Abstract
Background/Aim: With the increase in detection of non-palpable breast lesions through screening, wire-guided localisation (WGL) has long been the favoured method for preoperative localisation. However, this technique comes with several limitations. New methods have been developed, including several non-radioactive, wireless options. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of Savi Scout® localisation (SSL) through this pooled analysis and systematic review. Materials and Methods: A number of databases were searched for records reporting data on localisation and retrieval of SSL reflectors, as well as re-excision rate. We included our own data from 20 patients (22 reflectors) at our institution. Results: A total of 842 reflectors were inserted across eleven studies and our own data. Pooled analysis revealed an overall successful deployment rate of 99.64% and a successful retrieval rate of 99.64% using SSL. A statistically significant difference in re-excision rate was found in a smaller pooled analysis conducted across four studies comparing SSL and WGL (12.9% and 21.1% respectively, p<0.01). Conclusion: The Savi Scout® localisation system is a safe and effective alternative to WGL. It facilitates flexible scheduling by decoupling radiology and surgery interventions and may reduce the need for re-excision procedures for positive surgical margins.
- Savi Scout®
- reflector-guided localisation
- radar localisation
- non-wire localisation
- non-palpable breast lesions
- breast cancer
- review
- Received May 16, 2020.
- Revision received May 30, 2020.
- Accepted June 11, 2020.
- Copyright© 2020, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved