Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Accuracy Rates of US-guided Vacuum-assisted Breast Biopsy

ADRIANA BONIFACINO, VIVIANA PETROCELLI, TIZIANA PISANI, SIMONE GIANNERINI, ALESSANDRA GIOVAGNOLI, ALDO VECCHIONE, PIETRO L MINGAZZINI and MARIA ROSARIA GIOVAGNOLI
Anticancer Research May 2005, 25 (3C) 2465-2470;
ADRIANA BONIFACINO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
VIVIANA PETROCELLI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TIZIANA PISANI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SIMONE GIANNERINI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ALESSANDRA GIOVAGNOLI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ALDO VECCHIONE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PIETRO L MINGAZZINI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARIA ROSARIA GIOVAGNOLI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: mariarosaria.giovagnoli{at}uniroma1.it
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

A prospective study designed to measure the accuracy of mammography (MRx), ultrasound (US), fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and one of the most recently introduced techniques, vacuum biopsy (VB), in the diagnosis of breast cancer is reported. A sample of 146 breast lesions on 135 patients were examined. The design of the study made it possible to compare MRx, US, FNAC and VB directly, because it excluded several confounding variables. Statistical indicators - sensitivity, specificity, predictive values (PPV and NPV), false-negative and false-positive rates (FN and FP), suspicious plus indeterminate rate and likelihood ratios (LR) - were calculated. Results: The NPV of MRx and US were remarkably high (92.4% and 97.9%, respectively), confirming previous reports. The complete sensitivity of FNAC was 80%, while specificity was 99.1% and LR of positive tests 88.8. The combined score of FNAC, US and MRx resulted in a good increase in complete sensitivity (97.1%), when compared with the results of the single diagnostic tests evaluated separately. The absolute sensitivity of VB was 97.1% and specificity was 100%. In conclusion, considered together, MRx, US and FNAC appear to be reliable diagnostic procedures and, when they are all negative, the possibility of a cancer is extremely low, although it cannot be completely ruled out. The VB test had the highest absolute sensitivity among all the methods compared. Therefore, this technique could be considered conclusive in diagnostically doubtful cases, avoiding open surgical biopsy.

  • Breast cancer
  • diagnostic accuracy
  • mammotome
  • vacuum biopsy
  • FNAC
  • ultrasound
  • Received June 15, 2004.
  • Revision received April 20, 2005.
  • Accepted April 25, 2005.
  • Copyright© 2005 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 25, Issue 3C
1 May 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Accuracy Rates of US-guided Vacuum-assisted Breast Biopsy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
13 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Accuracy Rates of US-guided Vacuum-assisted Breast Biopsy
ADRIANA BONIFACINO, VIVIANA PETROCELLI, TIZIANA PISANI, SIMONE GIANNERINI, ALESSANDRA GIOVAGNOLI, ALDO VECCHIONE, PIETRO L MINGAZZINI, MARIA ROSARIA GIOVAGNOLI
Anticancer Research May 2005, 25 (3C) 2465-2470;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Accuracy Rates of US-guided Vacuum-assisted Breast Biopsy
ADRIANA BONIFACINO, VIVIANA PETROCELLI, TIZIANA PISANI, SIMONE GIANNERINI, ALESSANDRA GIOVAGNOLI, ALDO VECCHIONE, PIETRO L MINGAZZINI, MARIA ROSARIA GIOVAGNOLI
Anticancer Research May 2005, 25 (3C) 2465-2470;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Timing and Risk Factors for Hyperglycemia Associated With Anamorelin Administration
  • Identification of Risk Factors for the Local Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Post-radiofrequency Ablation
  • Practical Implementation and Validation of Geriatric Assessment in Older Adults With Esophageal Cancer
Show more Clinical Studies
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire