Cancer Research.

  • Received May 19, 2009.
  • Revision received July 29, 2009.
  • Accepted September 2, 2009.
  • Copyright© 2009 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Clarke R,
    2. Leonessa F,
    3. Welch JN,
    4. Skaar TC
    : Cellular and molecular pharmacology of antiestrogen action and resistance. Pharmacol Rev 53: 25-71, 2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Butt AJ,
    2. McNeil CM,
    3. Musgrove EA,
    4. Sutherland RL
    : Downstream targets of growth factor and oestrogen signalling and endocrine resistance: the potential roles of c-Myc, cyclin D1 and cyclin E. Endocr Relat Cancer 12(Suppl 1): S47-59, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Pohl G,
    2. Rudas M,
    3. Dietze O,
    4. Lax S,
    5. Markis E,
    6. Pirker R,
    7. Zielinski CC,
    8. Hausmaninger H,
    9. Kubista E,
    10. Samonigg H,
    11. Jakesz R,
    12. Filipits M
    : High p27Kip1 expression predicts superior relapse-free and overall survival for premenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer receiving adjuvant treatment with tamoxifen plus goserelin. J Clin Oncol 21: 3594-3600, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Zwijsen RM,
    2. Wientjens E,
    3. Klompmaker R,
    4. van der Sman J,
    5. Bernards R,
    6. Michalides RJ
    : CDK-independent activation of estrogen receptor by cyclin D1. Cell 88: 405-415, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Zwijsen RM,
    2. Buckle RS,
    3. Hijmans EM,
    4. Loomans CJ,
    5. Bernards R
    : Ligand-independent recruitment of steroid receptor coactivators to estrogen receptor by cyclin D1. Genes Dev 12: 3488-3498, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Wilcken NR,
    2. Prall OW,
    3. Musgrove EA,
    4. Sutherland RL
    : Inducible overexpression of cyclin D1 in breast cancer cells reverses the growth-inhibitory effects of antiestrogens. Clin Cancer Res 3: 849-854, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Bindels EM,
    2. Lallemand F,
    3. Balkenende A,
    4. Verwoerd D,
    5. Michalides R
    : Involvement of G1/S cyclins in estrogen-independent proliferation of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer cells. Oncogene 21: 8158-8165, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Hui R,
    2. Finney GL,
    3. Carroll JS,
    4. Lee CS,
    5. Musgrove EA,
    6. Sutherland RL
    : Constitutive overexpression of cyclin D1 but not cyclin E confers acute resistance to antiestrogens in T-47D breast cancer cells. Cancer Res 62: 6916-6923, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Kenny FS,
    2. Hui R,
    3. Musgrove EA,
    4. Gee JM,
    5. Blamey RW,
    6. Nicholson RI,
    7. Sutherland RL,
    8. Robertson JF
    : Overexpression of cyclin D1 messenger RNA predicts for poor prognosis in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 5: 2069-2076, 1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Stendahl M,
    2. Kronblad A,
    3. Ryden L,
    4. Emdin S,
    5. Bengtsson NO,
    6. Landberg G
    : Cyclin D1 overexpression is a negative predictive factor for tamoxifen response in postmenopausal breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer 90: 1942-1948, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Jirstrom K,
    2. Stendahl M,
    3. Ryden L,
    4. Kronblad A,
    5. Bendahl PO,
    6. Stal O,
    7. Landberg G
    : Adverse effect of adjuvant tamoxifen in premenopausal breast cancer with cyclin D1 gene amplification. Cancer Res 65: 8009-8016, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Ahnstrom M,
    2. Nordenskjold B,
    3. Rutqvist LE,
    4. Skoog L,
    5. Stal O
    : Role of cyclin D1 in ErbB2-positive breast cancer and tamoxifen resistance. Breast Cancer Res Treat 91: 145-151, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Rudas M,
    2. Lehnert M,
    3. Huynh A,
    4. Jakesz R,
    5. Singer C,
    6. Lax S,
    7. Schippinger W,
    8. Dietze O,
    9. Greil R,
    10. Stiglbauer W,
    11. Kwasny W,
    12. Grill R,
    13. Stierer M,
    14. Gnant MF,
    15. Filipits M
    : Cyclin D1 expression in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant tamoxifen-based therapy. Clin Cancer Res 14: 1767-1774, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Iorns E,
    2. Turner NC,
    3. Elliott R,
    4. Syed N,
    5. Garrone O,
    6. Gasco M,
    7. Tutt AN,
    8. Crook T,
    9. Lord CJ,
    10. Ashworth A
    : Identification of CDK10 as an important determinant of resistance to endocrine therapy for breast cancer. Cancer Cell 13: 91-104, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Baylin SB,
    2. Herman JG,
    3. Graff JR,
    4. Vertino PM,
    5. Issa JP
    : Alterations in DNA methylation: a fundamental aspect of neoplasia. Adv Cancer Res 72: 141-196, 1998.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Heller G,
    2. Fong KM,
    3. Girard L,
    4. Seidl S,
    5. End-Pfutzenreuter A,
    6. Lang G,
    7. Gazdar AF,
    8. Minna JD,
    9. Zielinski CC,
    10. Zöchbauer-Müller S
    : Expression and methylation pattern of TSLC1 cascade genes in lung carcinomas. Oncogene 25: 959-968, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Bohmann K,
    2. Hennig G,
    3. Rogel U,
    4. Poremba C,
    5. Mueller BM,
    6. Fritz P,
    7. Stoerkel S,
    8. Schaefer KL
    : RNA Extraction from Archival Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Tissue: A Comparison of Manual, Semiautomated, and Fully Automated Purification Methods. Clin Chem, 2009. Doi:10.1373/clinchem.2008.122572
  12. ↵
    1. Herman JG,
    2. Graff JR,
    3. Myohanen S,
    4. Nelkin BD,
    5. Baylin SB
    : Methylation-specific PCR: a novel PCR assay for methylation status of CpG islands. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 9821-9826, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Li LC,
    2. Dahiya R
    : MethPrimer: designing primers for methylation PCRs. Bioinformatics 18: 1427-1431, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Zöchbauer-Müller S,
    2. Fong KM,
    3. Virmani AK,
    4. Geradts J,
    5. Gazdar AF,
    6. Minna JD
    : Aberrant promoter methylation of multiple genes in non-small cell lung cancers. Cancer Res 61: 249-255, 2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Heller G,
    2. Fong KM,
    3. Girard L,
    4. Seidl S,
    5. End-Pfutzenreuter A,
    6. Lang G,
    7. Gazdar AF,
    8. Minna JD,
    9. Zielinski CC,
    10. Zöchbauer-Müller S
    : Expression and methylation pattern of TSLC1 cascade genes in lung carcinomas. Oncogene 25: 959-968, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Burbee DG,
    2. Forgacs E,
    3. Zöchbauer-Müller S,
    4. Shivakumar L,
    5. Fong K,
    6. Gao B,
    7. Randle D,
    8. Kondo M,
    9. Virmani A,
    10. Bader S,
    11. Sekido Y,
    12. Latif F,
    13. Milchgrub S,
    14. Toyooka S,
    15. Gazdar AF,
    16. Lerman MI,
    17. Zabarovsky E,
    18. White M,
    19. Minna JD
    : Epigenetic inactivation of RASSF1A in lung and breast cancers and malignant phenotype suppression. J Natl Cancer Inst 93: 691-699, 2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Lin NU,
    2. Winer EP
    : Advances in adjuvant endocrine therapy for postmenopausal women. J Clin Oncol 26: 798-805, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. van Engeland M,
    2. Weijenberg MP,
    3. Roemen GM,
    4. Brink M,
    5. de Bruine AP,
    6. Goldbohm RA,
    7. van den Brandt PA,
    8. Baylin SB,
    9. de Goeij AF,
    10. Herman JG
    : Effects of dietary folate and alcohol intake on promoter methylation in sporadic colorectal cancer: the Netherlands cohort study on diet and cancer. Cancer Res 63: 3133-3137, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 29 (10)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 29, Issue 10
October 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
CDK10 Is Not a Target for Aberrant DNA Methylation in Breast Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
10 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
CDK10 Is Not a Target for Aberrant DNA Methylation in Breast Cancer
GERWIN HELLER, BARBARA ZIEGLER, ANITA BRANDSTETTER, SABINE NOVAK, MARGARETHA RUDAS, GUIDO HENNIG, MATHIAS GEHRMANN, TORSTEN ACHT, SABINE ZÖCHBAUER-MÜLLER, MARTIN FILIPITS
Anticancer Research Oct 2009, 29 (10) 3939-3944;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
CDK10 Is Not a Target for Aberrant DNA Methylation in Breast Cancer
GERWIN HELLER, BARBARA ZIEGLER, ANITA BRANDSTETTER, SABINE NOVAK, MARGARETHA RUDAS, GUIDO HENNIG, MATHIAS GEHRMANN, TORSTEN ACHT, SABINE ZÖCHBAUER-MÜLLER, MARTIN FILIPITS
Anticancer Research Oct 2009, 29 (10) 3939-3944;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Comprehensive Analysis of KREMEN2 as an Immunotherapeutic and Prognostic Biomarker in Pan-Cancer
  • PD-L1 mRNA Detection in Immunohistochemically Negative Patients: A Complementary Method for a Better Treatment Selection?
  • Immune Cell Infiltration and Clinical Significance of Angiogenesis-related Genes in Lung Adenocarcinoma
Show more Experimental Studies

Similar Articles

Anticancer Research

© 2023 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire