Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

A Comparison of Two Orally Bioavailable Anti-cancer Agents, IRC-110160 and STX140

PAUL A. FOSTER, C. STENGEL, TAUHID ALI, MATHEW P. LEESE, BARRY V.L. POTTER, MICHAEL J. REED, ATUL PUROHIT and SIMON P. NEWMAN
Anticancer Research May 2008, 28 (3A) 1483-1491;
PAUL A. FOSTER
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. STENGEL
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TAUHID ALI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MATHEW P. LEESE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
BARRY V.L. POTTER
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MICHAEL J. REED
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ATUL PUROHIT
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SIMON P. NEWMAN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: simon.newman@imperial.ac.uk
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

This study characterises two recently developed anti-cancer agents in vitro and in vivo, 2-methoxyoestra-1,3,5(10), 16-tetraene-3-carboxamide (IRC-110160) and STX140. Materials and Methods: Hormone-dependent (MCF-7), hormone-independent (MDA-MB-231) and P-glycoprotein overexpressing (MCF-7DOX) cells were used for proliferation experiments. For the tumour efficacy studies, female nude mice were inoculated with MDA-MB-231 cells. Results: IRC-110160 is a potent inhibitor of both MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cell proliferation. Furthermore, the potency of IRC-110160 was unaffected by the over-expression of the P-glycoprotein drug efflux pump. IRC-110160 and 2-methoxyoestradiol-3,17-O,O-bis-sulfamate (STX140) induced apoptosis in a similar timeframe in the MDA-MB-231 cell line, but only STX140 caused G2/M arrest in these cells. In the MDA-MB-231 xenograft model 300 mg/kg p.o. (daily) of IRC-110160 and 20 mg/kg p.o. STX140 (daily) both completely inhibited tumour growth; however some toxicity was observed with IRC-110160. After 28 days of daily dosing STX140 (20 mg/kg p.o.) had minimal effect on the white blood population of mice with tumours. The masking of STX140 from white blood cells may be due to its interaction with carbonic anhydrase II (CAII) in the red blood cells. In contrast to STX140, IRC-110160 does not inhibit CAII. These studies highlight the activity of two orally bioavailable anti-cancer agents one of which, STX140, may offer a significant clinical advantage over existing drugs as a common dose limiting factor, haemotoxicity, may be minimised.

  • STX140
  • breast cancer
  • 2-methoxyestradiol
  • ENMD-1198
  • myelotoxicity

Footnotes

  • Received February 7, 2008.
  • Accepted March 3, 2008.
  • Copyright© 2008 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 28 (3A)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 28, Issue 3A
May-June 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Comparison of Two Orally Bioavailable Anti-cancer Agents, IRC-110160 and STX140
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
A Comparison of Two Orally Bioavailable Anti-cancer Agents, IRC-110160 and STX140
PAUL A. FOSTER, C. STENGEL, TAUHID ALI, MATHEW P. LEESE, BARRY V.L. POTTER, MICHAEL J. REED, ATUL PUROHIT, SIMON P. NEWMAN
Anticancer Research May 2008, 28 (3A) 1483-1491;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
A Comparison of Two Orally Bioavailable Anti-cancer Agents, IRC-110160 and STX140
PAUL A. FOSTER, C. STENGEL, TAUHID ALI, MATHEW P. LEESE, BARRY V.L. POTTER, MICHAEL J. REED, ATUL PUROHIT, SIMON P. NEWMAN
Anticancer Research May 2008, 28 (3A) 1483-1491;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Enhanced DNA Double-strand Break Induction by Carbon Ions Under Intratumoral Hypoxia
  • C-myc Oncogene Numerical Imbalances Analysis in Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
  • Association of Interleukin-12A Genotypes With Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Risk
Show more Experimental Studies

Similar Articles

Anticancer Research

© 2025 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire