Abstract
Background/Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the 3-year health status of cholecystectomy patients by the RAND-36 Survey. Patients and Methods: Initially, 110 patients with symptomatic gallstone disease were randomized to undergo either minicholecystectomy (MC) (n=58) or laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) (n=52). RAND-36 survey was performed preoperatively, 4 weeks, 6 months and 3 years following surgery. Results: RAND-36 scores improved in several RAND-36 domains in MC and LC groups with a similar postoperative course over the 3-year study period. In addition, at the 3-year follow-up telephone interview, no significant differences in patient-reported outcome measures between MC and LC patients were shown. The linear mixed effect model was used to test the overall significance of the RAND-36 survey during a 36-month follow-up period and the overall p-values were statistically significant in vitality, mental health (0.03), role physical and bodily pain domains. Conclusion: During the three years following cholecystectomy, four RAND-36 domains remained significantly higher, indicating a significant positive change in quality of life. RAND-36-Item Health Survey is a comprehensive test for analyzing long-term outcome and health status after cholecystectomy.
The classical outcome measures evaluated after surgery are usually perioperative course, complications, morbidity, mortality and long-term outcome (post-operative symptoms, disease recurrence, long-term complications) (1-5). One of the most frequently used quality of life (QoL) assessment tools for patients following surgery is the Short Form Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36) (2, 6-13). RAND–36, much like SF–36, is a widely used generic, coherent, and comprehensive health survey. It contains a total of eight domains: general health (GH), physical functioning (PF), mental health (MH), social functioning (SF), vitality (VT), bodily pain (BP), role physical (RP) and role emotional (RE). RAND-36 includes the same set of items as SF-36, however, the scoring of GH and BP scales differs slightly (14, 15). Several studies have evaluated SF-36 in benign disease and in cancer patients following surgery (1, 2, 4, 8, 10-12). To our knowledge, RAND-36 is rarely evaluated in surgical patients (3, 16, 17). In addition, RAND-36-Item Health Survey has not been addressed earlier in minilaparotomy cholecystectomy (MC) versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) patients with ultrasonic dissection. Therefore, our study design was to investigate RAND-36 domains preoperatively and repeatedly following surgery. In addition, a 3-year follow-up structured telephone interview was conducted asking the patients if they had any symptoms or pain following surgery and the pain intensity was reported on an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS). The end-point of our study was to determine differences in the 3-year health outcome in MC versus LC patient groups.
Patients and Methods
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kuopio University Hospital District, Kuopio, Finland (DNRO 27/02/2013), registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov database (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01723540, Consort diagram), and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written consent was collected from participants, after receiving verbal and written information about the study. Operations were carried out in two hospitals in Finland; Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki (n=28) and Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio (n=82) between March 2013 and May 2015. The design of the study is presented in Figure 1.
The study was a prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial with two parallel groups. Altogether, 110 patients with uncomplicated symptomatic cholelithiasis confirmed by ultrasound were randomized to undergo cholecystectomy with LC, 52 patients, or with MC, 58 patients. Sealed envelope method was used for randomization. The operations were carried out by three consultant-level surgeons (JH, PJ, ME), and both techniques were familiar to each operator.
The surgical techniques used were standardized in both groups (18). The LC is a laparoscopic operation and was performed using the four-trocar technique (two 10-mm and two 5-mm trocars), and intra-abdominal pressure was set at 12 mmHg. Ultrasonic scissors (Harmonic ACE®, Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Cincinnati, OH, USA) were used both in the MC and LC procedures.
The MC technique is a minimally invasive open technique with a very short wound. The rectus muscle is not cut, but split in the MC technique. A skin incision length of more than 7,0 cm or cutting of the rectus muscle was considered as a conversion to a conventional open operation. Incisions were infiltrated with local anesthetic (20 ml ropivacaine 7.5 mg/ml) at the end of the operation.
RAND-36 was assessed pre- and postoperatively using the validated Finnish version of the questionnaire (15). Non-responders were interviewed by phone. The eight health domains were calculated from the 36 questions as instructed by the RAND–36 item health survey (15, 16). The RAND-36 questionnaire takes 10-15 min to complete. We have earlier shown instructions for calculation of the eight health domains from the 36 questions of the RAND-36 survey (17).
At the 3-year follow-up, a telephone interview was conducted between January 2018 and May 2018. In the structured interview, the patients were asked whether they have experienced: a) similar abdominal symptoms or right upper quadrant pain, as they had before cholecystectomy, b) whether they have diarrhea or loose stools, and reflux symptoms, c) or if they had to avoid fatty or fried food to escape abdominal symptoms. If any of these symptoms were present, the interview continued with the question whether the patient had been further examined or received any other treatment for the residual symptoms. Pain or other symptoms at the incision area/port sites were filed, and patients reported the pain intensity on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) when at rest, in physical activity, and lifting heavy objects or coughing. Regarding satisfaction with the surgery, the patients were asked whether the operation had had any impact on their QoL, if they were satisfied with the cosmetic outcome, and the satisfaction with the surgery in general. The patients were asked to answer the question on a five-point Likert-scale. The author (I.S.), who performed all interviews and filed the questionnaires of the study persons, did not participate in the primary operation or treatment of any of the study patients and was blinded to the operative technique used in cholecystectomy.
The data were entered and analyzed with a statistical software program (IBM SPSS Statistics 24.0, IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Differences in the baseline characteristics between groups were tested by Fisher's exact test and in the case of continuous data the analysis was performed by independent samples t-test. Group differences at four time points were tested by the Mann-Whitney U-test and the Wilcoxon signed rank test. The linear mixed effect model was used to test overall significance of RAND-36 during the follow-period and the overall p value shows the interaction effects of different time and group interactions.
Results
Fifty-three patients (53/58=91.4 %) in the MC group and 44 (44/52=84.6 %) patients in the LC group underwent a follow-up phone interview at 36 months. Further on, 44 (44/58=75.9 %) of the MC patients and 43 (43/52=82.7%) of the LC patients returned the 3-year RAND-36 questionnaire following surgery (mean±SD, 43.2±7.7 months). The CONSORT diagram of the study and the perioperative surgical data are shown in Figure 1 and Table I, respectively.
Three patients in both groups (MC, 3/58 and LC, 3/53) had an incisional hernia of which two patients in both groups underwent hernia repair. None of the patients have shown signs of recurrent gallstones or surgery associated injuries in the bile ducts.
At the 3-year follow-up, no statistically significant differences in the structured interview domains between MC and LC patients were shown; residual abdominal symptoms (p=0.26), right upper quadrant pain (p=0.16), reflux symptoms (p=0.13), diarrhea/loose stools (p=0.27), fatty/fried food (p=0.69), overall satisfaction with the procedure (p=0.90), cosmetic satisfaction (p=0.30), recommend the procedure to others (p=0.60), quality of life (p=0.34, Table II).
The linear mixed effect model was used to test overall significance between groups during the 3-year follow-period and no significant differences were shown in any of the eight domains of RAND-36 at 4 weeks, 6 months or 36 months after surgery (Table III). The only significant difference between MC and LC groups following surgery was higher BP score in MC patients compared to LC patients at 6 months (p=0.04, Table III).
In the MC and LC groups combined (Table IV), the RAND-36 scores increased significantly in the ‘VT’ (mean preoperative score 65.0 vs. 4-week postoperative score 72.0, p=0.03 vs. 6-month postoperative score 75.7, p=0.001 vs. 36-month postoperative score 72.3, p=0.03), ‘MH’ (mean preoperative score 75.8 vs. 4-week postoperative score 85.2, p=0.001 vs. 6-month postoperative score 82.1, p=0.04), ‘RP’ (preoperative score 69.3 vs. 4-week postoperative score 47.2, p=0.008 vs. 6-month postoperative score 84.4, p=0.03), ‘BP’ (mean preoperative score 57.6 vs. 6-month postoperative score 75.4, p=0.0001 vs. 36-month postoperative score 75.7, p=0.0001, Table IV). The linear mixed effect model showed overall significance of the RAND-36 during three years following cholecystectomy and the overall statistically significant RAND-36 domains were VT (p=0.002), MH (p=0.031), RP (p<0.001) and BP (p<0.001, Table IV).
The 3-year postoperative scores of eight RAND-36 domains in MC and LC groups versus the Finnish reference scores are shown in Figure 2.
Discussion
The patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are important outcome indicators for evaluating treatment from a patient perspective (1-5, 19). In a review of 103 Swedish healthcare quality registries, authors encouraged to include PROMs in their arsenal of outcome measures and to collect PROM data to ensure highest level of registry classification (19). Evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery advice the use of the SF-36 for evaluating health status in patients following cholecystectomy, because the SF-36 questionnaire seems to be valid for evaluating patients' functional recovery after cholecystectomy (6). In our earlier preliminary RAND-36 report (16), there was no statistically significant difference between the LC and MC groups in seven RAND-36 domains, but the RE score was slightly higher in the LC group than in the MC group (p=0.038).
The results of the present study support the validity of the RAND-36 as a survey of health-related quality of life in cholecystectomy patients following surgery. In particular, BP, RP, MH and VT scores improved significantly following cholecystectomy, which indicates that RAND-36-Item Health Survey could be a comprehensive test for long-term outcome and health-status. The present study cohort of patients was comparable to the Finnish reference population (15) in terms of the GH and BP scores 3 years following surgery. However, the MH, SF, VT and RE scores, were higher compared to the reference population, and the bodily pain and the health change scores further increased by 6 months and 36 months following surgery, indicating recovery. Both MC and LC groups significantly improved the MH, SF, VT and RE scores at 36 months following surgery.
At the 3-year follow-up, no statistically significant differences in our structured telephone interview domains between MC and LC patients were shown; residual abdominal symptoms, right upper quadrant pain, reflux symptoms, diarrhea/loose stools, fatty/fried food, overall satisfaction with the procedure, cosmetic satisfaction, recommend the procedure to others and quality of life.
At the 3-year RAND-36 follow-up, the only statistically significant difference between MC and LC patients was higher BP score in MC group at 6 months following surgery. Moreover, the linear mixed effect model was used to test overall significance between groups during the 3-year follow-period and no significant differences were observed in any of the eight domains of RAND-36 at 4 weeks, 6 months or 36 months after surgery. Although, there are earlier reports available of SF-36 and RAND-36, the long-term outcome and health-status by RAND-36 in MC versus LC patients has been rarely reported. Marchiori et al. (3) evaluated the pelvic floor rehabilitation programme for continence recovery after radical prostatectomy by RAND-36 –health survey and found that data provided by RAND-36 questionnaire could help to evaluate the costs and benefits of treatment options. Pilger et al. (4) studied quality of life and sexuality of patients after treatment for gynaecological malignancies in 55 patients by the SF12 questionnaire and found that patients who reported changes of sexuality were also shown to have lower overall SF12 score. Yonemoto et al. (2) evaluated quality of life of long-term survivors of high-grade osteosarcoma by SF-36 and concluded that limb-sparing surgery improved the quality of life of survivors, and the highest SF-36 domains were found to be GH, VT, SF and MH. These results are in line with the results of this study.
In the MC and LC combined analysis, the RAND-36 scores increased significantly following surgery in the ‘PF’ (6 months), ‘VT’ (4 weeks, 6 months and 36 months), ‘MH’ (4 weeks, 6 months), ‘RP’ (4 weeks, 6 months), ‘BP’ (6/months and 6 months) and ‘health change’ (4 weeks, 6/36 months). The linear mixed effect model was used to test overall significance of RAND-36 during the three-year follow-period and showed a statistically significant value of RAND-36 domains in vitality (p=0.002), mental health (p=0.031), score, role physical (p<0.001) and bodily pain (p<0.001).
In conclusion, RAND-36 scores improved significantly in several RAND-36 subscales in MC and LC groups with a similar postoperative course over the 3-year study period. At the 3-year follow-up telephone interview, no statistically significant differences in patient-reported outcome measures between MC and LC patients were shown. It also seems that RAND-36-Item Health Survey is a comprehensive test for long-term outcome and health status after cholecystectomy. Health-related QoL is a multidimensional concept considering all aspects of patients' health and used widely as an outcome measure of treatment (1). Outcome data provided by QoL instruments complement clinical outcomes and may help to evaluate benefits of treatment options and care of patients.
Acknowledgements
The study was funded by the Heikki, Aino and Aarne Korhonen foundation and the EVO-funding of the Kuopio University Hospital, Finland.
Footnotes
↵* These Authors share first co-authorship.
↵# These Authors share last co-authorship.
Authors' Contributions
All Authors have met all of the following four criteria: 1. Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work, 2. Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content, 3. Final approval of the version to be published, 4. Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
This article is freely accessible online.
Conflicts of Interest
The Authors report no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose. The Authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.
- Received April 25, 2019.
- Revision received May 14, 2019.
- Accepted May 15, 2019.
- Copyright© 2019, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved