Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Review ArticleExperimental Studies

Does Homeobox-related “Positional” Genomic Information Contribute to Implantation of Metastatic Cancer Cells at Non-random Sites?

K.M. ANDERSON, M. DARWEESH, A. JAJAH, P. TSUI, P. GUINAN and M. RUBENSTEIN
Anticancer Research July 2007, 27 (4B) 2141-2153;
K.M. ANDERSON
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Kanderso427{at}aol.com
M. DARWEESH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. JAJAH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. TSUI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. GUINAN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. RUBENSTEIN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Reasons for the lodgment of metastases from several types of solid cancer at apparently non-random sites have not been established. Recently, a group of genes expressed in human fibroblasts obtained from different anatomic locations was implicated in “positional” genomic information. Essentially, a Cartesian coordinate system identifying fibroblasts originally resident at anterior or more posterior, proximal or distal and dermal or non-dermal (heart, lung, etc.) locations was proposed. The determinants used for these identifications included HOX genes, central to embryonic segmental development, some of which are expressed in differentiated, post-embryonic cells. To the extent that HOX or other homeobox genes are expressed in ectodermal, mesodermal or endodermally-derived, malignantly transformed cells, they might contribute “positional” information to nidation of specific malignant clones at non-random sites. As understood in the past, interdiction of HOX or homeobox-related gene expression might reduce the probability of cancer cell implantation or alter their destinations in complex ways. Ideally, by interfering with HOX or other homeobox gene-related expression of antigenic determinants potentially contributing to their “homing” and nidation, reduced implantation of circulating cancer cells could render them more susceptible to systemic chemotherapy or immunotherapy, as demonstrated in mice. Furthermore, HOX or other homeobox genes or their products could provide novel intra- or extracellular targets for therapy.

  • Homeobox-related genes
  • metastasis
  • metastatic sites
  • review

Footnotes

  • Received April 4, 2007.
  • Accepted April 18, 2007.
  • Copyright© 2007 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 27, Issue 4B
July-August 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Does Homeobox-related “Positional” Genomic Information Contribute to Implantation of Metastatic Cancer Cells at Non-random Sites?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Does Homeobox-related “Positional” Genomic Information Contribute to Implantation of Metastatic Cancer Cells at Non-random Sites?
K.M. ANDERSON, M. DARWEESH, A. JAJAH, P. TSUI, P. GUINAN, M. RUBENSTEIN
Anticancer Research Jul 2007, 27 (4B) 2141-2153;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Does Homeobox-related “Positional” Genomic Information Contribute to Implantation of Metastatic Cancer Cells at Non-random Sites?
K.M. ANDERSON, M. DARWEESH, A. JAJAH, P. TSUI, P. GUINAN, M. RUBENSTEIN
Anticancer Research Jul 2007, 27 (4B) 2141-2153;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Tenofovir Alafenamide Promotes Differentiation and Induces Apoptosis of AML Cells by Inhibiting Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase
  • VEGF and Hypoxia Independently Induce MDR1 Expression to Promote Endothelial Cell Angiogenesis
  • BIT1 as an Effector of EGFR-TKI-induced Apoptosis via TLE1 Inhibition in Lung Adenocarcinoma Cells
Show more Experimental Studies
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire