Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

Preclinical Evaluation of Adoptive Cell Therapy for Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

GAL MARKEL, TALI COHEN-SINAI, MICHAL J. BESSER, KFIR OVED, ORIT ITZHAKI, RACHEL SEIDMAN, AVRAHAM J. TREVES, EDUARD FRIDMAN, YONA KEISARI, ZOHAR DOTAN, JACOB RAMON and JACOB SCHACHTER
Anticancer Research January 2009, 29 (1) 145-154;
GAL MARKEL
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TALI COHEN-SINAI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MICHAL J. BESSER
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KFIR OVED
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ORIT ITZHAKI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
RACHEL SEIDMAN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
AVRAHAM J. TREVES
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
EDUARD FRIDMAN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YONA KEISARI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ZOHAR DOTAN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JACOB RAMON
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JACOB SCHACHTER
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jacob.schachter@sheba.health.gov.il
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Interleukin-2 (IL-2) shows encouraging clinical results in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients, but is limited by substantial toxicity. Cell-based therapy holds a promise, but past attempts in RCC were unsuccessful. Advances in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) generation technology and modified clinical protocols recently yielded a 50% response in refractory melanoma patients. Materials and Methods: RCC-derived TIL and tumor cells were processed by current protocols from tumor specimens in a clean laboratory. The expanded TIL were characterized and tested in functional assays. Results: The TIL cultures were efficiently generated and massively expanded. Virtually all the expanded cells were T-cells, but a considerable variability in the CD4/CD8 ratio and a frequent CD4-CD8- phenotype were observed. The TIL exerted cytotoxic or IFNγ-release activities against autologous targets in major histocompatibility (MHC) class I-restricted and -independent functional patterns. The functional results were superior to former technologies. Conclusion: Recent developments in TIL generation technology and clinical patient conditioning protocols indicate that the TIL-based approach for RCC could be revisited.

  • Adoptive cell transfer
  • immunotherapy
  • T-cells

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common renal tumor with an incidence of about 54,390 cases per year in the US alone (1). Twenty to 30% of patients who present with localized disease will develop metastasis following radical nephrectomy, with a 10-year disease-free survival rate of 50% (2-3). Around 30% of RCC patients present with metastatic disease (2-3). Metastatic RCC is an aggressive, chemotherapy-resistant, malignancy with a 5-year survival rate of around 10% (4-5). Recently, two new drugs have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of metastatic RCC, sorafenib and temsirolimus, and bevacizumab (Avastin) has shown some clinical benefit as well (5). Like melanoma, RCC is commonly considered as an immunogenic tumor, mainly due to the occurrence of spontaneous regressions (6) and rich intratumoral lymphocytic infiltration (7) with activated phenotype (8). Collectively, a natural immune response develops in most RCC patients, but for various reasons fails to control tumor growth. Indeed, many immunoinhibitory mechanisms have been described in RCC (9-16). Nevertheless, partial or complete response to cytokine therapy with interleukin-2 (IL-2) or IFNα has been observed in 20% of cases (17-18). Comparable response rates and survival have also been observed with regimens of high-dose continuous i.v. infusion (CIV) (19). IFNα activates NK cells and innate immunity, and promotes cell-mediated immune response by increasing dendritic cell cross-priming of T-cells (20). IL-2 has a pivotal role in the stimulation of cytotoxic lymphocytes, re-activation of inhibited lymphocytes (16), overcoming programmed death ligand (PD-L) inhibition of T-cells (21) and increasing proliferation and survival of tumor specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (22). These observations and others imply that RCC growth could be controlled by immunological intervention, with substantial emphasis on IL-2. Despite considerable efforts, only limited progress has been achieved in treating metastatic RCC patients with immunotherapy since the advent of IL-2 (23). Indeed, only IL-2 can induce a durable complete response or cure in a portion of the patients, while all other modalities, including newly approved drugs, only prolong overall survival without achieving a cure (5). However, the success of high dose IL-2 treatments is limited by toxic effects and can thus hardly be improved.

Adoptive cellular immunotherapy has been successfully implemented as a modality for the treatment of some human carcinomas for almost two decades, with considerable progress achieved especially in melanoma (24-26). Cell-based adoptive cell transfer (ACT) regimens might provide a promising and versatile therapeutic platform for RCC. Previous clinical trials with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in RCC did not yield substantial benefit (27-28), however, in addition to patient pretreatment, conditioning and concurrent treatment protocols, the TIL generation technology has evolved substantially over the past decade. Adoptive cell transfer protocols require a substantial number of cells, usually around 1010 per infusion (24-25, 29). Rapid numerical expansion is required to achieve these amounts of cells in short time. Currently, an initial short growing phase of TIL stimulated by a high concentration of IL-2 (6,000U/ml) is followed by a second rapid expansion phase that includes a high concentration of IL-2, T-cell receptor (TCR) stimulation with the agonistic antibody OKT3 and allogeneic stimulation with irradiated feeder lymphocytes derived from 3 different allogeneic healthy donors (24, 30). In contrast, in a 1995 RCC study, TIL cells were generated over a long culture time with a low concentration of IL-2 (100U/ml) and initial activation with anti-CD3 stimulation (27), and only low killing activity against autologous RCC tumor cells was observed (27, 31).

Neither the current technology for the generation of tumor reactive TIL cultures nor the modified clinical adjuncts have ever been tested in the setting of RCC. Recently, we have established clinical grade capabilities of generating melanoma-derived TIL cultures with current technology in clean laboratories (29) and have already successfully treated 20 refractory metastatic melanoma patients (manuscript submitted). The results of pre-clinical evaluation of this technology in the RCC setting are reported here. The establishment of tumor cells and TIL cultures, as well as the performance of complete dry runs of massive expansion under Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) conditions to ensure protocol compatibility, was tested. Further immune phenotyping and functional characterization of the established TIL cells were performed. The experimental implementation of this technology for the treatment of RCC patients is discussed.

Materials and Methods

Patients. Patients with diagnosed advanced RCC undergoing radical nephrectomy as part of standard care were included. Tumor specimens were sent for pathology and concurrently to the laboratory for the generation of TIL and tumor cell cultures. All the patients willingly gave their informed consent. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (approval 3881/2005) and performed according to the declaration of Helsinki.

Processing of tumors. The methods adopted were precisely as formerly reported (25, 29). The tissue was placed following resection in sterile saline in the operating room and transferred to the laboratory. A trained pathologist performed gross pathological examination, including size measurements and viability, as well as obtaining tissue for final histopathological diagnosis. The remaining tumor tissue was further subjected to various tumor processing methods, including: a) fragmentation of the tumor to 1-2 mm3 in size and culturing each fragment in a different well of 24-well tissue culture plates (Nunc, Rehovot Israel); b) tissue remnant culture (TRC); c) fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and d) enzymatic digestion of minced tissue by incubation for 3 hours at room temperature. The tumor samples from b) c) and d) were each seeded in a single flask. All the work was performed with clinically compatible reagents and in accordance with good laboratory practice with microbial monitoring laboratory.

Culturing of tumor cells. The cultures designated for the development of RCC were maintained in RPMI-1640 (Cambrex Bioscience, Walkersville, Maryland, USA), supplemented with 10% heat inactivated FCS (Gibco, Minneapolis MN, USA), 100 U/ml Pen-Strep (Cambrex Bioscience), 2 mM L-glutamine (Cambrex Bioscience), 1 mM sodium pyruvate (Cambrex Bioscience) and 1 mM non-essential amino acids (Cambrex Bioscience).

Culturing and rapid expansion protocols of TIL. The methods adopted were precisely as formerly reported (25, 29). Each TIL culture obtained by any of the above methods was maintained independently in RPMI-1640 (Cambrex Bioscience) supplemented with 10% heat inactivated human serum (Valley, Winchester, VA, USA), 100 U/ml penicillin-streptomycin (Cambrex Bioscience), 50 μM 2-mercaptoethanol (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA, USA), 25 mmol/l HEPES pH 7.2 (Cambrex Bioscience), 50 μg/ml gentamycin (Cambrex Bioscience) and 6,000 IU/ml IL-2 (Chiron, Suresnes, France). The cell density was maintained between 0.5×105-2×106/ml. When sufficient TIL numbers were available, functional assays and massive expansion were performed. Massive expansion was performed by stimulation with the anti-CD3 antibody OKT3 (30 ng/ml), IL-2 (6,000 IU/ml) and irradiated feeder cells (5000 rad, 200:1 ratio between feeder cells and TIL). The feeder cells were allogeneic peripheral blood mononuclear cells derived from at least three healthy donors who were negative for HIV, and hepatitis B and C. The process was halted and the cells were harvested after two weeks. Massive expansion in large scale differs from small scale in the quantities involved, but this process entails additional technical challenges, especially under clean laboratory conditions. These include mainly the cultivation of cells in large volumes and the harvesting and preparation of the cells for infusion. We have recently developed a novel method for harvesting of TIL cells from the culture medium by utilizing pheresis machines (32). Full large scale production protocols were employed for the massive numerical expansion of 2 TIL cultures.

Quality and sterility tests. The total viable cell number was determined by microscopic cell count and trypan blue exclusion. Microbiological tests were performed during rapid expansion protocol (REP) by membrane filtration and washing of the culture medium followed by 14-day incubation of the filter on bacterial growth media and on the end product by direct inoculation of a diluted product sample to bacterial growth media followed by 14-day incubation. Specific PCR for the detection of the mycoplasma genome with a chromogenic endotoxin assay which utilizes a modified limulus amoebocyte lysate and a synthetic color-producing substrate were also conducted.

Cytotoxicity and IFNγ-release assays. The killing assays were performed in 96-U shaped microplates (Nunc) following a standard 5h 35[S]-Met release protocol, as previously described (33). With the IFNγ-release assay TIL cultures are usually tested for reactivity against autologous tumor cells (25, 29-30). Therefore, the reactivity of TIL cultures could be tested only when cognate tumor cell cultures were established. IFNγ release was determined by a Sandwich ELISA Duo Set (R&D Systems, Minneapolis MN, USA) in 100 μl of supernatant harvested from each 96-U well, or from overnight co-incubation in 96-F wells, performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. The RCC-derived TIL cultures unresponsive both in IFNγ secretion and killing assays were tested in redirected killing assays, in which the T-cell receptor (TCR) is directly engaged, resulting in non-antigen restricted elimination of pre-labeled P815 murine target cells (34). Specifically, these cells express a receptor that binds the constant portion of immunoglobulins (Fc) of mouse anti human antibodies. Therefore, anti-human TCR antibodies, such as OKT3, pre-incubated for 1 hour with P815 cells at a concentration of 1 μg/ml are bound via the Fc portion. After washing of excess free antibody and co-incubation with human effector CD8+ T-cells, TCR is engaged by the antibody, resulting in T-cell-mediated elimination of the P815 cells, which is not antigen restricted.

Antibodies and cell lines. The following monoclonal antibodies were used in this work: anti-CD3 OKT3 (Janssen-Cilag, Australia), anti CD3-PE (DAKO, Glustrop, Denmark), anti-CD8-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) (DAKO), anti-CD4-phycoerythrin/Cy5 (DAKO), anti-von Hippel Lindau (VHL) (BD, San Diego, CA, USA), anti-carcinoembryonic antigen cell adhesion molecule-1 (CEACAM1) NC8 (kind gift from Dr Lopez-Botet, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain) and anti-human leukocyte antigen-G (HLA-G) MEM-G/4 (ABR-Fisher, USA). The following cell lines were used in this work: 526mel, 624mel, P815, and Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells transfected either with empty vector or with human VHL (kind gift of Dr. Michal Safran, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel).

Flow cytometry. The cells were harvested, washed and re-suspended in FACS buffer (PBS ×1, 0.05% NaN3, 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA)) at a density of 2×106/ml. Then, 2×105 cells were distributed in 100 μl per well were distributed in 96-U microplates (Nunc) and placed on ice. The various antibodies of interest were added in an additional 100 μl per well. The cells and antibodies were incubated on ice under dark conditions for 30 minutes and then centrifuged (350 xg, 5 minutes). The supernatants were discarded, the cells washed and re-suspended in 200 μl FACS buffer and then transferred into FACS tubes. The analysis was performed with a FACS-Calibur instrument and the CellQuest© software (BD Biosciences, Rockville, MD, USA).

Western blot. The total protein extracts (200 μg from each sample) were resolved by size on 12.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (Protran, Schleicher & Schuell, Inc., Keene, NH, USA), which were stained with Ponceau S (Sigma, Rehovot, Israel) to determine equal protein sample loading and transferrence. The membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat dry milk in Tris-buffered saline (20 mM Tris base [pH 7.6], 150 mM NaCl) containing 0.1% Tween-20 (TBS-T) and probed with the anti-VHL antibody (0.5 mg/ml; BD) overnight at 4°C. After washing in TBS-T, the membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibody (goat anti-mouse 1:10,000; Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc. Hercules, CA, USA) and developed using an enhanced chemiluminescence detection system (ECL detection kit; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Arlington Heights, IL, USA) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. The membranes were exposed to X-Omat AR film (Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, NY, USA). CHO/VHL cells were used as positive controls.

Results

Processing of tumor specimens for development of tumor and TIL lines. Ten tissue specimens were obtained from surgical resections of renal cell carcinoma tumors. The specimens were from patients in various clinical stages, including stage I (2 patients), stage II (1 patient) stage III (3 patients) and stage IV (4 patients) (Table I). The size of most of the tumors (length of the long axis) ranged between 5.3 and 8.5cm. All three larger specimens #2, #4 and #5 (Table I) were derived from stage IV patients. There was no clear correlation between the size of the resected tumor and the clinical stage among the rest of the cases. In total, 43 stable tumor cultures were established from 6 different patients (Table I). All the successful attempts were derived from the clear cell RCC subtype, while among the unsuccessful cases, two were of clear cell subtype and the rest were of non-clear cell subtypes, oncocytoma and chromophobe (Table I). There was no clear correlation between the ability to establish tumor cell culture and the disease stage (Table I). Tumor cell cultures were established in 6/10 (60%) cases with the fragmentation method, in 5/7 (71%) with the enzymatic digestion method, in 4/10 (40%) with the FNA method and in 2/10 (20%) with the TRC method. Twelve fragments were generated from each tumor, resulting in a total of thirty-two established tumor cultures derived from 6 of the patients. Importantly, there were no morphological differences between the various tumor cell cultures (data not shown).

TIL cultures were established from all 10 specimens, but the different processing methods had different yields. The fragmentation method yielded established TIL cultures in 10/10 (100%) cases, enzymatic digestion yielded 7/7 (100%), FNA yielded 3/10 (30%) and the TRC method yielded 4/10 (40%) (Table I). There was no correlation between size or disease stage and success in establishing TIL cultures.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Renal cell carcinoma biopsies processed to establish tumor lines and TIL for potential adoptive therapy.

Expansion potential of developed TIL culture. All the expansion attempts were successful and the TIL cultures derived from the RCC specimens were expanded by at least 2 orders of magnitude, between 133-fold to 521-fold (Table II). The two expansions using the large scale protocol successfully yielded 776-fold and 815-fold (Table II). All the microbiological and contamination tests were negative (data not shown).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Results of rapid expansion.

Phenotypic characterization of developed TIL cultures. All the expanded TIL cultures were triple stained for CD3, CD4 and CD8. Virtually all the cells were T-cells, as evident by CD3 expression, varying between 90-99% (Table III). There was no consistent CD4 and CD8 expression pattern, as the percentage of CD4+ T-cells varied between 14 to 85.9 percent and of CD8+ T-cells between 12 to 82 percent (Table III). In almost all cases there was an inverse correlation between these cell populations.

Out of the phenotyped TIL cultures, only TIL8-F11 and TIL9-Digest displayed specific killing activity against the autologous tumor cells (Table III). In both these TIL cultures there was a CD8+ predominance, although it was not robust (Table III). Noteworthy, in two of the cultures (TIL7-Digest and TIL8-Digest), a double positive CD4+CD8+ population was observed. The functional significance of these cells is still undefined. In addition, in six of the TIL cultures (TIL7-Digest, TIL8-F11, TIL8-Digest, TIL9-F9, TIL9-Digest and TIL10-Digest) a significant double negative CD4-CD8- T-cell population was identified, in some instances accounting for an unusually high percentage up to 30% of the cells (Table III).

Reactivity of developed TIL cultures. Specimens 4-6 and 8-10 (Table I) from which tumor cells were established were tested. A notable IFNγ release was measured in three TIL cultures (a single TIL culture derived from patient #4 and two TIL cultures derived from patient #6) out of a total of 30 tested (Table IV). The same TIL cultures were concomitantly tested for killing activity against the same autologous tumor cells. Surprisingly, the TIL cultures that were positive for IFNγ secretion did not display any killing activity (Table IV), whereas some of the IFNγ-negative TIL cultures displayed a marked direct cytotoxic activity (Table IV). Altogether, five additional TIL cultures displayed cytotoxic activity against autologous tumor cells (Table IV).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Phenotypic T cell analysis of established TIL by flow cytometry.

The autologous target cells were confirmed as RCC cells by testing for the VHL protein. The VHL protein was undetectable in the tumor cells derived from specimens 6, 8, 9 and 10 by Western blotting (Figure 1A), thus confirming them as RCC cells (35). VHL was successfully detected in the positive CHO/VHL control cells (Figure 1A). All the developed RCC cell cultures were positively stained for MHC class I expression (Figure 1B), which ruled out lack of recognition due to a simple MHC class I down-regulation, which is frequently observed during the tumor formation process (reviewed in 36). No staining was observed for CEACAM1 or HLA-G (Figure 1B).

Effector machinery of RCC-derived TIL cells. Figures 2A and 2B show that all the TIL cultures derived from a representative patient, #5, did not exhibit significant killing or IFNγ-release activities. Importantly, however, forced engagement of the TCR with OKT3 mAb resulted in robust killing activity against the P815 cells (Figure 2C). Similar results were observed with additional TIL cultures that were non-reactive to autologous tumor cells (data not shown). IFNγ secretion was also concomitantly induced in this experimental setup (data not shown).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table IV.

Functional tests of established TIL against autologous RCC cells.

Specificity of developed TIL cultures. Finally, cognate tumor reactive TIL cultures were further tested for specificity by co-incubation with autologous or allogeneic RCC cells, melanoma cells or alone. TIL4-F6, TIL6-F12 and TIL6-Digest were tested in IFNγ-release assays, while TIL8-F11 and TIL9-Digest were tested in killing assays. TIL4-F6, TIL6-F12 and TIL6-Digest displayed specific reactivity against autologous tumor cells only, as there was no release of IFNγ in the presence of allogeneic RCC or melanoma cells (Figure 3A). However, a high spontaneous release of IFNγ was observed by TIL6-F12 and TIL6-Digest, but not by TIL4-F6, even in the absence of any target cells (Figure 3A). TIL8-F11 and TIL9-Digest displayed strong cytotoxic activity against cognate autologous tumor cells, but also against allogeneic RCC cells (Figure 3B). A shared HLA-A24 allele between patients #8 and #9 could explain the reciprocal TIL alloreactivity (data not shown). The measurable killing activity observed against allogeneic melanoma cells further argues for a lack of strict specificity (Figure 3B).

Discussion

The substantial differences between previous and current technologies in efficiently generating potent TIL cells may be of considerable importance. For example, it has recently been shown that stimulation of CD8+ T-cells with high concentrations of IL-2 (3,000 U/ml) markedly and directly enhanced CD27-CD70 interactions, which facilitated activation and proliferation (37). Long culturing frequently results in cell “exhaustion”, and sometimes in the clinical deterioration of patients while waiting for preparation of the TILs. Decreased telomerase activity and shortening of telomere length has been associated with cell exhaustion (38). Furthermore, it has been suggested that decreased telomerase activity and length of telomeres in the TILs transferred to a patient, are directly correlated with decreased persistence and potentially with a worse outcome (39). Hence, shortening the expansion phase is important and could contribute to the success of the treatment.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Characterization of developed RCC cell cultures. A, Western blotting for the presence of VHL. B, Staining for MHC class I, HLA-G and CEACAM1 of developed RCC cultures.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Killing, IFNγ-release and redirected killing assays of TILs from one patient's sample. Various TIL cultures derived from patient 5 were tested for reactivity against cognate RCC cells in killing assay (A) and in IFNγ-release assay (B), at two effector-to-target (E:T) ratios, indicated by different bar colors. (C) Redirected killing against P815 target cells preincubated without (gray bars) or with (black bars) anti-CD3 mAb OKT3. Figure shows one representative TIL culture. Error bars represent the standard error of triplicate repetitions.

The present results showed that tumor cell cultures could be developed in the majority of the cases (60%), especially in the clear cell type (6 out of 8). It is suggested that this technology should focus on that malignancy, especially since 90% of metastatic renal malignancies are clear cell type RCC. Furthermore, TIL cultures were developed from all the patients and representative cultures were successfully massively expanded by 500-fold on average. The fragmentation and enzymatic digestion were superior for the establishment of both tumor cell and TIL cultures and should therefore be the methods of choice. The expansion results were similar to those previously reported for the production of TIL cultures form melanoma specimens (29). Therefore, the TIL cultures developed from the RCC specimens were expanded to sufficient numbers for clinical therapy. All work was performed in adherence to GMP standards in clean labs, with all microbiological tests negative. Phenotypic analysis showed that the developed TIL cultures were comprised of T-cells (Table III). However, while most TIL cultures developed from melanoma specimens are predominantly CD8+ (30), a substantial percentage of CD4+ T-cells were observed here. CD8+ predominance has been reported before in TILs derived from RCC specimens (27, 40). Although the antitumor effect is presumed to be mediated through the CD8+ cells, the CD4+ cells may have beneficial effect (30). Indeed, one of our TIL-treated melanoma patient, who exhibited a complete response, was treated with TIL cultures that almost exclusively comprised of CD4+ T-cells (unpublished results). Of note, a relatively high frequency of cells with CD4-CD8- double negative phenotype was observed (Table III). It has previously been proposed that double negative T-cells might have immunoregulatory (suppressive) functions both in vitro and in vivo in a variety of physiological and pathological contexts (41), but their properties are still not completely understood. In general, the low effector functions observed in the in vitro functional assays with the TILs derived from patients 8, 9 and 10, and the higher effector functions observed with TILs derived from patient 6, which contained minute quantities of these cells (Table IV and Figure 3) supported this suggestion. An exception was noted, however, with the TIL9-Digest, which was comprised of 30% double negative T-cells, but still displayed significant cytotoxic activity (Table IV and Figure 3).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Specificity tests of developed TIL cultures. TIL cultures were tested for IFNγ-release (A) and cytotoxic (B) activities. Different target cells are indicated at the bottom of each panel. Different TIL cultures are marked by specific colors. Figure shows the average of 3 independent experiments.

Functional analyses of TIL cultures developed from RCC revealed that most were “inert” and did not display killing or IFNγ secretion activities. The “inert” non-functional TIL cells were not defective or anergized, as TCR stimulation re-directed killing activity (Figure 2). Hence, other mechanisms may play a role, such as suppressive cell populations, or improper recognition of autologous RCC cells. No significant down-regulation of MHC class I was observed on the tumor cells, which concured with previous observations (42, 43). Although not observed in the present study, it has been reported that tumor-protective proteins such as CEACAM1 (44) and HLA-G (9) can be found on some RCC specimens. The CEACAM1 protein protects tumor cells by directly inhibiting effector lymphocytes such as NK cells (34, 45), T-cells (46-47) and TIL cells (16). HLA-G is recognized by inhibitory receptors such as leukocyte inhibitory receptor-1 (LIR1) (48). “Inert” TIL cultures are routinely identified among TIL cultures developed from melanoma specimens (26, 29). Out of the 30 TIL cultures tested, three displayed measurable IFNγ-secretion activity and another five displayed killing activity (Table IV). This frequency was similar to the tumor-reactive TIL cultures derived from melanoma (29). There were no TIL cultures that displayed simultaneous killing and IFNγ-secretion activities. This observation implies that these activities may be differentially regulated, as has been formerly suggested (33). Thus, the implementation of both tests enhances the chances of the identification of functional tumor-reactive TIL cultures. Cut-off values should be set to determine which TIL cultures are suitable for clinical use.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Schematic flow chart of cell processing, ex vivo expansion and quality testing. TRC: tissue remnant culture; FNA: fine-needle aspiration.

Some of the RCC-derived TIL cultures were unresponsive to both IFNγ-secretion and killing assays, but demonstrated robust killing activity in the redirected killing assay. Thus they could have had intact effector capacities, but were either actively inhibited, or had lost the ability to recognize and interact with the tumor cells. Additionally, some of the reactive TILs were not exclusively specific to autologous tumor cells. TIL cultures exerting killing activity clearly reacted against autologous RCC tumor cells, but non-specific killing of allogeneic RCC tumor cells and even of melanoma cells was observed. This killing pattern has been previously described in RCC-derived TIL cultures and was mainly ascribed to NK or CD3- lymphokine activated killer (LAK) cells (49). Non-specific effector functions are sometimes observed with melanoma-derived TILs as well (29). These results highlight the importance of specificity test, as most of the developed reactive TIL cultures were actually non-specific and could potentially cause undesired effects in a clinical setting. However, the phenotype of all tested TIL cultures in the present study almost exclusively comprised of CD3+ T-cells (Table III). Interestingly, the IFNγ-secreting TIL cultures were specific to the autologous tumor cells and did not react with the presence of allogeneic RCC or melanoma cells (Figure 3). Yet, some of these TIL cultures spontaneously secreted some amounts of IFNγ in the absence of any tumor cell. The clinical relevance of this non-MHC class I restricted killing activity is not entirely determined.

In summary, the successful melanoma protocol was demonstrated to be adoptable for the development of TILs from RCC specimens. TILs were able to be developed, activated and expanded to ACT compatible numbers under full GMP conditions, and tumor-reactive TIL cultures were generated and identified. A suggested schematic flow chart is presented in Figure 4. Furthermore, it was implied that reactive TILs might be selected with two concurrent functional assays, cytotoxicity and IFNγ-release, as these functions do not necessarily overlap and both are required for the elimination of tumors. Comparison with the in vitro functional results observed in a historic clinical trial demonstrated superior results with the current technology. The cut-off values for suitable clinical use should be determined. However, there may be a potential problem with decreased specificity, which could potentially lead to undesired effects of autoreactivity. Nevertheless, even past treatments with peripheral blood derived LAK cells with broad reactivity did not cause severe autoimmune manifestations. The enhancement of specificity remains an important objective for further research. In conclusion, TILs generated with the current technology adopted from melanoma studies could provide an improved cell-based therapeutic platform for ACT in RCC. This platform could be further improved by other approaches, such as genetic modifications of TCR or co-stimulating molecules.

Acknowledgements

Many special thanks to Direct Insurance Ltd. and the Lemelbaum family for the massive support enabling this research. The authors would like to thank Dr. Ester Schallmach, Dr. Rachel Seidman, Na'ama Zabari and Adva Kubi for their devoted and excellent technical assistance with all aspects of tissue culture. G.M. is supported by the Israel Cancer Association through the estate of the late Loewe Minna Margot and the Israel Cancer Research Fund (ICRF).

Footnotes

  • ↵* Both authors contributed equally to this work.

  • Received July 21, 2008.
  • Revision received October 7, 2008.
  • Accepted October 24, 2008.
  • Copyright© 2009 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Jemal A,
    2. Siegel R,
    3. Ward E,
    4. Hao Y,
    5. Xu J,
    6. Murray T,
    7. Thun MJ
    : Cancer statistics 2008. CA Cancer J Clin 58: 71-96, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. National Institute of Health
    : SEER Cancer Statistics Review. Bethesda, MD, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, 1990.
  3. ↵
    1. Golimbu M,
    2. Joshi P,
    3. Sperber A
    : Renal cell carcinoma: survival and prognostic factors. Urology 27: 291-301, 1986.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Bukowski RM,
    2. Novick AC
    : Clinical practice guidelines: renal cell carcinoma. Cleve Clin J Med 64: SI1-SI44, 1997.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Coppin C,
    2. Le L,
    3. Porzsolt F,
    4. Wilt T
    : Targeted therapy for renal cell carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2: CD006017, 2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Sanchez-Ortiz RF,
    2. Tannir N,
    3. Ahrar K,
    4. Wood CG
    : Spontaneous regression of pulmonary metastases from renal cell carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation of primary tumor: an in situ tumor vaccine? J Urol 170: 178-179, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Stoerkel S,
    2. Keymer R,
    3. Steinbach F,
    4. Thoenes W
    : Reaction patterns of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in different renal cell carcinomas and oncocytomas. Prog Clin Biol Res 378: 217-223, 1992.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Shabtai M,
    2. Ye H,
    3. Frischer Z,
    4. Martin J,
    5. Waltzer WC,
    6. Malinowski K
    : Increased expression of activation markers in renal cell carcinoma-infiltrating lymphocytes. J Urol 168: 2216-2219, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Bukur J,
    2. Malenica B,
    3. Huber C,
    4. Seliger B
    : Altered expression of nonclassical HLA class Ib antigens in human renal cell carcinoma and its association with impaired immune response. Hum Immunol 64: 1081-1092, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Zhang J,
    2. Chen Y,
    3. Li J,
    4. Zhang R,
    5. Wu Y,
    6. Zou L,
    7. Zhao T,
    8. Zhang X,
    9. Han J,
    10. Chen A,
    11. Wu Y
    : Renal tubular epithelial expression of the coinhibitory molecule B7-DC (programmed death-1 ligand). J Nephrol 19: 429-438, 2006.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Uzzo RG,
    2. Rayman P,
    3. Kolenko V,
    4. Clark PE,
    5. Cathcart MK,
    6. Bloom T,
    7. Novick AC,
    8. Bukowski RM,
    9. Hamilton T,
    10. Finke JH
    : Renal cell carcinoma-derived gangliosides suppress nuclear factor-kappaB activation in T-cells. J Clin Invest 104: 769-776, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Biswas K,
    2. Richmond A,
    3. Rayman P,
    4. Biswas S,
    5. Thornton M,
    6. Sa G,
    7. Das T,
    8. Zhang R,
    9. Chahlavi A,
    10. Tannenbaum CS,
    11. Novick A,
    12. Bukowski R,
    13. Finke JH
    : GM2 expression in renal cell carcinoma: potential role in tumor-induced T-cell dysfunction. Cancer Res 66: 6816-6825, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Nakagomi H,
    2. Pisa P,
    3. Pisa EK,
    4. Yamamoto Y,
    5. Halapi E,
    6. Backlin K,
    7. Juhlin C,
    8. Kiessling R
    : Lack of interleukin-2 (IL-2) expression and selective expression of IL-10 mRNA in human renal cell carcinoma. Int J Cancer 63: 366-371, 1995.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Mitropoulos D,
    2. Kiroudi A,
    3. Christelli E,
    4. Serafetinidis E,
    5. Zervas A,
    6. Anastasiou I,
    7. Dimopoulos C
    : Expression of transforming growth factor beta in renal cell carcinoma and matched non-involved renal tissue. Urol Res 32: 317-322, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Thompson RH,
    2. Gillett MD,
    3. Cheville JC,
    4. Lohse CM,
    5. Dong H,
    6. Webster WS,
    7. Krejci KG,
    8. Lobo JR,
    9. Sengupta S,
    10. Chen L,
    11. Zincke H,
    12. Blute ML,
    13. Strome SE,
    14. Leibovich BC,
    15. Kwon ED
    : Co-stimulatory B7-H1 in renal cell carcinoma patients: Indicator of tumor aggressiveness and potential therapeutic target. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 17174-17179, 2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Frankenberger B,
    2. Noessner E,
    3. Schendel DJ
    : Immune suppression in renal cell carcinoma. Sem Cancer Biol 17: 330-343, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Parton M,
    2. Gore M,
    3. Eisen T
    : Role of cytokine therapy in 2006 and beyond for metastatic renal cell cancer. J Clin Oncol 24: 5584-5592, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Klapper JA,
    2. Downey SG,
    3. Smith FO,
    4. Yang JC,
    5. Hughes MS,
    6. Kammula US,
    7. Sherry RM,
    8. Royal RE,
    9. Steinberg SM,
    10. Rosenberg S
    : High-dose interleukin-2 for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective analysis of response and survival in patients treated in the surgery branch at the National Cancer Institute between 1986 and 2006. Cancer. 113: 293-301, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Gold PJ,
    2. Thompson JA,
    3. Markowitz DR
    : Metastatic renal cell carcinoma: long-term survival after therapy with high-dose continuous-infusion interleukin-2. Cancer J Sci Am 3: S85-S91, 1997.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Beignon AS,
    2. Skoberne M,
    3. Bhardwaj N
    : Type I interferons promote cross-priming: more functions for old cytokines. Nat Immunol 4: 939-941, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Carter L,
    2. Fouser LA,
    3. Jussif J,
    4. Fitz L,
    5. Deng B,
    6. Wood CR,
    7. Collins M,
    8. Honjo T,
    9. Freeman GJ,
    10. Carreno BM
    : PD-1:PD-L inhibitory pathway affects both CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells and is overcome by IL-2. Eur J Immunol 32: 634-643, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Frankenberger B,
    2. Pohla H,
    3. Noessner E,
    4. Willimsky G,
    5. Papier B,
    6. Pezzutto A,
    7. Kopp J,
    8. Oberneder R,
    9. Blankenstein T,
    10. Schendel DJ
    : Influence of CD80, interleukin-2, and interleukin-7 expression in human renal cell carcinoma on the expansion, function, and survival of tumor-specific CTLs. Clin Cancer Res 11: 1733-1742, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Bleumer I,
    2. Oosterwijk E,
    3. De Mulder P,
    4. Mulders PF
    : Immunotherapy for renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 44: 65-75, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Dudley ME,
    2. Wunderlich JR,
    3. Robbins PF,
    4. Yang JC,
    5. Hwu P,
    6. Schwartzentruber DJ,
    7. Topalian SL,
    8. Sherry R,
    9. Restifo NP,
    10. Hubicki AM,
    11. Robinson MR,
    12. Raffeld M,
    13. Duray P,
    14. Seipp CA,
    15. Rogers-Freezer L,
    16. Morton KE,
    17. Mavroukakis SA,
    18. White DE,
    19. Rosenberg SA
    : Cancer regression and autoimmunity in patients after clonal repopulation with antitumor lymphocytes. Science 298: 850-854, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Dudley ME,
    2. Wunderlich JR,
    3. Yang JC,
    4. Sherry RM,
    5. Topalian SL,
    6. Restifo NP,
    7. Royal RE,
    8. Kammula U,
    9. White DE,
    10. Mavroukakis SA,
    11. Rogers LJ,
    12. Gracia GJ,
    13. Jones SA,
    14. Mangiameli DP,
    15. Pelletier MM,
    16. Gea-Banacloche J,
    17. Robinson MR,
    18. Berman DM,
    19. Filie AC,
    20. Abati A,
    21. Rosenberg SA
    : Adoptive cell transfer therapy following non-myeloablative but lympho-depleting chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with refractory metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol 23: 2346-2357, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Rosenberg SA,
    2. Dudley M
    : Cancer regression in patients with metastatic melanoma after transfer of autologous antitumor lymphoccytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 101: 14639-14645, 2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Goedegebuure PS,
    2. Douville LM,
    3. Li H,
    4. Richmond GC,
    5. Schoof DD,
    6. Scavone M,
    7. Eberlein TJ
    : Adoptive immunotherapy with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and interleukin-2 in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma and renal cell carcinoma: a pilot study. J Clin Oncol 13: 1939-1949, 1995.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Figlin RA,
    2. Thompson JA,
    3. Bukowski RM,
    4. Vogelzang NJ,
    5. Novick AC,
    6. Lange P,
    7. Steinberg GD,
    8. Belldegrun AS
    : Multicenter, randomized, phase III trial of CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in combination with recombinant interleukin-2 in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 17: 2521-2529, 1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Besser MJ,
    2. Treves AJ,
    3. Itzhaki O,
    4. Hardan I,
    5. Nagler A,
    6. Papa MZ,
    7. Catane R,
    8. Winkler E,
    9. Shalmon-Zifroni B,
    10. Schachter J
    : Adoptive cell therapy for metastatic melanoma patients: pre- clinical development at the Sheba Medical Center. Isr Med Assoc J 8: 164-168, 2006.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Dudley ME,
    2. Wunderlich JR,
    3. Shelton TE,
    4. Even J,
    5. Rosenberg SA
    : Generation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte cultures for use in adoptive transfer therapy for melanoma patients. J Immunother 26: 332-342, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Schoof DD,
    2. Terashima Y,
    3. Peoples GE,
    4. Goedegebuure PS,
    5. Andrews JV,
    6. Richie JP,
    7. Eberlein TJ
    : CD4+ T-cell clones isolated from human renal cell carcinoma possess the functional characteristics of Th2 helper cells. Cell Immunol 150: 114-123, 1993.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Schallmach E,
    2. Sareli R,
    3. Besser MJ,
    4. Leipsiger S,
    5. Hardan I,
    6. Treves AJ,
    7. Nagler A,
    8. Schachter J
    : Collection of large-scale expanded lymphocyte cultures for adoptive immunotherapy using a COBE spectra apheresis machine. J Immunother 31: 563-568, 2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Markel G,
    2. Seidman R,
    3. Stern N,
    4. Cohen-Sinai T,
    5. Itzhaki O,
    6. Katz G,
    7. Treves A,
    8. Besser M,
    9. Blumberg RS,
    10. Loewenthal R,
    11. Mandelboim O,
    12. Orenstein A,
    13. Schachter J
    : Inhibition of human tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) effector functions by homophilic carcinoembryonic cell adhesion molecule 1 (CEACAM1) interactions. J Immunol 177: 6062-6071, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Markel G,
    2. Lieberman N,
    3. Katz G,
    4. Arnon TI,
    5. Lotem M,
    6. Drize O,
    7. Blumberg RS,
    8. Bar-Haim E,
    9. Mader R,
    10. Eisenbach L,
    11. Mandelboim O
    : CD66a interactions between human melanoma and NK cells: a novel class I MHC-independent inhibitory mechanism of cytotoxicity. J Immunol 168: 2803-2810, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Zbar B,
    2. Brauch H,
    3. Talmadge C,
    4. Linehan M
    : Loss of alleles of loci on the short arm of chromosome 3 in renal cell carcinoma. Nature (Lond.) 327: 721-724, 1987.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Bubeník J
    : MHC class I down-regulation: tumour escape from immune surveillance? Int J Oncol 25: 487-491, 2004.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Huang J,
    2. Kerstann KW,
    3. Ahmadzadeh M,
    4. Li YF,
    5. El-Gamil M,
    6. Rosenberg SA,
    7. Robbins PF
    : Modulation by IL-2 of CD70 and CD27 expression on CD8+ T-cells: importance for the therapeutic effectiveness of cell transfer immunotherapy. J Immunol 176: 7726-7735, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Effros RB,
    2. Pawelec G
    : Replicative senescence of T-cells: does the Hayflick Limit lead to immune exhaustion? Immunol Today 18: 450-454, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Shen X,
    2. Zhou J,
    3. Hathcock KS,
    4. Robbins P,
    5. Powell DJ Jr,
    6. Rosenberg SA,
    7. Hodes RJ
    : Persistence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in adoptive immunotherapy correlates with telomere length. J Immunother 30: 123-129, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Van den Hove LE,
    2. Van Gool SW,
    3. Van Poppel H,
    4. Baert L,
    5. Coorevits L,
    6. Van Damme B,
    7. Ceuppens JL
    : Phenotype, cytokine production and cytolytic capacity of fresh (uncultured) tumour-infiltrating T lymphocytes in human renal cell carcinoma. Clin Exp Immunol 109: 501-509, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Thomson CW,
    2. Lee BP,
    3. Zhang L
    : Double-negative regulatory T-cells: non-conventional regulators. Immunol Res 35: 163-178, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Mattijssen V,
    2. Van Moorselaar J,
    3. De Mulder PH,
    4. Schalkwijk L,
    5. Ruiter DJ
    : Human leukocyte antigen expression in renal cell carcinoma lesions does not predict the response to interferon therapy, J Immunother 12: 64-69, 1992.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Ohmore T,
    2. Okada K,
    3. Arita N,
    4. Watanabe Y,
    5. Miyazako T,
    6. Tabei R
    : Characteristics of MHC antigen expression and tumor-infiltrating mononuclear cells in renal cell adenomas and carcinomas. Histol Histopathol 10: 789-794, 1995.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Kammerer R,
    2. Riesenberg R,
    3. Weiler C,
    4. Lohrmann J,
    5. Schleypen J,
    6. Zimmermann W
    : The tumour suppressor gene CEACAM1 is completely but reversibly down-regulated in renal cell carcinoma. J Pathol 204: 258-267, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Markel G,
    2. Wolf D,
    3. Hanna J,
    4. Gazit R,
    5. Goldman-Wohl D,
    6. Lavy Y,
    7. Yagel S,
    8. Mandelboim O
    : Pivotal role of CEACAM1 protein in the inhibition of activated decidual lymphocyte functions: implications for congenital CMV infection. J Clin Invest 110: 943-953, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Morales VM,
    2. Christ A,
    3. Watt SM,
    4. Kim HS,
    5. Johnson KW,
    6. Utku N,
    7. Texieira AM,
    8. Mizoguchi A,
    9. Mizoguchi E,
    10. Russell GJ,
    11. Russell SE,
    12. Bhan AK,
    13. Freeman GJ,
    14. Blumberg RS
    : Regulation of human intestinal intraepithelial lymphocyte cytolytic function by biliary glycoprotein (CD66a). J Immunol 163: 1363-1370, 1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    1. Boulton IC,
    2. Gray-Owen SD
    : Neisserial binding to CEACAM1 arrests the activation and proliferation of CD4+ T lymphocytes. Nat Immunol 3: 229-236, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Moretta L,
    2. Moretta A
    : Killer immunoglobulin-like receptors. Curr Opin Immunol 16: 626-633, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Schendel DJ,
    2. Oberneder R,
    3. Falk CS,
    4. Jantzer P,
    5. Kressenstein S,
    6. Maget B,
    7. Hofstetter A,
    8. Riethmüller G,
    9. Nößner E
    : Cellular and molecular analyses of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) restricted and non-MHC-restricted effector cells recognizing renal cell carcinomas: problems and perspectives for immunotherapy. J Mol Med 75: 400-413, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 29 (1)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 29, Issue 1
January 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Preclinical Evaluation of Adoptive Cell Therapy for Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
12 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Preclinical Evaluation of Adoptive Cell Therapy for Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
GAL MARKEL, TALI COHEN-SINAI, MICHAL J. BESSER, KFIR OVED, ORIT ITZHAKI, RACHEL SEIDMAN, AVRAHAM J. TREVES, EDUARD FRIDMAN, YONA KEISARI, ZOHAR DOTAN, JACOB RAMON, JACOB SCHACHTER
Anticancer Research Jan 2009, 29 (1) 145-154;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Preclinical Evaluation of Adoptive Cell Therapy for Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
GAL MARKEL, TALI COHEN-SINAI, MICHAL J. BESSER, KFIR OVED, ORIT ITZHAKI, RACHEL SEIDMAN, AVRAHAM J. TREVES, EDUARD FRIDMAN, YONA KEISARI, ZOHAR DOTAN, JACOB RAMON, JACOB SCHACHTER
Anticancer Research Jan 2009, 29 (1) 145-154;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Adherent cell depletion promotes the expansion of renal cell carcinoma infiltrating T cells with optimal characteristics for adoptive transfer
  • T cells expanded from renal cell carcinoma are tumor-reactive but fail to produce IFN-{gamma}, TNF-{alpha} or IL-2
  • Tissue Harvesting for Adoptive Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocyte Therapy in Metastatic Melanoma
  • T-cell Responses in the Microenvironment of Primary Renal Cell Carcinoma--Implications for Adoptive Cell Therapy
  • T Cell-Based Immunotherapy of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Modest Success and Future Perspective
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • TIG1 Inhibits the mTOR Signaling Pathway in Malignant Melanoma Through the VAC14 Protein
  • Novel α-Trifluoromethyl Chalcone Exerts Antitumor Effects Against Prostate Cancer Cells
  • Differential Effects of Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Checkpoint Inhibitors on Adhesion Molecules and Cytokine Secretion by THP-1 Monocytes
Show more Experimental Studies

Similar Articles

Anticancer Research

© 2023 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire